Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

Nothing like radfem crazy.

Screenshot_20211209-024952_Chrome.jpg
Lol, so salty. "How dare you not think of me as a perfect angel!" And lol, has this person ever actually looked at any portraits? All the ones I've seen depict people as they are, not as they want to be.

Screenshot_20211209-025124_Chrome.jpg
"My porn is not like your porn!" Shit ton of those bodice rippers with all those themes.

Screenshot_20211209-025137_Chrome.jpg
Stories where a man carries off a woman and rapes her is pretty on par with a modern porn video. Of course we can't have any of that. Otherwise we would have to admit women aren't innocent little angels.
 
i think that people cant call themselves a feminist if they support a person who is recently trans-identified since 2014 trying to silence and destroy the lives of women who spent 2-3 decades proving themselves with their ingenuity and/or talents.

just because theese womens disagreed on certain opinions.


needless to say im not saying that this is to defend the entire TERF community since there are some batshit insane women out there
but y'know... Rosie Kay and J.K Rowling deserved better.

especially with almost monthly doxxing of J.K Rowling by trans-activists who want to make sure she feels like they can break in at any moment and end her life.
 
Why the fuck is a terf complaining about "leftist men"? Terfism is inherently leftist. It'd be like if a Maoist was complaining about "leftists". Do they only want women involved in politics? Or is this like a Freudian slip where they secretly seek a man that says "nigger" all the time?
Their a trans exclusionary radical feminist. Them bitching about any man is pretty on brand.

They have a saying that goes to the effect of "rightist men want women to be private property, leftist men want women to be public property."

They gonna bitch just to bitch.
 
Last edited:
Terfism is inherently leftist.
Radical feminism is, but ever since trannies started calling everyone that bothers them a 'terf' a whole lot of centre-right wine moms and alt-right trad thots think that's what they are now.

But that's still probably a left-winger, seething at "allies" for not being good enough allies is something every crybaby left-wing minority has in common.
 
Nothing like radfem crazy.

View attachment 2785837
Lol, so salty. "How dare you not think of me as a perfect angel!" And lol, has this person ever actually looked at any portraits? All the ones I've seen depict people as they are, not as they want to be.

View attachment 2785848
"My porn is not like your porn!" Shit ton of those bodice rippers with all those themes.

View attachment 2785847
Stories where a man carries off a woman and rapes her is pretty on par with a modern porn video. Of course we can't have any of that. Otherwise we would have to admit women aren't innocent little angels.
'Bodice rippers' are indeed different from modern gonzo porn. As the saying goes, those books are fiction. Porn involves real people. Bella Knox was forced to eat her own vomit out of a dog food bowl. She was in tears. That aspect didn't make it into the libfem, pro sex work rhetoric and she makes no media appearances anymore.

As much as I hate it say it, I'd prefer degenerate fanfics over IRL porn. I'll take SFM over it. No real people are trafficked or raped, and you can laugh at shitty fanfics and the mentality of the people who write them.
Why the fuck is a terf complaining about "leftist men"? Terfism is inherently leftist. It'd be like if a Maoist was complaining about "leftists". Do they only want women involved in politics? Or is this like a Freudian slip where they secretly seek a man that says "nigger" all the time?
Seems rather a reach on your part. However criticism of Leftist men is valid. If you ever saw the stone toss panel of the male feminist secretly being a predator, that has been a trend that has been vindicated more than once. Right wing men, such as Nick Fuentes, tend to be more open about their misogyny while guys like Vaush are subtle. Neither will go in the kitchen and ask if their wife needs any help. Neither will approach a respectable woman. They'll act like hypocrites, jack off to catgirl or horse cock porn. and that's that.
 
'Bodice rippers' are indeed different from modern gonzo porn. As the saying goes, those books are fiction. Porn involves real people. Bella Knox was forced to eat her own vomit out of a dog food bowl. She was in tears. That aspect didn't make it into the libfem, pro sex work rhetoric and she makes no media appearances anymore.

As much as I hate it say it, I'd prefer degenerate fanfics over IRL porn. I'll take SFM over it. No real people are trafficked or raped, and you can laugh at shitty fanfics and the mentality of the people who write them.
Fantasy doesn't exist in a vacuum. A lot of those SFM videos (and NSFW art in general) is most likely using real life pornography as reference.

(and yes I am a megacoomer who knows too much about SFM heh heh heh)

also while I'm here here's another men bad post I found funny, I don't have the link to the original thread but I think it was in response to trannies in women's homeless shelters:

men_cursed_reeee.png
 
Last edited:
Fantasy doesn't exist in a vacuum. A lot of those SFM videos (and NSFW art in general) is most likely using real life pornography as reference.

(and yes I am a megacoomer who knows too much about SFM heh heh heh)

also while I'm here here's another men bad post I found funny, I don't have the link to the original thread but I think it was in response to trannies in women's homeless shelters:

View attachment 2795162

It always interests me they presume some inherant comradeship with historical people.
 
