The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spergy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

Fandase said:
Nope I don't wish someone dead that is just indicative of you and your problems, sir.
If he frustrates you that much I think it is time you moved on to something else, because it is obviously that you have a problem.


If you can't enjoy Chris on an almost abstract, ironic level then yes his behaviors will drive you nuts.

Take Chris for what he is and just enjoy the show. :D
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

Hating Chris–chan and wanting him to die is not unhealthy or abnormal.

Stopped reading after this. :alog:
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

I have a feeling whomever moved this meant to move it to the Spergatory subforum, not this board, however I'll keep it here because it opens up a conversation that we haven't had before on this incarnation. I imagine that's because it's common sense.

Chris doesn't deserve to die. He hasn't done anything wrong. There's a very stark distinction to be made between having no positive personality traits and having done something that warrants being put to death or put through induced suffering. There's several ways to break this down.

  • The Court System Failed! Chris should have been given the death sentence.
    Chris was convicted of a hit and run that left minor injuries. He was fleeing the scene of a trespassing incident, and if Michael Snyder hadn't of attempted to physically box Chris' vehicle into the parking lot it's likely he'd of not been hit. Chris is mentally handicapped and very stupid. He was afraid, he didn't want to get in trouble, and in a moment of retard panic he shoved Snyder out of the way of his vehicle and left. The reaction of the court system was that Chris never come near Snyder again that he pays his medical expenses, at the request of Snyder himself he did not receive a harsher penalty. Snyder saw it as it was: a stupid, reckless person did something stupid and reckless and now he just wants him gone. If you think Chris needs to be legally executed for this, you're advocating what would no doubt be hundreds of thousands of death a year. We'd live in a militaristic dictatorship. If you actually support that kind of idea, you're insane.
  • Fuck the courts, I want to kill Chris myself!
    So if you don't think this is a matter of objective morality or righteousness and it just becomes your own bloodlust, that makes it your own problem. You are so angry at a person with an IQ of about 70 that you want to kill him? For what? The untrue things he's said about people? The character assassination of Mary Lee Walsh? No doubt Chris has done monstrous things and is no saintly figure himself, but he doesn't need to die. In fact, if you want him to suffer, killing him would probably be doing him a favor at this point. What does Chris have to look forward to in life? Nothing. He is a person who has done nothing with his life and is now doomed to fade into obscurity. It's widely speculated that he'll be in jail shortly, and I believe if he does enter the corrections facility he'll remain there (or return repeatedly) for the remainder of his life. Do you really think that killing him would make the world a better place? I think we all enjoy a little schadenfreude watching Chris, but if you genuinely feel giddy thinking about how you'd kill him, please, seek help.
  • Fuck what's fair! I just want to torture him! Rip and shred, rip and shred!
    There's nothing to even elaborate on with this. If you want to torture Chris you're fucking psychotic. It's not like he's all there, it'd be like torturing an animal or something. What the fuck has some harmless little idiot done to cause such resentment? Not even the people he's affected directly have given enough of a fuck to become violent against Chris; he's never suffered a beating in his life. If you feel this way you'll feel this way about other undeserving people and you'll end up going ballistic. This is a really serious mental problem you need to get checked out.

There's no way you can justify wanting to hurt Chris or to kill Chris without in turn making yourself look either very dumb or extremely angry and psychotic. I think everyone has had moments where they've gotten a little bit upset or frustrated, even as a spectator, watching Chris blindly turn down useful help or take the least productive steps possible to any task. However, nothing, and I mean fucking nothing has ever made Chris even remotely close to someone who needs to be hurt in the ways you want to.

Also, great job trying to cover up the fact you want to normalize the discussion of torturing Chris by criticizing the A-Log article. A++.

https://www.google.com/?q=free+mental+h ... es+near+me
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

Null said:
I have a feeling whomever moved this meant to move it to the Spergatory subforum, not this board

It's right where I intended it to be.

Null said:
however I'll keep it here

It's right where I intended it to be.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

ABadassDoug said:
Hating Chris–chan and wanting him to die is not unhealthy or abnormal.

Actually, it is quite abnormal. Wishing death on another human being isn't something that a rational person would do, no matter what they've done.

He is literally one of the most narcissistic, disgusting, irredeemable human beings I have ever seen. He does not have one redeeming feature - not one quirk or interesting aspect that makes him a benefit to the world on any level. I am not merely talking about the fact that he will most likely never have a job, but that he isn't even interesting, self aware, cool, funny, or whatever. I know people who haven't done anything with their lives due to mental problems and have redeeming qualities and are even more self-aware than the average human being, whereas Chris–chan is a complete blight on humanity. Not one aspect of him is in any way endearing, worthwhile, or will register as positive to any sane functioning person. Anyone who claims otherwise and is not retarded themselves is lying for the sake of being politically correct.

