- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
But yet Jesse Singal is a man in his prime and Taylor Lorenz is a senile old woman.
Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout
- Thread starter Meat Target
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
Long interview with her, she looks really weird in this, even older than usual.
Not watching this faggotry myself, but if someone else wants to see this BS here it is.
Not watching this faggotry myself, but if someone else wants to see this BS here it is.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It's hilarious. Her whole gimmick is she's somehow with it, the yoots, but she is old as hell and she looks old. Whore is old. She's old. Her schtick is so OVER.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
The wincing expression on her cartoon in the thumbnail is odd. It's like she's transing into Hide-the-Pain Harold.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Look how old she is. She's an old woman. Old.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
- Highlight
- #3,086
Taylor appears to be upset about her Wikipedia page. Apparently journalists that interview her use wikipedia as a source and ask her questions that are based on "crazy right wing conspiracies"
She also appears to still be upset with her MSNBC interview from 2022?
edit: https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1754007681596375341
edit2: her twitter account has been private so i am unable to properly archive.
edit3: she unprivated her account presumably to speak with Bank of America employees on twitter because someone has her account info.
archive: https://archive.is/w1OQy https://archive.is/y68RW https://archive.is/dEsvm https://archive.is/2U7j4
She also appears to still be upset with her MSNBC interview from 2022?
edit: https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1754007681596375341
edit2: her twitter account has been private so i am unable to properly archive.
edit3: she unprivated her account presumably to speak with Bank of America employees on twitter because someone has her account info.
archive: https://archive.is/w1OQy https://archive.is/y68RW https://archive.is/dEsvm https://archive.is/2U7j4
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2021
- Highlight
- #3,087
People writing bullshit on Wikipedia, that gets picked up by lazy journalists of "quality media", which in turn gets used as source to substantiate the BS claims on the Wikipedia page? It's more common than you think, just look at the Wikipedia page for Kiwifarms and the suicide allegations there.
It couldn't have happened to a nicer person.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
Those poor journalists losing their jobs - but also not doing their jobs and just using Wikipedia. Interesting defence there, Taylor.
Also she loved the MSNBC interview at the time, it was a total softball and massaged her ego. She only started hating it and claiming it was full of lies because she was mocked for it relentlessly, for good reason, and her crying got memed to filth. So it became a trap full of lies, and another example of the noble profession of journalism being sullied by lack of professionalism. But aside from those times, journalists are great and experts and should be lauded and given lots of money.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
She sounds very angry. It must piss her off her own fictionalized version of herself isn't the one that got into Wikipedia.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
- Highlight
- #3,090
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
There are LIES on WIKIPEDIA about me.
Imagine being shocked about this. On a site where we're literally accused of murdering a dude who is still alive, they admit it's a lie, but they keep up the absolutely disproven lie because it's "consensus."
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Spoilers, but Wikipedia by its nature is fungible. And if the editors don't mind your edit, you too can say a lie on it too. Good lord, this bitch really lives in the first world.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
I've seen troons that were a better match for their anime pfp on twitter than this.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
But that's fine, because we're Bad People. But Taylor is a Good Person, and Good People don't get lied about by anyone other than Bad People. How can Wikipedia be Bad People?
Of course, she probably doesn't know that Wikipedia is full of bullshit and run mostly by autists, which nowadays means mostly by troons. So this is all coming as a great shock to her. I'd suggest she edit it herself, but she wouldn't count as a legitimate source on herself, she'd have to do it pseudonymously, and it would give the game away when she asked her followers how to do that because she crowdsources all her tech help, no matter how moronic it makes her look.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2021
Suffer, whore
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2015
Either her face bulges really weirdly when she moves or filters are attempting to do a LOT of work here.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
- Highlight
- #3,097
is the beast finally eating itself?
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2021
Wikipedia is a biased, pro-tranny, MSM propaganda machine. This should be known by everyone and anyone who has seen the slimy shit they do. I love watching them eat each other alive.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2023
Well shit, sucks for it to happen to you.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2021
- Highlight
- #3,100
Just a reminder of what Wikipedia does. "Right wing propaganda" my fucking ass.
(Link to the original version of the 2014 article / A)
(Link to the article now / A)
Last edited: