War The Army Has Finally Fielded Its Next Generation Squad Weapons - bringing an end to the service's decades-long effort to replace its M4 and M16 family

Article (Archive)

The Army has officially fielded its brand-new Next Generation Squad Weapon rifles to its first unit, bringing an end to the service's decades-long effort to replace its M4 and M16 family of military firearms.

Army Futures Command announced Thursday that soldiers from 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, accepted delivery of the XM7 Next Generation Rifle and XM250 Next Generation Automatic Rifle ahead of training in April.

Produced by firearm maker Sig Sauer, the XM7 is intended to replace the M4 carbine in close combat formations, while the XM250 will replace the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon, or SAW. Both new rifles are chambered in 6.8 mm to provide improved range and lethality against enemy body armor.

The Next Generation Squad Weapon series also includes the XM157 Fire Control smart scope, built by Vortex Optics, which integrates advanced technologies such as a laser range finder, ballistic calculator and digital display overlay into a next-generation rifle optic.

The fielding "is a culmination of a comprehensive and rigorous process of design, testing and feedback, all of which were led by soldiers," Col. Jason Bohannon, manager of soldier lethality for the Program Executive Office Soldier project, said in a statement. "As a result, the Army is delivering on its promise to deliver to soldiers the highest-quality, most-capable small-caliber weapons and ammunition."

Based on Sig Sauer's MCX-Spear rifle, the XM7 features a 13-inch barrel, both standard and left-side non-reciprocating charging handles, a collapsible buttstock, a free-floating reinforced M-LOK handguard, and AR-style ergonomics. The XM250, based on Sig's LMG 6.8 mm machine gun, features quick-detach magazines and increased M1913 rail space. Both weapons come with Sig Sauer suppressors designed to reduce the blowback from toxic fumes.

Soldiers should know that the XM7 is noticeably heavier than the M4 carbine -- 9.8 pounds suppressed in a basic combat load compared to the M4's 7.4-pound combat load, per the Army -- and delivers increased recoil compared to the M4 on par with a weapon system chambered in 7.62 mm, according to Sig Sauer officials.

According to the Army's fiscal 2025 budget request, the service has a long-term plan of buying 111,428 XM7 rifles, 13,334 XM250 automatic rifles, and 124,749 XM157 Fire Control devices stretching into the 2030s.

The XM7 and XM250 "ensure increased lethality against a broad spectrum of targets beyond current/legacy weapon capabilities; increased range, accuracy, and probability of hit; reduced engagement time; suppressed flash/sound signature; and improved controllability and mobility," the Army's budget says.

The service has been pushing for a new family of infantry rifles since the mid-1980s when it kicked off the Advanced Combat Rifle, or ACR, program to identify a replacement for the M16 family of assault rifles. The canceled ACR program was followed by the XM29 Objective Individual Combat Weapon program in the 1990s and the XM8 assault rifle effort of the early 2000s, both of which were also abandoned.

The M4/M16 replacement effort took on new urgency during the war in Afghanistan, where American soldiers found that the M16 family of rifles and their standard-issue 5.56 mm ammunition -- designed for the close-quarters combat of Vietnam and well-suited for urban warfare during the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq -- proved ineffective against Afghan insurgents engaged at longer distances amid the country's mountainous terrain, as The Associated Press reported in 2010.

That issue led to the 2010 fielding of the upgraded 5.56 mm cartridge, the M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round, as a temporary solution to bolster U.S. troops' lethality in Afghanistan. Eventually, the Defense Department's 2017 Small Arms Ammunition Configuration Study determined that an intermediate 6.8 mm cartridge would likely outperform both standard-issue 5.56 mm and 7.62 mm rounds, inducing the Army to establish the Next Generation Squad Weapon program in 2018 to replace both the M4 carbine and the M249 in its arsenal.

From there, the Army selected three gunmakers to furnish the service with prototypes of the NGSW-Rifle (the M4 replacement) and the NGSW-Automatic Rifle (the M249 replacement): General Dynamics-OTS Inc., AAI Corporation Textron Systems and Sig Sauer, the last of which had won the Army's Modular Handgun System program contract in 2017 to replace the M9 Beretta across every service in the U.S. armed forces.

Sig Sauer eventually clinched the contract in 2022. Since then, the Army has been conducting ongoing user testing on the rifles, putting them through their paces in extreme environments. In late March, days before revealing the initial fielding to 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment, the service announced plans to build a 6.8 mm ammunition plant in Missouri to support the proliferation of the weapons across the force.

According to the Army, soldiers have spent more than 25,000 hours testing the next-gen weapons from initial development to fielding.

"The process of developing and fielding new equipment is never without challenges and setbacks and speed bumps, so we're celebrating the fact that we're delivering on schedule, as promised," Lt. Col. Mark Vidotto, the program lead for the Soldier Lethality Cross-Functional Team at Fort Moore, Georgia, said in a statement.
 
Finally and... 6.8mm too! FINALLY learned their lesson. A happy medium between 7.62 and 5.56. At least it's not another of the latter.

