Culture Talking to your sons about Andrew Tate and the 'manosphere' - Understanding why boys might be attracted to figures who preach messages of ultra-masculinity and misogyny is crucial to helping them identify harmful content.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/521668/talking-to-your-sons-about-andrew-tate-and-the-manosphere

Talking to your sons about Andrew Tate and the 'manosphere'​

12:52 pm on 9 July 2024


Understanding why boys might be attracted to figures who preach messages of ultra-masculinity and misogyny is crucial to helping them identify harmful content. Photo: Unsplash
By Kellie Scott, ABC News

Whether we like it or not, boys are familiar with and curious about the "manosphere".

If that term is new for you, the manosphere is a network of online men's communities that have become dominated by misogynistic, anti-feminist views.

Andrew Tate is a self-described misogynist and was previously banned from social media platforms for expressing misogynistic views. Photo: YouTube screenshot
Social media influencer and former kickboxer Andrew Tate is an example of the men leading these spaces, known for preaching messages of ultra-masculinity and misogyny.

"It's not a question of whether boys will be exposed to the manosphere … [they] will get caught by it," says Josh Glover, senior facilitator of The Man Cave, a not-for-profit promoting healthy masculinity for boys and young men.

He says while he commonly hears of boys as young as 12 being influenced by the manosphere, that can extend to younger children also.

Understanding why our boys might be attracted, and how to talk to them about it, is crucial in helping them identify harmful content.

Why boys are attracted to the manosphere​

Curtin University researchers say the manosphere is a "symptom of a deeper set of challenges young men are facing" and appeals to men, given many are dealing with issues such as "romantic rejection", "alienation" and "loneliness".

New research funded by the eSafety Commissioner, based on interviews with Australian men aged 16 to 21, found a mix of views about controversial figures such as Tate.

Some of those interviewed said Tate was an important source of inspiration for general self-improvement and manhood. Others felt he expressed views about women and gender that were otherwise silenced.

The study's authors say it was optimistic to find there was also a "high level of critical awareness" among those they interviewed, for example, understanding that being controversial is a strategy to attract views.

Parenting expert and dad to six children Justin Coulson says boys in general are experiencing an "identity crisis", which in itself isn't a bad thing.

"[Teenage years] are a time of trying to do the inner work and figure out who you are … it's developmentally appropriate," Dr Coulson says.

But as "the whole idea of masculinity has been called into question" - a lot of which has been necessary, he says - many boys are no longer sure "what it means to be a man".

"Manosphere influencers are saying you need to reclaim your rightful role as protector, procreator … [and the manosphere has] created a space for boys and men who feel disenfranchised to step into that."

Glover says there is a community element in the manosphere that makes boys feel like part of something, and they fear being "left behind" if they don't keep up with what's trending.

Should parents be worried?​

It's healthy for kids to be curious about things like the manosphere, Coulson says.

"Parents need to emphasise that - it's normal to be curious."

Glover says often boys are just "trying ideas and attitudes on for size".

"The harm comes when they don't hear other perspectives … or don't have other role models they can ask questions of.

"Or [who] show a different way of what being a man can look like, or a different way of belonging with men."

He says being proactive in talking to your children about the manosphere is the best way to combat any concerns you have and help keep them safe online.

"Thanks to the unregulated nature of social media algorithms and the lack of accountability from the tech companies that operate them, harmful content can be easily accessed by young people online at any age," Glover says.

Helping boys identify harmful attitudes​

Glover says we should "choose to see the greatness in teenage boys" which involves giving them the space to talk about why what they are seeing online is resonating with them.

"They are connecting [with that idea] for a reason, and we want to try and understand that world and what is going on for them."

We need to approach these conversations with curiosity, says Glover.

"When we hear something we disagree with, it can be easy to come in and say, 'That's wrong.'" [But if teen boys] feel heard, they will be more likely to hear other perspectives as well."

Start with the positives​

As well as challenging concerning messages our children are seeing, Glover says we can focus on the positive aspects - and often that's a more helpful place to start.

"Particularly around health and fitness [a popular subject in the manosphere] - it's easy to have a chat with a young boy around what their nutrition is, or their gym habits.

"For a lot of teens, the gym is quite social. Asking who they are hanging out with, and understanding their progression - if it feels right to ask."

He says some of the things boys admire in figures in the manosphere are qualities like discipline and hard work.


Explore a specific aspect together​

Exploring a specific piece of content or idea with your child can be helpful, Coulson says.

