I see we are playing the "you aren't allowed to know who I am or derive predictions on my present attitudes based on my past statements" game.
You don't know the first thing about me, either in real life or much about me online apart from my posts here. I know as much about you as you about me, but your consistent strawmanning of virtually all right-wing sentiments expressed here makes me take you much less seriously. I've yet to see you offer a single solid critique of pro-White views that wasn't couched in bad faith arguments, elaborate strawmanning or just outright hostility.
For what it is worth, I am defensively pro-White and my politics flow from that. I support any system that keeps the political power in favor of Whites demographically. I'm pro-White not because of some great myth of White superiority. There were plenty of times in history when White Europeans were at the mercy of external forces, namely the Ottomans and the Mongols. The Persian Empire expanded more territory than even the Roman Empire at their respective heights. So no, White people aren't some super race chosen by whatever to seize the world. I'm pro-White because they are my ancestors and want to see them dominate in the very nations they founded.
Say what you will about unabashed racists, they're very well aware that demography is destiny, and shifting the country to majority non-White will have disastrous consequences, and not just for them. Do you believe that if a day were to come when Whites were no longer the majority of the population and no longer held the lions share of political power and wealth in the country, that affirmative action programs would disappear or be scaled back? Absolutely not. If anything, they would amplify 1000x fold. United States wasn't even a tenth as oppressive to its residents as South Africa or Rhodesia was, but the trajectory seems to be almost identical, and every person in their heart of hearts knows that transfers of power are never peaceful.
Miscegenation is what it is. People and cultures who come into contact with others will inevitably miscegenate and isn't something that doesn't need to be advocated or opposed. People are free to associate and marry whoever they want. I'm not interested having power over such affairs. That said, there are biological realities that demand to be addressed especially in light of the propaganda used to aggressively push race-mixing. No one is demanding East Asians and Sub-Saharan Africans to mix with races outside their ethnic group, although they are free to do so. That demand is strictly being put upon White people.
And yeah, mixing the races doesn't guarantee your children will be model material. If anything, they'll look ethnically ambiguous and just strange. That's not a deformity. Just something less than aesthetic and a solid counterpoint to the notion that mixing the races will yield towards more attractive offspring.
believe that the Afrikaaners should start a
race war and threaten to nuke the nigs to protect their state.
I never said they should start a race war. On the contrary, they should form their own state by any means necessary by Afrikaners for Afrikaners.
Like it or not, nuclear weapons affords you great power and allows you to continue existing as a nation regardless of what your policies may be. Look no further than DPRK or Pakistan for proof. Of course, you also need allegiances, but that's another debate entirely.
I never said they should go around nuking random African nations, but a theoretical Volkstaat must be defended by any means necessary.
Your rhetoric is built entirely around conflict theory: namely, that whites and non-whites have interests that are fundamentally incompatible and cannot be reconciled, and that thus the White race should focus on advancing their own interests and eliminating the influence non-whites have in any nation inhabited by both whites and non-whites.
The first part does sum up some of my views, but you then strawman me at the end. If a nation was founded by Whites, then it must be protected by the very Whites that founded it. That doesn't mean completely disenfranchising non-Whites, but artificially disenfranchising Whites to appease the underachieving non-Whites will only lead to discontent.
>Jumps back just to back up Mongler's point after no activity since Christmas
Cute.
Writing a response takes time, and frankly, there isn't a point arguing with someone who'll just use anything I say against me.
