Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

[Tasty Tatty]

I figure she's just genuinely a hypochondriac and also really liked how COVID let her hole up in her lizard cage of an LA apartment, spending her WaPo money on $25 avocado toast on Postmates, instead of having to talk with people IRL.

Those two go together. She's an hypochondriac because she's sheltered. She might be pro BLM and all that shit, but I am sure she thinks blacks and spics are dirty and could get her diseases.

 

[Mizafuginmike]

Taylor appears in the new HBO/ CNN documentary Glitch as a talking head where she brags about neglecting to do full (or any) diligence in a tech puff piece she wrote.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

Taylor appears in the new HBO/ CNN documentary Glitch as a talking head where she brags about neglecting to do full (or any) diligence in a tech puff piece she wrote.

Just comes to show that coming from money doesn't always make you a competent worker.

 

[Flexo]

Stacy McCain had fun taking the piss out of Taylor.

https://spectator.org/twitter-american-journalism-is-decadent-and-depraved/

Spoiler: Relevant section

The Washington Post employs Taylor Lorenz, who specializes in such dreadful nonsense as the April 2022 story, “Meet the woman behind Libs of TikTok, secretly fueling the right’s outrage machine,” which carried this subhead: “A popular Twitter account has morphed into a social media phenomenon, spreading anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment and shaping public discourse.”

What do those words mean? Who is “the right,” what is their “outrage,” and how was the Twitter account @LIbsOfTikTok “fueling” it? Also, while we’re inquiring about definitions, what does the phrase “anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment” mean, and at what point does a Twitter account become popular enough to be called “a social media phenomenon”?

Maybe in the world of Taylor Lorenz, the meaning of these phrases is self-evident, as is the newsworthiness of such a story. Most Americans however, are not obsessed with Twitter, and couldn’t fathom why the editors of the Washington Post would assign someone to write a 2,000-word “news” article about it.

TWO THOUSAND WORDS? Once upon a time in journalism, an article of such length — more than three full columns of a standard newspaper page — was a rarity, reserved for the most urgent topics. Maybe the Washington Post in 1968 would have devoted 2,000 words in their Sunday edition to recounting recent developments in the Tet Offensive, but other than such world-historic events, news stories generally ran somewhere in the range of 500 to 750 words. And what was the world-historic significance of @LibsOfTikTok? To quote Taylor Lorenz:

The anonymous account’s impact is deep and far-reaching. Its content is amplified by high-profile media figures, politicians and right-wing influencers. Its tweets reach millions, with influence spreading far beyond its more than 648,000 Twitter followers. Libs of TikTok has become an agenda-setter in right-wing online discourse, and the content it surfaces shows a direct correlation with the recent push in legislation and rhetoric directly targeting the LGBTQ+ community.

Such was the justification the Washington Post offered for “doxxing” the person behind the account, a Brooklyn lady named Chaya Raichik, in a 2,000-word article that included quotes from an ACLU officials accusing Raichik of inciting “a deep sense of paranoia” which “inspires a vigilante spirit.” All of this, you see, because Raichik had the simple idea of reposting to Twitter video clips of what liberals were saying on TikTok. And this was why the editors of the Washington Post felt justified in their Tet Offensive coverage of a Twitter account.

Perhaps the reader will not be surprised to learn that the Washington Post is projected to lose as much as $100 million dollars this year. It’s almost enough to make you suspect that people don’t want to pay money for the privilege of reading 2,000-word articles about “right-wing” Twitter accounts.

Meanwhile, there’s this Huff Post article about RFK Jr.’s alleged Nazi “dog whistle,” which made me think of my old boss, Wes Pruden. I was trying to imagine what would happen if someone walked into Mr. Pruden’s office and tried to pitch him on a story like that: “Hey, these people on Twitter are saying Bobby Kennedy’s kid is a secret Nazi sympathizer, and we want to do a story treating this as Serious News.”

Wes Pruden would have fired them on the spot and kicked them down the stairs, not necessarily in that order.

