Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

Good thing you didn't rely on just that service for music.

How many technophile bugmen out there don't have any media collection offline and just stream everything?
I'd imagine most in their mid-late 20's and older do. Even the staunchest minimalist gets attached to things. Younger people didn't really grow up with physical media being the norm outside of Nintendo handhelds like the DS and 3DS. Yeah, you could download games onto an SD card, but it wasn't practical if you were a kid with an insatiable hunger for all things gaming. This was only possible on the DS with an R4 card. Think the DSi had downloadable games but fuck that noise. Imagine not having a GBA slot.
Speaking as someone living in the no-man's land between Zoomer and Late Millennial, there is one experience I cannot relate to with my retarded abortion of a generation; watching something on stream and it goes down, or crashes, or buffers infinitely.
I like to call that generation the Halo generation just because Halo 3's release felt like a defining event at the time. I didn't care about it, but everyone else was talking about it. Modern Warfare did not get this level of schoolyard hype.
 
Lack of headphone jacks on flagship smartphones and everything going wireless. Even though bluetooth has gotten better over the last decade, it still is just not as good as an actual physical connection.
You can find headphones/earbuds that plug into usb-c slots. Just put "usb-c earbuds" into Amazon's search.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pee Cola
Obviously wired earbuds. Obviously the market is there for wireless earbuds for sports and doing menial chores around the house, but if I'm just chilling I don't care about the wire. I'd rather get it caught sometimes than have to worry about charging another device every fucking day.
In mobile devices, I miss features like physical buttons and switches and sliders (not so much keyboards), blinkenlights that notified you of messages and battery life, and foldable/slide-out mechanisms. Not too practical, but they made phones and handhelds feel like engineered devices rather than standard issue dopamine slabs.

One example is a friend who had an LG Optimus F3 for a few years. It had a physical home button with a light around it that you could program to flash or glow in different colors for different notifications. Out of the box it was blue for Facebook/Twitter, green for Vine (this was some years ago) etc. This is a cool idea that more phones should rip off.
Notification lights were great, such a useful feature for quickly seeing if you had a notification without having to pick up your phone and possibly waste time scrooooling like phones seem to want you to do nowadays.
Related: Another cool idea that someone on Kiwi thought of before me is a physical brightness control on modern devices (a slider or dial to conserve space maybe). I keep my brightness low to conserve battery and because it's easy on the eyes, so I'm always tweaking it. Of course modern tech is designed with the core idea of "loot the serf's money and run". Why would tech be designed to help you?
Thirding the brightness control button, but just because there have been so many (hundreds) of times where I've had my brighness at minimum indoors because that's how bright it needed to be, and as soon as I pull it out outdoors, I cannot see a single thing and have to fiddle around while squinting and blocking light with my hand to raise the brightness. It's such a no-brainer I'm surprised I haven't seen even "high-end" phones do this.
 
Lack of headphone jacks on flagship smartphones and everything going wireless. Even though bluetooth has gotten better over the last decade, it still is just not as good as an actual physical connection.
Now you'll need to carry a USB splitter if you want to charge your phone and listen to music at the same time. Glorious technological progress. Can't wait to see what piece of plastic shit I'll need for the thinnest phone imaginable to fit into my hand.

I despise the trend of slapping a touchscreen on everything. I dread the day when too many brain-damaged Zoomers and whatever feral children coming after their generation are making decisions on tech that we just do away with keyboard and mouse altogether and my living hellscape is complete. Touchscreen typing is the single most infuriating daily interaction I have with technology. I love fat-fingering the wrong letter or getting the letter I wanted right only to have it slide to the letter next to it as I lift my finger off the digital keyboard that takes up a quarter of my screen space every time I want to type something. Made a typo? Well, good luck fingering the exact positioning of that letter you messed up, because we don't have arrow keys on our wonderful touch screens. I have to imagine that the barely legible postings of Zoomers on social media is due to most of them simply writing off a typo as not being worth the time needed to get the cursor in the right spot to correct, and I can hardly blame them.

And don't even get me started on gaming with touchscreens. Anything more mechanically-intense than Fruit Ninja is just better off on a controller/keyboard than a fucking touchscreen.
The answer I usually hear when voicing the same grievances is that my touchscreen is cheap. Nigger, entering text into a computer is not a technically challenging task. A cheap chinky keyboard can accomplish this, fuck touchscreens. To put it more generally, the trend of consooming mouthbreathers swallowing the bait of needing expensive tech for trivial tasks hook, line and sinker is what I hate. "Aesthetics" or "just like muh Star Trek" isn't worth it.
 
