US Thanks To Leftist Corruption, U.S. Military Recruiting Is In Total Freefall - Article author, a retired lieutenant colonel, says that if he were 20 today there would be 0 chance of him enlisting to serve under a group of people who he thought would hate him and his political views.

mil-e1656464834980-1200x675.jpg
US ARMY/Flickr

Amid the first conventional war in Europe since 1945 and China’s massive military buildup — including nuclear weapons — the U.S. military is experiencing a dangerous drop in its warfighting capability. The U.S. Army, the largest service, has only reached 40 percent of its recruiting goal with just more than three months remaining in the fiscal year.

This military decay will continue under President Joe Biden’s disastrous anti-leadership and likely will take many years of concerted effort to reverse. Further, combined with the chaotic defeat in Afghanistan, America’s ability to deter its enemies from taking hostile action is at a low not seen since the late 1970s, making a major war far more likely.

There are three growing signs of trouble: an alarming collapse in recruiting, a profoundly unserious national security leadership, and weakness in the military supply chain and procurement.

Recruiting Collapse​


The military is facing its most severe staffing crisis since the advent of the all-volunteer force in 1973. In March, the Department of Defense (DoD) announced it would reduce its active-duty end strength by 0.2 percent to a little more than 2.1 million. Pentagon comptroller Michael McCord assured us that it’s “not about making the force bigger. We’re looking at making the force more capable.” But only three months later, word broke that every branch in the military is having trouble meeting its recruiting goals.


As a result of its massive recruiting shortfalls, the U.S. Army has lowered its standards, dropping requirements for recruits to have a high school diploma or GED to enlist, while relaxing tattoo restrictions to allow tattoos on hands and neck without a waiver. These two decisions will result in a less capable force with troublesome discipline issues. The Army is even offering enlistment contracts as short as two years — barely enough time to learn the basics of modern warfare.


The DoD is even reviewing more than 250 disqualifications for service, such as asthma and ADHD. With only 23 percent of Americans ages 17-24 qualified to serve in uniform without a waiver and just 9 percent of those eligible to serve even interested — the lowest since the Iraq War troop surge in 2007 — something has to give, with some experts suggesting that a draft might be needed again. Fears over not being able to meet uniformed staffing levels might have informed the seven Republican members of the Senate Armed Services Committee who voted to require women to register for a military draft in June.


Biden’s defense officials may hope money solves the problem, but they’d be better advised to look in the mirror instead. When you openly accuse the military of being rightwing and harboring white supremacists, insist on schooling them in transgender pronoun usage, and then force them to get vaccinated for a Covid-19 virus that’s less threatening than the flu for the young and healthy military demographic, you shouldn’t be shocked that they don’t want to enlist under a leadership they neither trust nor admire.


To doublecheck that the economy wasn’t the overriding reason why recruiting is failing, I spoke with a friend who leads a large police academy in Texas. He said the classes are full of new recruits (although in Chicago, Oregon, and Washington State, areas where police are under attack, things are different). He even noted an influx of police coming into Texas from other states to escape Covid-19 vaccination requirements for public safety employees.


Profoundly Unserious Leadership​


There are multiple warning flags that our civilian and senior military leadership are majoring in the minors while ignoring warfighting at our collective peril. Whether it’s the aforementioned policies or claiming climate change is an existential threat, our national security apparatus appears intent on losing its first engagement with a revanchist People’s Republic of China.


Even today’s extended 1 million barrels per day peacetime drawdown of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is aimed at the threat to Biden’s approval rating rather than the potential loss of our ability to import oil during a crisis. As of June 24, the reserve stood at 497.9 million barrels, the lowest since 1985, eight years after the program’s start. That’s a 59-day supply of imports.


The over-hyped fear of a military overrun with right-wing extremists is especially maddening as Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin initiated a military-wide standdown and struggle session on the premise of false reports from CNN and NPR. These outlets claimed that the ranks of those arrested in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot were doubly overrepresented by veterans. The claim, based on three math errors, was off by about 100 percent — meaning that the share of veterans among those arrested was exactly what one would expect from any random group of American adults who were almost 90 percent men.


At the time, retired Adm. John Kirby, then Austin’s spokesman, now communications chief for the National Security Council in the White House, darkly warned, “There may be cultural issues we have to deal with here.” Cultural issues? Tennessee Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen said the quiet part out loud when he worried that the National Guard soldiers sent to secure the Capitol in a symbolic show of force in 2021 were “predominantly more conservative” than Americans.


