Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The fact that she's complaining now shouldn't get her any kind of applause or ass-pats for 'noticing' the problem - it should get her mocked incessantly for contributing to a machine we all said would one day come for her.
In order to get credit for "noticing", her first or second complaint tweet about this should have included an apology to everyone victimized in the same way, primarily through her shitty hitpieces.
In a more honorable age the worst villains of politics would do at least this when hoisted by their own petard.
Not anymore.
 
They weaponized cytogenesis and ouroboros sourcing on Wikipedia long ago right after lefties took over the site by pure force of not having real jobs. The GamerGate article, for example, has absolutely nothing to do with any observable reality, but it's one of the foundational creation myths of the neo-left, so...
Speaking of....

(I've got like a half dozen threads that video should be posted on. Decided Taylor was the big winner.)
 
They weaponized cytogenesis and ouroboros sourcing on Wikipedia long ago right after lefties took over the site by pure force of not having real jobs. The GamerGate article, for example, has absolutely nothing to do with any observable reality, but it's one of the foundational creation myths of the neo-left, so...
You're discounting the actual history of this.
Wikipedia was from its instantiation a propaganda outlet. It was never intended to be an "open encyclopedia" at all, that was just the public justification, or do you think they got massive slush fund that could set dozens for life from bored college students and not 3 letter agencies?
Citogenesis pre-dates wikipedia and goes back to the first ever newspapers.
One makes an assertion, the next paper reports "first paper reports" in their headline, and on and on it goes.
A profession nearly as old as prostitution.. presstitution if you will.
 
Wow, Wikipedia is not accurate and is more useful as a tool for defaming people? Say it ain't so!
Wikipedia isn't a bastion of information, it's a political weapon.
BREAKING NEWS!

JOURNALIST LEARNS ABOUT WHAT JOURNALISTS ACTUALLY DO.

MORE AT 10PM
The problem she has isn't that journalists lie, the problem is that another journalist decided to cannibalize her.

The lies aren't the problem, the betrayal is.
 
Last edited:
Wikipedia is still useful for historical events, right? Like if you want to learn about the events that inspired 300 , etc?
Certainly not!

The Battle of Thermopylae article is a clear example of the right-wing takeover of Wikipedia. Fascist nazi Spartans, who were racist slaveowners (meaning they KEPT BLACK PEOPLE AS LITTORAL PROPERTY!) who clearly didn't get the "no humans are illegal" memo, used stochastic terrorism as a means to prevent Persians, fleeing oppression from Croesus (who was fantasically rich, and is colored orange in a lot of surviving pottery... remind you of anyone else!?!?!) from coming to Greece and opening up kebab carts; Alex Jones or maybe the slaveowning imperalistic Romans (meaning they KEPT BLACK PEOPLE AS LITTORAL PROPERTY!) invented lies about an "invasion" in order to blame the immigrants for the violence inflicted upon them by nazi Spartans.
 
I can fix her and the fix involves doing unspeakable things to her. :diddler:
Biddy fiddler.



Did she even bother to explain which parts of her wikipedia article are inaccurate? The page looks good to me
I'm guessing it's the part about her lying, subsequent demotion, and attempt to throw the editor under a bus.
 
Wikipedia isn't a bastion of information, it's a political weapon.

The problem she has isn't that journalists lie, the problem is that another journalist decided to cannibalize her.

The lies aren't the problem, the betrayal is.
Wikipedia also often shoehorn their climate change narratives on random towns nobody gives a fuck about either.
 
Certainly not!

The Battle of Thermopylae article is a clear example of the right-wing takeover of Wikipedia. Fascist nazi Spartans, who were racist slaveowners (meaning they KEPT BLACK PEOPLE AS LITTORAL PROPERTY!) who clearly didn't get the "no humans are illegal" memo, used stochastic terrorism as a means to prevent Persians, fleeing oppression from Croesus (who was fantasically rich, and is colored orange in a lot of surviving pottery... remind you of anyone else!?!?!) from coming to Greece and opening up kebab carts; Alex Jones or maybe the slaveowning imperalistic Romans (meaning they KEPT BLACK PEOPLE AS LITTORAL PROPERTY!) invented lies about an "invasion" in order to blame the immigrants for the violence inflicted upon them by nazi Spartans.
'LITTORAL PROPERTY"

Keepin' them niggers workin' on the river's edge, pickin' up them shells....
 
Media outlets don't issue corrections for fun or because, as journalists, they have an idealistic respect for the inherent value of the truth. Journalists like that are a dying breed.

Rather than that, they issue corrections because legal forces them to.
they certainly used to: the advantage (to them) of being mostly online these days is that they can easily memory-hole their fuckups, deny they ever existed, and call actual evidence a "fAr rIgHt cOnSpIrAcY tHeOrY"
They weaponized cytogenesis and ouroboros sourcing on Wikipedia long ago right after lefties took over the site by pure force of not having real jobs. The GamerGate article, for example, has absolutely nothing to do with any observable reality, but it's one of the foundational creation myths of the neo-left, so...
worse still, by Wikipedia's own standards, it's completely unworthy of its own article, being entirely reliant on primary sources written by people personally involved in it
the reason for that is simply because no-one outside that autistic slapfight gave enough of a shit to write about it in secondary sources
Why is it always women (and homosexuals, but mainly women) who ree for assistance when they get blowback for being press psychopaths?
there is no minimum standard of competence or responsibility for sufficiently wealthy white women in the western world
 
they certainly used to: the advantage (to them) of being mostly online these days is that they can easily memory-hole their fuckups, deny they ever existed, and call actual evidence a "fAr rIgHt cOnSpIrAcY tHeOrY"
Worst thing is the actual evidence usually comes from either their own side or their own mouth and they were celebrating it not 2 days before.

We’ve got to a point where people can say a thing, then say they never said it, be shown they said it, confirm it’s real and not faked and yet still deny they said the thing and people believe or go along with it.
 
But that's fine, because we're Bad People
Bad People behind six proxies ending in a dutch TOR node. At the end of the day I can hang up my Haramburger taqiyah and drift through public saying "nigger" in my head, Taylor is stuck with Taylor-specific problems 24/7, and she deserves it.
 
Back