The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

I would be more pro-life if we didn't live in brutal economic system with a very competitive job market.
This is one of the many reasons that I feel Christianity and unregulated capitalism are incompatible. I understand that many abortions take place as a result of economic factors and for me, one of the ways to solve that is to enlarge the welfare state and create a society where people don't feel that they have to turn to murder.
 
Why what's wrong with this?

That chick is awesome, prolifers fall for the most obvious bait. Plus do you really think she's someone that needs a kid?

In other news one of my friends got me some fun fundie goodies
20210531_175037.jpg

I'm gonna post the adventures of the rubber fetus itt
 
This is one of the many reasons that I feel Christianity and unregulated capitalism are incompatible. I understand that many abortions take place as a result of economic factors and for me, one of the ways to solve that is to enlarge the welfare state and create a society where people don't feel that they have to turn to murder.
Unregulated anything is incompatible with any sensible morality.

The problem is usually who gets to do the regulation and how much of it?
 
Unregulated anything is incompatible with any sensible morality.

The problem is usually who gets to do the regulation and how much of it?
True, fundies being able to pop out 10+ kids and then blatantly abuse them with no regulation is clearly a problem.
 
While abortion could be consider horrible. It isn't comparable to stealing.
Murder is significantly worse than stealing.
promiscuous, unmarried women are the ones that having abortions
This is overwhelmingly the case. Almost an order of magnitude more abortions are performed on unmarried women than married women.
(I would think this would be obvious but apparently not)
Untitled.png
Children take resources and tons of parental investment if you want them to succeed in this day and age.
So work hard and acquire resources to give them. That's kind of the whole point of work. Hell, it's kind of the whole point of life.
If I was poor and married, I would be on birth control. Not to equate abortion to birth control, but reproduction is a serious matter.
Personally, I feel that with the widening wealth and wage gap, it's better to plan for children.
Poor people overwhelmingly have more children than rich people and those poor children aren't dying of starvation at age 5. They reach adulthood just like everyone else. It's a lot of work to raise a child but the probability of catastrophic failure in a modern era with modern medicine and modern education is basically zero percent. Nothing you are saying makes any sense at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher
No it isn't. Why would it be?
Because it's torturing a child. And before you open your retarded mount, the embryos and fetuses aren't being tortured because they can't feel pain and they aren't sentient.
Keep telling yourself that, dude.
Look, just admit already that you're buttmad that I called you out for being way too invested in this topic for a sexually inexperienced male. It's kind of sad that you have to resort to insisting that I'm a man just because your fee fees are hurt.
 
Look, just admit already that you're buttmad that I called you out for being way too invested in this topic for a sexually inexperienced male. It's kind of sad that you have to resort to insisting that I'm a man just because your fee fees are hurt.
I know that you're male because you're hyperfixated on my sexual experience to a pathological degree. Either because you're a male incel, or because you're a hypereffeminate male so out of touch with actual masculinity that you think virginity or "touching a boob" is enough of a natural point of fixation for men that you can wield it as an insult or-- even more baffling-- suggest it as a remote prerequisite for discussion on the topic of abortion.

On top of that, in reality, you've given zero reason outside of faith (which, in you I have none) for anyone to believe that you're a woman. You haven't provided tits, you haven't GTFO, and actual women don't insist they're "100% natal female". Not only that, but so far, that insistence and the fact that your IQ is synonymous with your age are the only two personal traits you've stated or otherwise demonstrated. I have never been more sure of someone being male-- literally every other person who's asserted themselves as a female on this site has demonstrated that they're three-dimensional women, as opposed to being/"being" women whenever they think it'll bring them argumentative leverage.

This is probably a good approximation of your actual person:

 
Last edited:
Look, just admit already that you're buttmad that I called you out for being way too invested in this topic for a sexually inexperienced male. It's kind of sad that you have to resort to insisting that I'm a man just because your fee fees are hurt.
No one's fee fees are hurt. We read this thread to see what absolutely retarded shit you'll say next. It's mental exercise to dab on you daily.
 
I'm curious, what is prolife stance on in vitro fertilization? On one hand it allows people to have children, on the other hand it usually involves destruction of unused embryos.
 
In Hungary there are hospital areas where you can leave a baby without any legal consequences to be adopted by the state.

It is like abortion but with less killing. Not sure how good it would be for WELLFARE KWEENS but it does seem like a fundie friendly option that leaves thots with no consequences.
 
In Hungary there are hospital areas where you can leave a baby without any legal consequences to be adopted by the state.

It is like abortion but with less killing. Not sure how good it would be for WELLFARE KWEENS but it does seem like a fundie friendly option that leaves thots with no consequences.
Most states have the ability to leave an infant at a firehouse or hospital with no questions asked.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bunny Tracks
In Hungary there are hospital areas where you can leave a baby without any legal consequences to be adopted by the state.

It is like abortion but with less killing. Not sure how good it would be for WELLFARE KWEENS but it does seem like a fundie friendly option that leaves thots with no consequences.
Most states have the ability to leave an infant at a firehouse or hospital with no questions asked.
Abandoning your child is almost as immoral as murdering it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher
I don't see how forcing someone to not commit murder is torture.
Terminating a pregnancy is not murder. We've gone over this many, MANY times.

But thanks for confirming that you don't give a shit about children once they're actually born.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Android raptor
Yes, and every time we went over it you were wrong and we were right. Abortion is murder.
Not to most people. Just because your diseased mind can't fathom others point of view doesn't make your viewpoints the correct one.
Murdering them is exactly as immoral after they are born.
But letting them starve because you want to get rid of social welfare isn't?
 
Back