The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

[snailslime]

that doesn’t mean that 14 should be the age of consent. two high schoolers fucking isn’t really a big deal, it’s normal at that age, but AOC should still exist to prevent a 14 year old from getting with a 35 year old

@gang weeder probably thinks a 14 year old should be forced to carry her 35 year old rapists' baby.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

No woman is going to carry a baby for 8 months and then decide to abort it. Where do you Republicans get these ideas?

 

[gang weeder]

No woman is going to carry a baby for 8 months and then decide to abort it. Where do you Republicans get these ideas?

Why then did the Democrats just vote on a bill in the Senate that would've codified a right to abortion up til point of birth?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

on this thread?

Yes. They're calling pro-choicers "groomers" and pedos lol

Why then did the Democrats just vote on a bill in the Senate that would've codified a right to abortion up til point of birth?

Medical emergencies happen. You are showing you have no idea how women's bodies work if you think a woman is going to get pregnant and wait til the 8th month to decide for an abortion outside of a medical emergency

 

[Mark Antony]

that doesn’t mean that 14 should be the age of consent. two high schoolers fucking isn’t really a big deal, it’s normal at that age, but AOC should still exist to prevent a 14 year old from getting with a 35 year old

AOC doesn’t just regard sex, but also not needing parental consent to get tattoos, piercings, medical treatment, opening a bank account, signing documents, USED to be buying nicotine but the cucked government decided to ruin that for us

It's a really big deal when a disproportionate number of teens get labelled as sex offenders because of some arcane laws that fly in the face of reason. With sex, I do not agree with current AOC because it denies human agency, stunts people's development and, more often than not, covers victimless crimes that occur because of passion or negligence as opposed to really predatory behaviour. Lumping such incidents together with actual pedophiles, rapists and any other kind of adolescent abuse does a disservice to the people that they are meant to protect. Also @gang weeder I admire your sophism and therefore I'm calling you a pedophile for wanting to force teen girls to give birth to rape babies.

 

[gang weeder]

Yes. They're calling pro-choicers "groomers" and pedos lol


Medical emergencies happen. You are showing you have no idea how women's bodies work if you think a woman is going to get pregnant and wait til the 8th month to decide for an abortion outside of a medical emergency

Why did the Democrats' bill specify abortion for any reason up til point of birth? It does not say "only for medical emergencies at month 8," it's any reason til point of birth no questions asked.

It's a really big deal when a disproportionate number of teens get labelled as sex offenders because of some arcane laws that fly in the face of reason. With sex, I do not agree with current AOC because it denies human agency, stunts people's development and, more often than not, covers victimless crimes that occur because of passion or negligence as opposed to really predatory behaviour. Lumping such incidents together with actual pedophiles, rapists and any other kind of adolescent abuse does a disservice to the people that they are meant to protect. Also @gang weeder I admire your sophism and therefore I'm calling you a pedophile for wanting to force teen girls to give birth to rape babies.

I appreciate the admission that your mindset leads naturally to abolishing the age of consent and encouraging children to be sexually active.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Why did the Democrats' bill specify abortion for any reason up til point of birth? It does not say "only for medical emergencies at month 8," it's any reason til point of birth no questions asked.

Because "medical emergency" can be interpreted in different ways. They want no exceptions for that reason. Again, I realize you're a religious fundie virgin, but no woman is going to carry around a fetus for 8 months then just randomly decide to get an abortion. You are making it super obvious you've never touched a woman before.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

It might be just Eris, I don't remember what you changed your account to before you got banned the first time. It's fucking hilarious how much you try to deny it even though the evidence is obvious that it's 100% you. You're like when Chris Chan was JenkinsJinkies, autism and all

Speaking of Chris Chan there are two pro-abortion arguments that can be made with him

1. Should irresponsible out of touch parents have the right to carry a mentally ill child who will turn out to be a dreg?

2. Should a woman carry a baby if she was raped by a close relative, like their own son for example?

 

[gang weeder]

Speaking of Chris Chan there are two pro-abortion arguments that can be made with him

1. Should irresponsible out of touch parents have the right to carry a mentally ill child who will turn out to be a dreg?

2. Should a woman carry a baby if she was raped by a close relative, like their own son for example?

#1 requires us to define what counts as "out of touch parents" which is going to be incredibly messy. It also requires you to somehow know while the child is still in the womb that they will turn out to be "mentally ill" and "a dreg" which is going to be impossible to predict with much accuracy, plus again, what counts as "mentally ill" and "a dreg" is extremely subjective. For example, I consider most liberals to be a dreg regardless of any other traits they may have, personally.

