💼 Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

DragoonSierra said:
Is she pro or anti section 230?
Click to expand...
She is pro section 230, and pro extending it to be more protective, I think it would be fair to say. Her views aren't as mentally retarded as say, Donald Trump.

Funny segment from a recent episode on FOSTA/SESTA, where in a conversation with deranged tit reductionist porn whore Siri Dahl, Mizz Lorenz admits to trolling people by posting fake Craigslist profiles soliciting perverts in their local area to contact them for sex.

 
behindyourightnow said:
Some minor drama on Bluesky: a few Taylor Lorenz haters, apparently led by a MtF troon, are accusing Taylor of plagiarizing a TechDirt article during one of her videos (i.e., she narrates the article word by word as if it's her own thoughts). Someone then tags the author of the "plagiarized" article, who steps in himself and says that Taylor cited him and that he doesn't have any issues with her video.
Click to expand...
Not to defend this bitch, but accusations of plagiarizing or not giving proper credit are the most low hanging fruit they can get when there is someone they don't like and they just can't make arguments against their points.
 
New Taytay opinion piece dropped.

From TheGuardianWeekly magazine (March 6th, 2026)
Taylor Lorenz
Social media bans around the world won’t help young people


Over the past year, more than two dozen countries have proposed bans on social media use for vast swathes of their public. These laws, often under the guise of “child safety”, are ushering in an era of mass surveillance and widespread censorship, contributing to what scholars have called a “global free speech recession”.

Last year, Australia became the first country to ban anyone under the age of 16 from accessing social media. The move emboldened other countries to quickly follow suit. Germany’s ruling party announced it was backing a social media ban. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, called for a ban on social media for under-15s. In the UK, Keir Starmer has sought to enact sweeping social media bans. Greece, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Japan have also pursued similar online identity verification laws.

In the US, online age verification laws have passed or are being considered in more than half of the nation’s states. A package of 19 “child safety” bills is set to move forward in the House of Representatives. Big tech platforms such as Meta, Google and Discord have begun pre-complying with the laws. While social media bans may seem like a prudent measure to protect children, they are not only ineffective, they endanger both children and adults. There is little evidence that social media is driving any type of widespread mental health crisis in children. Removing anonymity from the web, which will inevitably happen, allows for easier government tracking and censorship of journalists, activists and whistleblowers, who rely on online anonymity.

While some claim the laws would curb big tech’s power, only the largest tech companies have the resources to shoulder the costs of age verification systems. Non-profit and indie platforms could be forced to close, consolidating big tech’s power further. Mass surveillance systems, once constructed, could also be easily leveraged by governments and bad actors.

If we want to fix the problems with social media, the place to start is through data-privacy reform and consumer protections. Governments could also take action to break up big tech companies and prosecute them for anti-competitive behaviour. Lawmakers could pass broader social and economic policies that we know would meaningfully improve children’s lives. Social media is a lifeline, especially for marginalised youth such as LGBTQ+ teens. Any policies that limit online access should centre on the most vulnerable people.

“All lawmakers fail to mention the convenient power this hands to government to control and punish their critics
To enact the social media bans being proposed requires a system of age verification, which inherently means expanding surveillance technology. Because algorithmic systems cannot accurately estimate age, verifying a user’s age requires collecting highly sensitive data or government documents to support the biometric data harvested. There are significant privacy and safety concerns with the laws being considered.

The core issue with “age verification” via technology is that it does not exist. Human beings do not age in a linear fashion. There is simply no physiological transformation that takes place on the night of your 16th or 18th birthday that would allow an AI to pinpoint your precise age. Consequently, age verification systems that rely on harvesting biometric data must also require government IDs or other sensitive personal information to tie a user’s online profile to their offline identity.

This system not only allows big tech companies to harvest even more deeply personal data on children, but it creates massive cybersecurity risks. Data harvested by identity verification systems does not stay private.

Another issue is the reactionary political movement that underlies them. In the US, groups that have played a pivotal role in lobbying for age verification include the Heritage Foundation, the rightwing thinktank that orchestrated Project 2025, and the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), formerly known as Morality in Media, a far-right activist organisation with religious fundamentalist ties.

Nor can the timing of these laws be separated from the broader crackdowns on free expression and protest under the Trump administration. The US government has escalated attacks on anonymous speech online, flooding tech companies with subpoenas for information on hundreds of anonymously run anti-ICE social media accounts. While the situation is less dire in the UK, successive governments have been keen to crack down on protests, often involving young people. Ari Cohn, the lead counsel for tech policy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (Fire), pointed out that the decision of Germany’s ruling Christian Democratic Union party to demand that the federal government institute age limitations for social media comes on the heels of German police launching investigations of people who insulted the chancellor, Friedrich Merz, on Facebook.