Excuse me if I’m a bit nostalgic for the Good Old Days. Maybe this will inspire Taylor Lorenz to write a 2,000-word article exposing me as an “advocate of newsroom violence.” There’s no such thing as bad publicity, they say, and last time I checked, @LibsOfTikTok had 2.3 million followers and, unlike the Washington Post, Chaya Raichik isn’t losing $100 million a year.

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

I wonder if these bug people realize that when you order from a restaurant and then have some other degenerate deliver it, you might as well be inhaling the coughing and sneezing of every person there as well as the driver.

Tay Tay getting a flesh eating disease from a Door Dash Pajeet who was picking his ass on the way over would be the icing on the poo cake.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

Cow crossover

somebody might wannna cross post this on Taylor Lorenz's thread--which I CAN'T FIND NOW --is she officially a lolcow or what?

Because it was really directed at her and her mask obsession/long Covid bullshit.

but everybody talking bout it since Dylan is on hand to look goofier than everybody else-- even sitting next to Margaret Cho in her funny hat.
View attachment 5304473
View attachment 5304474
i was hoping some of you kiwis might helpfully name the other party attendees for me? I see Whole Lotta Rosie and those two heavily botoxed brunettes look familiar,but otherwise I am going blank.

 

[BIG BILL HELL'S]

This woman is literally mentally ill (not that anyone reading this thread needed to be reminded):

(Source | Archive)

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

For someone who works with the news she certainly doesn't read it.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

You have to remember, when Taylor says "lockdown" she means that China didn't go far enough when they sealed people in their homes because China only did that in select cities against people who wouldn't obey.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

She wrote an article the other day about ... protecting the privacy of minors online. WTF. The hyporcrisy of this knock kneed hag seemingly has no upper limit, does it?

There are almost no legal protections for the internet’s child stars (ghostarchive)

 

[Trianon]

She wrote an article the other day about ... protecting the privacy of minors online. WTF. The hyporcrisy of this knock kneed hag seemingly has no upper limit, does it?

There are almost no legal protections for the internet’s child stars (ghostarchive)

"*I* was able to harass and stalk all these internet child stars, so clearly this is Musk's fault. Social media just makes it too damn tempting to interfere in the lives of minors!"

She also thinks Biden and Fauci are Nazis now.

 

[Attractive Sexhaver]

Anyone who wants a COVID vaccine can get one free of charge. There's a ton of antiviral treatments available for most of the western world, and for Americans who don't have trash tier health insurance. The virus has long since mutated into a more transmissible but less lethal strain. Anyone still at severe risk of dying from COVID was at severe risk of all the various colds, flus and viruses floating around prior to that.

People like Taylor are clearly neurotic with poorly managed anxiety. Most everyone else, including the sick, the elderly and those with a pre-existing condition, have decided to get on with life. She's perfectly welcome to continue being a reclusive shut in and spending stupid amounts of money for avo toast, but she's out of her fucking mind if she expects the rest of us to live that way.

 

[Lord Xenu]

People like Taylor are clearly neurotic with poorly managed anxiety.

Its a big problem today that people with this personality type have an outsized influence on public life.

Take the word “trauma.” In the early versions of the primary manual of
psychiatry, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM),17 psychiatrists used the word “trauma” only to describe a physical
agent causing physical damage, as in the case of what we now call traumatic
brain injury. In the 1980 revision, however, the manual (DSM III) recog-
nized “post-traumatic stress disorder” as a mental disorder—the first type
of traumatic injury that isn’t physical. PTSD is caused by an extraordinary
and terrifying experience, and the criteria for a traumatic event that war-
rants a diagnosis of PTSD were (and are) strict: to qualify, an event would
have to “evoke significant symptoms of distress in almost everyone” and be
“outside the range of usual human experience.”18 The DSM III emphasized
that the event was not based on a subjective standard. It had to be some-
thing that would cause most people to have a severe reaction. War, rape,
and torture were included in this category. Divorce and simple bereavement
(as in the death of a spouse due to natural causes), on the other hand, were
not, because they are normal parts of life, even if unexpected. These
experiences are sad and painful, but pain is not the same thing as trauma.
People in these situations that don’t fall into the “trauma” category might
benefit from counseling, but they generally recover from such losses with-
out any therapeutic interventions.19 In fact, even most people who do have
traumatic experiences recover completely without intervention.20
By the early 2000s, however, the concept of “trauma” within parts of the
therapeutic community had crept down so far that it included anything
“experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful . . . with
lasting adverse effects on the individual’s functioning and mental, physical,
social, emotional, or spiritual well-being.”21 The subjective experience of
“harm” became definitional in assessing trauma. As a result, the word
“trauma” became much more widely used, not just by mental health profes-
sionals but by their clients and patients—including an increasing number
of college students.
As with trauma, a key change for most of the concepts Haslam exam-
ined was the shift to a subjective standard.22 It was not for anyone else to
decide what counted as trauma, bullying, or abuse; if it felt like that to
you, trust your feelings. If a person reported that an event was traumatic
(or bullying or abusive), his or her subjective assessment was increasingly
taken as sufficient evidence. And if a rapidly growing number of stu-
dents have been diagnosed with a mental disorder (as we’ll see in chapter 7),
then there is a rapidly growing need for the campus community to protect them.
(The Coddling of the American Mind).

 

[Flexo]

Was surprised someone hadn't posted this lovely bit of trolling.

https://freebeacon.com/satire/alert-taylor-lorenz-tries-to-murder-trans-activist-who-tanked-bud-light-sales/

Spoiler: article text

SATIRE

ALERT: Taylor Lorenz Tries To Murder Trans Activist Who Tanked Bud Light Sales​

This is not okay​

What happened: Taylor Lorenz, the 38-year-old journalist best known for helping Red China indoctrinate America's youth, attempted to literally murder Dylan Mulvaney, the controversial trans activist best known for tanking Bud Light sales after promoting the beer on social media.

• Despite (still) posting hysterically about the dangers of not wearing a mask in public due to COVID-19, Lorenz partied (maskless and indoors) at a luncheon honoring Mulvaney. It was hosted by Kathy Griffin, the actress best known for hoisting a bloody effigy of former president Donald Trump's severed head.

• Lorenz posted photos of herself posing with Mulvaney, whom she described as "one of the most beautiful and brave women on the planet." The former Bud Light spokesperson wore a shiny pink dress with a heart-shaped cleavage hole.

What they're saying: Lorenz thanked Griffin for "taking so many COVID precautions so we could all hang safely."

• Fact check: THERE IS NOTHING SAFE ABOUT REFUSING TO WEAR A MASK INDOORS AND FAILING TO ABIDE BY SOCIAL DISTANCING GUIDELINES IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC!

• Days earlier, Lorenz berated a social media user for spreading "death and disease" by not wearing a mask. She has also promoted deranged articles suggesting outdoor dining is still unsafe in 2023.

• In June, the journalist described holding her breath to survive a harrowing encounter at an airport security checkpoint. Lorenz complained that TSA agents were "forcing all passengers to remove their masks before they even step up to the security desk," which was "so dangerous" and "so insane."

Why it matters: If Taylor Lorenz is going to denounce others for spreading death and disease, she should stop posting photographic evidence of her own efforts to spread death and disease. Her reckless actions are bound to get someone killed.

Bottom line: We are literally shaking right now.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

RT's:





amazing:

 

[Second Sun]

amazing:
View attachment 5313981

The ***FUCKING*** hypocrisy, holy shIt.

 

[Sprate Header]

Tay Tay's getting cyberbullied on the Fediverse again

(https://archive.ph/Uatfu)

 

[Maricón de Mierda]

What is that, $22 for maybe 500 calories of food? Her financials must be ruinous.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

"The toast itself was $14.50 but"

 

[Breadbassket]

$14 avocado toast, $22 avocado toast, what difference does it make it's still overpriced nonsense.