Wait, the LMG is 6.8mm too?! Oof

It sure took them long enough though.. How many times have they got weapons that meet their requirements, after years funding them, just to cancel them out of nowhere. It happened at least 3-4 times that i can remember. Which makes me wonder what the catch is to getting everyone to sign off.

Going to hold judgement on it's quality and usefulness for now though. Going to have to read up. Not a fan of the color or look. They look big too.
Looking this up.. Oof if true:

The XM7 rifle weighs 8.38 lb (3.80 kg), or 9.84 lb (4.46 kg) with a suppressor. It uses SR-25 pattern magazines that hold 20 rounds in a box magazine.[7] An optional 25-round box magazine is also available.[8] The proposed combat ammunition load for each soldier will be 140 total rounds, distributed across seven 20-round magazines, in total weighing 9.8 lb (4.4 kg). Compared to the M4A1 carbine weighing 6.34 lb (2.88 kg) unsuppressed, with a basic combat load of 210 rounds in seven 30-round magazines, in total weighing 7.4 lb (3.4 kg), the XM7 rifle weighs about 2 lb (0.91 kg) more and each soldier carries roughly a 4 lb (1.8 kg) heavier load with 70 fewer rounds.[3][19]

How the hell did they manage that? Weight was supposedly one of key stats they were aiming for? The SCAR would have been much better, and they would have had the choice of ammo to fit circumstances.
 
The XM7 is a pretty good rifle. Forgotten Weapons did a video on it a while back and came to the conclusion that it was a pretty good choice for the army to make. The short stroke piston system will eliminate all of the DI fouling issues that AR pattern rifles have had for their entire service life, and the choice to go to 6.8 shows that the military is finally interested in intellectually moving forward from the cold war.
 
The weird thing is the round is .277 Fury, which is still impossible to really get still. The big pain is that having it being Sig, it's going to be expensive. The Spear is still over $2.5k at most places and I doubt will ever come down much until clones. I saw some cleaning videos of the Spear and you have to take off the front end where the pistol is to clean, which didn't look very fun.
 
The M4/M16 replacement effort took on new urgency during the war in Afghanistan, where American soldiers found that the M16 family of rifles and their standard-issue 5.56 mm ammunition -- designed for the close-quarters combat of Vietnam and well-suited for urban warfare during the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq -- proved ineffective against Afghan insurgents engaged at longer distances amid the country's mountainous terrain, as The Associated Press reported in 2010.
So basically yet another weapon designed based on the last war the US was in, and likely to be useless, or worse than the M4 in the NEXT war? (That presumably won’t involve chasing goat herders.)
 
So basically yet another weapon designed based on the last war the US was in, and likely to be useless, or worse than the M4 in the NEXT war? (That presumably won’t involve chasing goat herders.)
I'm not exactly in a place to tell them what to do, but IMHO they should be proactive and make something suited for use in Eastern Europe or Taiwan, in case (Heaven forbid) it comes time to rock-n-roll in those regions.

New fuddlore will drop, both from consoomers who need to have the latest and greatest gear and from those coping that a 50+ year-old platform is "just as good".

To parphrase my namesake, "because it's what I have/what I prefer/what I'm used to training on" is perfectly acceptable. You don't need to justify it to other people.

5.56 and AR platforms have been the meta for so long, I highly doubt they're going anywhere anytime soon. Civilians, PDs, and POGS will still use them for years to come.
 
Last edited:
So basically yet another weapon designed based on the last war the US was in, and likely to be useless, or worse than the M4 in the NEXT war? (That presumably won’t involve chasing goat herders.)
The article got it wrong. The purpose of the NGSW project was to crack body armor.

The actual timeline looks like this:
1. In 2016, Russia announces that they've developed a powered exoskeleton called Ratnik-3. All reports show it to be at least NIJ IV armor, possibly higher.

2. Around the same time, China begins production of massive piles of cheap ceramic body armor, available on Wish.com. Most of this armor is actually just plastic coated in a millimeter of ceramic, but some of it proves remarkably strong despite its low price.

3. In 2017, the US begins the NGSW project, with the intent of producing a rifle that can crack these new Russian and Chinese body armors. To that end, they provide a 135gr round and tell defense contractors to build a rifle that can sling it out of a 13" barrel at 3,000fps. In the end, Sig wins the contract by using AI to develop new steel alloys that can handle much higher chamber pressures than previously possible, and adding a simple modification to the cartridge so it wouldn't weld itself to the inside of the chamber at 80,000psi.

4. However, the US is aware that you can't just design a rifle to crack body armor, and so also commissions an LPVO with a displaced reticle. This allows even the dumbest of troops to snipe enemies at 800 yards with nothing more than a basic rifle, and makes up for long range capabilities that were previously unheard of in the sandbox.

5. In 2022, Russia invades Ukraine. Not only do Russian troops not have Ratnik-3 powered exoskeletons, they only rarely have any body armor at all. Soldiers are sent to the front line without so much as a cheap holosun red dot on their AK. Reports come out showing that Ratnik-3 was little more than a motorcycle suit with foam padding glued on. China has still yet to provide ground troops with any body armor at all, and their new rifles are shown to keyhole at 10 yards.

