Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Elwood P. Dowd said:
Yes, tell us all about Blue Sky and how Twitter is going to collapse any day now, Taylor.
Click to expand...
Eventually they’ll stop saying how much Twitter sucks and how it’s about to die anyway lolz while also using it non-stop and treating it like it’s the most important thing in the world, right?

Right?
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flexo, InteracialBowelSyndrome, Meltryllis and 11 others
Ivan Daniloff said:
Eventually they’ll stop saying how much Twitter sucks and how it’s about to die anyway lolz while also using it non-stop and treating it like it’s the most important thing in the world, right?

Right?
Click to expand...
Very much an alcoholic who promises not to drink tomorrow and is smashed by 11am energy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muppetstudios, Flexo, suspended animation and 5 others
The Twitter Files said:
Once you show any bit of aggressive response to her—not stroking her ego and submitting—she goes scorched earth.
Click to expand...
Given how she went after LoTT's family and how she attacked that MSM reporter who broadcasted the interview of her crying, I'd say that fits TayTay to a T.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: InteracialBowelSyndrome, Not a bee, Moosebonker and 2 others
Trouble in paradise Elon's disaster we're all fleeing:
1687150107916.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coal Burner Account, Drowningman, Meat Target and 4 others
AirdropShitposts said:
Trouble in paradise Elon's disaster we're all fleeing:
Click to expand...
Funny thing, vaxers also threatened extinction events that never happened. And it looks in retrospect like the excessive prophylactic measures, at least stuff like lockdowns (which somehow never targeted big political donors like big box stores which would have to be the worst spreaders), may have done more harm than good.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: DavidFerrie, indomitable snowman, Coal Burner Account and 13 others
  • Like
Reactions: indomitable snowman, Gaius Cumulus, clipartfan92 and 4 others
AirdropShitposts said:
Trouble in paradise Elon's disaster we're all fleeing:
View attachment 5169602
Click to expand...
I get what she is saying, but at the same time no?
Yeah, the healthcare system in America is basically collapsing in on itself (as well as most other healthcare systems in the world), but it doesn't really prove anti-vaxxers right.

It's like arguing that a housefire was caused because aliens messed with the house wiring. They technically got the wire aspect right as a source, but then ignore the fact that the house has so many safety issues that it's a tinderbox waiting to ignite.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: DavidFerrie, Meat Target, Gaius Cumulus and 2 others
AirdropShitposts said:
Trouble in paradise Elon's disaster we're all fleeing:
View attachment 5169602
Click to expand...
"They're listening to the only faction in this country that's bothering to speak to them".

She *almost* gets it.

And RE: mass extinction and mutant babies, give it time. On a long enough timeline, the tinfoil hat kooks end up vindicated.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Coal Burner Account, Roland TB-303 and 2 others
My deranged haters love to claim crazy things about my life and career, then when you ask them for literally any evidence they start ranting about how I've "had it all deleted from the internet" with my "powerful connections" aka my uncle owning the internet archive. Brain worms!
Click to expand...
I mean, that is literally what’s happening though. She DFE’s her tweets once a week and archives are routinely removed due to wealthy family connections. All she’s doing is what corporations and Governments do to us on the daily but on a smaller scale. Make a claim, get proven wrong, make the opposite claim, delete or obfuscate your history, claim the new truth is what you were saying all along. We really do live in a post-truth society where if you’re in a position of authority you can say whatever the fuck you want and most people will just believe it. I think that’s what shits me about “experts” in MSM so much.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Next Task, Lizard Pope, Marvin and 8 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pedophobe, Roland TB-303, Nanashi no kiwi and 6 others
Markass the Worst said:
Lolcow crossover: Taylor Lorenz unapologetically sucks the dick of Patrick Tomlinson. (onion)

(archive)

I will never understand why she thinks she has a leg to stand on about MUH HARASSMENT and MUH DOXING when she doxed Libs of TikTok and showed up at her house.

also link to discussion in fat man's thread (onion)
Click to expand...
The comments section for the Post shows the people she's pitching to are the same as her. 3 out of every 4 are suggesting doing this to the SCOTUS. Most of the remainder are suggesting worse. There are some rational ones, at least one person pointed out that a different ruling could have seen Kathy Griffin in jail and this person seems stable too.

As non-lawyers, both the author of this article and most of the commenters profoundly misunderstand the implications of this decision. True threats of violence were not protected by the 1st Amendment before this opinion was issued. True threats are still not protected by the 1st Amendment now.

The only change is the mens rea (state of mind) that a prosecutor must prove to convict. It is now a subjective standard (recklessness) rather than an objective standard (whether a reasonable person would have found the messages threatening). This article makes no attempt to discuss or clarify this distinction.

And the decision is unlikely to change things on the ground in a typical prosecution, including in this very case. Although Counterman's conviction was overturned, he will almost certainly be convicted again when retried. His hundreds of disturbing Facebook messages to the victim using multiple accounts are truly threatening under any mens rea standard.

Likewise, prosecutors would have no trouble obtaining convictions regarding the other victim mentioned in the article, Mr. Tomlinson, including for harassment, stalking, and identity theft, among other likely charges.

Bottom line, there are many challenges in bringing cases against online harassers (e.g., merely finding the perpetrators in the first place can be difficult). But changing the mens rea standard from objective to subjective is not one of them.

And, contrary to many of the comments here, this case was clearly NOT about conservative vs. liberal judges. Justice Kagan wrote the opinion of the court, joined by Justice Jackson. Justice Sotomayor would have gone even further, requiring actual intent (a conscious desire to make a true threat) rather than just recklessness. And the only two who would have retained the current standard are Justices Barrett and Thomas, the most conservative judge on the court.

There are plenty of other cases that highlight the conservative/liberal split. This is not one of them.
Click to expand...

The majority of it is screaming madness though. So Taylor knows her audience. As one of them affectionately says;
Remind them they and their families are mortal too.
Click to expand...
Completely stable.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Pedophobe, Meltryllis, Not a bee and 12 others
Morethanabitfoolish said:
The majority of it is screaming madness though. So Taylor knows her audience. As one of them affectionately says;
Completely stable.
Click to expand...
And that's why it's my honor to be their enemies.

At least one of them has half a brain:

IMG_8680.jpeg

Taylor sidelined the real case, about a schizo convicted for texting "fuck you" to a musician.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pedophobe, InteracialBowelSyndrome, An automatic clown and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back