Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

Modern pop music is so sterile and I like the imperfections of older and more "rustically" produced music where one chorus is a bit better than the other one beause the vocal line haven't been copy-pasted across the song to make it perfect. There's also some songs that I prefer as the crusty 96kbps/22khz MP3 version that I downloaded in the 90's, some songs benefit from that crunch.

And there's live versions, something like the live version of Cantara by Dead Can Dance is just phenomenal because it's a bit raw and Gerrard's voice breaks boundaries. I don't follow pop-music but have someone like Nicki Minaj ever released a live album? I suspect that they haven't, not a real one at least.

Get some classical music recordings.

Firstly, classical music is usually recorded in a big ol' concert hall which is designed from the ground up to have music played in it.

Secondly, classical music is usually recorded in a single go. In fact, more often than not it's a live recording which means that it will sound slightly imperfect inasmuch as it won't be exactly what the composer put down on the page but will have all the musicians put in their take on the "personality" of the piece.

Thirdly, D Y N A M I C S. Have a listen to this. It's one of my favourite classical pieces and it has parts that go from pp to FFFF in a few bars. Yet you can hear all the texture and timbre of the pianissimo bits and the FUCKING FORTISSISSIMO bits don't brickwall your speakers. Why is this? No loudness war. No autotune. Who cares if the third viola is slightly off key? It adds personality to the work and allows you to pick out each instrument.

I recently came into possession of a double cassette tape recording of Wagner's "Die Fliegende Hollaender," conducted by Karl Boehm, from 1975. Granted, it may be just the start of three days of opera with no word for "fluffy," but it feels like actual music to be actively listened to, not background noise. You can even if you turn it right up hear the orchestra coughing and shifting in their seats between movements.
 
NewPipe I praise for not relying on google account service packages is now getting raped up its ass with recaptcha, so every now and then I have to fuck up 3-4 times with picture selection before accessing ONE VIDEO like everyone else has to through the official app.

Fuck google and fuck recaptcha.
 
NewPipe I praise for not relying on google account service packages is now getting raped up its ass with recaptcha, so every now and then I have to fuck up 3-4 times with picture selection before accessing ONE VIDEO like everyone else has to through the official app.

Fuck google and fuck recaptcha.
Are you using a VPN? I've found that when I use Newpipe without a VPN I never have to fill the captcha out. Otherwise, yeah fuck recaptcha.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
In search engines, I like using the up and down keys to go to the beginning or end of what I'm typing to change stuff. So I hate it when JavaShit changes it so up and down cycle through "suggested searches".

Did I mention I really don't like JavaShit bullshit? Why are Current Year web developers so obsessed with replacing perfectly functional plain HTML with it?
 
Maybe it isn't directly comparable, but modern bluetooth speakers perhaps are a better comparator. They always sound both fuzzy because bluetooth and strained as well. Also, built in Li-ion batteries. Once those are expired, it's all ogre. You can't easily replace the battery because it's a sealed unit. Granted you could plug it in but that precludes the portability of the unit. While with an old boombox (or a Walkman for that matter - and yes, there are original Sony Walkmans from 1979 that are still going today) you just insert a fresh sheaf of alkaline batteries and off you go. Or if you have rechargeables put those on the charger and insert your other set.

Either way, it all dovetails with my point about the throwaway nature of modern tech and society in general. Like you say, your iPhone is designed to make repair difficult. And we know that this is intentional because Apple got in hot water for retrospectively bricking all iPhones that were repaired by people other than them - which is low. I mean, I can accept that it might void the warranty to do that but bricking them out of spite? That's low. Those bluetooth earbuds? What happens to those when the Li-Ion batteries wear out? Fancy fixing those? Not gonna happen.

Alan Sugar (yes, that one) made his first successes in the 1970s selling hi-fis. He had a phrase to describe his products - the Mug's Eyeful. Basically, in the 70s the hi-fi system of choice was a big ol' stacker. You had your amp, your speakers, your tape deck, your reel to reel deck if you were into that sort of thing, your radio, and your turntable, and they were all designed to be in flat metal cases so you could pile them up and with standard plugs on the back. They sounded pretty nice and used quality components. They were expensive, but if you were at all serious about listening to music in general and not in just a wanky audiophile kind of way, they were sought after. For the more budget oriented listener there were all in one systems, like say a battery turntable, a tape and radio receiver, and suchlike. However they looked (and were) cheap, but if you were on a budget or undiscerning they were good enough. Alan Sugar's innovation, such as it was, was to make an all in one hi-fi with a turntable on the top, a twin tape deck in the middle, a radio and amp on the bottom, and two speakers thrown in, but styled to look like it was separate components all stacked up. So you had a cheap and not particularly nice sounding system, but to the untrained eye and ear it looked like you had a proper stacker hi-fi. That is the Mug's Eyeful - to a mug, it looks more impressive than it is.

