The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

A&N is a literal containment board for mouth breathing tards, to the point where even null segregated it from the rest of the site. why don't you go suck off the other faggot that just left in there?
Because I don't feel like it, get dabbed on libtard
i post in A&H sometimes, too, but it's funnier now that I stopped posting in there as often but they still tardrage about me

But why do you only post in here when abortion comes up? Do you guys have an abortion thread alert or something
Didn't even know there was an abortion take when I came in for the funny pickup truck pic but then just read a shit-take and had to step in, justice needs to be delivered to foid and libtards in equal doses and I'm here to avenge all of the fetusi that were holocausted in the name of science.

Nobody tardrages about you anymore sadly, you dropped your street cred brother and hulkamania is on the decline now, come back to debate the merits of vaccinin or whatever it is your current spergery.
 
So what you're saying is that because you don't like Pat Whatshisface, the story is total bullshit, but you think CNN is an actual news source?
Do you seriously not know who Pat Robertson is?
Why is science better than anything else, though?
Because there's actual tangible proof under science? It's certainly better than "Abortion is bad because my pastor says so."
 
Fetuses do not breathe in the womb. The mother breathes for them and oxygen is transferred through the placenta and umbilical cord.

Basically the same as a braindead person in a coma with a vent tube and a machine pumping oxygen for them.

You're half right in that it is a living thing and it does require oxygen, though. I'll grant you that. Then again, so does braindead coma vegetable.
That's why I said, "as in, receiving oxygen to live." As you said, they do require oxygen to live. They're not breathing on their own, but neither are millions on ventilators.

Hmm, an actual news source vs. some garbage founded by Pat Robertson. Gee, that's such a difficult choice.
CNN is proven fake news. Can you prove CBN is fabricating this story or is known to be fake news in general like CNN, the joke source you accept as "actual" news?
OK, but it won’t change the fact that you have literally no clue what it’s like to have an abortion and never will.
Pretty sure we know how blending babies out of convenience works.
 
Do you seriously not know who Pat Robertson is?
Is the story bullshit because Pat Robertson Bad?

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Nah, if they aren't born yet it's not murder.
You end the life of a human being, it's murder. A fetus is a human being no matter what kind of bullshit you concoct up. And the sole reason ant brains liberal fags like you justify fetuses as non-human expendables for the pleasure for hoes is because a fetus is too weak to defend itself.

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
A fetus isn't a baby yet, so it's not murder.
A fetus is a human being. I told you this a million times, but your halfwit brain that keeps parroting the same bullshit can't seem t get this basic shit through itself.
If you'd be original, you'd at least ask if an egg is a chicken or some shit.

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Nope, you want to remove body autonomy to save lives (your words, not mine), thus, you are also arguing for forced vaccines and organ/blood donations. Sorry, chump, but you lose again.
Are you literally brain dead and this is your spirit animal, which must be a monkey, typing this out?
I already told you, I don;t care about the vaccines, I care about the "my body my choice" baby murderers deciding that my own body is their choice, aka, I'm anti forced vaccinations. That's not even talking about that even if it that shit would happen, that it would not end corona.
Get a load of this chode and his double speak

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Just because you want to punish women for having sex doesn't mean you should be able to take away their body autonomy.
Women punish themselves by having sex and getting knocked up. Then they punish themselves even more when they get an abortion, fuck up their bodies and kill a child.
I ain't paying taxes so some hoes can kill their babies.

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Besides, all outlawing abortions does is increase back alley abortions. If you really wanted to limit abortions, you'd be pushing for more access to birth control and sexual education, but you don't actually give a shit about the fetus. You just want to punish women who have sex.
Oh yeah. A degenerate culture that celebrates itself definitely is not the cause of abortions, drug abuse, child abuse, depression, poverty and all that other shit that the democrats fight with higher wellfare taxes and free drugs for the homeless. This kind of attitude is exactly why libtard fags flee blue regions for the red ones.

