Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

[AnOminous]

How on earth did Taylor fucking Lorenz just manage to produce one of the most correct paragraphs written about this election? Shit is getting so weird.

I can't say I have much respect for someone who only changed her mind once the mainstream media kicked HER ass out, but she's definitely right about that.

 

[Temperance]

Joe Biden is a war criminal who should never know peace

---

I thought Pew Research was generally pretty neutral & reliable, but I might have to reconsider this. They apparently put out a report claiming that the majority of online "news content creators" are conservative and that there's no evidence to suggest that social media websites have been "suppressing, censoring or otherwise discriminating" against conservatives.
Naturally, TayTay wrote a blogpost about this: https://www.usermag.co/p/the-majority-of-news-influencers


I don't even know who this is, but the irony made me laugh:


Classic TayTay. She still thinks children should all be masking at school, btw.


She's wayyy less active on Twitter these days, fyi. Mainly on Bluesky and Mastodon now.

...but even the Bluesky loons aren't crazy enough for TayTay's liking.
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social

 

[Temperance]

TayTay is mad at an NPR journalist (David Folkenflik) who wrote a story about the Biden war criminal drama that got her fired from the Washington Post.

https://x.com/davidfolkenflik/status/1860040392810594764 [Archive]


The (old) NPR article in question: https://www.npr.org/2024/10/10/g-s1...eaves-washington-post-after-rift-with-editors [Archive]

TayTay responds:
https://x.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1860044309858517240 [Archive]


Some replies to TayTay:

Spoiler: Random thoughts

Even if I try to be charitable to Taylor here, what she's saying just doesn't make much sense. So the "war criminal " thing is supposedly just a meme... but she also loudly & proudly proclaims it to be true. She says she didn't make the edit, but why would that matter when she was the one who posted it on her private Instagram? And in particular, why did she lie to her editors about it?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
TayTay says she's being "smeared" for "speaking out against war and genocide". But I thought it was just a dumb meme made by someone else? Now it was a genuine protest all along? She's just a bad liar.

The funny thing is how dumb and pointless this whole situation was. Calling Biden a war criminal is not a big deal, no... but TayTay was determined to (poorly) lie about it, lash out at other journos, and keep stirring up drama. All while she was already disliked at WaPo. Even today, she just won't let it go. 100% certified lolcow behavior.

---

---

Unrelated, but she's begging for followers on Bluesky:

 

[behindyourightnow]

I thought Pew Research was generally pretty neutral & reliable, but I might have to reconsider this.

No, you're falling for Taylor's dishonest framing. The Pew report she cites is very neutral and just gives demographics of surveyed content creators. Taylor uses the article to combine the Pew information with speculation about evil algorithms from a report by some "disinformation researcher" from the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, and then uses her subheading ("The latest Pew Research report on news content creators paints a damning picture of our skewed information ecosystem") to imply that the whole thing comes from Pew. She knows they are trustworthy and well-regarded, and wants to use their good name to launder the other bullshit.

The headline is also blatantly false. Headline: "The majority of news influencers are conservative men, study finds"

Within the article: "27% of news influencers explicitly identify as conservative, significantly outnumbering the 21% who lean liberal."

So, 27% is apparently a majority, if you're a smart person like TayTay.

They apparently put out a report claiming that the majority of online "news content creators" are conservative and that there's no evidence to suggest that social media websites have been "suppressing, censoring or otherwise discriminating" against conservatives.
Naturally, TayTay wrote a blogpost about this: https://www.usermag.co/p/the-majority-of-news-influencers

“In fact, it is often conservatives who gain the most in terms of engagement and online attention, thanks to the platforms’ systems of algorithmic promotion of content.” Across social media, right wing content receives regular amplification while left wing content is suppressed.

Imagine being a "disinformation researcher" and never stopping to consider why the algorithms favor these popular conservative commentators. You know, maybe the clue is contained within that sentence? Maybe platforms like to point people towards the type of content that is consistently popular with their users, in order to keep those users on their platforms and make more money? And maybe it's conservative creators who are consistently more popular?

Why do these "researchers" assume it's the other way around, and decide that users have no preferences at all until a mysterious evil algorithm points them randomly towards conservatives for no fucking reason? They never consider that maybe conservative online commentators are popular precisely because almost all mainstream content these days caters to liberals, and so conservatives go looking elsewhere and disproportionately end up online?

Crazy how I could figure that out after five seconds of thought, but the professional "disinformation" guy (and TayTay) apparently cannot.

 

[The Taco Santo!]

