Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

Everybody arguing over Android Raptor is gay. More likely than not you are falling for a "woman" or a retard LARPing as a woman. Even if she is a woman, she's a self-proclaimed BPD case and ergo would either be actually insane, either by virtue of BPD or being such a demented bitch she thinks claiming BPD is cool.

At all angles, it is retarded to be worked up over its bait, or to be actually trying to defend such a retard.
Nope, she's a bio female who uses the same name everywhere.
 
Has a lolcow ever been born from here? Now that would be the ultimate irony, if someone sperged so hard they managed to make themselves into cows.
Nope, she's a bio female who uses the same name everywhere.
You mean username? I don't think I've seen a user named "Android Raptor" on Ovarit or any other TERF-centered sites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snap Oversteer
Heavy seething from misandrist central Ovarit about the Johnny Depp verdict

View attachment 3343852View attachment 3343854
View attachment 3343853
Funny how these are the probably the same people who (correctly) blast the troons for being so ideologically rigid and not understanding that people can have different viewpoints without being monsters
Zero self-awareness from Ovarit. One of the biggest reasons so many people are seeing the trannies for what they are is that they'll go to the wall to defend their most disgusting specimens like Jonathan Yaniv. They refuse to compromise on anything and insist that Willy Thomas is a real woman with no natural advantage in swimming. Then the TERFs wonder why Matt Walsh and Chris Rufo can join the trans backlash and outdo their years of work in a few months.

No one wants to listen to them because just like the trannies, they always put ideology first and choose guilty and innocent parties based on politics. Johnny is male and Amber is female, thus Johnny can only be a perpetrator and Amber can only be a victim. They were even going to bat for that woman who murdered her husband after having like 3 other wealthy husbands mysteriously die. That's why no one who isn't neck-deep in radical feminism will listen to them. And what infuriates them most about the trannies is that they took their strategy, did it better and then exiled them from the positions of power they used to have.

They complain the idea that a man can become a woman and that men in dresses are the most oppressed group is irrational, when the postmodern philosophy feminism is built on is opposed to the use of logic and calls it a tool of white supremacy and patriarchy. Pomo thinking runs on sob stories and victimhood, and the trannies came up with a really compelling victim narrative piggybacking on the gay rights movement and the natural tendency of leftists (as described by Uncle Ted) to identify with groups they see as weak and repellent. The only way to defeat them is to dismiss this kind of thinking completely.
 
Has a lolcow ever been born from here? Now that would be the ultimate irony, if someone sperged so hard they managed to make themselves into cows.

You mean username? I don't think I've seen a user named "Android Raptor" on Ovarit or any other TERF-centered sites.
Android is well on her way. Many comments here are aging like the finest of milk. Not too sure why spergs itt thought I was revealing some grand lesbian cabal though, I was literally commenting on one individual user based on a previous comment.
 
Last edited:
TERFs take over the threads the same way. They dog pile and mass report users they disagree with or when they are being exposed. They use sock puppet accounts and call up their friends for cover. It literally happened in this thread when one terf got caught being lesbo pedo or something talking how movie cuties is liberating and shit. Mods cleaned up that embarrassing part of the thread to defend true and honest name of damsel in distress. Mods will also gaslight you when you try to contact them on the subject.
Null may follow the footsteps of lowT to a T if things will keep going like this.
Null's problem is that he's locked up in his apartment in some foreign nation all day everyday, as such he doesn't interact with normal women.
 
The US abortion-pocalypse really reminds me of how useless any kind of modern feminism specially in social media really is (outside of exemptions like Mexico or Chile). If all women stopped going to their jobs for a day the health and school system stops existing, but instead of that they will larp and shitpost in reddit or wherever about trannies (that WNBAW but that's besides the point), incels, guns, rightoids (and incel rightoids with guns), about tradthots fucking said incels rightoids with guns etc

Why won't they just do something. I'm guessing most terminally online terves are NEETS and the protranny libfems are the functional members of society, but those will be shitposting about men in wigs more affected by abortion laws so nothing is going to happen and I will continue to laugh at them
 
If all women stopped going to their jobs for a day the health and school system stops existing, but instead of that they will larp and shitpost in reddit or wherever about trannies (that WNBAW but that's besides the point), incels, guns, rightoids (and incel rightoids with guns), about tradthots fucking said incels rightoids with guns etc
And don't forget what their "opinion leaders" are saying to do: TikTok dances!
 