Those modern Crosley Cruiser turntables that all the teenagers seem to like are a mug's eyeful. Techmoan did a video about how he imported the mechanism for it from China for ten quid. But one of those Crosleys costs seventy or eighty quid. They cost probably almost nothing make (economies of scale, using cheapshit turntable mechs and speakers and a few feet of thin gauge wiring, then podge them into a cheap looking briefcase and off you go) but are sold for way more than that. And most of the cost of manufacture is the styling. Like I said, the Mug's Eyeful.

The same applies to clothes for this matter. Marks & Spencer here in the UK used to be middle of the road clobber that was solid and well made. The suit I wore to my first job interview for a training contract was a pinstripe from M&S (I got the job, if you must know) and it lasted for three to four years. But replacement M&S suits have been shit. The fabric is like tissue paper. And they still cost the same as they used to, but they look sharp and fashionable.

I cannot afford a Savile Row jobbie, much as I'd like to (when the coof is over and we've got more money coming in I am going to save up for one) so I go to a local menswear shop near me. I spend about two to three times as much as I would on an M&S suit. It isn't quite as sharp looking or trendy and they don't have impeccably groomed male models in the posters showing it off. But it's tough and hardwearing and feels robust. Once again, the Mug's Eyeful.

Sites like Wish and Ali Express trade almost exclusively on the Mug's Eyeful.
Ohh yes. Many menswear brands in the USA have turned to trash in the last 2-3 decades and still cost as much or more than their previously high quality offerings. See Cole Haan and Johnson and Murphy shoes, Sperry's not called "Gold cup", LL Bean anything, ect.

For men's suits..... There are a few MTO online places that set you up with a local tailor and you're getting a good quality suit tailored to you for less than $1k.

I loved the Shuffle, once they updated the software. Built-in USB so you don't have to carry any cables, extremely lightweight, and decent audio quality. I never used it in "random songs from your library" mode, just kept it loaded with specific tracks for work or working out. You could drop it in any pocket and never feel it there until you wanted it.

It's probably been said here before, but that's a trend I really hate: we spent decades going for miniaturization on consumer tech like phones and audio players, reached some kind of peak... and then the companies gave up on tiny and switched to making everything bigger again. Yeah, phones are thinner than ever, but they're also massive slabs that feel bulky in my pocket and require 2 hands to navigate across the entire screen.

The wearables and IoT trends are transparent bullshit; companies trying to get back into miniaturization, but not their flagship, full-featured tech. Instead we get gimped single-purpose knick knacks, or privacy-destroying trackers, or 50 iterations on a basic bitch pedometer whose only difference is which app it connects to.

And all these gadgets still require you to carry a phone to connect and do the real work anyway.

Look, either give me my Dick Tracy self-contained wristwatch phone, or admit you can't innovate. Don't give me this Bluetooth enabled bullshit whose main draw is "you don't have to reach into your pocket to answer the phone now!" If you can't get a cell radio into a wristwatch without giving me cancer, then stop doing launch events pitching lazy crap until you figure it out.

While I'm on it, laptops appear super thin now, but they haven't made real laptops that thin, just some sealed case ultra-fragile toys with more style than computing power. Thermal throttling is a failure of computing design. And they're all 15-17 inch anyway, instead of giving me a paper-thin 11" foldable I can drop in a portfolio, yet still handle serious computing/rendering tasks.

I'm not asking for flying cars and hoverboards, I just want tech that makes my job and my life easier, instead of tech that wants to be the center of attention.
Some modern 14 inch laptops from some brands still allow RAM, HDD, Wlan card, and battery replacement pretty easily.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
perhaps it's a glitch but it did this to me with a VPN complaining of "high traffic"
That's what happens to me sometimes. It's probably an antispam tool by Youtube, and gets triggered from dozens of other people using the same server for Youtube. Just turn off the VPN or change the server and reset the app and it should work fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Some modern 14 inch laptops from some brands still allow RAM, HDD, Wlan card, and battery replacement pretty easily.