#2 is easy to extrapolate. If a woman bears a child by rape, can she smother it in its crib if she one day decides she doesn't want it anymore?

Because "medical emergency" can be interpreted in different ways. They want no exceptions for that reason. Again, I realize you're a religious fundie virgin, but no woman is going to carry around a fetus for 8 months then just randomly decide to get an abortion. You are making it super obvious you've never touched a woman before.

You should tell that to the Democrats who left this qualifier out of their bill.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

You should tell that to the Democrats who left this qualifier out of their bill.

What does it matter? I'd rather allow the choice up to 8 months, but again, no woman is going to carry a baby around in their womb for 8 months and then decide to abort. Do you have any idea how much work a pregnancy is? By 8 months, the name will have already been picked out. Baby clothes and other supplies will be bought. A room and crib will be ready.

Again, you are showing you were asleep in sex ed in your remedial school here. Why are most of you 2022 join dates puritanical virgin Republican fundies?

 

[Doctor of Autism]

#1 requires us to define what counts as "out of touch parents" which is going to be incredibly messy. It also requires you to somehow know while the child is still in the womb that they will turn out to be "mentally ill" and "a dreg" which is going to be impossible to predict with much accuracy, plus again, what counts as "mentally ill" and "a dreg" is extremely subjective. For example, I consider most liberals to be a dreg regardless of any other traits they may have, personally.

That’s fair so thanks for letting us know you want more liberals in the world

#2 is easy to extrapolate. If a woman bears a child by rape, can she smother it in its crib if she one day decides she doesn't want it anymore?

Not really since there’s the part about it being done by a relative, so I guess inbreeding is perfectly fine to you then

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

That’s fair so thanks for letting us know you want more liberals in the world

Not really since there’s the part about it being done by a relative, so I guess inbreeding is perfectly fine to you then

Well, he is a Republican and a QTard, so he is probably the product of inbreeding

 

[Marcus Tullius Cicero]

No woman is going to carry a baby for 8 months and then decide to abort it. Where do you Republicans get these ideas?

I never mentioned that. It was more in reference to what you said, about how making a woman carry a child to term due to failed birth-control is cruel. I said letting the fetus develop for a few weeks and then aborting it is irresponsible. Nothing about waiting eight months and then doing it.

 

[NoTimeToLose]

Yes. They're calling pro-choicers "groomers" and pedos lol

what does that have to do with QTardism?

 

[snailslime]

#1 requires us to define what counts as "out of touch parents" which is going to be incredibly messy. It also requires you to somehow know while the child is still in the womb that they will turn out to be "mentally ill" and "a dreg" which is going to be impossible to predict with much accuracy, plus again, what counts as "mentally ill" and "a dreg" is extremely subjective. For example, I consider most liberals to be a dreg regardless of any other traits they may have, personally.

#2 is easy to extrapolate. If a woman bears a child by rape, can she smother it in its crib if she one day decides she doesn't want it anymore?



You should tell that to the Democrats who left this qualifier out of their bill.

do you think a daughter should have to carry her father's fetus if he rapes her?

 

[gang weeder]

That’s fair so thanks for letting us know you want more liberals in the world

Not really since there’s the part about it being done by a relative, so I guess inbreeding is perfectly fine to you then

You didn't answer the question. Assume it's rape by a relative if you want.

 

[snailslime]

You didn't answer the question. Assume it's rape by a relative if you want.

Yes or no?

do you think a daughter should have to carry her father's fetus if he rapes her?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

I never mentioned that. It was more in reference to what you said, about how making a woman carry a child to term due to failed birth-control is cruel. I said letting the fetus develop for a few weeks and then aborting it is irresponsible. Nothing about waiting eight months and then doing it.

Women who get abortions are typically going to get one as soon as they find out they're pregnant. That usually happens within the first trimester by a huge amount. But doesn't matter because you GOPers want to ban that, too.

what does that have to do with QTardism?

The QTard way is to accuse everyone who isn't a Republican of being a pedo or groomer

 

[gang weeder]

You didn't answer the question. Assume it's rape by a relative if you want.

@Doctor of Autism Dislike in lieu of an answer. Kek. So much for that little "gotcha."

 

[Doctor of Autism]

@Doctor of Autism Dislike in lieu of an answer. Kek. So much for that little "gotcha."

I love how you dodged my question because it's easier for you to endorse rape babies than babies conceived by incest. Why not admit you're fine with inbreeding? Like sure the kid will be physically and mentally impaired but it's important to preserve life, that is except for the financial support needed to raise a damn kid.