"I will spend time watching this with you, because I want to understand it," is an example of what you might say, he says.

Coulson says unpacking it together can help you identify what resonates with your child, and what doesn't.

"It's not trying to interfere with their world, but understand it."

Some of the things boys admire in figures in the manosphere are qualities like discipline and hard work. Photo: Unsplash
If something comes up that is of concern for you, Coulson suggests explaining you are a bit nervous about it, and empower the child to share how they will protect themselves moving forward.

"It's really about effective problem-solving. Trying to find solutions we can feel good about that still give children as much as autonomy possible."

Role modelling healthy masculinity​

Helping children define healthy masculinity - and not just inside these conversations about the manosphere - is key, Coulson says.

"Healthy men make the people around them feel safer and stronger. And that's the message parents need to be teaching to sons and daughters."

Glover says we need to expose boys to different versions of masculinity than what they are seeing online.

"There are so many people in our lives who are healthy, wonderful male role models - find ways to connect with them."

This story was first published by the ABC
 
That kind of shit is basically all that men have been hearing from women in the mainstream culture for the last 15 years and it's never properly addressed.
Here's how you properly address it: you ignore it completely when you can, and you laugh at any stupid bitch saying it if you're somehow confronted and have no other choice but to respond. Then you ignore her and go about your day. None of this is anything but childish, feminine gameplay.

Women who act like this literally do not understand what they're doing. On the surface, the behavior and expressed beliefs are not only irrational, they're anti-rational. So the purpose must not be to communicate or propagate a coherent, meaningful, and useful ideology.

So what is the purpose? What are they trying to communicate? All of what you listed is:

  • shit testing - Refusing to play along or even take it seriously enough to argue about it marks you, as a male, as an independant free-thinker, and, thus, higher status. Realty itself is not changed by language. Serious people don't even dignify the behavior with attention.
  • status signaling - What in the world could be the purpose of behavior like this be in our evolutionary prehistory, where no woman failed to understand (for long) how badly they needed men for survival? It could only have served to signal, "Even as insufferable and emasculating as I am, I'm still here doing it, so I'm being taken care of anyway, and that means I'm high status." Very common in pretty young women who guys want, against all logic, to fuck and become further involved with.
  • in-group signaling - The crazier a trendy ideology is, the better its function as a way to signal your loyalty to an in-group. "I'm so down with the cause, I talk in public about how I believe in objectively crazy dogma." Women, in aggregate, are more susceptible to this than men are. (See: the suicidal empathy evident in troon worship and stanning for violent illegal immigrants.)
  • dysfunction- Happy women do not behave like this. These kinds of women don't even know they're basically asking someone to come fix their problems, but it doesn't have to be you. You don't have to care if women you don't know are happy. They may not even be sane.
 
Understanding why boys might be attracted to figures who preach messages of ultra-masculinity and misogyny
Maybe it's in response to rampant misandry destroying men's jobs, hobbies, shelters, abusing/murdering men with nigh-impunity, and spreading lies about rape to destroy innocent livelihoods. This all might go away if you stop the mass psychological torture inflicted by toxic femininity.
 
Maybe it's in response to rampant misandry destroying men's jobs, hobbies, shelters, abusing/murdering men with nigh-impunity, and spreading lies about rape to destroy innocent livelihoods. This all might go away if you stop the mass psychological torture inflicted by toxic femininity.
"We all ran out on our families and now complain that there are too many single mothers"
 
Imagine being such a feckless father that you cannot explain why a chinless rapist is a piece of shit.
Without "experts" backing them up? The modern parent is shamefully spineless and afraid to put their foot down if they can't justify their decision through extra layers beyond "I'm your Father/Mother"

When I'd try to justify my unapproved behavior as a kid to mine with "But X's parents let him do that"? I got a stern "I'm not X's parent"

Or I'd say "I read in a book by so-and-so that it's okay for me as a kid to do this!"? I'd get an equally-stern "They don't run this house, I do"




Grow some nuts, people, or your kid will make you wish you had.


Tate is a clown, a huckster, but as usual they're missing the point (on purpose): that without all these miserable harpies in academia and on social media shitting on adolescent boys and men and convicing them that they're garbage, a figure like Tate would not exist.
The left are masters at creating enemies by way of ideological paranoia. They fear being subverted so much, they start blaming and then persecuting a mostly niche or even nonexistent group that they blame for their lack of progress, and then losing to that group for real in actual politics as said group fights back against a common enemy that came after them for literally nothing.
 