Even some laptops that claim that you can replace parts still make it a pain in the ass, like last time I went laptop shopping one I was looking at turns out to replace the HDD/SSD you had to take out the motherboard and flip it over...the fuck.

Then you have others like the no name brand I got (Eluktrotincs) came with a physical manual showing you the motherboard layout and how to access everything.
 
Pretty much any new “truly wireless” earbuds.

I remember buying a pair of nice-looking Bose Sports earbuds. I turn them on and my phone tells me I have to download an app for them to function. Retarded but whatever. Download the app, sign up for a Bose account, pair my earbuds with the account. Leave them charging for 3 hours. Take them out, start using them, super uncomfortable. I try on all three fits and all of them suck. I leave the best one on, but even that gets annoying after an hour of use and keeps falling off. Then I listen to some music, and the quality is worse than my last pair of wireless earbuds that I bought at fucking Walgreens: a $30 pair of SkullCandy’s. Decide it’s all in my head and leave them on. 2 hours later, they’re out of battery.

Keep on with 2 months of unreliable, uncomfortable, shitty sounding earbuds until I lose one of them. Decide “fuck it”, take a trip to my local pharmacy and buy the same $30 pair of SkullCandy’s. I listen to some music and the difference in sound was like popping your ears after landing during a plane ride. At least 10x better than my last pair that sounded like it was being transmitted through fucking HAM radio.

The best part? Bose earbuds were nearly seven times as expensive. Fuck that noise.
 
That, and because most modern popular / semi-popular music is made to be consoomed by mindless normies. They don't actually listen to it. It's all just background noise to them. That, and social media has crabbed everyone's attention span so much that songs with dynamics in them are "boring."
Part of the appeal for dynamic music to me is the ability to choose parts of a song to have as "favorites". While I know that a lot of video game tracks are designed to be short and repeat frequently, they often have dynamics with in them to keep the listener engaged. Vaal Hazak's theme from MHW is a perfect example of this. It's mostly an ominous piece dominated by harpsichord, brass, and strings but there's a bridge where the percussion and brass drop out to leave only harpsichord and strings to create an almost mournful respite before the track swells in intensity again. This little 2 minute loop has so much more going on in it than most pop music around today.



Another example is Dancing Mad. There's something like 3 or 4 movements in the theme that match the phases of the fight. Aside from repetition to facilitate gameplay, no two parts are the same save for Kefka's leitmotif.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
I have a few old industrial computers lying around from work back in the day. Nice machines, have entire 486 and Pentium class machines on something the size of an average ISA card. A lot of overclocking those days was FSB-based and you can overclock them quite aggressively, CPU permitting. Always wanted to build the tiniest retro PC with these parts but I have too many projects already. Smallest one I have is a Cyrix MediaGX based one. It has sound, networking and graphics included on the same board as these functions were integrated in the SoC/Companion chip. HDD goes into a CF-Card slot. Everything on a PCB that fits into a 3,5" drive bay. The PCBs of these are often very thick with many layers to get all the routing into such a small space, there's usually not a mm² wasted. Great engineering.


I said it before here but I went back all the way from 4k to 1280x1024 and didn't regret it. If you customize your desktop environment heavily yourself and use bitmap fonts there's nothing sharper and nicer even for long text-based sessions. The Resolution also allows media watching at "720p" (1280x720) which is good enough really. Gaming is good too although a few games just don't support anything that isn't 16:9 and only run at 720p. The most pleasant surprise on this resolution was less wasted space, both on the desk and on the desktop. I wouldn't bother with old 1280x1024 as they don't have nice panels but a few manufactures like Eizo and Dell make new ones with very nice IPS panels that are just as good as your normal mid-range widescreen and come with modern features like LED backlight and light sensors. They're expensive new but if you know what to look for you can often pick them up for like, 20 bucks on eBay. If you're some kind of rich guy, eizo also offers a true 1:1 aspect 1920x1920 screen.
I had a 1600x1200 dell IPS display as a teenager, and every display I have used since then has felt like a massive downgrade. My current 1200p is pretty good, I cant STAND 16:9 monitors. Some days I'm tempted to go back to ebay and find another working 1600x1200 and hold onto it forever.
Pretty much any new “truly wireless” earbuds.