I wouldn't say that. Simply put, while Chris is narcissistic and is unsanitary for sure, he doesn't know the scope of what he is doing. A great part of this has to do with his autism and another part of this has to do with his upbringing. His childish principles and lack of worldly understanding are due to the fact that he's never lived life from outside of his home. The most he has in terms of branching out was in high school and at the Game Place where he met Megan, which is why he yearns so much for his high school reunion or to go back in time to high school. This is why he rages so much over Michael Snyder and being banned from the Game Place. But now, because he has no life skills, he really does need that Monthly Tugboat since he would never be able to function at a job because he's never known better. Someone who has the capability to do more in life and chooses not to (Wizardchan is a great example of that) or someone who is malevolent and is aware of it (The more extreme Loveshies are great examples of that) would be contemptible. Not Chris.

And this isn't political correctness. This is calling it like it is. Chris is the poster child for when the educational system fails for autistic children, when parents use video games as a babysitter, and when they don't get the help they need. There's a lot of improvements that could be made.

The point of me stating this is that it does not really matter if it is partially not his fault. I have absolutely no problem whatsoever accepting that his problems are partially beyond his control - that he is mentally/genetically defective and suffers from autism - whilst simultaneously having no shame whatsoever in admitting that I would dearly like someone to lock him in a gas chamber until he foams at the mouth and dies because nothing about him is worthwhile on any level. These are not mutually exclusive feelings. If he is useless, uninteresting, un-endearing, and terrible on every single possible level and paradigm whilst being a horrible, rude, entitled narcissist to boot, then there is no reason to defend him at all. For example this. Jesus christ, look at this. The autistic entitlement and lack of self-awareness. He's not even admitting what he did was wrong.

Jesus Christ dude, read what I said above. The detail that you've put into locking him in a gas chamber tells me that you've been stewing about with this for a while, and that is really, really sad and unhealthy. If you're thinking like that consistently then you probably really need some help. If people similar to him were to die because they were undesirable under this type of logic, we would be no different than the Third Reich sending Jewish folks, homosexuals, and other "undesirables" to concentration camps. There is a reason why Hitler is still considered the most evil person out there to this day. If this is about making Chris suffer, each day for him is a point of suffering. His aspirations have all manifested as unrealistic and he has to live each day knowing that he only has Barb to look forward to. So whatever vendetta you have against him wouldn't prove anything. Like pretty much every other A-Log, the torture you would want to put upon him is probably a reflection on how much of Chris you see in yourself and how much you want for that to go away.

At the very best you'd pity him and naturally just want him euthanized. I don't even think him getting some low-paying easy job would make up for it, he's just so disgusting the world can do without him. There are mentally ill/mentally weird people who are redeemable on some level and aren't flat out disgusting, an example I could give is Ulillillia.
The only possible reason one could hypothetically want to keep him alive is because how disgusting and horrible he is makes him somewhat of a novelty.
Stop lying to yourselves, he's fucking disgusting.
in b4 :alog: and ban.

There's an old saying that my dad says, that everyone has a ticket. Nobody knows what their ticket is, but when their ticket is up, that's the end of their life, the end of the road for them. What Chris decides to do before his ticket is up is his problem. How he decides to live his life is his choice. Not yours.

Also, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

:alog: I suggest worrying about your own issues before ranting about how Chris is evil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: homerbeoulve
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

whilst simultaneously having no shame whatsoever in admitting that I would dearly like someone to lock him in a gas chamber until he foams at the mouth and dies because nothing about him is worthwhile on any level. These are not mutually exclusive feelings.
I would dearly like someone to lock him in a gas chamber until he foams at the mouth and dies
I would dearly like someone to lock him in a gas chamber until he foams at the mouth and dies
I would dearly like someone to lock him in a gas chamber until he foams at the mouth and dies

.......

Looks like I have to read the whole thing.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

It sounds like Anthony Logatto has come to the forum. :tomgirl: :alog:
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

Bgheff warned me about guys like you, OP.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

Chris is a shithead? Good. Move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OtterParty
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

There are other lolcows who are worse than Chris, and I wouldn't wish death on them. Now, chemical castration, maybe...
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

That is what separates us from lolcows. I do not think I have ever wished death on anyone. It's just such a foreign concept to me I guess.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

ABadassDoug said:
Before I get to the main point of this topic I am going to go on the record and say that I am in no way denying that Anthony LoGatto as well as many "A-Loggers" are themselves spergy idiots who troll CWC primarily as a form of projection. No one is denying this.

With that out of the way, onto the point. This topic may get deleted but this shit needs to be said. I'd appreciate it if this gets a full read and at least somewhat of a constructive response before any moderator action is taken, which I am willing to bet probably will.

