The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

can't see your source and i'm not signing up to some site, dude.

This thread is all the proof one needs. Do you have any proof to the contrary? So far I see a bunch of screeching cat ladies and their dickless male feminist orbiters losing their shit about something that has never affected them and never will.
proof literally based on nothing but some incel's presumptions about the people posting on this forum based on virtually fuck-all, yeah, dude, good shit.
 
can't see your source and i'm not signing up to some site, dude.


proof literally based on nothing but some incel's presumptions about the people posting on this forum based on virtually fuck-all, yeah, dude, good shit.
I must've hit a nerve, lol. How many cats do you own?

Again, the opinions of faggots and spinsters on abortion are not relevant, just like the opinions of a bald person on brands of shampoo.
 
I must've hit a nerve, lol. How many cats do you own?

Again, the opinions of faggots and spinsters on abortion are not relevant, just like the opinions of a bald person on brands of shampoo.
nah, i'm just telling it like it is. you have zero proof. you lose this internet slapfight.
 
So I have a question after scrolling through this thread for a bit. How come all the people screeching about "muh abortion" are sad, childless incels/femcels? If you're not in danger of getting pregnant, then your opinion on this doesn't matter.
Yes the majority of people whining about abortion are kissless male incels who live in their mom’s basement such as yourself glad you see it now
 
nah, i'm just telling it like it is. you have zero proof. you lose this internet slapfight.

Yes the majority of people whining about abortion are kissless male incels who live in their mom’s basement such as yourself glad you see it now

Hoes mad.

Funny thing is, you know that I'm right, and I know that you know that I'm right. That's why it gets you so angry. You don't like it when people point out that the vast majority of the people who want the right to kill babies are dysfunctional femcels/incels who never had a functional family and never will. Can't forget the orbiters, there are enough of them here too. Going through this thread you can easily point out the low-IQ male feminists who think this is a good way for them to crush puss.
 
Last edited:
Hoes mad.

Funny thing is, you know that I'm right, and I know that you know that I'm right. That's why it gets you so angry. You don't like it when people point out that the vast majority of the people who want the right to kill babies are dysfunctional femcels/incels who never had a functional family and never will, plus a smattering of low-IQ male feminists who think this is a good way for them to crush puss.
no one's mad, though? but lol okay

so i see you still have no argument, by the way. just presumptions of people based on an incel neet's view of the world. get a job yet?

@gang weeder i did my own independent search and it does appear to be true that non-married women typically have abortions. weird thing is, though, is that the majority of women who get abortions have already had at least one kid. so if one wants to argue that only childless monsters who want to remain childless are the ones getting abortions, that would be untrue. these are women who are already providing for one or more children and likely cannot financially handle another.
 
I am not a fan of abortion and struggle to say I support it. I detest things like "abortion parties" and other celebrations of it. But overall I am okay with it being available and enshrined within law.

Technically speaking life does begin at conception. Any biologist could tell you this because cells are dividing and are 'alive' and will eventually form a baby. I have heard it quoted that at a very early stage, having an abortion is just terminating a clump of cells and is similar to for example pulling a tooth. That seems reasonable enough to me and is why I wouldn't consider it murder. Once true viability comes into the question though (ie. you could whip this thing out and it'd survive, however unlikely), I become decidedly anti-abortion. Except of course in extreme circumstances like the mother's life being in danger. I think the current cutoff laws in most countries are fine and so I oppose ready access to third trimester abortion like some activists campaign for.

However, as an alive person who appreciates being here a lot as well as the astronomical odds involved (about 1 in 400 trillion apparently), I do think that there is a sadness that the chance of eventual life has been extinguished. On a cellular level, yes I guess it's accurate to nonchalantly say it's a "clump of cells" and "like pulling a tooth", even if it's technically accurate. But so much potential for a person to experience the same as me in this world has now been lost. Then again, I suppose the same could be said about many other things like masturbation, contraception, or even poor life choices preventing a would-be parent finding a mate.

