- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
It's kind of like I Am Legend, only I am Will Smith and they are the zombiesYou dumb faggots know he doesn't have any power if you don't give him it, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's kind of like I Am Legend, only I am Will Smith and they are the zombiesYou dumb faggots know he doesn't have any power if you don't give him it, right?
Reading it again, I see that you didn't, sorry brah.I'm pretty sure I didn't say that bruh
While I disagree with allowing abortion or allowing fathers to skimp out on child support, this does bring up a very good point. As the system is currently setup, a mother can murder her child in the womb and walk away, whether the father wants her to do so or not, because he has no say. But the moment the child is born, the father is expected to be on the hook for child support whether he wants the child or not, and he has to pay it until the child is 18. Even if the child is a child by rape, as in, the mother raping him. Even if father is underage at the time while the mother is over the age of consent, making it statutory rape. And this can happen to a man who is not actually the child's birth father. That shows how fucked up our system really is. All in all, as long as abortion is legal, I would have no problem passing laws allowing fathers to absolve themselves of the responsibility to pay child support or any other legal responsibility to the child. But at the caveat that these laws would immediately cease to be enforced upon Roe v. Wade's repeal. It be interesting to see how long support for Roe v. Wade holds up in such a situation.The woman gets to decide whether to continue the pregnancy because it is her body and life that are on the line. Pregnancy and childbirth are dangerous and debilitating.
However I think the man should also have an “out” where if he doesn’t want a child, and discovers he has impregnated someone, he can complete a legal form and have no responsibility towards the eventual child in future ever. If the woman doesn’t contact him during the pregnancy so that he can get this organised, he retains the right to do so within a reasonable time (maybe a month) after she claims money from him.
And yet you are the one person in this thread who has constantly expressed an outright irrational fear of getting pregnant, despite being the one person in the thread who is the least likely to face this issue.Penis in vagina sex is my favorite addiction even though I've powerleveled all over this thread about being gay and having like no sex drive?
Reality Check: There are plenty of women who are pro-life, and some of the strongest pro-life advocates are female, including women who have had abortions in the past.Women generally don't like it when you want to take away their reproductive rights. You might be able to get laid if you stop acting like a right-wing incel
What's more, many of the laws found in the Old Testament were carried over and reiterated as sins in the New Testament, and Jesus actually made thing more strict than the OT. For instance, under the Old Covenant, you only committed adultery when you committed the act, but Jesus said that any man who even looks upon a woman with lust has already committed adultery within his heart. Similarly, a man who hates his brother is considered the equivalent of murder.Specifically, it was to "complete" it, so that it could actually be eternally salvific, rather than to abolish it. Consequently, according to Paul Christians are meant to understand Mosaic Law as a schoolteacher that at least got them to the halfway mark-- depending on the domain of a particular commandment, it has moral import that still clarifies Christian living.
I know basic science; its why I'm pro-life. And not a single pro-choice person in this thread has managed to make a cogent scientific argument for abortion. Period.If you knew basic science, you would be pro-choice.
Not if the subject is scripture. As you might recall it started with someone claiming there was no scripture basis for being opposed to abortion.Anybody who tries to quote scripture to prove a point is a braindead retard.
But why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out?Reality Check: There are plenty of women who are pro-life, and some of the strongest pro-life advocates are female, including women who have had abortions in the past.
You don't know how to read.I know you'll try to be anal and be all "but I didn't literally say birth control is evil!" or whatever, but it doesnt matter. You did, in fact, go on about how horrible birth control and single mothers supposedly are and shit.
Because I want something else from the relationship other than sex? Because I want a woman who doesn't put out for the first man who comes along? Because I want a woman who respects herself enough to not lower herself to a more base standard just to keep a man? There's more to relationships than sex my friend.But why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out?
Women enjoy sex, too. There's nothing wrong with sex between two consenting adults.Because I want something else from the relationship other than sex? Because I want a woman who doesn't put out for the first man who comes along? Because I want a woman who respects herself enough to not lower herself to a more base standard just to keep a man? There's more to relationships than sex my friend.
Can't believe people are still giving genuine responses to low effort shit like "why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out".Because I want something else from the relationship other than sex? Because I want a woman who doesn't put out for the first man who comes along? Because I want a woman who respects herself enough to not lower herself to a more base standard just to keep a man? There's more to relationships than sex my friend.
Normally I wouldn't give an easy bit for someone who just signed up a month ago but I figure this one would be easy to figure out.Can't believe people are still giving genuine responses to low effort shit like "why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out".
HHH is like the Mr Magoo of trolling.
Yes. Anyone can sincerely believe something and bait excitable retards with opposing beliefs into getting worked up over it.Normally I wouldn't give an easy bit for someone who just signed up a month ago but I figure this one would be easy to figure out.
HHH is sincere about what he's posting.
Plenty of prolife women put out and get abortions on the down-low.But why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out?
Congratulations, you have achieved more awareness than 90% of your peers.Yes. Anyone can sincerely believe something and bait excitable retards with opposing beliefs into getting worked up over it.
No need to be so generous with the statistics, 10% is more than a bit much.Congratulations, you have achieved more awareness than 90% of your peers.
Never implied or stated I was against either one of those things. People in this thread seem to have a problem with reading more into posts than what is being said.Women enjoy sex, too. There's nothing wrong with sex between two consenting adults.
Thing is, I don't think he's actually trolling. And if he is, its rather low effort. I mean this is a thread where people have outright suggesting giving unwanted babies to soup kitchens to add to their dishes. He is far from egregious here.Can't believe people are still giving genuine responses to low effort shit like "why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out".
HHH is like the Mr Magoo of trolling.
And now you go on making gross generalizations. How many logical fallacies do you plan on making in this thread.Plenty of prolife women put out and get abortions on the down-low.
From what I've seen prolife women are almost always insane fundies, and a good chunk of them are old enough to no longer have to worry about pregnancy. They're also great fodder for shit to post in Tard Baby.
Maybe because I'd prefer to live a fulfilling life (unlike you) with someone I love, over a glorified fleshlight.But why would you want to date a woman who doesn't put out?
Is it really a generalization when it's what I've personally witnessed? Yeah, almost all prolife women I've seen are insane fundies. A good chunk of them are elderly. And I'm sure a large percentage of them have some serious skeletons in their closets because that's usually the case with fundies.And now you go on making gross generalizations. How many logical fallacies do you plan on making in this thread.
Rosy palms and her 5 daughters must be very flattered you feel that way about them.Maybe because I'd prefer to live a fulfilling life (unlike you) with someone I love, over a glorified fleshlight.
This is an abortion debate, when did it get into your autistic skull that I have a problem with having children? Better yet, when did it get into your head that I don't like sex? I don't think it should be treated like a necessity, or should be a priority in a relationship (because it shouldn't), but there's nothing wrong with it. My problem is when people start to let it take over and destroy their lives, and when they start bringing the killing of unborn children in so they can perpetuate their degenerative addiction. Especially when those same people turn around and ask "why am I so unhappy?" when their entire life is a bunch of material bullshit that does nothing to fulfill them in the end.Rosy palms and her 5 daughters must be very flattered you feel that way about them.
Regular sex is a pretty awesome thing.Maybe because I'd prefer to live a fulfilling life (unlike you) with someone I love, over a glorified fleshlight.