Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

Holy shit, Saigon. Two posts in and you already served up a fresh (and, might I add, delicious) copypasta.

You're so far down the rabbit hole I can't tell if you're just on a whole other fucking plane of existence, or schizophrenic. Can you break this shit down for us brainlets who have yet to find God's MAC address?
Breaking shit down for fags more than that isn’t my job. Don’t matter anyways, you’re already fucked, I’m fucked, everyone in the states is pretty much fucked.
Arguing with dudes online about the reality of the that we all got dirty chink chips that root all our shit is more retarded than the FCC mandate that mandates our chink chips accept “interference”.
0 shits given whether you believe me, because there ain’t shit you can do about it.
 
Holy shit, Saigon. Two posts in and you already served up a fresh (and, might I add, delicious) copypasta.

You're so far down the rabbit hole I can't tell if you're just on a whole other fucking plane of existence, or schizophrenic. Can you break this shit down for us brainlets who have yet to find God's MAC address?
I think he might be upset because he bought a Huawei laptop with an eSim and it has some certs installed to sign the drivers. But I'm probably missing part of the plot. He doesn't seem any less coherent than any other Westerner who thinks the CHINE GOMMUNISTS are a greater threat to his personal security than the NSA to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
In regards to the automotive industry's growing obsessions with electronics and touchscreens, I don't like how in some cars, controls such as A/C or volume, are now on touchscreens, instead of simple to use knobs and buttons in the past. It's a headache waiting to happen when the touchscreen inevitably fails, not to mention it being a hazard due to needing to pay more attention to adjust your A/C settings with a touchscreen. And touchpad controls, i.e. on Lexus's cars, are even worse in this regard.

I'm also not a fan of screens to display the speedometer and tachometer, compared to the trusty gauges of past cars.
With knobs and buttons in mind:

I don't miss knobs with television. But I prefer knobs for A/C control or volume in a car over buttons.

This is a gaming thing I remember:

Up until the PS3/360 era, multiplatform games had slight or massive differences between consoles. I'm sure you'd know what I'm talking about from the SNES/Genesis days.

A game released on multiple consoles in the 90s could be drastically different. Graphics, gameplay, sound, developers. Aladdin is a great example. Either because of power, space or time constraints.

That continued with the sixth generation (PS2, Xbox, GC), although it was more subtle. Texture differences, better resolution.

One example of what I'm talking about.

The GameCube suffered the most from multiplatform releases because of the MiniDVD limitations Nintendo imposed, but it was more powerful. Less memory means less stuff in the game compared to other versions.

I'm indifferent about multiplatform games. If you have a keen eye, you'd notice the differences. Which would make that version slightly unique I suppose. But locking stuff out for ONE version for no reason is anti-consumer. SpiderMan exclusive to Marvel's The Avengers and locking a mode from COD with the PS4 comes to mind.
 
This is a gaming thing I remember:

Up until the PS3/360 era, multiplatform games had slight or massive differences between consoles. I'm sure you'd know what I'm talking about from the SNES/Genesis days.

A game released on multiple consoles in the 90s could be drastically different. Graphics, gameplay, sound, developers. Aladdin is a great example. Either because of power, space or time constraints.

That continued with the sixth generation (PS2, Xbox, GC), although it was more subtle. Texture differences, better resolution.
Even on PC the games would look different on different graphics cards using the exact same settings, until MS put their foot down and required no deviation from the reference rasterizer for a GPU to be considered Direct3D compatible, starting with 8 or 8.1 I think. Before that ATi/Nvidia/Matrox/S3/3dfx/PVR played fast and loose with their internal calculations. The rendered frame going through whatever cheap RAMDAC a board partner slapped on to the card and then having that displayed on a teenagers uncalibrated CRT monitor meant that the differences in color didn't really matter much at the time. No one noticed.

Ubisoft multiplat games on PS2/GC/Xbox are interesting to look at because they use whatever platform specific strengths were available to the devs, making even the worst looking version of a game(PS2) have some graphical features that the others might not be able to pull off as easily.
 
"Interactive" shit where all it is is watching a fucking digital video. I've seen this most with the advertisements for excercise equipment recently. Does it actually change if you don't follow the prerecorded video? It doesn't show. Seems to just be the streaming version of the old Richard Simmons videos.

Has anybody seen the creepy advertisement of the full body mirror that supposedly watches you as you do exercise? I guess it's called Mirror with a capital "M". Well I think it watches you, it might just count stream shit as "interactive".

I have to admit I'm not an excercise buff, but I thought the reason you got a personal trainer was so they could correct your stance and shit when you did the execises, to minimize the possibility of injury and ensure you're actually exercising the right muscles. Which videos do none of.
 
