The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I already explained this to you. Asian has been the name for south and central asian people (pakis, banglas, and indians) for decades. There are letters from the Ugandan resettlement in the 1970s that refer to them as Asians, when the nomenclature was already well-established. Nobody calls Arabs "Asian". Nobody in the UK calls Chinese and the like "Asian" without a clarifier, like "east asian", which was only really adopted in the 90s when Oriental and Fer Eastern became a politically incorrect.
I have never heard of Indians, Pakis, or Banglas referred to as "Asians" until very recently. They were always referred to by those aforementioned names.
 
Archived.
View attachment 6303376
Keywords: British Rioter Stabbed In Prison by Muslim Pakistani Paki
This post is getting buried under a pile of shit and it's one of the most important posts in the entire thread.

If you protest against unequal treatment you will be killed. This is the message Starmer is sending and he fucking knows it. If you so much as see someone protesting you can also be killed. Why the fuck were they sent to high risk prisons? Because that's where the rapists and murderers got let out from?!
 
Last edited:
Archived.
View attachment 6303376
Keywords: British Rioter Stabbed In Prison by Muslim Pakistani Paki
There's literally 0 evidence this person was a rioter or that he was stabbed by a muslim. Even the person who originally posted it says he doesn't even know if it's true:
fakenews.PNG

He just got sent a shitty quality video of a person in a prison bleeding and then said 'apparently this person was a rioter and stabbed by a muslim' with no proof to back it up.
 
If heaven and hell are real, it's going to be funny to see Starmer trying to justify his actions at the pearly white gates.
I can imagine him standing on his tippy toes swaying back and forth naked with his autistic fat pig face and emotionless thousand-yard stare, sweaty grey hair swept to one side, as he mumbles some incoherent nonsense as to why he decided to become a race traitor in a stupid British accent.
1723577740841.png1723577755629.png
 
The Canadians burned the White House not the British.
Mostly British troops operating from Canadian soil. Canadian troops were involved in the sack of Washington and burning down the white house, but not the sole contribution much as I would like it to have been, but don't simplify history just for bragging rights, bro.
 
Please fact check me on this (because I cannot fucking find anything and I would love to have the infographic that I seem to have lost) but I remember hearing somewhere that on average immigrants from western europe contribute roughly 10% more tax money than they use, but immigration from everywhere else in general costs 20% more than what those people will pay into the system. I have looked everywhere and I swear I'm not making this up, even ddg results are fucking worthless propagandised slop.
I doubt these numbers are correct because, on average, people contribute less than they use across their lifetime (for immigrants it might make them a net contributor if they leave once they are old and thus don't use the NHS; although it also means they don't spend their pension in the local economy... it is a complex topic). *

My guess would be that legal immigration for work from outside the EU contributes more since, before Brexit, they had stricter rules (also had to pay to use the NHS and other things)*. They also cannot use the welfare system iirc. Also tuition and fees for uni - non-EU spent a lot more than their EU counterparts before Brexit (tho EU grants...).
Those with legal status of refugee are the ones using the most of welfare, as they are more likely to be low education, low skills, low English proficiency. They are also entitled to welfare from day 0 iirc.
EU is different. Even with Brexit, there are a lot of EUs who came from before Brexit who can stay as long as they wish to since when they came over there were no restrictions about minimum salary. *Now same rules for EU and non-EU.

*I think this is more the "median" taxpayer, rather than the average one. So pretty much everyone contributes less than gives. But again, you spend money in the economy, and you spend a higher % than a rich person who, whilst contributes more for tax, cannot spend that much more into the economy.

TLDR: it's complicated. You can twist the numbers each way you want.

The issue with unemployment and the economy is also not really new immigration. It is a problem, but you cannot ignore the British people who are second gen. Look at Bradford, where there is so much incest that they made it the ground 0 for a study on its effects. (NHS Study "Born in Bradford", Example).
 
There were fights between the christian and muslim groups. The latter were a mix of Africans and Asians.


And no, no one thought for even a second that maybe these men were not a good addition for our country/culture. I have left this behind me years ago now, so cannot tell you how many have gone silent (aka changed their mind) on the topic.
So... They left their home country to cause the exact same issue as their new host country? Most white folks who immigrated to the US before the 70s explicitly state they left because of said issues and refuse the re-create them lmao.

Back on the 8chan board I seem to recall /pol/ (Lmao at the turkroach BO) blackpilling itself with some video(s?) of some white volunteer chicks banging refugees. I don't even the logic behind that.

Mostly British troops operating from Canadian soil. Canadian troops were involved in the sack of Washington and burning down the white house, but not the sole contribution much as I would like it to have been, but don't simplify history just for bragging rights, bro.
At the rate we're going, it's either gonna be Hispanics, Blacks, Muslim or god forbid Americans actually decide to actually use the 2nd Amendment, Americans themselves.
 
Last edited:
British Rioter Stabbed In Prison by Muslim Pakistani Paki
The police are intentionally trying to get white peasants killed or crippled so they can parade around their corpses or wheelchair bound husks as a mockery to the victim's friends and family, any as a clear warning for the people to sit down, shut up, and let them do what they please because it will be less painful than being a quadreplegic who spends the rest of his miserable life being mocked by the left, foreigners, and the government, and forced to watch the same happen to his friends and family while being physically unable to do anything about it. I expect this video and that poor man's screams to make the rounds as a warning to the white peasant. "Sit down, shut up, accept your fate, or you're next."
 
I'm prolly gonna get massacreed for this, but I don't understand how countries like the US (and Canada and Australia) can get super-upset about immigration, since all 3 countries are made up of various waves of immigrants.
Interesting you bring up Australia since one of the driving motives behind Federation was to have control of our immigration, which in the same year would result in the 'White Australia policy'.

Anyway, leaving aside the disproportionate level of crime committed by Africans and Lebanese in Australia, or Hispanics in the USA, these extracts from the 'Global South' are almost never able to assimilate as Europeans did. Our countries were originally made by and for Europeans, every accomplishment worth a damn was thanks to men of European stock.

Even the brown and black migrants who keep their nose down and just work like bugmen and don't commit crime will often stay within their ethnic groups, support their ancestral nation from overseas and as their numbers increase in our nations, form cultural and political blocs instead of even pretending to integrate. For an example of the latter, look to the Indians in Canada.

Every one of these black and brown people belong in their own countries and not ours. Even if 1/10 of them can integrate well after a few generations, it isn't worth keeping them around. Culture is downstream of race and our race has already been vindicated by history as the superior one. Admixture will only harm us.
 
The police are intentionally trying to get white peasants killed or crippled so they can parade around their corpses or wheelchair bound husks as a mockery to the victim's friends and family, any as a clear warning for the people to sit down, shut up, and let them do what they please because it will be less painful than being a quadreplegic who spends the rest of his miserable life being mocked by the left, foreigners, and the government, and forced to watch the same happen to his friends and family while being physically unable to do anything about it. I expect this video and that poor man's screams to make the rounds as a warning to the white peasant. "Sit down, shut up, accept your fate, or you're next."
Can bongstains sue their prison for negligence like they can in America ?
 
Can't be arsed to quote the 2 page argument but the word is Arabic.
Pakis, Saudis, etc. Arabic.
It changed to Asian to blur reporting when the rape gangs first got in the news.
That's when it became PC to call Arabs Asians yea. I recall how everyone took the piss at how brown these supposed Asians were.

Can bongstains sue their prison for negligence like they can in America ?
Sure, sue the people who want to kill you. That's a way of winning! The court system that put your father/husband/brother there will absolutely surrender and say they did wrong..

Can a mod just thread ban the off topic Americans already? It's every day the topic drifts off to yank politics. Surely some moderator can step it, thread ban for a week and let us discuss what's going on here and not over there.
 
Back