Disaster Texas Supreme Court rules against father seeking to prevent 'chemical castration' of his son - "Based" Texas strikes again

Jeffrey Younger has lost his court case to prevent his ex-wife from taking their son to California, where he could be medically transitioned. Younger has been trying to stop this from happening for years, and said that he has now reached the end of the line.

He wanted the courts to stop his ex-wife from taking the children to California and to protect his boys from medical mutilation at the hands of their mother, who is a pediatrician. The courts prevented him from forcing the mother to bring the boys back from California. Younger has accused her of using the children to help advertise her "inclusive," "gender affirming" practice.

"The Supreme Court of Texas denied my Mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights. My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse, led by Texas judges," he said.

This after Judge Kim Cooks, on October 24, said that both parents should have a "joint managing conservatorship," which each able to have "a say in his medical treatment," The Texan reported.

The custody case was before the Supreme Court of Texas, which ruled against Younger. Younger had issued a petition on December 16 to try to retain his parental rights after his ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, took the boys to California.

California has a law in place, starting on Sunday, that children in that state will not be returned to their home state in the event that the home state would prevent the children from being medically transitioned to present as the opposite sex. Younger wanted the boys brought home.

California Senate Bill 107, proposed by State Senator Scott Wiener and signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, will "prohibit the enforcement of an order based on another state’s law authorizing a child to be removed from their parent or guardian based on that parent or guardian allowing their child to receive gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care."

Younger's concern, per his petition, is that in California, his son "would be subjected to transgender procedures deemed to be child abuse by official opinion of the Texas Attorney General." Texas has laws against the medical gender transition of children and teens.

"The Children would lose the protections of injunctions on the Mother that prevent her from chemically castrating the Children or sexually mutilating them in transgender surgeries," younger said in his petition, according to The Texan.


Younger was married to pediatrician Georgulas. Georgulas and Younger ended up in court fighting over the children when she believed that James, Younger's 7-year-old, wanted to live as a girl called Luna.

She petitioned the court to prevent Younger from "from signing Luna up as James for any activities or taking her as James or calling her James or using male pronouns related to Luna at any activities outside the home…"

She further asked the court to prevent Younger from "allowing the children to remain in the presence of anyone who is not calling Luna by her chosen name, 'Luna,' not using female pronouns to refer to her and otherwise not affirming Luna."

Georgulas began to believe James was a girl when he asked for a "girl's toy" from McDonald's and wanted to wear dresses, as well as began to emulate the female lead characters in Disney's Frozen. It was a counselor at the GENecis clinic at the Children's Hospital Center who advised Georgulas to "socially transition" James, according to court documents. Georgulas was affiliated with that hospital.

Younger, who had joint custody in 2019, was and remains entirely against this course of action. When James is with Younger, he does not ask to be called Luna, does not seek out girls' clothes. Yet a court determined that Younger must use the pronouns and names the ex-wife demanded.

In a video posted to the dad’s website, James is asked, "You’re a boy right?" Heavy reported.

"No, I’m a girl."

"Who told you you’re a girl?"

"Mommy."

The child said Anne also put James in dresses. "She buys me headbands. She gets me hair clips…she paints my nails."

“Do you think you’re a girl?” The child answered in the affirmative.

Georgulas was awarded custody by the Texas courts in 2021. "Dallas County District Court Judge Mary Brown awarded Georgulas full custody of James. Brown also eliminated the requirement that Jeff Younger be notified about James’ medical procedures, except for instances of hormone suppression therapy, puberty-blocking drugs, and gender reassignment surgery. Under that order, Younger must consent to any decisions made under those categories of procedure," The Texan reported.

Witnesses who knew the boys and could attest that James did not identify as a girl when left to his own devices, were prevented from testifying in the case. One mother of the boys' friends said, in testimony she wasn't allowed to give in 2019, that:

"Over the past year, I have observed that James is blissfully happy as a boy. He loves to march around outside and yell, ‘we are the only boy scout troop’ or ‘I’m the Leader of the wolf pack!’ He is always the ring leader, even though he isn’t the oldest of the group. He loves dressing as a super hero and sword fighting. One day we all walked to a playground near my house and on the way home James slipped in some mud and got his clothes dirty. He asked if he could borrow some of my kids clothes and I could wash his.

"Of course I said, ‘no problem’ and grabbed him a pair of shorts from the chest of drawers and tossed them to him. I said, ‘hang on while I grab a shirt from the closet’. He immediately said, ‘Mrs. Sarah, I don’t need a shirt! It’s hot! And boys don’t have to wear shirts if they don’t want to! Isn’t that awesome!’ He was so cute. I said, ‘yes that is awesome!’ As he ran off to play. I did eventually get him to put on a shirt. It was gray with lizards on it and he loved it! He also likes having his hair cut a certain way but told my son Grayson that his mom wouldn’t let him get it too short even though he wanted it to be spikey."

The Office of the Attorney General of Texas filed an amicus letter with the courts on December 22, 2022, saying "a trial court has allowed relator’s former partner to move to California with their children over relator’s objection. There, she intends to provide the child with potentially irreversible medical interventions that may constitute child abuse under Texas law, Atty Gen. Op. KP-0401—particularly given that a court has previously found that 'Mom may have over corrected' for any symptoms of gender confusion exhibited by their child, Pet. 8 (excerpting order). The trial court clearly abused its discretion in permitting relator’s former partner to remove the children from the State given the ongoing litigation regarding their well-being. And that error may be irremediable on appeal because California has enacted a law that makes it difficult (if not impossible) for Relator to regain custody of his vulnerable child."

