Disaster Tears as Dog Adopted After 900 Days in Shelter Is Returned Within Hours

Article Archive

Tears as Dog Adopted After 900 Days in Shelter Is Returned Within Hours​

A dog who was adopted after spending over 900 days in an animal shelter has suffered the heartbreak of being returned just 24 hours later.
Sora first arrived at the Valley Animal Center in Fresno, California, just over two and a half years ago, having been surrendered by her owner. The Valley Animal Center is the largest no-kill animal center in the Central Valley.

For over 900 days, Sora struggled to attract much in the way of attention. That's not entirely surprising given the circumstances, with a 2014 study published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science highlighting how the average shelter visitor interacts with just one dog per visit and that these interactions last just eight minutes.
But staff at the shelter knew Sora had all the attributes necessary to make a great pet.

"Sora is a high-energy dog who loves to play and gets super excited anytime she gets to go on walks," Sim Kaur from the Valley Animal Center told Newsweek.

"She is great on walks and hikes, making her a good traveling companion. She also loves playing with tennis balls. She is lovable with humans and has tested well with children over the age of five."
Despite being overlooked for so long, Sora's luck looked to have changed recently after she caught the eye of a prospective pet owner visiting the shelter. Eventually, they decided to adopt the pup, and it seemed like Sora's story would get the happy ending it so richly deserved.

Then, every shelter pet's worst nightmare happened. Just a day later, her new owner called to say they would be returning the rescue pup. Sora was understandably heartbroken upon her arrival at the shelter, with a video posted to TikTok by @jjack.iie capturing the shelter dog looking especially sad to be back in familiar surroundings.

This development was a source of some frustration to Kaur who felt Sora's adopters should have given her more time to settle before making their decision.

"Being in a shelter for many years affects the mental health of our adoptables and it is no different for Sora," she said. "Sora did not get enough time to decompress in her new home and was introduced to new family members too quickly."

She hasn't given up hope of finding Sora the perfect home, though, and has already got a pretty clear idea of the sort of home that would suit her best.

IMG_7274.jpeg

Kaur said: "Although Sora does well with other dogs at the shelter, she is dog-selective, so we recommend she go to a home where she is the only pet. With her high energy, her future home will need to spend dedicated time with her for training."

Despite this setback, she remains as sure as ever that Sora will find her true forever home in due course.

"With patience and guidance, we know Sora can be a great addition to anyone's family."

Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
 
Last edited:
Interesting they don't say why it is the dog was returned to the shelter after a day. The adoptee probably didn't want to hurt the shelter's feelings for all we know.
They pretty much did
>wasn't allowed to decompress
>was introduced to family members too early
Translation: Tried to eat the children the minute they brought it through the door. And they definitely would've told the shelter. It's not the adoptive owner that's being dishonest here.
 
Just euthanize it then, problem solved. Why waste so much time and money keeping a useless dog nobody wants alive in a shelter?
The shelter staff is comprised mainly of women with their nurturing instinct attuned to the animals kept there. There are some volunteers who show up on weekends to prove their progressive credibility.

Euthanizing a dog who obviously needs to be euthanized is still very emotionally difficult for the staff and the volunteers are constantly pressuring them on top
 
The shelter staff is comprised mainly of women with their nurturing instinct attuned to the animals kept there. There are some volunteers who show up on weekends to prove their progressive credibility.

Euthanizing a dog who obviously needs to be euthanized is still very emotionally difficult for the staff and the volunteers are constantly pressuring them on top

This article is from California, but your description still fits my local shelter to a tee.

White women with a saviour complex "rescue" feral mutts from fly-in reserves who would otherwise cull them.

Then they dump dozens of low-value dogs in cages back in civilization but lose complete interest in them once back at home. They are like NGO thrill junkies who only get off with the chase.
 
This article is from California, but your description still fits my local shelter to a tee.

White women with a saviour complex "rescue" feral mutts from fly-in reserves who would otherwise cull them.

Then they dump dozens of low-value dogs in cages back in civilization but lose complete interest in them once back at home. They are like NGO thrill junkies who only get off with the chase.
Yeah I didn’t get as far as the inter-shelter shuffling to reset the euth timer.

Also, being locked up with pitbulls does to normal dogs what being locked up with “young scholars” does to normal people
 
I did the same most likely suspect thing but something needs to be done about shelters.

Especially the "no kill" ones.

They just lie. They lie and lie and lie some more.
Like they tried to sell me that my dog, in a cage next to her sister, was a Siberian husky. Her sister was literally half her size and vocal. Completely different bouncy behavior etc.

My dog is a malamute, but bc some shit brain decided that malamute isn't as attractive as husky they called her a husky. So as much as the breed shit bull sucks it's also 100% the shelters fault this dog can't be rehomed and they should just man up and euthanize it. As opposed to whichever psychotic wine mom they have on staff that spit balled the genius idea of an institutionalized dog on its 3 year bid being safe to send anywhere other than the gas chamber.

It's a catch 22 being a no kill shelter but the ppl that work there are usually scum once you get past the volunteer levels. It's all about maintaining funding so they have to lie about the dogs breed and behavior to show on paper it was a successful adoption. The right hand doesn't care what the left is doing on the govs end so even the single day adoption goes down as a success and this entire article is just damage control so they maintain funding .
 
Last edited:
Was really hoping this article wouldn't make it here, because it pissed me off, so much. Rule of threes, assholes! It takes them three days just to adjust to being somewhere completely new. A month ago we adopted a beautiful 9 year-old girl who had previously been returned in less than a day for eating the contents of her new owner's fridge. She's been a bit rough to deal with, (most shelter dogs have some sort of behavioral issue that takes time), but we would never adopt without knowing what we were in for. We would never take her back. She is family, now. Makes me want to spit.
ETA- We knew about the fridge burglary and took precautions, but didn't tape up the freezer. Found out the first time we left her alone in the house that, Lol, my new girl is tall enough to get in there. Didn't punish her; that's all on me. Kind of impressed, but it does seem to point to food insecurity issues that we are working on. Owning dogs is like having permanent 60lb toddlers. They get smart enough to cause problems, if you aren't consistent in your training.
 
Last edited:
Back