The other day my sister pulled out some old walkie-talkies that my folks found in an old junk box. Back in the olden days before cell phones, that was how my parents would communicate across the road while they drove different cars.

I began to realize that walkie-talkies are a lot more practical to use than cell phones in certain situations, such as two people driving somewhere in different vehicles. Walkie-talkies don't rely on cell towers or Internet connection for example, so as long as you're in range with the other person you don't have to worry about the call dropping out. Plus you don't have to fiddle around with the walkie-talkie if you need to call back the other person; usually with a cell phone you have to navigate a couple of different screens just to call the person back, and voice control can be fiddly to use, especially if the software has a hard time understanding you. Meanwhile with walkie-talkies, as long as you're on the same frequency you don't have to worry about wasting time with the process of calling the other person; just press a button and bam you're talking again.

Granted, walkie-talkies have their limits, but when it comes to short-distance communications I think they can more useful.
 
The other day my sister pulled out some old walkie-talkies that my folks found in an old junk box. Back in the olden days before cell phones, that was how my parents would communicate across the road while they drove different cars.

I began to realize that walkie-talkies are a lot more practical to use than cell phones in certain situations, such as two people driving somewhere in different vehicles. Walkie-talkies don't rely on cell towers or Internet connection for example, so as long as you're in range with the other person you don't have to worry about the call dropping out. Plus you don't have to fiddle around with the walkie-talkie if you need to call back the other person; usually with a cell phone you have to navigate a couple of different screens just to call the person back, and voice control can be fiddly to use, especially if the software has a hard time understanding you. Meanwhile with walkie-talkies, as long as you're on the same frequency you don't have to worry about wasting time with the process of calling the other person; just press a button and bam you're talking again.

Granted, walkie-talkies have their limits, but when it comes to short-distance communications I think they can more useful.
I was looking in to some walkie-talkies last week, and they now make ones that are blue tooth enabled and can connect to your smart phone for radio control (kind of nifty as the interface on the radio them selves isn't the most intuitive and the documentation is shit...shame on you Motorola), and when connected to the app you can send text messages to others in your party/have the app it doesn't use data/cell but sends it though though the radio.

Then there is a mode (that I assumes uses gps/data on your phone) to give others your location.

Its stupid but at the same time neat, and the SOS/location mode is something I would have never thought of (in terms of some one is able to give rescue your location, your friends could find you if lost, etc).
 
I don't like the tech trend of Netflix et al. adhering to old TV formats for episodes/shows while also promoting "binging" it. They can do something new, change the format of the story telling, make an actual 10-12 hour movie and cut a rolling recap that plays the most recent things when resuming it. You watched up until hour 8 out of 12 and then didn't resume for 13 months? Oh, full recap then to get that person up to speed. Someone stopped watching at hour 8 last night, then go with a light touch and remind the viewer why Greta is holding a knife and Plastic Man is masquerading as a fridge, skippable of course. They could actually create something that would be hard to pirate and make people subscribe to their service to get that experience, 3D in cinemas obviously isn't it and streaming have that opportunity to do SOMETHING.
 
Last edited:
In regards to the automotive industry's growing obsessions with electronics and touchscreens, I don't like how in some cars, controls such as A/C or volume, are now on touchscreens, instead of simple to use knobs and buttons in the past. It's a headache waiting to happen when the touchscreen inevitably fails, not to mention it being a hazard due to needing to pay more attention to adjust your A/C settings with a touchscreen. And touchpad controls, i.e. on Lexus's cars, are even worse in this regard.

I'm also not a fan of screens to display the speedometer and tachometer, compared to the trusty gauges of past cars.

The pouplarity of touchscreen HVAC controls has somewhat dialed back since its peak in 2013. The logic manufacturers went through boils down to two key points:

1. They could save money on soucring, assembling, and installing physical HVAC buttons, instead opting to lump them all into the existing touchscreen.
2. It was the style at the time.

Everyone once thought the glass-cockpit car interior was super slick, so intereiors were designed to meet that demand. It looks nice on promo shots that will draw people in, but now consumers realized that actually drilling down through on-screen menus just for defrost WILE DRIVING is an enormous dick chafe. To the manufacturers' credit, they recently picked up on this and gave you the HVAC basics (where do you want it? how hot do you want it? and how much do you want?) on physical buttons. Camaros in particular have a neat thing where the temperature dial is set into the bezel of the vent itself.


Now with all that being said, what really fucks me up about cars is how manufacturers deliberately fuck with maintainability by slowly including parts that are not serviceable by the owner. Tesla is probably the most severe offender seeing as how they go out of their way to seal off every part of the fucking car with glue, or use wild ass DRM measures to "marry" a digital screen to the car so it cannot be replaced by anyone else but the dealership. They're the Apple of the car world. Fuck 'em.

