A study for what?
I just want you to answer this question:
Is an organism which performs the seven processes of life, is a member of the species Homo sapiens and has different DNA from both its mother and father a human being? If not, why?
Why killing another "human", as you put it, is bad. Studies separate these by fetus and human though, so you're going to have to take that into account.
You could, however, look at other studies of what happens to unwanted pregnancies and their outcomes. Because you're too afraid to google, I'll do it for you.
While the focus of this section and this work is not to debate whether personhood of non-humans is reasonable, we explore the faulty reasoning of the suggestion and expand on the negative implications that would ensue if a similar genetic code was sufficient criterion for personhood.
This is a study from 2017, so it's not outdated. Everyone has their own definition, no one wins. Why does your definition have to affect mine, though? There are also explained definitions that some give as any living thing should also have human rights. Is their definition better than yours? Why or why not? You cannot win, as will no one. My definition does not affect yours because I'm not going to be forcing you to harbor something you don't want. Yours affects mine in a way that does not benefit anyone.
-
https://www.bmj.com/content/331/7528/1303.short
The abortion group had a significantly higher mean education and income and lower total family size, all of which were associated with a lower risk of depression. ... The observed association of abortion with education and income—social variables that have profound implications for mental health—is consistent with the literature on the negative effects of early and unwanted childbearing.
1
If you're uneducated you're more likely. So that's promoting generally poorer populations to have kids because of the weird lies and forced attachment to something you can't even see, not a great start.
-https://search.proquest.com/openview/7665b37e6f41a7d7c416cd211e4e3e9e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=35753
More mental health issues. Gotta keep more mentally ill people coming because their life is going to be so precious! They're gonna love it!
-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386715001589
Although induced abortion has indeed been shown to be safer than childbirth with respect to risk of death (
Raymond & Grimes, 2012), the literature also documents that the extremely low risk of mortality associated with abortion increases gradually with each week of gestation (
Bartlett et al., 2004).
A woman is more likely to die pushing that unwanted fucker out instead of yeeting it early. Baby-makers are natural at having babies though and abortion UNNATURAL AND BAD! Clearly one is better because it's happened for a really long time! Stupid women when will you just learnnnnn.
-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347618312976
Results
From 6 months to 4.5 years after their mothers sought abortions, existing children of women denied abortions had lower mean child development scores (adjusted β −0.04, 95% CI −0.07 to −0.00) and were more likely to live below the Federal Poverty Level (aOR 3.74, 95% CI 1.59-8.79) than the children of women who received a wanted abortion. There were no significant differences in child health or time spent with a caregiver other than the mother.
We have to keep women and their kids poor and stupid! How else will we have cheap labor to exploit! They just need to pick themselves up by their bootstraps, stupid kids, they clearly chose this to happen.
You're welcome.
And these are just the articles that I don't have to log into university shit for because lord knows none of you guys are in/went to one so you can't get access to information that you are so proud of denying others of.
> "Noooooo, you can't be against murder unless you've first solved all problems faced by the living!"
Some variation of this galaxy-brained deflection from the issue gets parroted in every single abortion discussion ever, and the people posting it always seem to think that it's a genius knock-out argument.
You're right, because the genius knock-out argument of "have babby because you opened your legs and it's human so that's MURDER" is good enough. What life are you even taking? Trees are alive, stop murdering them for paper uwu. You're fucking stupid to think I'm dumb enough to think all world problems can be remedied.
Please tell me how ruining 2 lives is so forgiving and benevolent for everyone involved. I'm into schadenfreude but that's full-retard.
ETA for retards: moved a paragraph up because it was in the wrong place. What a spin!
, merged