💼 Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Plum Smuggler said:
LOL. There is a big stir over this. There isn't a partnership between her and bark.
Click to expand...
It's just amazing to see someone doubling down on lies instead of just saying "Yes, I've advertised "Bark", but it's got nothing to do with my opinions on banning phones in school. I think it's bad because [reasons and arguments]". Or she could've just shut up and let this blow over. Instead she's sperging out and trying to get someone pointing out her relationship to Bark in trouble on their job, which certainly won't help her get back into proper journalism.

Lolcows, always living life in the hardest way possible despite too often given the absolute best chances in life.
 
Polychromos said:
It's very possible she didn't have a sponsorship and is just really retarded. I consider looking at Taylor's twitter feed mental torture, so I wasn't able to scroll far enough to her main sperg out. But she seems to have really insane views on kids and social media. This retweet once again also talks about conspiracies:
Screenshot_20250827-115157_1.webp
Click to expand...
Genuinely asking, who the fuck is concerned about "limiting children's autonomy" that isn't a fucking pedophile/groomer?
 
CTR Operative said:
Genuinely asking, who the fuck is concerned about "limiting children's autonomy" that isn't a fucking pedophile/groomer?
Click to expand...
She's admitted to interviewing several minors without their parents' consent or knowledge on Roblox, a site that's a known grooming ground for pedos.

I'm surprised unmarked black helicopters haven't shown up at her house and confiscated her hard drives already.
 
CTR Operative said:
Genuinely asking, who the fuck is concerned about "limiting children's autonomy" that isn't a fucking pedophile/groomer?
Click to expand...
A conspiracy theorist. Which Taylor is. She thinks we live in a fascist dystopian society that specifically tries to kill disabled people.

In pretty much any other context I'd agree with you, but you have to consider how far removed from reality her worldview is.

PatrickButtmanJr. said:
She's admitted to interviewing several minors without their parents' consent or knowledge on Roblox, a site that's a known grooming ground for pedos.

I'm surprised unmarked black helicopters haven't shown up at her house and confiscated her hard drives already.
Click to expand...
Because she is a woman and she hides behind the journo label. She also never engages in the conversations about her wrongdoings. She always tries to shift the conversation and targets slightly unfortunately worded posts by randos without engaging with her more informed critics. However, everytime someone scrutinizes her wording she portraits it as fascist violence against a disabled "young" woman.
It feels like most people have turned against her now, but no one thinks it's worth it to engage with her.
She managed to weponize "being annoying" to a degree, any old school SJW could only dream of. This might be her only accomplishment! ❤️
 
" thinks we live in a fascist dystopian society that specifically tries to kill disabled people."
thats the only part shes right about, but not how its being done
 
I didn’t see this mentioned in the thread. But Tay Tay’s terrible Wired article is now full of retractions and an apology.
IMG_8254.webp
IMG_8257.webp
 
I think the hateboner she got for Jersh is slowly turning in to just a regular boner.

Screenshot_20250831_095606_X.webp
link archive

Byrne being a moron (in my opinion but different strokes i guess......).
To bad Taylor dont seem to have sound points when it comes to age verification irl reading if I'm to believe the replies (I'm not a lorenz aficionado).
Screenshot_20250831_100136_X.webp

link archive
 
Terfatron said:
Byrne being a moron (in my opinion but different strokes i guess......).
To bad Taylor dont seem to have sound points when it comes to age verification irl reading if I'm to believe the replies (I'm not a lorenz aficionado).
Click to expand...
If she actually put the effort into being factually correct for a change, I would not mind at all someone who utterly loathes us pointing out that we're actually on the right side here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom