- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
I don't think it did. I couldn't find it. I believe only on the XMB.PS3 also had this but there weren't many games that allowed it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think it did. I couldn't find it. I believe only on the XMB.PS3 also had this but there weren't many games that allowed it.
Here are a list of PS3 games that supported this feature. The 360 was easier; you would be able to rip and access your songs on the Xbox Guide. I don't know why this wasn't pushed.Games with it usually said it was supported on the box. Here's the back of Vanquish.
View attachment 2588959
Maybe I'm confusing this feature with something else.
Metal Gear Solid 4 won't run unless you do it.I don't think it did. I couldn't find it. I believe only on the XMB.
Someone I know has a 2016 Toyota that won't let you mess with the presets while driving. You can change the station, but if you try to save it you get "that feature is not available while the vehicle is in motion."What the fuck? That's lunacy.
Buy an mp3 player with blu-tooth and blu tooth to the car stereo, or fit a better stereo. I've not heard of a car stopping you from browsing music while in motion. How does it even know the car is driving? I would snippedy snipping a few wires at the back.
Shit like this is why I hate new cars. Supposedly it's about improving driver safety by preventing distraction, but that excuse falls a bit flat when so many of the "driving aids" they've added actually reduce driver concentration. Automatic lane-keeping and auto-braking, and things of that nature, lull drivers into a false sense of security and allow their attention to wander from the road. This is before we get to dumb shit like tesla's autopilot. My driving safety is reduced by a bunch of retards who are letting the car "drive" for them, while they stare out of the front into a distant nothing.Someone I know has a 2016 Toyota that won't let you mess with the presets while driving. You can change the station, but if you try to save it you get "that feature is not available while the vehicle is in motion."
It was pushed! Heavily! It was one of the things about the 360, custom soundtracks!Here are a list of PS3 games that supported this feature. The 360 was easier; you would be able to rip and access your songs on the Xbox Guide. I don't know why this wasn't pushed.
Oh, I remember that!Another thing that people forget is the Xbox Live voice modulation that they also pushed, so someone could mask the voice of actually being a 13 year old boy or VelocityGirl.
Can't you just swap out the iPad bullshit for a standard DIN stereo? I wouldn't know since I've only ever driven cars that have CD players and no touchfaggotry.I miss CD players in cars. The few times I borrow a relative's car or rent one, instead of driving my own, this huge velcro-case of burned CDs goes to waste.
Even though I could upload all those songs into a larger storage unit, and it may even be more convenient, there is just something so satisfying hearing the clicks and whirs of a CD, inserting, ejecting, or shifting between tracks.
What if you're not a 13 year old boy or a dweeby geek but a strong grrl and want everyone to know it? Drop the feature.As cheesy as that video is NOW, it's quite accurate. Have a problem with a player? Mute them.
I think I know what happened here. They implemented the auto-play block in the most retarded way possible: instead of it being a permission system that you could have blanket rules and exceptions for like damn near everything else (cookies, notifications, mic and webcam access, etc), it was instead based arbitrarily on how much you interacted with the site. Go to CNN and scroll down? Oh shit, clearly you want that unrelated video they've got queued up to blare in the background as you're reading!You know what they should bring back? The ability so set autoplay video to off in the Chrome settings. What a stupid thing to remove.
As far as I can tell the disc reader standards have been abandoned. Most likely many brands have proprietary bs and nothing else now.Can't you just swap out the iPad bullshit for a standard DIN stereo? I wouldn't know since I've only ever driven cars that have CD players and no touchfaggotry.
If it has a 3.5mm audio in you can plug anything you feel like into it, the problem is the awkwardness of having to deal with an external device that also probably needs to be powered itself. There are CD players that buffer audio for use in motion, though.As far as I can tell the disc reader standards have been abandoned. Most likely many brands have proprietary bs and nothing else now.
My conspiracy theory is that places like CNN does that to drive video views. They often let you mute the video at least, then it plays as a thumbnail in the corner and at least on Forbes it keeps autoplaying 40-50 second videos from a playlist. If I pause the video, then at some point scroll up, there's a good chance that it will start playing again. It becomes a war of attrition until I just let the thumbnail play in the corner and after I've spent 15 minutes reading one article I have also viewed 20 videos. Technically that makes me a big fan of Mainstream Media video content.Go to CNN and scroll down? Oh shit, clearly you want that unrelated video they've got queued up to blare in the background as you're reading!
This isn't a conspiracy. When a new season of Star Trek Discovery or Picard came out Viacom paid to have the season trailers to be ads in various social media platforms. This led to the videos having over a million views each but barely more than 5,000 likes.My conspiracy theory is that places like CNN does that to drive video views. They often let you mute the video at least, then it plays as a thumbnail in the corner and at least on Forbes it keeps autoplaying 40-50 second videos from a playlist. If I pause the video, then at some point scroll up, there's a good chance that it will start playing again. It becomes a war of attrition until I just let the thumbnail play in the corner and after I've spent 15 minutes reading one article I have also viewed 20 videos. Technically that makes me a big fan of Mainstream Media video content.