you live in their heads rent free
As if he could affort to pay rent in the first place. He's a democrat.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but why does proof make it innately superior to anything else?
Are you serious right now? What do you rely on?
CNN is proven fake news. Can you prove CBN is fabricating this story or is known to be fake news in general like CNN, the joke source you accept as "actual" news?
CNN is a legitimate news source. CBN is religious quackery.
Is the story bullshit because Pat Robertson Bad?
Known Jesus freak fundie grifter? Yes.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • oh-wait-youre-serious.gif
    oh-wait-youre-serious.gif
    4.8 MB · Views: 31
Excuse me, that wasn't my question. Why do you think science should take precedent over anything else when it comes to making decisions?
Hi, very late and barging in uninvited. Science should take precedent over anything else when it comes to euthanasia because science can show concrete evidence for and against it, I guess in a way that can't really be argued with unless you provide alternative evidence. Is a fetus owed human rights while living inside/off of another human? That, I don't know.
 
If you’re not a woman shut the fuck up about how easy or hard it is to get an abortion because, honestly, you’re out of your fucking element Donnie.
Men are the ones that indirectly made it so that there weren't abortion hubs in the United States, by way of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Men are the ones drafting abortion legislation either for or against. Men are the ones that came up with the techniques, tech, drugs, and manufacturing for performing abortion. Since Roe v. Wade, it's been more likely for the person performing the abortion to be a man-- only recently has that ceased to be the case, and even then, just barely.

No, I think men are very in their element, on either side of the debate.

Women are the ones that came up with coat hangers and drinking funny stuff to maybe induce miscarriage. Why do you think pro-choice women are so insistent on Planned Parenthood continuing to be a thing? Because left to them, they'd just be killing themselves trying to perform an abortion.
 
Vaccines are a legitimate "my body, my choice" matter. The baby isn't the mother's body no matter how much you scream, and they shouldn't have the right to kill it just because they no longer want their invited guest.

If someone needs my blood then I should give it to them if I want to, I'd feel obligated especially if they were a decent person. However, they're not my family, and I didn't willingly conceive them and so therefore have no moral responsibility to them. Totally different situation.
I don't know if it's atypical for a pro-abortion person, but I agree that the fetus is alive. I just think the mother should be able to kill it. Someone really has to stretch things to say that late-term fetuses, especially viable births, aren't "alive"

If I have a very clingy child who will literally die if I stop hugging them, I shouldn't be required to hug them forever. It sucks, but I'd rather have dead babies than a world where we force people to bring them to term. Most of the talk about religion, is the baby alive, it's mostly irrelevant. To me, the question is whether you think the right to bodily autonomy outweighs the baby's right to a chance at birth. I think it does, some people disagree. For example, if you have a child who has a medical condition requiring one of your kidneys, most parents would happily give it up. But it shouldn't be illegal to refuse, however detestable that refusal might be.

The problem with this is that neither side will never be happy. One will always think babies are being murdered, the other side will always feel like people have lost bodily sovereignty to a completely unacceptable degree.
 
can show concrete evidence for and against it
Science is also constantly changing and in the 20th and 21st centuries, scientists have shown just how corruptible they are. Science cannot answer all the questions we ask and to double down on the current scientific knowledge as gospel, is to hobble yourself, spiritually and unironically scientifically too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Science is also constantly changing and in the 20th and 21st centuries, scientists have shown just how corruptible they are. Science cannot answer all the questions we ask and to double down on the current scientific knowledge as gospel, is to hobble yourself, spiritually and unironically scientifically too.
Ahh yes, hating scientists because they tell you things you don't like to hear
 
That's because you guys keep posting the same stuff over and over again. You hate scientists and science because they tell you things you don't want to hear, so you just disregard all scientists and claim they're all corrupt
Walk me through the steps that made you conclude that we hate scientists. Surely, for a man of high intelligence such as yourself, this will be nary a task. And let's try to keep the conversation on the topic, shall we? We're talking about abortions here.
 
Walk me through the steps that made you conclude that we hate scientists. Surely, for a man of high intelligence such as yourself, this will be nary a task. And let's try to keep the conversation on the topic, shall we? We're talking about abortions here.
you've literally said that 99% of scientists are corrupt in the covid threads.

You also said, in this very thread:
scientists have shown just how corruptible they are
You shit talk scientists because they say things you don't want to hear and your fragile brain just can't handle things you don't like
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Vain Pain
Back