"just like muh Star Trek" isn't worth it.
LCARS is the ultimate evolution of the smart phone interface.

lcars_3_by_mlbryant_d5s4jup-pre.jpg
 
Idk if this counts, but I miss Sharper Image stores. It was cool to be able to walk into a store and see different tech products that weren’t tablets or phones. Being able to experience technological ingenuity in person beyond fiddling with the newest iPhone was interesting, and the fact the online market killed the demand for these types of stores is tragic.
 
Those cryptic numbers, that sort of hard-to-read narrow font...
There was an LCARS Windows 98 theme which was cool for about 5 minutes until the loud color scheme and very narrow fonts became tiring.
new RAM management: keep filling up the RAM (and virtual memory) until no space left?
Behold the future of memory management
systemd-oomd — A userspace out-of-memory (OOM) killer
It is highly recommended for the system to have swap enabled for systemd-oomd to function optimally. With swap enabled, the system spends enough time swapping pages to let systemd-oomd react. Without swap, the system enters a livelocked state much more quickly and may prevent systemd-oomd from responding in a reasonable amount of time.
 
LCARS is the ultimate evolution of the smart phone interface.

View attachment 3498660
The huge symbol of my organization in the upper left of the corner is in case the psychic monster of the week makes me forget again which side I am on.

You might not like it, but that is what peak UI performance looks like.

Jokes aside, Star Trek was the first show where I become aware of the concept of how practical a tablet would be, long before tablets were a reasonable thing to build, mind you. The stuff they have in these old shows seems pretty blase these days, like picard facetiming the star trek official of the week in his private office on his tiny netbook like thing but that was pretty cool stuff back then, if you watch the shows now it's easy to forget we didn't actually have any of that. When I started watching that show my main computer had a CPU with less than 10 MHz and could practically only do 32 colors at once. Remember that.

From an engineering standpoint, touch interfaces sadly make a lot of sense. If you put buttons in such devices, every button makes things a lot more complicated and also more expensive. Buttons also fail, their assembly is complicated, they're a lot of additional parts (in case of actual mechanical buttons parts of a completely other realm of electrical engineering altogether) so you need additional suppliers, they need to be connected to something inside your device and things just get more and more complicated with each new button. It really changes the nature of your entire device. On top of that, there's a small but distinct possibility to fuck up buttons to a point where people still talk about it ten years down the road. A touch screen is simple. You hook it up to the SoC/MCU and beyond that point it's a software thing. It doesn't wear down. It's multi functional - every square millimeter of the touch screen can be whatever you like, from display to button, or hell - both at once - the software engineer can decide this and it'll always be changeable over the lifetime of the device.

The downside is people want the haptic feedback of the mechanical control. Not any control mind you, the good, pricier one. From the standpoint of whoever does the budgeting even trying to fulfill that wish doesn't make any sense. So touchscreen it is. It's really the same with additional connectors. Brings up the cost of price per unit and makes it all more complicated and most people really do not care. You'd be surprised how many phones do not implement the USB-C port even up to full spec, which sometimes is just a question of a few passive parts and additonal traces on the PCB. A fraction of a penny saved is a fraction of a penny earned. If you want to protest any of this, my tip is to buy the expensive devices and use them for a long time and talk about how you still use yours. People rarely do though.
 
Last edited:
memory management
It'd be nice if Wii browser had that sort of thing. The more one surfs, the more the memory fills up with internet stuff until "out of memory" messages keep popping up.

(yeah at one point I was using a Wii to surf the internet - on a CRT TV IIRC)

From an engineering standpoint, touch interfaces sadly make a lot of sense.
I still like physical controls better on appliances. Like I miss using an older microwave that had dials with a mechanical bell.

Also if physical controls are built better - not that likely with "planned obsolescence" BS though - they can last a lot longer.

I love fat-fingering the wrong letter or getting the letter I wanted right only to have it slide to the letter next to it as I lift my finger off the digital keyboard that takes up a quarter of my screen space every time I want to type something. Made a typo? Well, good luck fingering the exact positioning of that letter you messed up, because we don't have arrow keys on our wonderful touch screens.
Sounds like how I described typing with a touchscreen awhile back.

Typing on a smartphone or tablet. The autocorrect. The selecting of text it considers "wrong" when you're just trying to select a place before the "wrong" word. The "giving up" when you're trying to select a block of text. The endless mistakes. How the hell do smartphone addicts tolerate that potentially enraging nonsense?
 
Last edited:
If you want to protest any of this, my tip is to buy the expensive devices and use them for a long time and talk about how you still use yours. People rarely do though.
I would do this but the current expensive devices are so outrageously overpriced I'd never even consider buying them. But I generally do use electronics until they completely die, often well after so-called "end of life" termination of support.
 