Military Procurement Weaknesses​


The U.S. military supply chain has become increasingly reliant on the import of key items, such as computer chips. America makes 10 percent of the world’s computer chips with 75 percent of global production in East Asia and some 90 percent of the most advanced chips made in Taiwan.


Every Javelin missile launched in Ukraine at invading Russian forces uses a Javelin missile Command Launch Unit (CLU), and every CLU has more than 250 computer chips in it. As of mid-April, Ukraine received some 5,500 Javelin systems — CLU and missile — with reports that the United States has supplied 7,000 missiles so far, about one-third of its stockpile.


Javelin orders take 32 months to deliver, and in recent years, the United States has been buying only 1,000 Javelins per year with a maximum production rate of 6,480 per year. But the semiconductor-using industry typically has less than five days of chips on hand and it will likely take a year or more to reach the maximum production rate — assuming the chips will be available.


Unlike Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a land war in which American supplies of anti-tank missiles, anti-aircraft missile, and artillery, have been sent in large numbers, a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would mostly involve the Navy and Air Force. Unfortunately, naval ship building and drydock repair is a glaring weak spot in our national security. America now builds fewer than 10 vessels for oceangoing trade every year — China builds more than 1,000.


In military shipbuilding, America strains to build more than four combat vessels per year. The U.S. Navy used to operate 13 shipyards — it has five now, with 14 new construction shipyards (commercial and government) lost since 1970. The U.S. Navy had 298 battle force ships in April (including the U.S.S. Constitution, built in 1797) and about another 190 support and reserve ships. Meanwhile, China has 350 warships and that number is climbing quickly.


My own decision to enlist the military in 1983 was motivated by President Ronald Reagan and his call to defeat the Soviet Union in the Cold War. In 2007, I retired as a lieutenant colonel. If I were 20 today, there’d be zero chance I’d enlist to serve under a group of people whom I thought hated me and despised my political views — and who would use my time in military service as a cross between a reeducation camp and an armed international social service agency.

Article Link

Archive
 
Why do trannies want to serve in the military if they're so against American imperialism?
They just want the military to pay for their tranny-ism. It was already covered but it's the simple truth.
They join, begin the tranny process, and then are non-deployable the entire time. They don't want to serve they just want the benefits.
I was interested in trying to become a Navy officer. I was connected to a Navy officer recruiter, but before I could get far at all in explaining what I wanted, he asked if I was white. Apparently being white automatically lessens your chances of being accepted into Navy OCS.
Yup and it's been that way for a long time. Not near enough non-whites even apply for commission slots so in their efforts to "fix" that, they place certain races above others for slots and naturally this means whites, especially white men, are the least desirable and have to be significantly more competitive. White men joining the military are like Asians applying to college.
 
Late stage USSR: bad
Late stage USA: bad

I don't understand why people bother arguing which was/is worse. Blind loyalty to an ideology is for the uneducated, unsophisticated or easily influenced. All the proof you need is to see how quickly the elites in charge of America turned on their most loyal supporters and instead elevated the scum of society, to legitimize their rule. The USSR fell apart, due to serious and gross miscalculations as well as sustained outside pressure, then became the Russian Federation. It adopted a more American style of government, only for most to regret it almost immediately. Six or half dozen, there's no difference. Conservative/liberal elites have no loyalty and will ruthlessly set out to destroy anyone challenging their rule.

The only smart thing the average person can do is align themselves with elites/oligarchs who do the least harm to them and their loved ones.
 
Last edited:
Not saying this isn't happening. But the US just got out of the War on Terror, so I suspect the US military doesn't really need that many soldiers. This is basically peace time again. With the economy getting worse people will probably be looking for economic advantages and the military is always a source of a steady paycheck. Even better when you don't have to do anything really dangerous. If anyone remembers what happened in 2001 with the invasion of Afghanistan and the Iraq invasion. All the people that joined the military because it was a source of a steady paycheck and a way to get some free college money were absolutely shocked when they had to go fight a war. What do you mean? I thought the US military was just a glorified Boy Scouts. You join up get a paycheck get to play with some cool weapons maybe do some training exercises and when you get out you can get some money for college. What do you mean I have to go fight a war? I remember the words of one young person in the US army at the time. "We aren't supposed to go to war we are just supposed to train for it and stuff". The War on Terror caught all the young Gen Xer's that joined the military in the last few years of the Clinton administration by complete surprise.

Back in the early and mid 2000's the Democrats had a term for it. It's called the economic draft. Something I actually agreed with the Democrats on. Bad economic times usually creates more military enlistments with people looking for steady paychecks and benefits. As long as Biden sticks to his anti-war stance more people will probably join for a paycheck.
 
Businesses are going through a labor shortage, why would anyone believe this somehow translates into people wanting to joining the globohomo tranny LGBTQQ woke military for a steady paycheck? Recruiters can't meet recruitment goals, they dumped the HS graduate requirement, they allow visible tats now, the AIDS is now acceptable and I suspect waivers for criminals and illegals are easily available yet still they can't get enough people to sign up. Nah, I think everyone understands there's a good chance of dying in a far away land just so Pelosi's kids can have a steady supply of hookers and blow.
 
They just want the military to pay for their tranny-ism. It was already covered but it's the simple truth.
They join, begin the tranny process, and then are non-deployable the entire time. They don't want to serve they just want the benefits.

They don't just want the tangible benefits, they want the validation that comes from being trans with the full legal backing of the military justice system. You will respect pronouns, and you will not complain about the new E3's throbbing precum-dripping girl erection accidentally brushing against you in the shower, or you will be UCMJed.
 
I imagine that's a useful skill in combat. Remember not to hurt the Tango's feelings when you're trying to ventilate, stab, or splode him.
considering how quickly the niggers in the service chimp out at the wrong times, it might just be.
Globalization has hit everywhere in the world economy, I imagine the national defense sector is no different.

This article for example lists that Javelin missile CLUs use 250 computer chips each, while at the same time the bulk of these chips are made in East Asia and America by comparison makes only 10% of the world's computer chips. Everyone knows how reliant on computer chips high-tech gear currently is. Taiwan, the country where a lot of the most advanced chips are manufactured is constantly under the threat of a Chinese invasion.

In the event of an actual war between the ROC and PRC breaking out, it is hard to fathom how crippled the US Armed Forces would become as a result. Add to this China's rapid expansion of their own army, navy, and air force while the US seems to be increasingly reluctant to intervene in worldly affairs and politically divided at the same time, the future looks grim for the American Century.
it shouldn't, half of china's industrial base is in the path of the 3GD, if China decides to do a fucking thing, they need to know that within about 48 hours their country will be flooded.
An “army” of drug addicted pedophiles who are troons or furries doesn’t seem like a useful force to defend the country or launch an assault.
the Nazis thought the same thing during operation Barbarossa, turns out if you have enough cannon fodder you can win a war. all those degenerates suddenly become Patriots who die for Stalin.
It's going to be a real treat once someone, likely a hawkish Senator (or three), does finally say the draft is needed again and pushes for its reintroduction. Will make those 2020 protests look truly peaceful in comparison.
its not a very talked about part of the draft, but there's a reason only white men usually from conservative areas got picked. It was ever so slightly rigged to make sure none of the left's favorite groups ever got called up. all the deferments were designed to help the niggers and kikes and other bad types avoid the war.

If they could do it then, sure as shit they'll do it now. the draft comes back but along with draft number the government gets to look though your internet history before letting you die for israel. with all the powerpoints the military already looks like a reeducation camp, might as well take it to the logical conclusion.
Not even just 2020 - I was warned away in the early 2000s from it by my Navy Father and Grandfather. I was shocked, but, they probably saw this coming down the line and clearly knew better than I.
Joe? its a common story, as we saw in the last thread the military is like the night's watch. anyone with a brain or knowledge avoids it and it has been trending downwards for about half a century.
No, they actually think white males from the South are just as dumb as Africans and Guatemalans, so they genuinely think they can rebuild the military out of foreigners without any of those pesky loyalties that would prevent them from turning it on the American population.

It's a good thing Republicans focused on tax cuts and trying to figure out how to sneak more illegals into the country than actually fixing any of this shit.
Republicans won the civil war with illegals and tax cuts, if they cared about ancestral americans they wouldn't have existed in the first place.
Not to mention the 40% is probably understating the effect. Like you said it's hard work, just because a dindu enlists doesn't mean they intend to do that hard work. They instead plan to be a half-assing skeezer to cheat the system.
agreed, its a 40% drop off but thats not accounting for the fact that every recuiting office let literal Cat4 on AFQT overweight retards in, if you could see the enlisted by AFQT category, i 100% guarantee the Cat 1s are down 93%+, Cat2s down 65%+
All that would really happen is boards would convene to see if the cis people "really" deserved their medals.

You know, like First Cav in 92.
the way you and Stalin keep talking, anyone that was still in after Reagan left office was a dipshit.
They just want the military to pay for their tranny-ism. It was already covered but it's the simple truth.
They join, begin the tranny process, and then are non-deployable the entire time. They don't want to serve they just want the benefits.