'Bodice rippers' are indeed different from modern gonzo porn. As the saying goes, those books are fiction. Porn involves real people.
Anything in a physical medium involves real people. American psycho involves actual people. Nobody is actually being murdered in that movie despite all the blood. Maybe it hits harder emotionally because you can actually see it; instead of seeing it in your mind. Otherwise the content is exactly the same.

Bella Knox was forced to eat her own vomit out of a dog food bowl. She was in tears. That aspect didn't make it into the libfem, pro sex work rhetoric and she makes no media appearances anymore.
🤮🤮🤮

"And then the second they let us in, we consistently outperform them."

They butcher higher education in the name of tolerance and progress. Stack the deck in their favor and then smugly claim their better despite clear evidence to the contrary. I hope this woman doesn't have kids.
 
Last edited:
Fantasy doesn't exist in a vacuum. A lot of those SFM videos (and NSFW art in general) is most likely using real life pornography as reference.

(and yes I am a megacoomer who knows too much about SFM heh heh heh)

also while I'm here here's another men bad post I found funny, I don't have the link to the original thread but I think it was in response to trannies in women's homeless shelters:

View attachment 2795162
At the same time, this argument can be made on how video games cause violence as their likeness is based on real people.

Excluding DeepFakes - which can be considered a crime as you are using real world likenesses of people to make porn of them - character models that may have been inspired by real people are still not real people. Lara Croft has been inspired by multiple IRL actresses, but she still isn't a real person.
Anything in a physical medium involves real people. American psycho involves actual people. Nobody is actually being murdered in that movie despite all the blood. Maybe it hits harder emotionally because you can actually see it; instead of seeing it in your mind. Otherwise the content is exactly the same.


🤮🤮🤮


"And then the second they let us in, we consistently outperform them."

They butcher higher education in the name of tolerance and progress. Stack the deck in their favor and then smugly claim their better despite clear evidence to the contrary. I hope this woman doesn't have kids.
This argument was made for 'violent video games' like DOOM and Manhunt. Those were pixelated people and monsters getting torn apart, yet it 'influenced real world violence'.

One more thing: you let in Jews, with their deceptive social theories like Freud, into universities long before women. Men were already accepting Freudian thinking or debating de Sade before women were even allowed full force into college.
 
Came to laugh at TERF nonsense, found a thread that’s just unironically full of TERF nonsense.

Very meta!
This is my problem with it. It sucks they have no large platform of their own, but I come here to relax and laugh, have fun, sometimes ponder shit. Not to get a lecture on how when the evil troon oppressoor mutilates their genitalia women end up being the victim 100% of the time. Or how Aidens are pwoor wesbian babies that need to be pwotected from misogyny. Or how they (terfs) are so happy that they love being super cool butches with tits. Okay mate, congrats. Now shut up because no one outside your fellow female warriors cares. It sucks out all the fun.
Feminists had platforms like Twitter. They created a noose for everyone they didn't like and as the pool of lynchings shrunk they ended up next in line. They weren't progressive enough for Tumblr any more, they're not progressive enough for Twitter/facebook any more so now they're moving in here where they can be cunty at each other and troons without getting banned. Null doesn't care if they ruin threads, they're increased traffic and that's more interesting to the guy in charge than quality content. There's plenty of threads with the plagued tag because the target of those threads have colonized them through babysitting them. TERFs are doing it now and as Twitter bans more of them they will come here until every thread is plagued.

At the same time, this argument can be made on how video games cause violence as their likeness is based on real people.

Excluding DeepFakes - which can be considered a crime as you are using real world likenesses of people to make porn of them - character models that may have been inspired by real people are still not real people. Lara Croft has been inspired by multiple IRL actresses, but she still isn't a real person.

This argument was made for 'violent video games' like DOOM and Manhunt. Those were pixelated people and monsters getting torn apart, yet it 'influenced real world violence'.

One more thing: you let in Jews, with their deceptive social theories like Freud, into universities long before women. Men were already accepting Freudian thinking or debating de Sade before women were even allowed full force into college.
Media you watch influences your thoughts. If you act on those influences is an entirely different debate but Death Stranding shilling Monster and Sonic Adventure 2 changing Sonic's shoes to a real life pair implies video games do influence people enough it's worth paying for sponsored content in them. If the Slenderman games didn't exist would those two girls have killed their friend over him?

Deepfakes shouldn't be considered a crime unless you think Lara Croft and all modern video game characters rule 34 is a crime. Any 3D game from a large studio is more movie than game now. Everything is mocapped and face scanned.
 
Feminists had platforms like Twitter. They created a noose for everyone they didn't like and as the pool of lynchings shrunk they ended up next in line. They weren't progressive enough for Tumblr any more, they're not progressive enough for Twitter/facebook any more so now they're moving in here where they can be cunty at each other and troons without getting banned. Null doesn't care if they ruin threads, they're increased traffic and that's more interesting to the guy in charge than quality content. There's plenty of threads with the plagued tag because the target of those threads have colonized them through babysitting them. TERFs are doing it now and as Twitter bans more of them they will come here until every thread is plagued.


Media you watch influences your thoughts. If you act on those influences is an entirely different debate but Death Stranding shilling Monster and Sonic Adventure 2 changing Sonic's shoes to a real life pair implies video games do influence people enough it's worth paying for sponsored content in them. If the Slenderman games didn't exist would those two girls have killed their friend over him?

Deepfakes shouldn't be considered a crime unless you think Lara Croft and all modern video game characters rule 34 is a crime. Any 3D game from a large studio is more movie than game now. Everything is mocapped and face scanned.
Once I agreed with this, that the feminists are getting what they deserved. However, they didn't start troonism and the waves of bans and enbies that arose out of tumblr really was something they could not control. Since troonism is mostly male-dominated - whether we like it or not, it's transwomen who dominate the narrative and actually change laws - it did not take them long to butt in and remove any TERF posts. We have seen this with virtually every social media platform. The discussion of women's rights in general no longer involves women, but is 'women plus'.

Reddit by far is the best example of this, where every female-centric sub becomes male over time. Libfems, more so than TERFs, are responsible, as their need to be submissive and agreeable caused this.

Now, in regards to the Slenderman thing. If we are going to argue that all sorts of media leads to that sort of thing, how many prostitutes were murdered because of GTA? How many gang wars did Carl Johnson start?

As a matter of fact, Gail Dines - author of Porn Land - once said that GTA normalizes the abuse of prostitutes because you can buy their services and run them over afterwards. Let's not forget the legendary 'virtual rape'.


Feminists drummed that up, too, despite never playing those games. Yes, media can change your thoughts. Yet has HALO influenced people as much as, say, government propaganda has?
 
Once I agreed with this, that the feminists are getting what they deserved. However, they didn't start troonism and the waves of bans and enbies that arose out of tumblr really was something they could not control.
Feminists deconstructed biological differences and societal expectations on men and women. In doing so they enabled trannies to use the same feminist power structure to subvert things even further. Feminists have never stopped the snowball rolling once they start it, every time they achieved their goals the next most radical element picked it up and pushed it further down the slope. All the legal resources and organizations from last generation now carries on rolling making a huge profit off of it and deconstructing even more of society.

Feminists caused trannies. End of story.
 
Feminists deconstructed biological differences and societal expectations on men and women. In doing so they enabled trannies to use the same feminist power structure to subvert things even further. Feminists have never stopped the snowball rolling once they start it, every time they achieved their goals the next most radical element picked it up and pushed it further down the slope. All the legal resources and organizations from last generation now carries on rolling making a huge profit off of it and deconstructing even more of society.

Feminists caused trannies. End of story.
Objectively this is wrong. Trannies came from Magnus Hirschfeld and Kraft-Ebbing before him. A feminist didn't start the Sexual Institute, a Jew did. Gender theory largely came from men like Foucault and Freud.

Radfems may lie about a lot of things but troons didn't start with them. Men were cross dressing as women and getting their dicks inverted before women could even own credit cards.
 
Objectively this is wrong. Trannies came from Magnus Hirschfeld and Kraft-Ebbing before him. A feminist didn't start the Sexual Institute, a Jew did. Gender theory largely came from men like Foucault and Freud.

Radfems may lie about a lot of things but troons didn't start with them. Men were cross dressing as women and getting their dicks inverted before women could even own credit cards.
TERF internet defense force is just sad.

It doesn't matter who invent the idea. If you deconstruct things and offer nothing to replace them then the most degenerate option will fill the void.
 
Terfism is inherently leftist.
If you see it as left = progress, right = conservative then you could easily say TERFs are not leftist if they're trying to rollback trans acceptance to stop nonces in prisons, toilets, changing rooms etc... Obviously TERFs don't like the idea of being right-wing though, which is why many of them try to paint the troon menace as just another day under the patriarchy. Only this time the patriarchy has a purple wig and knee socks :story:

Trannies came from Magnus Hirschfeld and Kraft-Ebbing before him. A feminist didn't start the Sexual Institute, a Jew did. Gender theory largely came from men like Foucault and Freud.
True, but so much of the astroturf idpol troon insanity comes from a lot of the same feminist people, and follows so much of the same playbook. It's very easy to draw a direct line from the era of Anita and Zoe Quinn feminist culture war to where we are now. Even someone as zealous as Glinner is able to be magnanimous about the past ten years in retrospect. Yet there's a very vocal part of his audience who hate him for that.
 
Objectively this is wrong. Trannies came from Magnus Hirschfeld and Kraft-Ebbing before him. A feminist didn't start the Sexual Institute, a Jew did. Gender theory largely came from men like Foucault and Freud.

Radfems may lie about a lot of things but troons didn't start with them. Men were cross dressing as women and getting their dicks inverted before women could even own credit cards.
Jews also invented Feminism.
 
Back