Ugh... why do people keep talking about modern feminism as if it's different from what it was hundred years ago. Feminism is ideology of female narcissism, they explicitly hated men back then and wanted government gibs for having an uterus. They were middle and upper middle class cunts who knew no real struggle. While men were dying en masse at dangerous jobs, these bitches were complaining they had nothing to do at home but to watch children and keep the house. Lack of self awareness and entitlement was already at its peak back then.
 
Ugh... why do people keep talking about modern feminism as if it's different from what it was hundred years ago. Feminism is ideology of female narcissism, they explicitly hated men back then and wanted government gibs for having an uterus. They were middle and upper middle class cunts who knew no real struggle. While men were dying en masse at dangerous jobs, these bitches were complaining they had nothing to do at home but to watch children and keep the house. Lack of self awareness and entitlement was already at its peak back then.
Everyone was dying working dangerous jobs back then, from ladies licking radium paint all the way down to little Johnnie getting his arm crushed in factory machinery. Public ‘gibs’ weren’t really a thing. Personally I can’t fault a woman for wanting a vote or the ability to inherit property. If you have a child you’d probably want to have a say in how they grew up, and under what policies, especially if your husband died in WWI or of the flu. And would you know, some of America’s most prosperous years (the 50s) took place with women voting, because the majority of women believed feminism obtained its goals. Second wave fems a decade later in the late 60s/early 70s literally pulled problems out of their ass and if you look at the initial female reaction towards them, it wasn’t too nice.
 
Heterodorx podcast interviewed Queen Cathy Brennan, who still doesn't like Gender Critical Feminism:

But if you care what she thinks, listen to this lesbian, radical feminist, lawyer, and Fake Goth hold forth about Tumblr, putting gender identity above sex in the law, the distraction of public bathroom policies, Republican lesbians, “queer” as a reclaimed slur, the civil rights of trans people, why “ROGD moms are bad moms”, and how gender criticals are stupid, boring, annoying, too reactive, care too much about identities, and should shut the fuck up.


I didn't know Cathy had converted Corinna out of the cult, LMAO, they should dox their old exchanges here on KF so we can learn how to deprogram others.

BTW, I think she's talking about Nyk halfway into the interview. She mentions "a straight man in Baltimore" - "everyone in Baltimore knows who I'm talking about" - who is "100 years old" and who "is just a pervert, but he's, like, he's queer, but he's annoying". Who the fuck could this be other than Nyk? Unless there was a Nyk in her generation, in which case enlighten me.

She also mentions WoLF's Kara Dansky on Tucker Carlson.

Here's Cathy's Livestream about Natasha Chart's argument with WoLF, which over a 1.5 million dollar donation, which Cathy claims is entirely the result of WoLF partnering with the right:


"Do you really think that feminists had given 1.5 million dollars for WoLF? If you think that, you're also an idiot. There is a reason why this organization had partnered with lots of concervative organizations. It's for money. So, OK. I'm sure feminists had given 1.5 million dollars to WoLF."

Later in the Twitter thread, Natasha Chart claimed that "people from Deep Green Resistence" were given passes "no matter what they said.", to which Cathy responds with:

No shit Natasha! Go figure that the eco-fascist group might be fucked up with fucked up people. What a shock!

I highly recommend listening to the rest of this Livestream, especially if you're Terri Strange. It's actually hilarious to listen to how money streams were apparently mismanaged at WoLF. Remember, women run organizations such much better than men because they are more empathic and willing to share the profits with the collective and shit.

KF gets mentioned during this part, apparently Lierre Keith is a regular here and likes to browse the AntiFa thread, hi Lierre!

 
Everyone was dying working dangerous jobs back then, from ladies licking radium paint all the way down to little Johnnie getting his arm crushed in factory machinery. Public ‘gibs’ weren’t really a thing. Personally I can’t fault a woman for wanting a vote or the ability to inherit property. If you have a child you’d probably want to have a say in how they grew up, and under what policies, especially if your husband died in WWI or of the flu. And would you know, some of America’s most prosperous years (the 50s) took place with women voting, because the majority of women believed feminism obtained its goals. Second wave fems a decade later in the late 60s/early 70s literally pulled problems out of their ass and if you look at the initial female reaction towards them, it wasn’t too nice.
I don't agree with him in general but he's not wrong to say the feminist movement was always led by privileged middle and upper class women. History makes a big deal of radical and liberal first wave icons like Anthony and Goldman but the bulk of the first wave movement was largely made up of conservative upper-class pro-war women pushing for suffrage so they could vote in austerity laws. History likes to claim the Radium and Matchstick Girls as early feminist movements, but they were just regular labor rights campaigners from female-dominated industries, because being female is obviously far far less of a problem than having the phossy jaw.