There has to be a reason for this absolute bullshit behavior and I think my conspiracy theory is at least partially correct.
I only read news sites with javascript disabled nowadays. Most of them still work perfectly fine, and the subscription nag screens, videos and all that shit are disabled because they rely on JS.My conspiracy theory is that places like CNN does that to drive video views. They often let you mute the video at least, then it plays as a thumbnail in the corner and at least on Forbes it keeps autoplaying 40-50 second videos from a playlist. If I pause the video, then at some point scroll up, there's a good chance that it will start playing again. It becomes a war of attrition until I just let the thumbnail play in the corner and after I've spent 15 minutes reading one article I have also viewed 20 videos. Technically that makes me a big fan of Mainstream Media video content.
There has to be a reason for this absolute bullshit behavior and I think my conspiracy theory is at least partially correct.
There is this annoying trend to view old = good in all cases in the tech world, you see this on /g/ where there have been some threads waxing nostalgia about trackball mice that you to clean hair and/or dust out from every few weeks and slowly turned to shit even after cleanings. Take it from a KF old, they were garbage, don't listen to tech hipsters if they try to meme them as better.
JS and it's consequences where a disaster for the human race. All I want from the web is to show me text and show me multimedia. (videos/sound/pictures) If we wanna get extra fancy ok, let me enter text sometimes. How these basic demands turned into the mess we have today is anyone guess but I personally blame that too much idiots are in that industry.I only read news sites with javascript disabled nowadays. Most of them still work perfectly fine, and the subscription nag screens, videos and all that shit are disabled because they rely on JS.
There are some wrong turns this newer tech takes sometimes though but people forget about subtlety and middle ways. Modern optical mice are clearly more useful and superior to trackball mice.
Nice thesis. But you have some good points.Yeah I know. I also like to wax nostalgic often but a lot of that old stuff was garbage, quite frankly. Especially e.g. 90s PCs were this weird combination of bleeding edge tech and incredibly cheap implementation. If you have lived in that time you have heard a lot of jokes how Win9x always crashes. While software and OS were to blame too, you also had a lot of this instability because of frankly, hardware problems. From just plain poorly designed ICs to bus problems, mainboard layout problems etc.. There was a lot wrong with those old machines sometimes. My modern computer is amazing and can do things easily in seconds I frankly at least for a while didn't think the average joe on a non-government budget could ever do at home. As much as I enjoy the simple nature of that old tech sometimes, I wouldn't wanna go back full time ever. Lets just say having to search for floppies again would get old very quickly. Doesn't mean I have any issues with new tech. I'm actually quite annoyed at some choices and the opaque complexity in itself really bothers me sometimes. Still, it's a net plus for me.
There are some wrong turns this newer tech takes sometimes though but people forget about subtlety and middle ways. Modern optical mice are clearly more useful and superior to trackball mice. (and please, that's just my opinion, don't quote this and start a holy war because I literally don't care enough) Even (chronologically) newer laser mice with 3 trillion DPI, 32 buttons and needing an active internet connection to even work are garbage nobody needs. Both statements can be true at the same time.
I have the theory that people who blanket state all old tech was better are too young to have lived with that technology every day to experience it in every day situations and only know it through the "antique" consumer angle that's pushed so hard by youtubers and such. Either that, or they are old enough and just were disinterested in computers and technology when that stuff was still new.
JS and it's consequences where a disaster for the human race. All I want from the web is to show me text and show me multimedia. (videos/sound/pictures) If we wanna get extra fancy ok, let me enter text sometimes. How these basic demands turned into the mess we have today is anyone guess but I personally blame that too much idiots are in that industry.
Coincidentally it's also the only industry where gatekeeping is something that's seen as something negative, 100% of the time. If you need to fly somewhere, do you want the pilot who breaths and eats flying, did it since he was 15 and has a natural talent for it or do you want the guy who flunked flight school several times and just barely got all his licenses, suffers from anxiety every time he hears a plane engine and has a "safety track record"? Same for doctors, accountants, chefs etc.. you'll always want the good guy and that's ok and nobody would blame you for it. Yet, in this tech sector the trans disabled black woman who suffers from PTSD and depression is seen with the same or even more value than the white guy who just likes to code and honestly, we see the results of that. IT touches so many things in the modern world and is incredibly influential in how this world works. People would be surprised how huge industies sometimes hinge on the work on a handful of programmers working on some open source library somewhere. Yet gatekeeping to keep the idiots out is somehow frowned upon. Then people are surprised everything's a mess.