The XM7 continues the United States' proud tradition of jumping at shadows so hard that they create military hardware that outclasses the rest of the world for the next three generations (our last great example being the F-15, also developed in response to Russian bullshit).
 
I'm not exactly in a place to tell them what to do, but IMHO they should be proactive and make something suited for use in Eastern Europe or Taiwan, in case (Heaven forbid) it comes time to rock-n-roll in those regions.
Why Taiwan? If we’re serious for a second, we both know there’s fuck all they can do when the Chinks roll in.

Send an army across the pacific? Through a hail of hypersonic anti ship missiles? On the off chance that Taiwan con hold out for a few weeks?

The only thing they US can do is to deploy a few tripwire troops, and pray to god that China doesn’t call their bluff and bomb the shit outta whatever hapless marine happens to be there.

As for Europe, the 556 is good enough. Not ideal, but you won’t have the distances and altitude as in Afghanistan so it’s good enough.

Yes, body armor is a problem, but if it’s a choice between a heavy gun and a lighter gun, overall the lighter gun is the way to go. Americans also have body armor and it all adds up.
 
OH, wow, another weapon.

Well, let me check something.

What's that? The Biden administration doesn't have the ammo plant up? Well, when's it scheduled to open? Oh, it's estimated that it'll put out 15K rounds a month? When's it open?

TBD?

Oh. Well... I'm sure that won't be a problem. How about Sig, what's their plant's capacity?

What's that? It takes them 3 months to put out 100K rounds according to unclassified data?

Oh, well, I'm sure that's all the military needs, right?

How about that Texas plant?

Oh, wasn't given certification by the Biden Administration?

Yup, here we go.

Another fucking logistical shit-show.

By some of the estimates I've seen, it'll take 5-10 years for Class-V stocks to reach good enough saturation to trust the rifle to be fielded in large quantities.

While it's great at cracking body armor at 500m, the M4 will still be retained, according to what I've been reading. The M249 SAW and the M4 will still remain in service as well as remain in armories at a Brigade or Regimental level to allow the military to grab whatever they need.

This should be positively hilarious.
 
The NGSW continues the United States' proud tradition of jumping at shadows so hard that they create military hardware that outclasses the rest of the world for the next three generations (our last great example being the F-15, also developed in response to Russian bullshit).
I think the Ukraine war has shown that this “vaunted three generations superiority” is mostly in the minds of Hollywood and keyboard warriors.

If anything, the NGSW is a continuation of the Pentagon and the MIC’s proud tradition of drawing the wrong conclusions from the LAST conflict the US was in.

The Ukraine war has shown that artillery and drones are the big killer. Instead of plonking farmers in flip flops in mountainous terrain from 800 yards away, chances are that American soldiers in the next war will kiss FPV drones long before they get to take a shit at half a mile of distance.
 
The Biden administration doesn't have the ammo plant up?
There's an ongoing campaign to gimp Lake City's output for selling surplus on the civilian market.
Why Taiwan?
Unlike Ukraine, we're bound by treaty to protect them, and they have significant microchip supplies.
If we’re serious for a second, we both know there’s fuck all they can do when the Chinks roll in.
That's why we have the Navy and Muhreens. Will they successfully defend Taiwan? Fuck if I know, probably not. But that's supposed to be what they're used for. They've been out of their ostensible element chasing camel jockeys in mountains.
 
Last edited:
So basically yet another weapon designed based on the last war the US was in, and likely to be useless, or worse than the M4 in the NEXT war? (That presumably won’t involve chasing goat herders.)
Kind of the opposite. The XM7 was build around so hypothetical war with a near peer rival whose able to equip every solider with advanced body armor.
 
Kind of the opposite. The XM7 was build around so hypothetical war with a near peer rival whose able to equip every solider with advanced body armor.

More because of combat experience in Afghanistan. Otherwise a smaller, faster round would have been chosen, like the Russians have done as well as the 4.7 round.
 
There's an ongoing campaign to gimp Lake City's output for selling surplus on the civilian market.
Is'nt it great?

I got into an argument with someone who eventually just said: "Well, I guess they'll have to outsource the ammunition production."

From what I've seen with the anti-drone, the M203 is going to make a comeback, since the 40mm APERS round has proven really good for anti-drone work.

Of course, our retarded generals and procurement officers want high tech laser bullshit that will break after 10 minutes in the field.
 
I think the Ukraine war has shown that this “vaunted three generations superiority” is mostly in the minds of Hollywood and keyboard warriors.
>war between two former Soviet states where one side is given scraps from decades ago and the US doesn't actually participate
>surely this destroys the overwhelming materiel superiority that the US holds

Truly baffling
 
The weird thing is the round is .277 Fury, which is still impossible to really get still. The big pain is that having it being Sig, it's going to be expensive. The Spear is still over $2.5k at most places and I doubt will ever come down much until clones. I saw some cleaning videos of the Spear and you have to take off the front end where the pistol is to clean, which didn't look very fun.
And Sig’s QC has gone down since they moved the main plant to East Germany according to a dealer I know.
 
Last edited:
Back