“All lawmakers will claim that they are [enacting age verification] to protect youth from some harm, but they fail to mention the convenient power it hands to government to control and chill speech they oppose, and even punish their critics,” Cohn said.

Politicians seem intent to push laws that will strip both young and old alike of their rights. This could transform the internet from a space of free expression to a fully surveilled digital panopticon where every action you take online is tied to your government ID. Once built, this surveillance infrastructure will be abused, just as every expansion of government surveillance and censorship power has been. We must do all we can to stop these laws and preserve a free and open internet

✱ Taylor Lorenz is a journalist and technology columnist ■
Click to expand...
She still wants you to buy into her caring about free expression on the internet. Lol
 
behindyourightnow said:
Hate towards Kiwi Farms, so they are determined to try to make her the next Will Stancil.
Click to expand...
She isn't sexy enough to be the next Will Stancil, Grok told me so. She's not rapeable enough. Even the man she was supposedly engaged to didn't even want to have sex with her.
 
I haven’t followed this thread since like DKF but what the fuck is this???

IMG_7008.jpeg
 
So same old same old with her. Spewing false information. At least Canada's own Taylor Lorenz, Rachel Gilmore tries something knew every few months.
 
ASeabear8952 said:
I haven’t followed this thread since like DKF but what the fuck is this???

View attachment 8741544
Click to expand...
The crippling poverty and lack of electricity and medicine isn’t killing Cubans - its lack of masks for a disease that only kills old sick people. WOW, no wonder Taylor is seen as the new vanguard of journalism! Give her all the Pulitzers!
 
Null said:
she deleted her xeet from backlash lol

It's 36 minutes long and I don't know if I can listen to TL that long. Has she ever addressed how she's a gigantic fucking hypocrite at any point? Did she ever make a post explaining that she loves the Kiwi Farms thread on Destiny or some shit?
Click to expand...
Josh you should go on a show that would be funny. But then again, her audience would probably have a little meltdown.
Anonymus Fluhre said:
She isn't sexy enough to be the next Will Stancil, Grok told me so. She's not rapeable enough. Even the man she was supposedly engaged to didn't even want to have sex with her.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't even rape her, says my stepfather. Completely unweightable.
 
The Taco Santo! said:
I'm guessing Tay wasn't invited to the rich socialists' prom in Cuba with Piker and the rest. Or was she? I have no idea, but who would ever possibly want her at a party?
Click to expand...
My guess is no. She would have spent the whole trip trying to get her Senpai to let her in his hotel room under the pretense of an interview.

Then she’d tackle him and rave about how SHE NEEDS A BABY ON HER NOW HER EGGS ARE DRYING UP
 
I feel like she only talks about this COVID bullshit when no one is talking about her. At least Rachel came up with this story about two men "intimidating" her somewhere this month.
Sargon's wife's son said:
Josh you should go on a show that would be funny. But then again, her audience would probably have a little meltdown.

I wouldn't even rape her, says my stepfather. Completely unweightable.
Click to expand...
I don't think Reynhard Sinaga would rape her.
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
I feel like she only talks about this COVID bullshit when no one is talking about her. At least Rachel came up with this story about two men "intimidating" her somewhere this month.

I don't think Reynhard Sinaga would rape her.
Click to expand...
Yeah there are a gaggle of COVID Karens who wistfully look back fondly on how people took their petty authoritarianism seriously and long for those days again. It’s a small group but these freaks exist. To your point, Taylor likes bringing it up when she feels left out and with a sliver of hope that someone might take her seriously. Of course, this thread is full of cases where Taylor “rawdogged” the air, including when she was at a PornHub convention.
 
The Hardest R said:
Yeah there are a gaggle of COVID Karens who wistfully look back fondly on how people took their petty authoritarianism seriously and long for those days again. It’s a small group but these freaks exist. To your point, Taylor likes bringing it up when she feels left out and with a sliver of hope that someone might take her seriously. Of course, this thread is full of cases where Taylor “rawdogged” the air, including when she was at a PornHub convention.
Click to expand...
I came here looking for answers about why she was seemingly so mind broken by covid.
 
I'm not as interested following this particular cow, but she showed up in a livestream with this Tech channel that I'm following


the comment section is as expected.


Screenshot 2026-03-25 at 04-41-07 The New Doxxing Playbook (how to protect yourself) - YouTube.png
Screenshot 2026-03-25 at 04-41-44 The New Doxxing Playbook (how to protect yourself) - YouTube.png



very pathetic that Josh (the guy in the video) has to dance around the preamble about how it doesn't matter if she's on the opposite side of the political spectrum, yada yada.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom