The Australian totalitarian megathread - She won't be right mate.

Who do you think will win the Farrer by-election?

  • Independent Michelle Milthorpe

    Votes: 4 16.0%

  • Liberals or Nations (Both fielding candidates)

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • One Nation

    Votes: 16 64.0%
  • Total voters
    25
  • This poll will close: .
I'd be interested to hear how the prosecution intends to link booing - a common display of disapproval - with offensive behaviour. Especially considering the booing was immediately drowned out by applause (cucked or not). Unless they intend to suggest some imaginary 'group' took offense.
 
Alkor said:
I'd be interested to hear how the prosecution intends to link booing - a common display of disapproval - with offensive behaviour. Especially considering the booing was immediately drowned out by applause (cucked or not). Unless they intend to suggest some imaginary 'group' took offense.
Click to expand...
The problem with this "offensive behaviour" prosecution is that since there's no way to define what is offensive other than "someone said they were offended", it's impossible to mount a defence. It literally relies on the accused to prove that they didn't offend anyone.
 
Iron Jaguar said:
The problem with this "offensive behaviour" prosecution is that since there's no way to define what is offensive other than "someone said they were offended", it's impossible to mount a defence. It literally relies on the accused to prove that they didn't offend anyone.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, that was the keystone of the 'hatespeech' laws Lickle Anfony Ellery rammed through post-Bondi. For this exact purpose, undeniably.


Hopefully, this is a harbinger of things to come:

1777889677957.png
 
On One Nation's candidate for Farrer:

He broke with One Nation policy at a separate candidate forum last week by suggesting it was “probably not” an issue if Australia’s net migration reached 306,000 – more than double the party’s proposed cap of 130,000 migrants a year.
“If we’re successful in One Nation’s water policies, we’re going to need more labour, and we’re going to need more labour quickly, skilled labour,” he said.

“So for anyone to be able to say ‘what is the number today’, it should be addressed as what are we doing with productivity and what are we doing with capacity building, then you will get a true number that’s required for Australia.”
Click to expand...

Stone the bloody crows cobber, why can't we get a fair dinkum nativist party going in shitsville? Instead we're stuck with a personality cult run by some ranga Sheila who's a total galah

Shits me to fuckin tears
 
Iron Jaguar said:
The problem with this "offensive behaviour" prosecution is that since there's no way to define what is offensive other than "someone said they were offended", it's impossible to mount a defence. It literally relies on the accused to prove that they didn't offend anyone.
Click to expand...
whats stopping us from reporting uncle abo's welcum speech? It's basically some clown dressed in roadkill calling white people second class citizens. Very offensive.
 
Cat Funt said:
whats stopping us from reporting uncle abo's welcum speech?
Click to expand...
The inherent two tier system propping up a white sweaty fat rude man who glorified Charlie Kirk's death as Aboriginal elders is stopping you. You aren't even allowed to boo the grift without intentional misconstruing that it was booing ANZACs
 
Last edited:
Nobody's thinking they were booing ANZAC's. Seriously, cunts need to carefully dissect everything coming from lefto mouths cause if enough people report them as hurt feels, it would set some kinda precedent for what's 'offensive'. Of course you'd need an actual lawman who could take it beyond local courts and their lefto magistrates. Next thing you know they'll arrest a bloke for turning his back during an abo humiliation ritual. Shit's getting too dumb for words fuck me sideways etc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom