- Joined
- May 26, 2016
My theory is that a certain age is crucial to what social status you gain for pretty much the rest of your life. That age span would roughly be 12 to 16. This is time in life in which children gradually become more independent socially.
At 12 parents no longer match up kids with eachother. The whole class is no longer invited to someones birthday party, etc. Kids suddenly have to learn to keep up a social life on their own. Gradually as they age social groups and friendships form and solidify. If you for any reason don't manage to construct a social network before your late teens (late bloomer, domestic problems, bad health, whatever) you will have a very diffucult time fixing this.
Basically it will be a moment-22. Because you have no social experience you can't get friends. Because you don't have friends you can't gain social experience. It's like when people become long-term unemployed. You don't get hired with a big hole in your CV. In the same way you don't get admitted into social circles without any references.
The only way I can see someone come out of this is to make themselves objectively admireable in some way. Material wealth or measureable intellectual capital. Even if the first wave might be golddiggers they will often be a springboard to a greater social circle.
Note that the issue here is not the same as of, say, CWC whos social ineptness is etched into his genes. Incels can sometimes be explained this way though. What makes them exceptional is that they don't see success as a way out for some twisted ideological reason. I.e. "Why should I have to improve when Chads and females don't".
So for the discussion: Does it makes sense what I say here? I've lived most of my life in a small town which might influence my perception. I'd love to hear other theories and experiences on this subject.
At 12 parents no longer match up kids with eachother. The whole class is no longer invited to someones birthday party, etc. Kids suddenly have to learn to keep up a social life on their own. Gradually as they age social groups and friendships form and solidify. If you for any reason don't manage to construct a social network before your late teens (late bloomer, domestic problems, bad health, whatever) you will have a very diffucult time fixing this.
Basically it will be a moment-22. Because you have no social experience you can't get friends. Because you don't have friends you can't gain social experience. It's like when people become long-term unemployed. You don't get hired with a big hole in your CV. In the same way you don't get admitted into social circles without any references.
The only way I can see someone come out of this is to make themselves objectively admireable in some way. Material wealth or measureable intellectual capital. Even if the first wave might be golddiggers they will often be a springboard to a greater social circle.
Note that the issue here is not the same as of, say, CWC whos social ineptness is etched into his genes. Incels can sometimes be explained this way though. What makes them exceptional is that they don't see success as a way out for some twisted ideological reason. I.e. "Why should I have to improve when Chads and females don't".
So for the discussion: Does it makes sense what I say here? I've lived most of my life in a small town which might influence my perception. I'd love to hear other theories and experiences on this subject.