The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Shut the fuck up.

You have zero comprehension of what laws are if you're going to cry about your "bodily autonomy" being policed, and you have zero idea of what bodily autonomy even is if you're suggesting that not being able to procure someone else's services because said services are banned independent of you is some violation of your bodily autonomy-- as if it were the state's job to prevent you from killing yourself with a coathanger out of desperation. You probably don't even know what Roe's verdict was.

The people that can't bear the weight of contemplating that they're cheering on snuffing out the most innocent of human lives have to do their damnedest to distract themselves from the reality. They claim that the people who oppose them hate women and want them punished-- meanwhile, at least half of aborted fetuses are girls. They claim that human life has no human dignity if it's super small and still inside a uterus, and then they-- without fail-- paper over the horrifying applicability of such an argument by arbitrarily claiming some cutoff that only exists for their comfort. They use outlier cases (whether they talk about rape cases or maternal mortality) to justify an institution virtually completely powered by the seeking of convenience. They sniffle at the idea of suffering a little, as if they're the only ones to ever suffer. They distort systematic medical/legal incompetence cases in a country where abortion laws were already lax in order to make the case for greater abortion access instead. They diffuse the responsibility of women by bringing up-- apropos of nothing-- the responsibility of men, as if somehow they've justified themselves with the rhetorical equivalent of "and you are lynching Negroes" instead of having tacitly accepted the charge against them. Worst of all, they project their moral bankruptcy and surrepetitiousness onto their opposition-- "No, they don't actually care about children, they all just want them alive so they can molest them! They just don't want to pay taxes for abortion! See, WE'RE the good ones! We want to kill them before they can get molested!"

Then you wonder why you can't stop hearing about kids being groomed, molested and raped in public schools. Then you wonder why children are being taught to be confused about their sex, or outright hate themselves for it. Then you wonder why those same children are then convinced that the only way they can be happy is if they mutilate themselves and abort their puberty. Soon enough, you'll end up wondering why the same people who said this was okay are now saying that they should be able to consent to sex with their adult """lovers."""

All of it is at the hands of people who hate children but have the gall to invent morality where there isn't any.
not reading all that but i'm happy for you/sorry that happened

cope and seethe, incel, cope and seethe
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
I'm already tired of you making your hypersexuality my problem.
nigga, you brought up child rape, lynching negroes, and trooning out in a thread about abortion literally apropos of nothing. it sounds like you're projecting and you should probably get some help, you fucking incel.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
it's not my fault you're unhinged and upset that you can't get laid.
"I'm very angry about the victimization of children!"
"You're just mad because you can't get laid!"
edit: "can't even not read right" guess that means i can read right. nice double-negative, sped.
No, it means that you say:
not reading all that
and then proceed to still read what I said, but poorly. So, you're half-assed and can't even commit to not doing a thing.
 
"I'm very angry about the victimization of children!"
"You're just mad because you can't get laid!"

No, it means that you say:

and then proceed to still read what I said, but poorly. So, you're half-assed and can't even commit to not doing a thing.
sir, you need to be able to form a proper sentence before trying to communicate your idiotic points.

no one was talking about children being molested or victimized in the current conversation, and then your dumb ass waltzes right in like "THE CHILDREN ARE BEING MOLESTED AND ABORTION IS BAD REEEEE!" like what is wrong with you? why are you so unhinged? i have no choice but to believe, based on your post history, that you are a very angry incel who hates women because you can't get laid.

have you considered perhaps not being an absolute misogynist pig?
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Didn't you say you didn't read what I wrote? Why are you talking about what you didn't rea-- oh, wait, I forgot where I was.

Shoot.
so you're unable to actually rebut what i've said. niceeeeeeeeeee.
 
You never responded to what I wrote, either, and you said that you didn't even read it.

I'm desperately trying to keep in mind that that's just natural for A&N posters.
what you typed wasn't worth a dignified response, because it just came off as ranting from a spiteful angry incel who can't get laid. i'm sorry, but it's not the fault of women that you're undesirable and a genetic tragedy.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Breh, what's more nazi shit? To protect life or to end it before it can walk for your own pleasure?
I'd say forcing your religion on others is. Especially when you have simped for nazis in previous posts.
I bet I can raise a fetus to sing songs and shit in about 10 years time, but you can't do that shit with a brick house in a 1000 years lol
What? I know you right-wingers are known for being low IQ, but a house isn't a human
Breh, have you even seen my raging in the Ukraine thread?
Uh huh. You /pol/tards love your Putin because of the propaganda Russia posts there.

A fetus is a genetically distinct individual of the human species. If you tested the DNA in its tissue, it will be different from that of the mother.

Sperm and eggs on their own are not such individuals. If this were true, every man would be a mass murderer in the hundred of billions simply by existing, as that's how many sperm cells an average man generates over his lifetime (each ejaculation alone contains millions of sperm). The entire female population of the planet all carrying a single man's children at once would still barely even leave a dent in this number.
Aww, you don't want to punish men for killing sperm but you want to punish women for not having a baby. Listen, I know you evangelical fundies want to push your religion on the rest of us, but America isn't a religious nation. If you don't like abortions, that's fine. Then push for more access to birth control and non-abstinent sexual education. I see you have no answer to that, since you just want to punish harlots who have sex with guys who aren't you.

And the DNA doesn't matter. It's not a human any more than sperm or an egg is. But since you kill sperm, you don't want to be a murderer, so you say it's not. It's the same logic.

Since you're fine with removing women's body autonomy, I am guessing you're also fine with the government making organ donation mandatory?
An infant can't survive on its own either. "It hasn't been born" is an actual difference between a fetus and a child, yes. It is not apparent why this makes it okay to kill a person at the pre-birth stage of development but not post-birth.
An infant can survive outside of the womb, though. A fetus cannot. I know you're a religious fundie so you want to push your Talibanesque laws on the rest of us, but stop pushing your religious shit on us.
 
what part of "wasn't worth a dignified response" did you not understand?
"Not worth a dignified response" means "not worth a response that's dignified". On top of that, you responded, so you're only calling your own response to me undignified.

I'm guessing you meant "not worth dignifying with a response", but even if I'm not going to be a smartass who calls that out as a response in itself, you still attempted to talk about what I wrote, dignifying it with a response you seemingly expected to be taken seriously.

...So I'm guessing you are drunk.

Don't, uh...

...don't drink and post, yeah?
 
"Not worth a dignified response" means "not worth a response that's dignified". On top of that, you responded, so you're only calling your own response to me undignified.

I'm guessing you meant "not worth dignifying with a response", but even if I'm not going to be a smartass who calls that out as a response in itself, you still attempted to talk about what I wrote, dignifying it with a response you seemingly expected to be taken seriously.

...So I'm guessing you are drunk.

Don't, uh...

...don't drink and post, yeah?
i like how you still can't rebut my point that you're an angry seething incel who is also unhinged, so instead you try to play semantics. it's a nice play, i admit, but it still doesn't change that i'm right and you're still a virgin.
 
i like how you still can't rebut my point
What's the point of rebutting the point of someone who said they didn't read what I wrote, and at best demonstrably half-assed a reading? On top of that, you don't even have a good grasp of what you're writing, but it's bad that I'm pointing that out when you expect me to believe that you do mean to convey meaning.
 
What's the point of rebutting the point of someone who said they didn't read what I wrote, and at best demonstrably half-assed a reading? On top of that, you don't even have a good grasp of what you're writing, but it's bad that I'm pointing that out when you expect me to believe that you do mean to convey meaning.
stop weaseling out of a rebuttal. why are you such an angry little man? did mommy not hug you enough? did she not bring you your tendies? inquiring minds want to know.
 
Earnestly respond to what I said instead of projecting onto me.
"I'M NOT PROJECTING UR PROJECTING!"

lol nah, there is no point in trying to debate with an angry incel on why their stance on abortion is shitty. sorry, buddy, but as long as you continue to be male, whatever opinions you have on an issue that affects only women are irrelevant.
 
Back