Or Ethan Ralph. Well same thing. Funny how these creeps do exactly the same things as the Internet filth they seek to demonize.
More than evil, I'd say that's pathetic and cowardly. She's evil for other reasons, but this is just funny when you think about it from her perspective: evil people do evil shit out of being evil, but she thinks that she's either witnessing a crime or the victim of one.
It's not the Internet Archive so they're technically correct, hence why they're so smug about it. Her uncle has something to do with the Wayback Machine, which is easy for people who are not as deep as us into the internet to confuse them/think they're all the same thing, and that's why everything about her has been scrubbed from it. I'm trying to find how that information was found out.
To be fair, the chance of a millionaire with dissenting ideas buying twitter was closer to zero until it happened.
I mean the point of the US system is to be very slow to dramatic change in the hopes that if any malfeasance is going on that someone meticulous or clever will catch it. The old judges exist to conserve some sense of identity within the legal system and prevent zeitgeist from running rampant.
The Substack author saying Lorenz's uncle is the "owner" of the Internet Archive is incorrect. However, he is (or was until recently) one of their executive staff members.
She may be attacking "nobodies" as that's about as much as her talent level will allow, but she's FAR from a "nobody." She's a member of an elite, aristocratic family with a lot of influence in media and government.
I agree that she has a lot of power, but she's hardly an elite. The government loves giving unconditional power and influence to insane, talentless idiots. Particularly journos and leaders of (non)Governmental Organizations. Taylor is just one of the people that is given the position of being a crybaby tyrant. The real elites are busy making kids troon out, eliminating free speech, and giving support to Ukraine and Israel.
You forgot the second step between those two: piss and shit in the ditch.
She's an elite in that she was born to a wealthy elite family, a family with sufficient influence that it has the power to scrub the Internet of information it doesn't want people to see. I did imply (and I see now that I could have been more clear) that she in no way is an elite based on merit or talent. She's an elite in that mummy and daddy (or auntie and uncle), or even just their names, can get this untalented crybully gigs with major-league corporate press outlets where she gets to play dress-up as a "reporter" and use that as a springboard to happily fuck up the lives of people that she doesn't even deem as people (see the disgust impulse I touched upon above).
Another spoiled liberal to rule over us. It's important to note however that the real elites didn't find her doxxing LoTT amusing at all. The only time the media decided to hold bitch Lorenz accountable was when she attacked an Orthodox Jew. That Jew had the same "wrong opinions" as all her other victims, which normally means they're free game. For some reason LoTT is not free game. Very interesting!
Are you out of your mind? A Washington Post and Atlantic reporter who is the scion of multimillionaires isn't an elite? Who the fuck is then?
