- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I mean, you could argue all the ones that killed their moms are murderers. You also don't have to be a mass murderer to get the death penalty.How many unborn babies do you know that are mass murderers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean, you could argue all the ones that killed their moms are murderers. You also don't have to be a mass murderer to get the death penalty.How many unborn babies do you know that are mass murderers?
No, there would be a lot more dead adult women and teenage girls. The deaths from back alley abortions and giving birth would skyrocket.And unlike most changes we've seen in recent times, on lives destroyed vs lives saved it would be massively in the plus.
How many is a lot? 5, 50, 500, 5000, 50000?No, there would be a lot more dead adult women and teenage girls. The deaths from back alley abortions and giving birth would skyrocket.
No, there would be a lot more dead adult women and teenage girls. The deaths from back alley abortions and giving birth would skyrocket
Lol that's not what happened when romania banned abortion. Thousands of women and girls ended up dead.Let's take massively generous numbers. Like multiple orders of magnitude generous. Let's say that 50% of women would opt for "back alley abortions" if they're illegal and let's be massively generous and say that 50% would die in them.
Let's also be massively generous and say that 5% of women that give birth die.
You get to at most (50% baby death from abortions + 25% mothers died from abortions, 2.5% mothers death from birth). You get to 77.5% compared to the deaths from abortions.
And these numbers are inflated to insane degrees.
On top of that, people would start to modify their behaviour to better prevent unwanted pregnancy.
Nothing you said about Romania contradicts what I wrote.Lol that's not what happened when romania banned abortion. Thousands of women and girls ended up dead.
You don't actually care about children if you think even one should die horribly due to being unable to access a safe abortion.
You're being incredibly disingenuous by ignoring the fact that Romania was a commie shithole under the leadership of a hilariously corrupt and incompentent man.that's not what happened when romania banned abortion.
It was a commie shithole but them banning abortion undeniably cost the the lives of thousands of women and girls. Even to this day unsafe abortions are actually the 3rd leading cause of maternal death worldwide, every year thousands of women and girls die almost exclusively in countries where abortion is heavily restricted or banned entirely.You're being incredibly disingenuous by ignoring the fact that Romania was a commie shithole under the leadership of a hilariously corrupt and incompentent man.
”Abortions are the third most prominent cause of maternal death. So obviously I support abortion.”Even to this day unsafe abortions are actually the 3rd leading cause of maternal death worldwide,
unsafe backalley abortions that women and girls turn to in desperation when they cant access safe ones you fucking sped”Abortions are the third most prominent cause of maternal death. So obviously I support abortion.”
![]()
For half the people involved maybe.unsafe backalley abortions that women and girls turn to in desperation when they cant access safe ones you fucking sped
Legal abortions are safer than giving birth is.
Nah, for all the people involved. Embryos and fetuses aren't people. Women and girls however, are people contrary to popular belief.For half the people involved maybe.
Do you ever not talk in circles?Nah, for all the people involved. Embryos and fetuses aren't people. Women and girls however, are people contrary to popular belief.
The solution to that is to deal with why these abortions are taking place - for instance, by giving benefits to poor mothers - not by legalising murder.
Why not? Explain to us why a being with a seperate set of DNA to its parents and which is part of the human race isn't a person.Embryos and fetuses aren't people.
Idk, do you ever stop trying to pretend embryos are people (except when IVF clinics destroy them of course)?Do you ever not talk in circles?
I'm as opposed to that as I am to abortion. Life begins at conception and it is murder to wilfully destroy it.except when IVF clinics destroy them of course
A fertilized embryo is as much a potential human life as you are, considering your lack of development and mental abilities. So I wouldn't judge them too harshly.Idk, do you ever stop trying to pretend embryos are people (except when IVF clinics destroy them of course)?
Because unique DNA doesn't make you a person. Corpses have unique DNA, they aren't people (not anymore anyway). Certain body parts of people with chimerism have unique DNA and they sure as fuck aren't people either. Same with fertilized eggs that naturally get yeeted by the body all the time, often before ever implanting in the uterus (I think I've mentioned that's how plan B works, it discouraged fertilized eggs from implanting in the uterus and starting a pregnancy).The solution to that is to deal with why these abortions are taking place - for instance, by giving benefits to poor mothers - not by legalising murder.
Why not? Explain to us why a being with a seperate set of DNA to its parents and which is part of the human race isn't a person.
Corpses also don't grow or fulfil any of the processes of life, unlike embryos.Corpses have unique DNA, they aren't people (not anymore anyway).
Those body parts do not have any of the organs that humans need to survive nor will they ever develop them. This is not the case for embryos.Certain body parts of people with chimerism have unique DNA
Not if you abort them, plus embryos stop growing and die on their own plenty.Corpses also don't grow or fulfil any of the processes of life, unlike embryos.