That said, there also wasn't a decade of "mission accomplished" in the 50s, it was just a period of post-war economic growth and development that people look back on with a particularly rose-tinted memory. There were still a lot of important legal rights women lagged behind in then, and in the United States it was the uppity 1960's university-educated second wavers that won women the right to equal pay, equal access to education, the right to no-fault divorce, equal protections from employment discrimination, a nationwide end to coveture, the federally-protected right to use contraceptives, and the illegalisation of marital rape. I don't think any of these were problems they just pulled out of their asses.
 
TERFs have a lot in common with troons, unironically.

Yeah, they’re angry about men dressing up as women and stealing their grift, but at the end of the day they share the same “politics trumps everything” mindset and victimization fetish.

Troons think they’re oh so oppressed because of who they are, and need to fight TERFs and the patriarchy.

TERFs think they’re oh so oppressed because of who they are, and men are all conspiring to kill and enslave them.

Watching them freak out over things like the Depp trial and SCOTUS is as satisfying as it’s well deserved.
 
TERFs have a lot in common with troons, unironically.

Yeah, they’re angry about men dressing up as women and stealing their grift, but at the end of the day they share the same “politics trumps everything” mindset and victimization fetish.

Troons think they’re oh so oppressed because of who they are, and need to fight TERFs and the patriarchy.

TERFs think they’re oh so oppressed because of who they are, and men are all conspiring to kill and enslave them.

Watching them freak out over things like the Depp trial and SCOTUS is as satisfying as it’s well deserved.
Both groups have warped ideas about what manhood and womanhood mean and are flailing around acting like weirdos because of that. Most interestingly they share a perspective that biology itself is an oppressor. You can see it in the hostility terfs bear towards heterosexuality and childbearing, taken sometimes to florid extremes by the likes of Shulamith Firestone and her transhumanist ramblings. And when terfs try to explain troonism, they betray the fact that they basically agree with troons on the "problem" (nature itself, maybe God) but just differ as to the "solution." For instance:

Problem: 12 year old girls feel uncomfortable, scared, and demeaned by the male attention directed at their developing bodies.
Troon solution: "You are a true and honest man, no wonder you hate people noticing your chest fat! Bind your breasts and then cut them off, bro!"
Radfem solution: "You are a true and honest feminist lesbian womon, no wonder you hate being objectified by ape-like MALES. Wear ugly butch dyke clothes and avoid nasty rapey MALES in all circumstances, they are not to be trusted and will ruin your life!"

But the actual problem is the moral lawlessness of our society and the fact that kids are booted out to be raised by their peers and are not properly guarded or guided by their parents.

Problem: 19 year old Cyndi is "not like the other girls," likes computer games and playing guitar and wearing ugly shirts.
Troon solution: You're actually Cayden and need to troon out to be like the other bros.
Radfem solution: You are a smart and superior woman, probably a "baby dyke" who just needs to be properly greeted and initiated by your local lesbian feminist coven.

But the actual problem is, your interests and fashion tastes are trivial and changeable and have nothing to do with either your sex or your politics or your sexuality. Cyndi needs to just grow up and stop caring so much what others think.

So radfemmery and troonery are simply competing forms of emotional reactivity and identity instability. They are stuck in adolescent mode. Both are manifestations of societal borderline personality disorder.
 
If all women stopped going to their jobs
If women stopped going to jobs, homes would be cleaned, clothes would be washed, meals would be cooked, and husbands and children would be happy.
If women stopped going to jobs, men would earn enough to support their families on one income.
If women stopped going to jobs, women would be happier and society would be better.

When the Covid lockdowns happened here, it was proof that 90% of women have jobs that are utterly worthless and unnecessary. - Society functioned just fine without nail salons, coffee shops, retail clothing stores, jewellers, etc.
 
When the Covid lockdowns happened here, it was proof that 90% of women have jobs that are utterly worthless and unnecessary. - Society functioned just fine without nail salons, coffee shops, retail clothing stores, jewellers, etc.
The most important job is the telephone sanitizers though, they have to still come to work.
 
Back