When Younger attemtped to speak out about gender transition at the University of North Texas, he was prevented from doing so by far-left activists who shut the speaking engagement down.

Link / Archive
 
The kid's SEVEN? When I was seven, I wanted to be Wonder Woman. That didn't make me a superhero with the ability to change my clothes by spinning around. How are they determining that the kid actually wants to be a girl versus the kid acting like a girl because they know Mommy likes them better and buys them more stuff when they're a girl? Oh that's right, they can't. What they should do is let the kid live with a third party for awhile and see if the social contagion wears off, but they won't because the Troon Lobby is politically powerful and the BPD Mother is a pediatrician, which means she must be infallible. Because no doctor in the history of the world has ever gone off their nut and hurt their own family members.

This won't end because large, powerful segments of the population support it. The only thing that can stop it is widespread starvation (making sex roles relevant to survival again,) or enough Cletusses getting off of their asses and hunting Californians down Mad Max style.
At this point, its all are on the dad. Unless the Govenor sends in the guard, declares martial law, saves the kid, there's only one man at this point that can do anything.
 
When I was seven, I wanted to be Wonder Woman.

Well, don't leave us in suspense...

On a serious note though, I wonder if the mom accidentally got hit with an errant HIMARS rocket fired from Ukraine which got caught up in the jet stream and somehow made it all the way over here and then fell on her head and she died (or some other crazy accident), would the dad automatically get full custody?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TexasRanger
You cant just abscond with your child and perform life altering medical care when you are shared visitation.
You can when you're in California trying to own the cons, and this shit is more a mom doing whatever she can to hurt that dad. It's vile and protected via the special kind of hell that is the family courts. That father knows what he must do here. It has yet to be seen if he will do it.
 
Imo he should grab his kid and flee to Hungary or Poland. Or hell, even China. And ask for humanitarian asylum. I would gladly and immediately donate for that cause.

"Conservative" Texas is not willing to put up a fight for it's young ones.
This isn't a bad idea, but he should have played it cool and done it at the beginning of all this. He will never get away with it now- does he even have visitation rights, let alone the authorization to get on a plane with the kid?

I suppose it's admirable to try to "work within the system" but the writing was on the wall from day one, even in muh based Texas, if you were paying any attention.
It gets better (read: worse) when you know that the boys came from a donor egg. The "mother," despite incubating them, has no genetic link to either. The only blood parent is the father, and the entire legal system in this country will kick him to the curb because muh vagina.

And they wonder why men aren't interested in relationships anymore.
Oh yeah you can thank the "LGB" for this one- they had to have falsified birth certificates for the kids they bought so they could pretend they were capable of making a baby and being a "family" and could hide from the fact that they had to pay someone to jizz in a cup/gestate their jizz slurry.
 
I've said it before, and I don't give a fuck if it's fedposting, this dude should just kill his cunt ex wife. Shoot her in the face with a 12 gauge shotgun. Fuck give me her address broski and I'll do it for free *in club penguin.
At a certain point if this Jew-Tranny system leaves you no other recourse I absolutely agree. You either lay down and accept the humiliation like the Dalit they want you to be or you go down fighting.
 
I've said it before, and I don't give a fuck if it's fedposting, this dude should just kill his cunt ex wife. Shoot her in the face with a 12 gauge shotgun. Fuck give me her address broski and I'll do it for free *in club penguin.
I'm not gonna sit here and fedpost, but once someone is psychologically abusing your child to a point they think they are a different sex than they are and even going as far as to start injecting them with shit to fuck with their puberty and development not to mention the risk of extreme genital mutilation of them in the future it's hard to argue than any recourse against this isn't justified entirely.
 
Is that even within the power the Texas SC? This exact same issue came up with abortion, and SCOTUS made it clear states can't hold you accountable for doing something legal in another state. By that same logic, it seems like there is nothing they can do in the first place.
I'm not convinced anything at the state level can legally stop interstate travel short of being convinced and confined to a certain radius, but I'm sure Texas can at least maintain the father's parental rights so he has some standing in the issue.

I have heard of attempts to pass a law stating that leaving the state for the purpose of having FGM performed on a child in and then returning would be deemed child abuse, thereby giving the state grounds to put the child and her siblings into foster care. Instead of being easily slapped down with a "you can't do that", people played the racism card to kill the bill.

Unfortunately that involves the legislative branch so it's too slow for this kid, but in theory Texas has the power to at least make things difficult for the mother if she has any expectations of coming back after the procedure.
 
Told you so: As long as the TX GOP will be able to pull off meaningless PR stunts like sending illegals to Martha's Vinyard (while doing nothing against them here in Texas as the GOP big donors need their Pablos and Consuelas to lower wages) and being "tough on crime" (mass incarceration, sometimes executing s.o after 20 + years and p...ing away millions of our tax doe in the process) they will do nothing to improve the lives of normal Texans.

But yeah, "muh conservatism", "muh family values" "muh -insert GOP election talking point".

Is there anything one can do for Mr. Younger and his son?
The Texas GOP is effectively owned by the energy conglomos. The fastest the T-GOP have ever acted was when the Denton city government held a local referendum on whether or not to ban fracking within city limits, which passed with a significant margin of city residents voting in favor of the ban. How did the Abbot and the state government respond? By passing a law stripping all local governments of any power to ban fracking. This happened within months.
 
The Texas GOP is effectively owned by the energy conglomos. The fastest the T-GOP have ever acted was when the Denton city government held a local referendum on whether or not to ban fracking within city limits, which passed with a significant margin of city residents voting in favor of the ban. How did the Abbot and the state government respond? By passing a law stripping all local governments of any power to ban fracking. This happened within months.
"Democracy" in action.
 
Back