Hating Chris–chan and wanting him to die is not unhealthy or abnormal. He is literally one of the most narcissistic, disgusting, irredeemable human beings I have ever seen. He does not have one redeeming feature - not one quirk or interesting aspect that makes him a benefit to the world on any level. I am not merely talking about the fact that he will most likely never have a job, but that he isn't even interesting, self aware, cool, funny, or whatever. I know people who haven't done anything with their lives due to mental problems and have redeeming qualities and are even more self-aware than the average human being, whereas Chris–chan is a complete blight on humanity. Not one aspect of him is in any way endearing, worthwhile, or will register as positive to any sane functioning person. Anyone who claims otherwise and is not retarded themselves is lying for the sake of being politically correct.

The point of me stating this is that it does not really matter if it is partially not his fault. I have absolutely no problem whatsoever accepting that his problems are partially beyond his control - that he is mentally/genetically defective and suffers from autism - whilst simultaneously having no shame whatsoever in admitting that I would dearly like someone to lock him in a gas chamber until he foams at the mouth and dies because nothing about him is worthwhile on any level. These are not mutually exclusive feelings. If he is useless, uninteresting, un-endearing, and terrible on every single possible level and paradigm whilst being a horrible, rude, entitled narcissist to boot, then there is no reason to defend him at all. For example this. Jesus christ, look at this. The autistic entitlement and lack of self-awareness. He's not even admitting what he did was wrong.

At the very best you'd pity him and naturally just want him euthanized. I don't even think him getting some low-paying easy job would make up for it, he's just so disgusting the world can do without him. There are mentally ill/mentally weird people who are redeemable on some level and aren't flat out disgusting, an example I could give is Ulillillia.
The only possible reason one could hypothetically want to keep him alive is because how disgusting and horrible he is makes him somewhat of a novelty.

Stop lying to yourselves, he's fucking disgusting.

4309230175_6b3417d720.jpg


Dude, you need to take one look at the lolcow board to know there is much worse than Chris out there.

And wishing death on Chris is abnormal, not to mention childish.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

I decided to give this guy credit - instead of banning him for being a huge A-Logger, I decided to ban him on the grounds that this guy must be a troll that wants to catch us joining in on the A-Logging. Either way, this behavior won't stand.

Serious answer, about the article:

If you talk to someone from /cwc/ or PVCC, they'll tell you they never read the CWCki? Why? "Because it's full of spergs and A-Loggers" or "A-Logs run it now." Most of the base material and prominent articles of the CWCki were written in 2009. Back then, we obviously didn't know as much as we know now about Chris so there were people who would white knight and try to fuck up trolling plans. So, it made sense to point out that Chris is not a "sweet, kindhearted soul" as Anna recently put it and put out his flaws. For rhetorical purposes, these faults were often exaggerated for dramatic effect. Problem is, you had people reading the CWCki who assumed that because it was a wiki, it had high standards like Wikipedia (which it doesn't, mostly due to the content matter and the users who it appealed to) and they interpreted the material as "Chris is worse than Hitler." In a way, I've failed as an admin to enforce objectivity standards sooner but at the same time, it's not the CWCki's fault that some of their readers have autism and cannot read content critically. One of my goals as an admin has always been to ensure that the CWCki is a resource that people will want to use and will use. Addressing A-Logging in articles is one such way, as it's a complaint I've heard over and over.

The problem with A-Logging is that if you feel that Chris deserves to die, I can guarantee you that you have some issue yourself or you see some part of yourself in Chris. You have fatasses like Anthony Logatto saying "Well I might write furry erotic fanfiction where I have sex with cartoon characters, BUT AT LEAST I'M NOT CHRIS! HE GIVES AUTISTICS LIKE ME A BAD NAME!" It's overcompensation. Also with my experience from Chris, he's mostly a child mentally. I think some people A-Log to justify us trolling a mentally deficient man, I did at one point, but I've since realized that yes, I am going to burn in hell for it but so be it because damn, Chris is funny.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

Subject: I wasn't trolling, I was actually 100% serious.
To: admin@cwckiforums.com

Regardless I find it amusing that you have to rationalize all controversial opinions
as “trolling” when perhaps some people actually believe such things. I really
honest-to-God find Chris-chan to be a repugnant and disgusting human being and I
don’t have a single bit of sympathy for him. I don’t see the justification for the
ban, I clearly took the effort to elaborate and explain my views.

Honestly, why is it so hard to believe I was being serious? I don’t find such
opinions weird at all, but a logical conclusion to witnessing such an abomination.
 
Re: The A-Logging article is really self-referential and spe

To repeat, Chris is not evil, just an idiot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back