Plagued The Alt-Right

You are making the mistake that I am engaging you in good faith. I tried that several times about... oh, I think 2 or 3 years ago. By this point, I've figured out that we can't have a dialogue and now just try to see how quickly I can make you chimp out.
Seriously, why should I engage with you when anything but simpering admission of how I'm an evil libtard and you are right and just gets "REE PEDO PSYCH DRUGS BAD I AM RIGHT AND JUST!"? Like trying to talk to a social studies major.
And I don't need antidepressants or fringe ideology to be content at this point, which puts me one slot above you.
Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?
2200 EST, 06/26/2020, 4210 Wolfetown Rd, Cherokee, NC 28719
Bring as many of your cowardly friends as you want; I'll go to prison, but all of you will go to the morgue.
 
Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?
2200 EST, 06/26/2020, 4210 Wolfetown Rd, Cherokee, NC 28719
Bring as many of your cowardly friends as you want; I'll go to prison, but all of you will go to the morgue.
This will never get old. One of the greatest self-owns in this forum's history.
 
Can't be a true conservative without having a mouth full of shemale cock.

Well, you said it not me.

I know you're super fond of "150 yEaRs AgO, this would have been fine..." etc., but I'd bet good money that even then, someone like you would be dragged out of town behind a horse and nailed to a tree.

Hmm, its almost like giving corporations personhood gives them the right to essentially do precisely that to whoever they want.
 
Hmm, its almost like giving corporations personhood gives them the right to essentially do precisely that to whoever they want.
It's more of a lack of enforcement against monopolistic companies that violate their Section 230 privileges. Existing laws could clamp down on this no matter what anyone felt about corporate personhood, but good luck getting Pajeet Eye to do it.
 
It's more of a lack of enforcement against monopolistic companies that violate their Section 230 privileges. Existing laws could clamp down on this no matter what anyone felt about corporate personhood, but good luck getting Pajeet Eye to do it.

The situation we're in currently is known as an Oligopoly Sturcture. With less technobabble, it basically means a bunch of powerful corporations are colluding with each other. Its different from an Oligarchy because that's a bunch of powerful people colluding with each other. Corporations are not people, they are machines.
 
The situation we're in currently is known as an Oligopoly Sturcture. With less technobabble, it basically means a bunch of powerful corporations are colluding with each other. Its different from an Oligarchy because that's a bunch of powerful people colluding with each other. Corporations are not people, they are machines.
I always liked the terms Anarcho-Tyranny or Distributed Totalitarianism, but yeah pretty much. Corporations and NGOs are more capable of influencing individual behavior and social norms than the government is. It's really wack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: L50LasPak
Not all of us live in SoCal. Thank the Great Goddess.

Also after reading thru the last couple pages I hate how that faggot Richard Spencer hijacked the term Alt Right for his own purposes. There's no good descriptor, since a lot of them just didn't give a fuck about Jesus, were nationalist, and were race realist. Oh, and loved delicious trap cock. Can't be a true conservative without having a mouth full of shemale cock.

Funny you mention SoCal, it used to have a massive skinhead scene. I visited family there once and it's the only place I've seen a swastika tattoo in the wild.

What you're describing is a phenomenon called "Racist Liberalism" by traditionalists. Racist Liberals were basically NIMBY Libertarians who got racist because they were scared of nigs and spics threatening their decadent urban/suburbanite bugman existence. No niggers in MY bathhouse, dammit! Lots of them are sexual degenerates who ascribe to Racist Liberalism because they'd be rejected by both non-whites and whites who returned to traditional morality.

The problem with this is that moral weakness makes you more vulnerable to outside invaders.

The reason "pro-White" organizations fail is because very few of their members are "pro-White" in the sense of wanting to promote the long-term health of Caucasian cultures and societies- they're anti-other-races, and think that this is enough due to a conception of reality as a zero-sum game where, if enough misery and damage are inflicted on non-whites, this will magically improve white living conditions.

You talk like a SPLC intern with brain damage. White nationalism isn't dashing brown babies against a pyramid so the Racism God will give you a good harvest this year. The point isn't to inflict cruelty on nonwhites because we think it'll magically give whites nice things.

The goal is to separate from nonwhites because diversity isn't working for us or them, and every faction wants it done as peacefully as possible. The only violence anyone would endorse is self-defense. If somebody talks about genociding nonwhites seriously, they're either a federal agent, retarded, or a fed pretending to be retarded.
 
freedom of speech ≠ freedom from consequences.
Thanks for sparing me the bugman comic.