I guess Android Foobar is okay? But also sorta useless without components like on the PC, and to build on the touchscreen stuff above, going from tactile buttons you've been using forever to a touchscreen for music is miserable for things as basic as play/pause or seeking
Oh, Jesus, you just reminded me of how furious I would get with my old Skull Candy TOUCH CONTROL wireless earbuds. I didn't think of how annoying touch control earbuds would be at the time of purchasing them, but I can assure you after about 2-3 years of using them whoever thought using touch controls for earbuds was a good idea should be hanged from a streetlamp and left to rot off the rope as a lesson to all future tech designers. Not only is it impossible to tell if you've successfully pressed the "button," but nothing about the inclusion of the touch tech has even improved the functionality of the "button." The commands are exactly the same as with regular command earbuds. There's no swiping, just "did you touch the touch surface?" So while it's not doing anything a regular button in the same space couldn't do, I now have to put up with accidentally activating the controls while handling the earbuds. Also, these earbuds were impossible to wear under a motorcycle helmet. I occasionally like to place a single earbud in so I can listen to music or podcasts while I ride, and I guess part of my ear would ride up on the touch space and effectively "hold down" the button on that earpiece, causing it to shut off. Even if I were to get my helmet just right, the moment I turn to look at something the button would activate. Fucking worthless, it was a blessing in disguise when I lost the case to charge them. I now have some Soundcore wireless earbuds with physical buttons and they're a hundred times better.
 
Why go through the extra step of burning it onto a bluray instead of just directly watching from a flash/hard drive?
Trying to stream from a computer isn't ideal. My two current solutions in making my TV play nice with what I have on my computer is an exercise in frustration. Chromecast and VLC is a no-go, apparently the memory buffering is too much for Chromecast for too handle, copying videos to my iPhone is cumbersome, and copying my videos to a flash drive, then hooking up my MacBook to the TV also a mess because then the computer is not only on, but I have no control over it.

I would also need to invest a BR player/burner for my computer to even copy over the stuff to begin with.
 
Trying to stream from a computer isn't ideal. My two current solutions in making my TV play nice with what I have on my computer is an exercise in frustration. Chromecast and VLC is a no-go, apparently the memory buffering is too much for Chromecast for too handle, copying videos to my iPhone is cumbersome, and copying my videos to a flash drive, then hooking up my MacBook to the TV also a mess because then the computer is not only on, but I have no control over it.

I would also need to invest a BR player/burner for my computer to even copy over the stuff to begin with.
Maybe try https://www.universalmediaserver.com
Its been my solution to watching stuff over LAN for the last few months.
 
I despise the trend of slapping a touchscreen on everything. I dread the day when too many brain-damaged Zoomers and whatever feral children coming after their generation are making decisions on tech that we just do away with keyboard and mouse altogether and my living hellscape is complete. Touchscreen typing is the single most infuriating daily interaction I have with technology. I love fat-fingering the wrong letter or getting the letter I wanted right only to have it slide to the letter next to it as I lift my finger off the digital keyboard that takes up a quarter of my screen space every time I want to type something. Made a typo? Well, good luck fingering the exact positioning of that letter you messed up, because we don't have arrow keys on our wonderful touch screens. I have to imagine that the barely legible postings of Zoomers on social media is due to most of them simply writing off a typo as not being worth the time needed to get the cursor in the right spot to correct, and I can hardly blame them.

And don't even get me started on gaming with touchscreens. Anything more mechanically-intense than Fruit Ninja is just better off on a controller/keyboard than a fucking touchscreen.
This is the vibe I'm getting from you:

1658132474890.png


Why don't laptops come with DVD drives anymore?
 
Made a typo? Well, good luck fingering the exact positioning of that letter you messed up, because we don't have arrow keys on our wonderful touch screens.
Android has been through so many iterations and has so many skins but I STILL have not seen arrow keys on any official version of android either by google or any (((manufacturer))). I cannot believe this shit, just think, all those developers/programmers/coders/trannies working away their fingers to the bone and the cannot think of such a simple feature? Some unpaid contributor somewhere understood it years ago, but not the so called experts. Is it not in their budgets/guidelines or something? Are they not adding this feature in their OSes on purpose? Lineage is the only version of android I've seen navigation keys for, and it was just too good. used it on a piece of shit chinese relabelled phone. It made life so much easier. Then I bought a new phone and despite all of its gizmos n shit i didn't feel at home because of the lack of those arrows.
Text selection is shit on android, too. the menu for selection pops up if it wants to. it shows the options it wants to. sometimes 'select all' isn't there for some reason. other times 'copy' doesnt show up.
are phones a jewish conspiracy to dumb down the general population, make them more subservient by forcing those dumb things down our throats? You konw, boil the frogs slowly?

Also, what are those little japanese flip phones called? I keep forgetting, this is the third time i am asking about them online.
 
Back