Overall i'd say my kindred spirit is Johnny Rotten on this issue:


That song was hated and loathed. It's not anti-abortion, it's not pro-abortion. It's: 'Think about it. Don't be callous about a human being, but don't be limited about a thing as 'morals' either. Because it's immoral to bring a kid in this world and not give a toss about it.

So that's my conflicted stance on the morality and biology I guess. In terms of the law, I see little point in outlawing it federally and "putting it to the states". If the objective of overturning Roe v Wade is just to decentralize the decision making back to people's state of residence, why not atomize the decision further and just leave it up to the individual? Except at that point, we're right back to where we already are.
 
no one's mad, though? but lol okay

so i see you still have no argument, by the way. just presumptions of people based on an incel neet's view of the world. get a job yet?

@gang weeder i did my own independent search and it does appear to be true that non-married women typically have abortions. weird thing is, though, is that the majority of women who get abortions have already had at least one kid. so if one wants to argue that only childless monsters who want to remain childless are the ones getting abortions, that would be untrue. these are women who are already providing for one or more children and likely cannot financially handle another.

Yes, the characterization of anti-lifers as "childless" is not necessarily correct (though I do also believe that most LGBTQ@P#(*$Y&@*(RFYHN*(UERYH people are likely to support abortion, just as an overlap with being progressive in general), obviously unmarried women who get abortions are successfully spreading their legs and taking the seed. What this does imply is that users of abortion don't value family formation and are more likely to practice casual sex or be sexually "loose" in general.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
no one's mad, though? but lol okay

so i see you still have no argument, by the way. just presumptions of people based on an incel neet's view of the world. get a job yet?
Let's do a poll. Who from the abortion supporting side is from a normal family (two married parents), is married themselves (remember, marriage is only between a man and a woman) and has kids?
 
Let's do a poll. Who from the abortion supporting side is from a normal family (two married parents), is married themselves (remember, marriage is only between a man and a woman) and has kids?
lol get a job

Yes, the characterization of anti-lifers as "childless" is not necessarily correct (though I do also believe that most LGBTQ@P#(*$Y&@*(RFYHN*(UERYH people are likely to support abortion, just as an overlap with being progressive in general), obviously unmarried women who get abortions are successfully spreading their legs and taking the seed. What this does imply is that users of abortion don't value family formation and are more likely to practice casual sex or be sexually "loose" in general.
why is it your problem, personally, if a woman has casual sex? are men allowed to have casual sex? and if your response is "everyone should wait until marriage", i can tell you straight up that isn't going to happen
 
lol get a job


why is it your problem, personally, if a woman has casual sex? are men allowed to have casual sex? and if your response is "everyone should wait until marriage", i can tell you straight up that isn't going to happen

It's usually a bigger problem for the woman than for me, yes. Being a whore does not generally lead to happiness for women. It tends only to benefit certain high-status low-conscientiousness men who enjoy easy access to sexual variety. Regardless, the morality of casual sex is a separate discussion. My point was only to indicate to you that it is indeed the case that most abortions are carried out by the unmarried (and by extension, the more sexually "liberated," one might say).
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Kiwi & Cow
To be fair, I doubt that much of anyone in this thread is married, on either "side."
Some people are. But I want to see if the allegations of the babykillers are true, that they're all dindu-nuthin good family people and upstanding pillars in their communities, rather than smelly lonely NEETs who only make life worse for anyone around them.
 
Take a shower and change your cat's litter box, abortcel.
:story:get a job parasite

It's usually a bigger problem for the woman than for me, yes. Being a whore does not generally lead to happiness for women. It tends only to benefit certain high-status low-conscientiousness men who enjoy easy access to sexual variety. Regardless, the morality of casual sex is a separate discussion. My point was only to indicate to you that it is indeed the case that most abortions are carried out by the unmarried (and by extension, the more sexually "liberated," one might say).
well we can both agree that abortion is carried out by unmarried women with children who may be sexually liberal. so that's a thing.

edit:

Some people are. But I want to see if the allegations of the babykillers are true, that they're all dindu-nuthin good family people and upstanding pillars in their communities, rather than smelly lonely NEETs who only make life worse for anyone around them.
that's literally you, though
 
Back