TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.

[Dan of Steel]

Update
Was surprised saw from LUZ.
REDDIT HAS LOST
View attachment 8933256

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.456742/gov.uscourts.cand.456742.45.0.pdf

View attachment 8933233
.....
torture dance
View attachment 8933240

ONCE AGAIN, WITH JEWS, YOU WIN.

 

[Rudolf's Friend]

My thoughts on this specific news:

 

[anliteralidiot]

They're whining about the mega thread, but unable to accept that having a thread pointing at alternative sources to watch the nuke was the reason this happened. Suffah, snarkers!

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Man, Ethan putting himself on the line for this lawsuit is literally the greatest sacrifice a jew has ever made for mankind.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

I'm hoping their shit lawyer turns out to be one of the mods. Everything would make a lot more sense if that's the case.

 

[kcbbq]

I'm hoping their shit lawyer turns out to be one of the mods. Everything would make a lot more sense if that's the case.

Maybe they'll 41% themselves.

 

[HackerX]

Snark has a thread started, and I see some seething.
View attachment 8933374View attachment 8933374

Jesus Christ. "So now this post we made explicitly to infringe someone's copyright is enough to cause us to get sued for infringing someone's copyright?"

Also, there's deep deep irony in the "gotta love how shortsighted all of this is" comment. Like, Jesus Christ. You'd think they'd have picked up on what that means with how forward thinking H3H3 was when he registered the copyright to his video.

 

[Irene and 22 others]

The court spells out how badly they all fucked up. The citation to Urban Dictionary to define what "hatewatching" means is pretty funny, as is the footnote pointing out that the court occasionally uses Urban Dictionary to define slang words.



Reddit is going to throw all of these idiots under the bus and it's going to be amazing.

 

[Harm]

Best part:




They've been legally deemed "hatewatchers" who "cannot stop watching." Lol. Lmao even.

 

[Ralph's Unfinished Church]

How are the snark and Hassan reddits taking it?

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftoversH3/comments/1szfqnd/motion_to_quash_the_subpoenas_has_been_denied/

Not well, but in their stoic and high empathy snarky way where they pretend they're totally unbothered and this is actually a self own from H3 and their wine aunt fanbase

Here's an archive of the thread so far in case their mods delete it

 

[Vect]

They've been legally deemed "hatewatchers" who "cannot stop watching."

This is what you get for being terminally online about a guy because he happened to be on the wrong side for the day. There is now legal precedent for being an absolute loser who does nothing but watch somebody you don't enjoy (clippers excepted of course).

 

[AirMail]

To my layman mind, not wanting to give views to the original creator is quite valid. The new source for "hate watching" is for a distinctly audience, separate from the original source for what you may call "support watching", and does not infringe on the original market share.

This is what I was given to understand by the Sargon case. Merely repackaging content for an opposite audience is enough not violate copyright.

 

[PatrickButtmanJr.]

https://old.reddit.com/r/h3h3productions/comments/1szdmde/ethan_wins_against_the_h3_snark_mods_their_motion/oj0yj7f/

Apparently this means the mods will now have to be unmasked by reddit and discord so they can be served. TOTAL JANNY DEATH!

I CANNOT WAIT for all the "hostage videos" that all the faggots involved will have to make to Ethan.

Lew Jewthor never misses!

 

[Vect]

Merely repackaging content for an opposite audience is enough not violate copyright.

They didn't repackage it. The Reddit mods advertised these streams and said 'watch it here so you don't give the Jew any views'. And these streams were hosted by complete airheads (one of them high off their face) who sat there, let it play and said nothing except 'watch it here so you don't give the Jew any views'.

'Merely repackaging content' would have indeed been so easy, but that was beyond the ability of these idiots, because the ONLY goal they had was to harm Ethan Klein because he happened to be Jewish, which suddenly became a crime because they ran out of people they could pretend were genociding them or something,

That's all these cretins do, is sit online in one of the safest countries in the world and pretend their heads are being kicked into the sand.

 

[AnOminous]

Fucking redditors man.

Redditors have been given the delusional belief that they can act with utter impunity and that reality doesn't apply to them. They are being taught they are wrong.

 

[anliteralidiot]

Redditors have been given the delusional belief that they can act with utter impunity and that reality doesn't apply to them. They are being taught they are wrong.

And it is hilarious.

 

[Irene and 22 others]

To my layman mind, not wanting to give views to the original creator is quite valid. The new source for "hate watching" is for a distinctly audience, separate from the original source for what you may call "support watching", and does not infringe on the original market share.

This is what I was given to understand by the Sargon case. Merely repackaging content for an opposite audience is enough not violate copyright.

That grossly oversimplifies the Sargon case. He heavily edited the original content to produce his critique. His modifications served to mock Akilah and her political views, which was an important aspect of his defense among other factors. The court also looked down on Akilah publicly stating that she was suing Sargon to financially damage him, which was part of the reason he wound up getting costs awarded to him as well.

This case is an entirely different animal.

Redditors have been given the delusional belief that they can act with utter impunity and that reality doesn't apply to them. They are being taught they are wrong.

Teaching implies a capacity in the recipient of the lesson to learn. These Redditors are being hit with a legal stick and are incapable of understanding why it happened. Expect them to post explanations involving such manifest unfairness, conspiratorial notions, or thoughts so untethered from reality that they seem like something Russell Greer would write. Their behavior won't change one bit.

 

[Vibralldo]

Redditors think they're the "good guys" and that anyone they oppose is the "bad guy" and that they can do anything to the "bad guy" without limits. They've usually never received pushback for their sociopathy so they just think it's ok.

 

[Big Fucking Rat]

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftoversH3/comments/1szfqnd/motion_to_quash_the_subpoenas_has_been_denied/

Fungi? Man, they're such fags even when giving nicknames.

 

[Ralph's Unfinished Church]

To my layman mind, not wanting to give views to the original creator is quite valid. The new source for "hate watching" is for a distinctly audience, separate from the original source for what you may call "support watching", and does not infringe on the original market share.

This might be correct under normal copyright law (IANAL, and also I'm not a copyright attorney) but as I understand it Lex Jewthor registered the Content Nuke under the Library of Congress, which is such a lengthy process it delayed the release of the video by a number of weeks. However the LoC registration grants you extended powers under copyright law, so the bar for what would be considered transformative is much higher. The lengthy and deliberate (and probably expensive if you need to pay someone to file it on your behalf) process of submitting it to the LoC also acts as a practical barrier to these laws applying for your garden variety video or stream, so your average stream sniper, clipper or archiver wouldn't be harmed by these powers.