The problem here is that you do not understand Total Propaganda. In your mind, people form opinions on their own, and the only reason pro-whites are systematically denied a platform to speak or even hold a bank account is that they're obvious assholes, and everyone agrees. In actual reality, the controllers of the media are able to manufacture "reality" as perceived by the masses, and are able to systematically badger and shame their ideological enemies via a distorted presentation of reality.

Does the average American, white or black, have any clue that 93% of interracial crimes are black on white? No, of course not, and they never will. That fact is suppressed, and anyone who attempts to make others aware of it are viciously branded haters and extra-legal action is taken against them. The kike dyke going after the UTR organizers outright stated that she was doing it in an effort to suppress the ability of such people to organize: literal lawfare, which is illegal. Yet is she disbarred for that? No, of course not.

You're either a liar or an ignoramus.

i've never met a minority who unironically hated/wanted to wipe out whites (i'm sure i've met more than you).
You've not looked very hard. I'd wager most of the residents in Saint-Domingue said and thought the same thing. Until they were viciously murdered, raped, and tortured of course. And then the mulattoes after them. Look at the videos of the statue-topplings. Look at how full of hateful glee these people attack symbols of whiteness. Many outright state they want to "destroy whiteness." Do you believe the more scholarly types when they say that they don't mean white people, but merely "white systems" or whatever bullshit? If you do, you're a fool. Even if they weren't lying -and they're certainly lying- such a force, once unleashed, could not be contained.

living such a paranoid life must honestly suck. all nonwhites are definitely out to get you!
Few actually are, but I understand Total Propaganda, I understand the nature of witch hunts, and it's pretty obvious where this is all headed. These people aren't nuanced. The narrative isn't "all people are tribal and have done bad things in the past, but white people, as the majority population, need to place a particular emphasis on bridging divides." No. The narrative is "white people are uniquely evil, and are the root cause of all the world's problems." What could possibly be the endgame of such a narrative? Do you think normie non-whites will stick their necks out and put their lives on the line against the radicals when the time comes? If so, you better think again.
 
Thanks for sparing me the bugman comic.

The problem here is that you do not understand Total Propaganda. In your mind, people form opinions on their own, and the only reason pro-whites are systematically denied a platform to speak or even hold a bank account is that they're obvious assholes, and everyone agrees. In actual reality, the controllers of the media are able to manufacture "reality" as perceived by the masses, and are able to systematically badger and shame their ideological enemies via a distorted presentation of reality.

Does the average American, white or black, have any clue that 93% of interracial crimes are black on white? No, of course not, and they never will. That fact is suppressed, and anyone who attempts to make others aware of it are viciously branded haters and extra-legal action is taken against them. The kike dyke going after the UTR organizers outright stated that she was doing it in an effort to suppress the ability of such people to organize: literal lawfare, which is illegal. Yet is she disbarred for that? No, of course not.

You're either a liar or an ignoramus.


You've not looked very hard. I'd wager most of the residents in Saint-Domingue said and thought the same thing. Until they were viciously murdered, raped, and tortured of course. And then the mulattoes after them. Look at the videos of the statue-topplings. Look at how full of hateful glee these people attack symbols of whiteness. Many outright state they want to "destroy whiteness." Do you believe the more scholarly types when they say that they don't mean white people, but merely "white systems" or whatever bullshit? If you do, you're a fool. Even if they weren't lying -and they're certainly lying- such a force, once unleashed, could not be contained.


Few actually are, but I understand Total Propaganda, I understand the nature of witch hunts, and it's pretty obvious where this is all headed. These people aren't nuanced. The narrative isn't "all people are tribal and have done bad things in the past, but white people, as the majority population, need to place a particular emphasis on bridging divides." No. The narrative is "white people are uniquely evil, and are the root cause of all the world's problems." What could possibly be the endgame of such a narrative? Do you think normie non-whites will stick their necks out and put their lives on the line against the radicals when the time comes? If so, you better think again.
Have sex already
 

"How could having sex possibly make my life any better?"

Fucking hell, this has to be bait. Do you mean you don't have a heckin tradwife who is at this this very moment dancing in a wheat field? I'd be sympathetic to WNs if they generally had their shit together, but it's a movement led and populated by homosexuals, memelords, and petty criminals. I can't take it seriously.
 
Back