Last edited:
This goes out to Tate and other figures in the Manosphere, they're merely symptoms of the problem and banning or ridding of one doesn't make the problem go away. Another will simply take his place and nothing is solved until the gender insanity stops or at least isn't where it is now. The moment that happens, clowns like Tate will have no audience because they'll have no valid points.
 
I don't actually know anything about Tate except that he talks about picking up women, or something?

Do Leftists think that Tate's advice actually works??

Because if the answer is, "this totally doesn't work" then the solution is to give young men advice that does work.

...but if Leftists believe that Tate's advice does work, then why are leftists talking to men? Why aren't they talking to women, saying "stop falling for this bullshit!"
 
I don't actually know anything about Tate except that he talks about picking up women, or something?

Do Leftists think that Tate's advice actually works??

Because if the answer is, "this totally doesn't work" then the solution is to give young men advice that does work.

...but if Leftists believe that Tate's advice does work, then why are leftists talking to men? Why aren't they talking to women, saying "stop falling for this bullshit!"
they're retarded
it's that easy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorak Prison Pod
The harm comes when they don't hear other perspectives … or don't have other role models they can ask questions of.
Maybe it's in response to rampant misandry destroying men's jobs, hobbies, shelters, abusing/murdering men with nigh-impunity, and spreading lies about rape to destroy innocent livelihoods. This all might go away if you stop the mass psychological torture inflicted by toxic femininity.
Tate and other manosphere faggots are the only "other perspective" young men have been exposed to in their entire lives.
The left are masters at creating enemies where none existed through ideological paranoia, and then losing to them for real in actual politics.
The Oppression Olympics always require an Emmanuel Goldstein to stay relevant.
Another will simply take his place and nothing is solved until the gender insanity stops or at least isn't where it is now.
Roosh V found Jesus and gave up the grift, Jordan Peterson became an oversharing pill-popper, Jack Murphy got outed as a fag...anyone I'm missing?

ETA: Oh, right, Coach Redpill fuckkng died in a gulag.
 
Last edited:
"Son, this guy is a fucking dork." Easy. Imagine being such a feckless father that you cannot explain why a chinless rapist is a piece of shit.
Kids don't respond to that "This is dumb". You need to give them a reason, otherwise they just go "YOUR DUMB". The proper answer is: "You know this guy launched of all his camgirl sites by pretending to be a woman and sexting men, right? He's fucking gay."
 
The issue is that none of these anti-manosphere fuckers can ever explain what about the manosphere's message is so wrong and why.
They can't provide an alternative path to success for men either, something that actually will work.
It's always just about making men docile and obedient, always about feminizing them.

If you can't do those things then men won't listen to you anyway.
Until you have proper arguments and a viable alternative, leave them alone.

Also, how about finally addressing the rampant sexism coming from women these days?
- #KillAllMen
- a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle
- I choose the bear
That kind of shit is basically all that men have been hearing from women in the mainstream culture for the last 15 years and it's never properly addressed.
If women are allowed to be misandrist and are often even rewarded for it, men will not be nice little women respecters.
Fix that and you will see a lot of this super evil manosphere go away.
How to talk to your son about Andrew Tate:

Tell him men are bad.
Tell him that being attracted to hot young women is primitive and unprogressive, but maybe he can be gay?
Present an example of positive masculinity: point to your wife's boyfriend, and say "Uncle Jamaal is a very nice man, he always brings me snacks whenever he comes over to visit your mother. Maybe YOU can bring HIM snacks next time?"

If all else fails, tell him he's a girl from now on, and chop his balls off.

Redirect your boys to kiwi farms. We at least show *why* he is an idiot, with receipts. We also offer competing opinions on whether he is based or even worse than presented via the thunder dome and the beauty parlor

Say what you want about this corner of the internet, but we truly have it all.
Unironically this, yeah.

Kiwifarms, by documenting and archiving public figures of all stripes, really IS the best way to keep young people from turning into useless faggots. It's really difficult to gain perspective in our current, algorithm directed, search bubble/walled-garden internet, where you basically get sucked into one rabbithole and are never allowed to leave, but the free market of ideas still functions here in Kiwiland, and it really does do wonders for demonstrating which ideas lead to ruin, and which to success.
 
I've learned from wokism that ignoring a poisonous ideology that is spreading fast leads to a catastrophe.
I'm talking about interpersonal behavior. In institutional terms, we have to root these people out like ticks. They will ruin everything otherwise.
 
Back