Even domestic brands are getting in on this with non-serviceable transmissions. What does this mean? Basically the manual tells you that the entire transmission is "sealed", and should last throughout the lifetime of the car. How long is that lifetime? 90k? 150k? fuck knows! You can't even run a dipstick into the tranny to check the fluid for levels and discoloration, which will give you important information that it will grenade soon.

I like to work on my own cars, so I dont generally like a lot of tech in them. Right now, its kind of a pain, but I can tolerate it. I can see my breaking point being hit as manufacturers keep tryin to fuck people like me over, and also as the sum of the parts becomes "the internet of things" within the vehicle.
 
I don't like the tech trend of Netflix et al. adhering to old TV formats for episodes/shows while also promoting "binging" it. They can do something new, change the format of the story telling, make an actual 10-12 hour movie and cut a rolling recap that plays the most recent things when resuming it. You watched up until hour 8 out of 12 and then didn't resume for 13 months? Oh, full recap then to get that person up to speed. Someone stopped watching at hour 8 last night, then go with a light touch and remind the viewer why Greta is holding a knife and Plastic Man is masquerading as a fridge, skippable of course. They could actually create something that would be hard to pirate and make people subscribe to their service to get that experience, 3D in cinemas obviously isn't it and streaming have that opportunity to do SOMETHING.
Yeah if you're gonna make a Zack Snyder double-feature with no break in between that lets you resume at specific hours you might as well divide it into episodes. What you're proposing would be considered a novelty that never took off like the Nintendo Virtual Boy. And probably would be pirated anyway just so it can be cut up into episodes.

(No one's pirating shit themselves if it isn't convenient for them to, they wait for someone else to put it up on youtube and strike while the iron's hot)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: stupidpieceofshit
I miss;
  • Utilitarian design on smartphones (such as the notification LED)
  • Phones that didn't need charging every/every other day
  • Physical media being the standard (actual ownership of digital media)
I hate;
  • Anything related to streaming media (spotify, etc.)
  • Websites (and software in general) being so fucking slow and resource consuming
  • The design philosophy of "less ports = better"
 
I miss my old school Motorola RAZR. There, I said it.
It had a nice form factor that fit into the pocket well, had decent call quality, and contrary to what others seem to have experienced mine survived several accidental drops without ill effect. I'd still be using one today if I could get it on my network, and would happily sacrifice mobile internet browsing for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
I miss all pre-cd tech. CDs are so flimsy and easily damaged, and the repair gadgets never can fully restore them. VHS, cassette tapes, floppy discs, video game cartridges, all sturdy and reliable technology.
A great compromise was the original PSP discs, which had badass little cases around a mini cd.
Universal_Media_Disc,_an_optical_disc_medium_developed_by_Sony_for_use_on_the_PlayStation_Port...jpg


Nowadays tech just feels so fucking flimsy, a lot of it breaks with the slightest mishandling. I remember dropping my SNES down a flight of stairs onto concrete and it wasn't even phased. Do that with a modern console and it's probably fucking dead.
 
I miss all pre-cd tech. CDs are so flimsy and easily damaged, and the repair gadgets never can fully restore them. VHS, cassette tapes, floppy discs, video game cartridges, all sturdy and reliable technology.
A great compromise was the original PSP discs, which had badass little cases around a mini cd.
View attachment 1760308

Nowadays tech just feels so fucking flimsy, a lot of it breaks with the slightest mishandling. I remember dropping my SNES down a flight of stairs onto concrete and it wasn't even phased. Do that with a modern console and it's probably fucking dead.
older computers would legit have "drop computer 2 to 3 feet" (e.g. Mac III, hard drives from the 90s, other older computers) instructions (well maybe not the HDD but it fixed a common issue).
 
I miss all pre-cd tech. CDs are so flimsy and easily damaged, and the repair gadgets never can fully restore them. VHS, cassette tapes, floppy discs, video game cartridges, all sturdy and reliable technology.
A great compromise was the original PSP discs, which had badass little cases around a mini cd.
View attachment 1760308

Nowadays tech just feels so fucking flimsy, a lot of it breaks with the slightest mishandling. I remember dropping my SNES down a flight of stairs onto concrete and it wasn't even phased. Do that with a modern console and it's probably fucking dead.
Lool what world did you live in where VHS was more reliable than DVD.
 
Lool what world did you live in where VHS was more reliable than DVD.
A world where solid plastic cases have ensured the survival of millions of VHS tapes for decades while a single good scratch can make a DVD unwatchable garbage.
Imagine DVDs in cases similar to those little PSP game cases. They'd be fucking glorious because you'd have the superior tech mixed with the superior protective design.
 
Back