The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

I'd like to know where the protesters on both side live.

I can bet that the pro immigration protesters are not from with a 20 mile radius
Considering the police had to ferry some protestors to Epping and the Norwich protestors were 300-450 to 150 counter-protestors, I think we can be assured that the majority of locals want them gone and it's only "empathetic" out of towners who want them to remain.

I recall that this Green councillor who showed up on the side of one of the counter-protests was not from the area.

 
The copes I see right now:

* The anti's outnumbered the "fascists"
* It's AI!
* It's only 600 people!

A lot of people seem to have trouble estimating crowd sizes, or don't understand that at least 600 people turning up to a protest that is liable to see you totally ostracised from "polite society" is a huge shift.

One good thing I see from this: no kettling. The police used to force anti-immigrant protests into confined spaces and then hold them until they boiled over, at which point they'd start arresting people. They'd often turn a blind eye to antifa assaulting people at the same time.
 
Marches in favour of remigration, organised by Britain First, or something.



Some mums and kids sit outside Canary Wharf in protest of immigration. Sing Sweet Caroline.

Protestors around Canary Wharf prevent hotel migrant from doing his Deliveroo/Ubereats gig.
 
Marches in favour of remigration, organised by Britain First, or something.

View attachment 7730666View attachment 7730665

Some mums and kids sit outside Canary Wharf in protest of immigration. Sing Sweet Caroline.
View attachment 7730667
Protestors around Canary Wharf prevent hotel migrant from doing his Deliveroo/Ubereats gig.
View attachment 7730671
American here, does remigration mean deporting the immigrants?

Bri'ish always have to have some clever phrase or term, three quarters past noon. Just say 12:45 you asshole!!!
 
American here, does remigration mean deporting the immigrants?

Bri'ish always have to have some clever phrase or term, three quarters past noon. Just say 12:45 you asshole!!!
The term was taken from the Swedes I believe, so they can be blamed for it. It was probably the most politically correct way for the Sweden Democrats to package a "encourage all non-natives to leave and never come back" policy in the most palatable way they could, which involves paying them a lump "fuck-off" sum of money and then they're gone forever (hopefully). Sweden is currently paying them 7 hundo USD to leave but they're raising it to 35k USD in 2026. For reference: 1 year minimum wage salary in the UK (33K USD) can buy you a 3-storey, middle-class house in Pakistan in a nice part of the country and still leave you with 7k USD left over.

So yeah, it does mean deporting immigrants. But it can also mean getting those who've stayed her for longer and naturalise to leave too, hence Sweden's very generous offer if you get out.

As an aside: Wikipedia were rather quick to call it "ethnic cleaning" as just as they justifiably could.

Present article in 2025, citing a single writer to justify calling it ethnic cleaning with no introspection whatsoever (Since I know you're maybe thinking it: No, Bergmann isn't Jewish. He lives in Iceland, so he's doing the equivalent of a sheltered rich white person living in an all-white area supporting mass immigration because they never have to deal with the consequences of their actions):
1754265511959.webp
Article in 2021:
1754267497492.webp
2023:
1754267537806.webp
September 2024, the wording has been altered to be more emotional ("Typically with no regard for their citizenship vs. "regardless of citizenship status"):
1754267611542.webp
March 2025:
1754267708261.webp

With this in mind, no wonder Wikipedia oppose the Online Safety Act — if Brits can't read about remigration from the most trusted source on the internet, how will they know it's the it's evil far-right nonsense and so they'd be in the wrong for supporting it or supporting those that do?
 
Last edited:
I think they've learned a lot from the anti coof vaxx protests.

Sure there was no coverage on the media of those but they were heavily recorded and streamed live by those who went. (((They))) Also tried to sabotage stuff. One occasion sticks in my mind where they left a "broken down" bus across a road in the hopes people would set it alight.

Because those there weren't niggers or filthy gyppo vermin like those in Harehills in Leeds, it didn't happen. Gosh it's almost like non white people are intellectually inferior and lack the ability to be civil as nd decent. Goodness me. Who knew.
 
American here, does remigration mean deporting the immigrants?
also American, I hope so, deporting the Muzzies absolutely needs to happen from everything ive observed from that island, these MPs live in safe neighborhoods far from any Muslim no-go zone yet your average British Christian is being demanded to convert to Islam on the streets, thats the end result of this "multiculturalism" movement, ask any African Christian what happens when Muslims are allowed to live among a Christian population, these psychopaths have no moral qualm about sawing an infants head off with a dull knife in front of their parents before killing the parents as well, I don't give a shit what Muslims do in their sandnigger containment zone but if there allowed to spread anywhere else it starts to become game over for any pre-Islamic population
 
Considering the police had to ferry some protestors to Epping and the Norwich protestors were 300-450 to 150 counter-protestors, I think we can be assured that the majority of locals want them gone and it's only "empathetic" out of towners who want them to remain.

I recall that this Green councillor who showed up on the side of one of the counter-protests was not from the area.

View attachment 7717002
i notice alot of these out of town figureheads tend to be curly haired "fellow white" women.
With this in mind, no wonder Wikipedia oppose the Online Safety Act — if Brits can't read about remigration from the most trusted source on the internet, how will they know it's the it's evil far-right nonsense and so they'd be in the wrong for supporting it or supporting those that do?
thats actually a pretty slick point i didnt even realize the online safety act means kids actually have a harder time being fed propaganda online, which means all their info will have to come from word of mouth which tends to be right wing.
He lives in Iceland, so he's doing the equivalent of a sheltered rich white person living in an all-white area supporting mass immigration because they never have to deal with the consequences of their actions
iirc theyre starting the process of getting some so never say never.
 
:stress:
It happened AGAIN it was covered up AGAIN, this time however niggel is being exceptionally based about it:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Not just leaving it to the Homeland fags (activation phrase: BNWO sissy hypno :story:) this time thank god.
Oh what are those guys up to again? Oh yeah, being faggots, even their whistleblowers like to blow a bit of whistle :suffering:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
 
also American, I hope so, deporting the Muzzies absolutely needs to happen from everything ive observed from that island, these MPs live in safe neighborhoods far from any Muslim no-go zone yet your average British Christian is being demanded to convert to Islam on the streets, thats the end result of this "multiculturalism" movement, ask any African Christian what happens when Muslims are allowed to live among a Christian population, these psychopaths have no moral qualm about sawing an infants head off with a dull knife in front of their parents before killing the parents as well, I don't give a shit what Muslims do in their sandnigger containment zone but if there allowed to spread anywhere else it starts to become game over for any pre-Islamic population
After America sorts out its issue with illegals, legal immigration ought to be on the chopping block next. I think that's why even members of the GOP are slow-walking the illegal issue because they know legal immigration might end up getting talked about next, and I'd argue that's just as big if not a bigger issue than illegals. The big thing I highlighted in the USA news thread once was how the number of legal immigrants coming in outnumbers houses being built every year, and that's despite the number of houses being built every year continues to increase. Right now the British sentiment is both legal and illegal immigration ought to be culled, at least on the right-wing. Even the Left is coming 'round on illegal immigration (at least some of their politicians).

It helps a lot when you have people in positions of power (legitimacy) and influence (large media presence or followers) able to push the overton window, which we have with the likes of Lowe and such, and America does with Trump.
 
Back