Yup and it's been that way for a long time. Not near enough non-whites even apply for commission slots so in their efforts to "fix" that, they place certain races above others for slots and naturally this means whites, especially white men, are the least desirable and have to be significantly more competitive. White men joining the military are like Asians applying to college.
its been that way since the 1950s; really makes you think that no general is willing to go to bat for soldiers unless they're trannies, coons, or socialists.
 
This sort of thing is why I don't think the elites really have everything under control. The world is too complicated. There's always some factor not considered. They've spent decades importing millions of people from alien countries, and rather than assimilate them the way we did with Germans, Italians, and Poles, they've promoted ethnic separatism, promoted immigration by people who look to different to easily intermarry with the white population, and promoted racial grievance, telling those people and their children that every problem in their lives is caused by the wicked, hateful white natives and their corrupt, racist system.

Now they want to go on military adventures, but surprise, immigration hasn't produced new generations of soldiers to recruit.

Meanwhile, you've been telling all the white males of America that we're worthless pieces of shit, and the world would be better off if we all killed ourselves, right now, this second. Whoops, turns out that's not really a big motivator for getting any of us to go pick up a rifle and sit in a shithole somewhere for bad pay. Plus, when's the last time we fought a war that legitimately had anything to do with protecting Americans' interests? WW2? Vietnam if we're being generous.

The liberal kids have been hearing their whole lives that America is an evil, racist country. They'll sign up for antifa and throw molotov cocktails at bookstores, but the Army?

Then they've been pushing fat acceptance, recess and phys ed are a joke, and they cram kids full of carbs, so everybody's a fat little butterball now.

They're lucky they get any recruits at all.
 
We're going to end up with a smaller but more ideologically extremist military of leftist nutjobs itching to turn it into Antifa 2.0, and it might be by design.
During the Spanish Civil War the Left got the police & the Right got the military. Guess the next US Civil War could be a reverse of that.
 
There are quite a few normie conservative women from backwater dead-end towns who go into the military right out of high school. It's the only guarantee to a "real job with benefits" for those who don't want to go the crap-out-babies-with-a-felon-collect-food-stamps-and-live-in-a trailer-park
Theory checks out
2011-women-in-the-military-02a.png
 
During the Spanish Civil War the Left got the police & the Right got the military. Guess the next US Civil War could be a reverse of that.

Contrary to popular belief.

Any police left at this point in blue areas, are either Democrats or RINOs.

I didn't know that the police unions of Chicago and New York and other areas either haven't endorsed a Republican in a long ass time or never even done it before.

Look into how police get carveouts from gun control laws in many blue states and that should kill off the notion that the police are fully right wing.

They are more authoritarian and serve whoever pays them.

As far as military goes, I expect the national guards of states like Oklahoma to be right wing and will just take out the trash compared to California, where there will be many "right wingers" or socially conservative folks fighting for the leftoids.
 
They just want the military to pay for their tranny-ism. It was already covered but it's the simple truth.
They join, begin the tranny process, and then are non-deployable the entire time. They don't want to serve they just want the benefits.

Yup and it's been that way for a long time. Not near enough non-whites even apply for commission slots so in their efforts to "fix" that, they place certain races above others for slots and naturally this means whites, especially white men, are the least desirable and have to be significantly more competitive. White men joining the military are like Asians applying to college.

That's what I don't understand about transition surgery being a thing the military covers. Regardless of any politics, mortality, etc., It makes that person unable to deploy for YEARS at a minimum. What's the fucking point of a soldier that can't deploy? In any other circumstance, they will absolutely begin the medical separation process.

Of course we all know the reason why and we're watching the results.
 
That's what I don't understand about transition surgery being a thing the military covers. Regardless of any politics, mortality, etc., It makes that person unable to deploy for YEARS at a minimum. What's the fucking point of a soldier that can't deploy? In any other circumstance, they will absolutely begin the medical separation process.

Of course we all know the reason why and we're watching the results.
The precedent was started when Obama pardoned Private Manning, whom only got consideration because of he identified as trans. You think Bradley Manning would have been pardoned?
 
The precedent was started when Obama pardoned Private Manning, whom only got consideration because of he identified as trans. You think Bradley Manning would have been pardoned?
The most irritating thing about that shitshow is how Manning was treated as a martyr. The dude was trying to get a dopamine rush and it's very evident in his chat logs.

He did not care about transparency and all that jazz, just the temporary attention from people who wanted him to spill the goods.
 
Back