Pretty much any organization with "Human Rights" in the name is guaranteed to have nothing to do with actual human rights, and are almost always mouthpieces for far-left talking points and proposals.

 

[Nod Flenders]

How about stop wearing a fucking mask, you crazy bitch!?

 

[A.P. Hill]

View attachment 6661138

And I wonder who contributed to that? I think I know a name, but I just can't remember...

 

[Flatline]

TayTay was determined to (poorly) lie about it, lash out at other journos, and keep stirring up drama. All while she was already disliked at WaPo. Even today, she just won't let it go.

Taylor isn't the only dumb bitch who has an axe to grind with David and NPR for reporting on their behavior while working at WaPo.

 

[Sneedy Gonzales]

She’s currently fighting with another substacker named Nate Silver on x:

Nate’s a pussy for deleting this next one :

Does she think saying she’s 50 is funny? She really doesn’t realize she’s no longer at an age where saying you’re 50 is funny. Because she may just be for all we know

She says people are already coming to her house, so she’s doxxed already. But she won’t say her age because it will doxx her

lmao:

She’s currently coping:

Lady too sensitive to disclose birth year calling people “pussy”

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Lady too sensitive to disclose birth year calling people “pussy”

I'm sure she just doesn't want to hear all the jokes and puns when she admits to being born in 1969.

 

[Herpes is Brat]

She’s currently fighting with another substacker named Nate Silver on x:
View attachment 6679259View attachment 6679257
Nate’s a pussy for deleting this next one :
View attachment 6679272
Does she think saying she’s 50 is funny? She really doesn’t realize she’s no longer at an age where saying you’re 50 is funny. Because she may just be for all we know
View attachment 6679253
She says people are already coming to her house, so she’s doxxed already. But she won’t say her age because it will doxx her

View attachment 6679251
lmao:
View attachment 6679250
She’s currently coping:
View attachment 6679249View attachment 6679268

Lady too sensitive to disclose birth year calling people “pussy”

As great as this smackdown was wait until one of them mentions her uncle.

 

[JT Marlin]

Nate got her to admit her age. Time to update the OP, @Meat Target.

https://x.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1860557006022803494

 

[mandatorylurk]

JFC Stinky Clam....



You won't say your actual age, you pretend you're hot when at best you're above average from a distance that looks like every other northeast middle aged woman, and you get uglier the closer people get because your internal hate and spite becomes visible, and you also act like you're a vanguard for liberal politics. The ego of the mollusk.

 

[Ceral Funt]

above average from a distance

I'm sorry, excuse me, but what the actual shitfuck are you smoking?

 

[mandatorylurk]

I'm sorry, excuse me, but what the actual shitfuck are you smoking?

I'm not saying she's hot. She is normal weight and size for a woman who is 40 and from an affluent area, and if you saw her on the other end of the grocery aisle you would think she's doing well as a mother of 2. Then she'd walk up closer and instigate conversation, chide you for something in your cart that is offensive, you'd see the crazy whites in her eyes and her makeup caked cheeks and the stinky clam smell with her forced vocal fry, and you'd just go "holy shit leave me alone lady."

 

[Big Beefus]

I've been messing around with photoshop effects all day, and I think I managed to turn taylor into a Pixar character.

 

[Baraka Obama]

if you saw her on the other end of the grocery aisle you would think she's doing well as a mother of 2

She's over there, hunched in what looks like an uncomfortable angle but you quickly realize it's her normal posture. She turns towards you and you see the black duckbilled facemask she's wearing and the closer she gets the crazed whites of her eyes make you extremely uncomfortable. She sees you staring at her and you pathetically bark out "oh sorry, are you looking for your children?" and as the words leave your mouth you can see the wrinkles on her face scrunch up in instinctive internal agony. She walks past you without saying anything and you can't help but think:

"wow, she's doing well as a mother of 2"

 

[Hamplanet Fitness]

She's still doing the Covid thing, but was caught maskless lol

 

[Drama Fan]

Taylor is blowing up on twitter for a bluesky post in which she describes breathing normally as "raw dogging air" on the year of our lord 2024, December 2nd. This seems have been a post designed to counter those purity testing her for her frequent public and private gathering appearances in which she didn't act like Covid was literally killing 99% of people.
Original skeet (archive)

Twitter finds this hilarious.

 

[mandatorylurk]

Behold the duality of Stinky Clam, I guess she's trying to sound "like da yoot" with such Gen Z phrasing because that's the closest she'll ever get to raw dogging, but at the same time she shows her cards by saying the "disease ridden breath all over ur elderly neighbors" ie her.