I remember buying a pair of nice-looking Bose Sports earbuds. I turn them on and my phone tells me I have to download an app for them to function. Retarded but whatever. Download the app, sign up for a Bose account, pair my earbuds with the account. Leave them charging for 3 hours. Take them out, start using them, super uncomfortable. I try on all three fits and all of them suck. I leave the best one on, but even that gets annoying after an hour of use and keeps falling off. Then I listen to some music, and the quality is worse than my last pair of wireless earbuds that I bought at fucking Walgreens: a $30 pair of SkullCandy’s. Decide it’s all in my head and leave them on. 2 hours later, they’re out of battery.

Keep on with 2 months of unreliable, uncomfortable, shitty sounding earbuds until I lose one of them. Decide “fuck it”, take a trip to my local pharmacy and buy the same $30 pair of SkullCandy’s. I listen to some music and the difference in sound was like popping your ears after landing during a plane ride. At least 10x better than my last pair that sounded like it was being transmitted through fucking HAM radio.

The best part? Bose earbuds were nearly seven times as expensive. Fuck that noise.
Bose has been a shit brand as long as I can remember. If you are spending bose level money, fuck it, get some Sennheiser muffs.
 
Having to hand over your email, name, phone number and blood type to 60% of websites these days still horrifies me as someone who remembers when you weren’t supposed to just give that shit out to everyone who asks for it on the internet.
I hate that and the fact department stores expect cashiers to collect personal information or convince a certain quota of shoppers to apply for a store-branded credit card and use their "success" rate as a job performance metric.

I used to be a member of so many forums back in the day, even moderated one as a kid, and next to none of them exist now.
Forums were a good place to discuss anything from a niche topic to general stuff and everything in between. With the rise in spam, malware exploits, and a general lack of interest in maintaining them, forums and interest in them waned rather quickly once social media became a thing.
 
I had a 1600x1200 dell IPS display as a teenager, and every display I have used since then has felt like a massive downgrade. My current 1200p is pretty good, I cant STAND 16:9 monitors. Some days I'm tempted to go back to ebay and find another working 1600x1200 and hold onto it forever.

Bose has been a shit brand as long as I can remember. If you are spending bose level money, fuck it, get some Sennheiser muffs.
Bose does have one good product, the noise cancelling headphones for airplane Passengers. My Dad flies dozens of times a year and sweets by them.
 
With the rise in spam, malware exploits, and a general lack of interest in maintaining them, forums and interest in them waned rather quickly once social media became a thing.
This pisses me of when people cry about a lack of law enforcement on the internet.
You got millions of hijacked computers spamming and DDoSing the shit out of everything, even running straight up protection rackets. This and many other sites wouldn't even be possible without CloudFlare, creating a single point of failure.

But what do people focus on? This guy was mean to me on the internet! They posted my publicly available information! These people campaign for the wrong president!
 
This pisses me of when people cry about a lack of law enforcement on the internet
Continuing to talk about forums, the big downfall of many of the early ones were the ones that allowed posts to contain any and all HTML markup codes. Bad actors used that as a way to spread viruses or post hyperlinks leading to malware or other undesirable content. One on occasion, someone's personal site was potentially compromised as it constantly tried to push a download for custom cursors that were notorious for containing spyware.

But what do people focus on? This guy was mean to me on the internet! They posted my publicly available information! These people campaign for the wrong president!
It's ironic to see people powerleveling the heck out of their private lives on the internet and then complain when someone else reacts to or otherwise does something in response to what was posted for all to see. It's as if the idea of not posting what they don't want others to see, react to, or redistribute is a totally foreign concept all the while they redefine what counts as bullying and harassment in an effort to gain sympathy or a personal army to come to their rescue.
 
The reveal of the new interior for the Tesla Model S and X just added more fuel to the fire towards my dislike of the "minimalistic" car interior designs that are becoming more and more common. Just look at this:

new-tesla-model-s-x-102-1611788803.jpg


-The steering wheel, while some may like it because it reminds them of control yokes in planes, and steering wheels in racing cars, looks inconvenient to use, if you actually want to park the car.

-They removed the gear shifter completely, and functionality for PRND is supposed to be automated through sensors detecting objects in the area, but you can change it on the screen. As if gearshift knobs and pushbutton gearshifts weren't already bad enough...

-I don't seem to see a button to start the car, so I'd assume that functionality would be through the touchscreen. Which again, will be a pain once you have to replace it when it fails, since most of the car's functionality is done with it.

-At least they kept the driver's side HUD though, unlike how the Model 3 and Y don't even have one.

Speaking of which, I also don't like how auto makers are pushing for capacitive touch controls, which lack physical feedback when you use them, instead of putting actual buttons and knobs.
 
Last edited:
The reveal of the new interior for the Tesla Model S and X just added more fuel to the fire towards my dislike of the "minimalistic" car interior designs that are becoming more and more common. Just look at this:

View attachment 1881863

-The steering wheel, while some may like it because it reminds them of control yokes in planes, and steering wheels in racing cars, looks inconvenient to use, if you actually want to park the car.

-They removed the gear shifter completely, and functionality for PRND is supposed to be automated through sensors detecting objects in the area, but you can change it on the screen. As if gearshift knobs and pushbutton gearshifts weren't already bad enough...

-I don't seem to see a button to start the car, so I'd assume that functionality would be through the touchscreen. Which again, will be a pain once you have to replace it when it fails, since most of the car's functionality is done with it.

-At least they kept the driver's side HUD though, unlike how the Model 3 and Y don't even have one.

Speaking of which, I also don't like how auto makers are pushing for capacitive touch controls, which lack physical feedback when you use them, instead of putting actual buttons and knobs.

There is a reason behind all these things. I've said before how we live in a throwaway society and that applies to cars as well. For instance, engines are increasingly sealed units that you just swap out when they die off and are difficult (deliberately) to repair so BMW or GM or VW or Tesla or whoever can sell you a whole new one.

That centre console goes wonky? Got to buy a whole new one. Oh dear, and it just happens that only Tesla sells them directly at an artificially inflated price.

Basically, Tesla are trying to bring Apple style walled garden / vertical integration into the automotive space. Which reminds me. If Apple ever makes an iCar as they've been threatening to do for some years, IT'S A TRAP! Don't buy it. They will rinse you for the cost of parts that require their proprietary tools and gear to fit or remove, and will probably have software that bricks the whole care if it detects anyone's tried to fix things on it manually, like they do with iPhones. Also, your driving and location data will be surreptitiously harvested and sold to governmental bodies.
 
Speaking of which, I also don't like how auto makers are pushing for capacitive touch controls, which lack physical feedback when you use them, instead of putting actual buttons and knobs.
Dude, if you put tablets everywhere it makes it super high-tech!

Have you seen the SpaceX shuttle? Everything has big flat touch panels and even the EVA suit has a little touch screen.
No simply sturdy controls anywhere.
It makes me nervous just looking at its cockpit. One shock and the whole thing splinters apart.
 
Dude, if you put tablets everywhere it makes it super high-tech!

Have you seen the SpaceX shuttle? Everything has big flat touch panels and even the EVA suit has a little touch screen.
No simply sturdy controls anywhere.
It makes me nervous just looking at its cockpit. One shock and the whole thing splinters apart.

I suspect, or rather hope, in such case there are physical backup controls for emergencies. In aviation you have to have redundant systems for everything; I'd expect that to go double for space flight.
 
The reveal of the new interior for the Tesla Model S and X just added more fuel to the fire towards my dislike of the "minimalistic" car interior designs that are becoming more and more common. Just look at this:

View attachment 1881863

-The steering wheel, while some may like it because it reminds them of control yokes in planes, and steering wheels in racing cars, looks inconvenient to use, if you actually want to park the car.

-They removed the gear shifter completely, and functionality for PRND is supposed to be automated through sensors detecting objects in the area, but you can change it on the screen. As if gearshift knobs and pushbutton gearshifts weren't already bad enough...

-I don't seem to see a button to start the car, so I'd assume that functionality would be through the touchscreen. Which again, will be a pain once you have to replace it when it fails, since most of the car's functionality is done with it.

-At least they kept the driver's side HUD though, unlike how the Model 3 and Y don't even have one.

Speaking of which, I also don't like how auto makers are pushing for capacitive touch controls, which lack physical feedback when you use them, instead of putting actual buttons and knobs.
It doesn't have a turn signal stalk. The turn signals are capacitive touch buttons on the steering wheel. And they're both on one side of the yoke........................................................................

Also, it doesn't have a cruise control stalk. Apparently you have to use the touch screen? Amazing.

Honestly, I could see the yoke being alright, if Tesla is moving to steer-by-wire in the Model S, which they had been suggesting that they would for a while. That would eliminate issues parking- even if you don't use autopark- by allowing the amplification of steering wheel inputs at low speeds especially very low speeds.

The turn signals, though? Absolutely insane. You might as well change to just have the car decide to put turn signals on based on where the driver is looking.
 
Back