The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Out of the two of us, you are the one who would encourage minors to have sex.
Now pretending I said things I didn't to make yourself feel better is one thing, but it's a pretty bold move to do that in a response to a post that actually contains the posts contradicting what you're saying, Flip.

Also, the reason it's illegal for you to have sex with minors isn't because they're a minor, it's because you're like 32, and also apparently believe that if some teenage girl walks up to you and starts talking about sex that it's in any way appropriate to say anything except "Uh, I'm really not the right person to be talking to about this".

do you think a daughter should have to carry her father's fetus if he rapes her?
Don't answer that question Ness, snailslime is one of those women I was referring to a few posts back. She's sick.
 
Don't answer that question Ness, snailslime is one of those women I was referring to a few posts back. She's sick.
In honesty I shouldn't because, above all else, it's an insincere question, as is her entire presence in this thread for that matter. However, I'd still do so if she wasn't so afraid of answering my questions which I posed first.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: veri and Kiwi & Cow
Why do you avoid the fact that religion is not a requirement to oppose abortion? I'm not disagreeing that most people who do probably have some religious inclination, but it's dishonest to label everyone who does as a megachurch attending, virtue signalling religious zealot.
I realize you have crippling autism so you missed the point where I said, "the vast majority", which is not all. You happen to be in that vast majority, that are evangelical zealots trying to force their religion on the rest of us. Move to Afghanistan since you want a theocracy so badly, Feetloaf.

Is that why I'm asking what his other account was? I could find his "Feetloaf" account and look through it, but not "ErisChan", so I'm asking you to tag the account.


That doesn't show up, was the account completely removed or something?
It might be just Eris, I don't remember what you changed your account to before you got banned the first time. It's fucking hilarious how much you try to deny it even though the evidence is obvious that it's 100% you. You're like when Chris Chan was JenkinsJinkies, autism and all
Null didn't confirm that, he implied it based solely upon my participation in this thread.
Lol he confirmed it by saying you make your socking way too obvious.
You think Soros' influence is positive? Anybody who doesn't is a QTard?
Well, QTards are obsessed with Soros because he's jewish and a liberal. You also called everyone who is against the US becoming theocracy a pedophile, so yeah, you're a QTard.

I still find it hilarious how you throw a temper tantrum about mask and vaccine mandates mandates, which are to protect people's lives, but then when it comes to the government forcing women to give birth, you are for it because "ALL LIFE IS SACRED". Especially so when you want to cut welfare and don't want free healthcare for poor single mothers. Yet you won't admit you're just virtue signaling for fetuses because it's easier on your part and requires no sacrifice from you. Even wearing a mask is too much to ask from your autistic self, yet you think women should be forced to raise a child for 18 years. Jesus would be hella pissed at you, son. You do know what he said about hypocrites, right?
 
I realize you have crippling autism so you missed the point where I said, "the vast majority", which is not all. You happen to be in that vast majority, that are evangelical zealots trying to force their religion on the rest of us. Move to Afghanistan since you want a theocracy so badly, Feetloaf.
I understand that your crippling autism is something you want to project onto me, and that it prevents you from answering even simple questions, but I'll ask again:

What about the non-religious pro-lifers who, despite being in the minority, do factually exist in significant numbers?

It might be just Eris, I don't remember what you changed your account to before you got banned the first time. It's fucking hilarious how much you try to deny it even though the evidence is obvious that it's 100% you. You're like when Chris Chan was JenkinsJinkies, autism and all
I don't get your Chris Chan reference because I don't autistically document autists, but I do find it suspect that you can't tag the account in question. Is there even proof Meatloaf is Eris/ErisChan, or is that just another bullshit assumption like you're making now about me?

What is this "evidence" which indicates with "100%" certainty that I'm someone else? At that point it's not even evidence, it's proof, so it must be rather compelling. Don't tell me it's just me "chimping out" here and the join date which isn't even that close. Surely you've got something better...

Lol he confirmed it by saying you make your socking way too obvious.
His opinion that it's "obvious" is not a confirmation, it's merely an offhand comment he made once, and he tends to be a tad hyperbolic.

Well, QTards are obsessed with Soros because he's jewish and a liberal. You also called everyone who is against the US becoming theocracy a pedophile, so yeah, you're a QTard.
Find my posts obsessing over Soros, I've probably only even mentioned him a couple times due to articles about the garbage he does.

Also, I have nothing against Jews, they're an ally of the U.S, and I've never seen proof that they're disproportionately "bad". Soros isn't bad because he's a Jew, he's bad because he's a demonic leftist (which is redundant).

I still find it hilarious how you throw a temper tantrum about mask and vaccine mandates mandates, which are to protect people's lives, but then when it comes to the government forcing women to give birth, you are for it because "ALL LIFE IS SACRED".
First, not all life is sacred. If there's irrefutable proof of guilt in a particularly bad case, or the person is determined to be sane and admits to a terrible crime, I'm not necessarily opposed to the death penalty. I honestly go back and forth on it a bit, but I'm closer to neutral or supportive of it in those cases than against it.

I can't imagine why you'd be so vehemently opposed to it across the board under all circumstances, it's unreasonable and also the same "black and white autistic thinking" you accuse me of.

Second, I'm not going to tell you again, but I'm not against mask mandates. They are, at worst, ineffective. Fauci did say at one point they could be detrimental, but overall I think they can maybe help a bit, and if not, no big deal.

Vaccines are a different matter, however. There's no logical reason to force them on people. You cannot present a coherent argument for it.

Especially so when you want to cut welfare and don't want free healthcare for poor single mothers.
Another thing I'll reiterate for the last time, I'm not opposed to welfare, it merely needs reform (and I'd in fact expand it in doing so while removing people who abuse it). I also support free healthcare not only for single mothers, but every natural-born citizen.

Maybe Feetloaf was against that stuff, but again, don't apply any of his bullshit to me.

Yet you won't admit you're just virtue signaling for fetuses because it's easier on your part and requires no sacrifice from you. Even wearing a mask is too much to ask from your autistic self, yet you think women should be forced to raise a child for 18 years. Jesus would be hella pissed at you, son. You do know what he said about hypocrites, right?
I don't think just women should be forced to raise a child for 18 years, I think both men and women should be. Men shouldn't be exempt from what is a creation of life which is equally their responsibility. They should be arrested and rehabilitated if they abandon their family, because there's something wrong with a man who does that.
 
Now pretending I said things I didn't to make yourself feel better is one thing, but it's a pretty bold move to do that in a response to a post that actually contains the posts contradicting what you're saying, Flip.

Also, the reason it's illegal for you to have sex with minors isn't because they're a minor, it's because you're like 32, and also apparently believe that if some teenage girl walks up to you and starts talking about sex that it's in any way appropriate to say anything except "Uh, I'm really not the right person to be talking to about this".

Let's suppose the teenage girl is your daughter. What do you tell her?

Also notable is that I did not specify a gender, I simply said "teenager," and you've assumed without prompting that it must be a female we are speaking of.
 
Screenshot_1.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: veri and snailslime
I understand that your crippling autism is something you want to project onto me, and that it prevents you from answering even simple questions, but I'll ask again:

What about the non-religious pro-lifers who, despite being in the minority, do factually exist in significant numbers?
They don't exist in significant numbers. And it's not projection when it's obvious you're autistic. You even pretend to not be the person you obviously are, thinking you're so clever when anyone can tell it's you, Erischan.

I don't get your Chris Chan reference because I don't autistically document autists, but I do find it suspect that you can't tag the account in question. Is there even proof Meatloaf is Eris/ErisChan, or is that just another bullshit assumption like you're making now about me?
This forum is built on documenting autists. Except for you, who are here to push your religious bullshit onto the rest of us like a good little fundie.

What is this "evidence" which indicates with "100%" certainty that I'm someone else? At that point it's not even evidence, it's proof, so it must be rather compelling. Don't tell me it's just me "chimping out" here and the join date which isn't even that close. Surely you've got something better...
I've shown you the evidence. You just deny it because you're seriously retarded enough to think you can fool anyone.
His opinion that it's "obvious" is not a confirmation, it's merely an offhand comment he made once, and he tends to be a tad hyperbolic.
Uh huh.
Find my posts obsessing over Soros, I've probably only even mentioned him a couple times due to articles about the garbage he does.

Also, I have nothing against Jews, they're an ally of the U.S, and I've never seen proof that they're disproportionately "bad". Soros isn't bad because he's a Jew, he's bad because he's a demonic leftist (which is redundant).
Lol a "demonic leftist"? That is literally QTard talk. It's hilarious how you're so obviously a QTard but you're ashamed of being a gullible autist so you deny it
First, not all life is sacred. If there's irrefutable proof of guilt in a particularly bad case, or the person is determined to be sane and admits to a terrible crime, I'm not necessarily opposed to the death penalty. I honestly go back and forth on it a bit, but I'm closer to neutral or supportive of it in those cases than against it.

I can't imagine why you'd be so vehemently opposed to it across the board under all circumstances, it's unreasonable and also the same "black and white autistic thinking" you accuse me of.
You are arguing life is precious, but you won't do anything to help poor single mothers. You are just further proving my point you're a virtue signaling fundie who is a hypocrite. You don't want to have to do anything but want to be holier-than-thou
Second, I'm not going to tell you again, but I'm not against mask mandates. They are, at worst, ineffective. Fauci did say at one point they could be detrimental, but overall I think they can maybe help a bit, and if not, no big deal.
Fauci said it at the beginning of the pandemic. I know you're an uneducated simpleton, but later on when new data came in showing otherwise, he changed his tune. That's what intelligent people do (which is why you think it's a foreign concept).
Vaccines are a different matter, however. There's no logical reason to force them on people. You cannot present a coherent argument for it.
Why not? Vaccines help someone from spreading a disease, thus saving the other person's life. I know you're an uneducated simpleton but it's not hard to follow the logic
Another thing I'll reiterate for the last time, I'm not opposed to welfare, it merely needs reform (and I'd in fact expand it in doing so while removing people who abuse it). I also support free healthcare not only for single mothers, but every natural-born citizen.

Maybe Feetloaf was against that stuff, but again, don't apply any of his bullshit to me.
At least you're pro government healthcare. That is one thing we do agree on. Why don't you fight for that as hard as you sperg up this thread with your fundie bullshit?
I don't think just women should be forced to raise a child for 18 years, I think both men and women should be. Men shouldn't be exempt from what is a creation of life which is equally their responsibility. They should be arrested and rehabilitated if they abandon their family, because there's something wrong with a man who does that.
Why are you so against abortion? Someone else getting an abortion doesn't effect you. The fetus doesn't even have sentience until way past the first trimester. Is it because it's easy for you to virtue signal without any sacrifice on your part? Because again, Jesus hated hypocrites and you come off as a huge one
 
Let's take a moment to be thankful that all of us can sperg out this hard here and not worry about being banned or cancelled.

It may not be a healthy debate, but it's better than nothing. Reminiscent of the old internet. If only we could have puzzle stickers back to rate this post autistic
Why were certain reactions/icons removed, anyway? I would imagine from overuse, but I don't know.
 
Back