🐱 The Chris Chan story shows the moral vacuum at the heart of trans ideology

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
CatParty



A few days ago we reported that one of the most documented people on the internet, Chris Chan, a deeply disturbed individual with a long history of predatory behaviour towards women, and who, according to his own words, transitioned so he could have sex with lesbians, had been served with an emergency protective order for allegedly raping his 79-year-old, dementia-suffering mother.

As Blaire White points out, many trans activists expressed their disgust on Twitter - not with the alleged crime but with the fact that some people have referred to Chan as ‘he’. Yesterday a Spanish feminist received a permanent suspension from Twitter for using male pronouns for him.

Chan has now been arrested on one count of incest and, despite him being a fully intact biological male charged with raping his mother, his custody record states that he is ‘female’.


According to various reports, this means he will be jailed in a women’s prison.

Unsurprisingly, given Chan’s fame and the nature of the charge, this story has been all over the media - although it’s so far failed to be covered by the BBC, despite its keen interest in stories about transgender people.

One publication that has covered it is Metro, which includes a history of Chan's extreme behaviour - but it doesn't mention that Chan is male or transgender, and even refers to the incident as a 'sexual relationship with her mother'.

Not content with pinning this appalling male crime on women, the online stormtroopers of gender ideology are also claiming the whole thing could have been avoided if it wasn’t for lesbians being so damn picky. The account Trans History Month tweeted “None of this would have happened if the lesbian community validated Christine’s gender identity. We’ve mentioned this before but it’s almost impossible for a trans lesbian to find dates. Maybe Christie wouldn’t have had to vent her sexual energies on her unfortunate mother if lesbians weren’t such bigots and more willing to date her.”



You could perhaps pass this off as one homophobic lunatic if it wasn’t also the current line of thinking at Stonewall, and institutions all over the UK that have been groomed by that organisation.

Rcecently, it has emerged NHS trusts included instructions that male sex offenders who self-identify as women can be placed on female-only wards.

Baroness Nicholson wrote: “In their haste to assert the primacy of 'Self-Identification' — in which a person can legally declare their own gender regardless of their biology — NHS chiefs have knowingly distorted the equality laws that Parliament has passed and the Queen herself has signed.

And it is women who are paying the price. As a woman who has spent a great deal of her adult career campaigning for the rights of women and children, I approached colleagues to form an all-party campaign group to collect evidence from patients and medics on the impact of the deviation from single-sex spaces.

The examples we have received are legion.

In hundreds of emails and hours of personal testimony, we have heard cases ranging from dementia patients distressed at waking up next to someone who, in their mind, looks like a man, to reports of a rape on a psychiatric unit undertaken by a biological male who identified as a woman.”


The Chris Chan story is grotesque and cruel and sad. It is a story of a deeply disturbed and lonely man whose delusions are still being spoon-fed to him by a complicit media class that has utterly lost its way.

Combine it with the knowledge that women are not safe from men like Chan even after his arrest, it takes on another level of horror. Our captured institutions—The NHS, the prison service, the judiciary—are guilty of bringing about a nightmare world for women. It is a vision of hell, but when we blink and rub our eyes, it persists.

If you’re female and you want to know the state of your rights in 2021, imagine a world where no matter what you do, no matter where you are, you will never be safe from men like Chris Chan.
 
I get their argument, its like if a black person commited a serious crime and everyone starts calling him a nigger. It all depends if you believe that being trans has any weight to it or not. Of course, to me, the whole trans movement exists to pander to the delusions of pathetic men and exploit confused teenagers.
I get that that's how deranged troons are taking it, but he/him isn't a slur, except in the minds of deranged troons and their enablers. If they were stepping in to say 'hey I know Chris did a heinous thing but can you not call her a tranny freak when referring to her' that'd be one thing. This is more like if Shaun King raped someone and other white people got triggered you were referring to him as a white person when mentioning it.
 
Needs to be said again, mainstream media is mad that "Mr Chan" is exposing the reality of MtF transition, while the other side of the discussion is trying hard to make it as "see? this is why all leftists are bad!". It's a bid of both, tbh, but we're not living in the time of nuances.

Unsurprisingly, given Chan’s fame and the nature of the charge, this story has been all over the media - although it’s so far failed to be covered by the BBC, despite its keen interest in stories about transgender people.

"Sir, we have a new story about a trans person... it's all over the internet!"

"Tell me more."

"Well... I think it could be a bit... shocking... he-- I mean-- she raped hi-- her mother---"

"..."

"..."

"A false accusation, I am sure. Check who made the accusation."

"Well, the mother's senile..."

"There, she probably assaulted hi-- I mean, her."

"Sure, right? Also, h-- she has said that... well... there is some audio or text saying h- she has only transitioned with the intention of hook up with lesbians after convincing them that he-- erm--- she is in f--"

"Enough. Anyway, what are the muslims doing today? Has any of them already came out as trans? Quickly! We need a trans muslim!"
 
I get their argument, its like if a black person commited a serious crime and everyone starts calling him a nigger. It all depends if you believe that being trans has any weight to it or not. Of course, to me, the whole trans movement exists to pander to the delusions of pathetic men and exploit confused teenagers.
Totally different argument.

A black man convicted of a crime is still a black man, and should be referred to as such, even if he identified as a white woman. Calling a black man a nigger is a deliberate attempt to paint them in a negative light, and shows prejudice. Calling a black man a black man just shows that your eyes work.

Calling a man "he" when he wants to be called "she" is the same. The naked eye can see Chris is not a woman. For your analogy to work with Chris-chan, we'd have to be deliberately calling him a Dick, Bastard, or some other insulting term generally applied to males, instead of his preferred feminine title.

So this argument that calling a man a man instead of a woman is somehow being prejudiced is already based on a broken analogy. No insult can be inherent by simply stating a person's appearance.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Oh piss off!
I mean if the trans movement wants to be associated with an incestual rapist, so be it. Make your "victimhood" harder to get past like the professional outragers/victims that you are.
 
This headline is transphobic.

I mean if the trans movement wants to be associated with an incestual rapist, so be it. Make your "victimhood" harder to get past like the professional outragers/victims that you are.

Agreed. I'm in favor of all their lunacy. The only way to move past all of this tranny shit is to move through it. Take it to its logical conclusion and peak trans as many people as possible. I'm not going to argue against trannies in womens sports or in womens prisons. I say let them all in. The sooner they get what they want, and the faster they get it, the harder the backlash ought to be. Or if the backlash fails to occur, then at least I can laugh at it. In any case, there's no use fighting against the tide.
 
I'm pretty sure that the women Chris is locked up with will be safe from him unless they're completely immobile.
 
Totally different argument.

A black man convicted of a crime is still a black man, and should be referred to as such, even if he identified as a white woman. Calling a black man a nigger is a deliberate attempt to paint them in a negative light, and shows prejudice. Calling a black man a black man just shows that your eyes work.

Calling a man "he" when he wants to be called "she" is the same. The naked eye can see Chris is not a woman. For your analogy to work with Chris-chan, we'd have to be deliberately calling him a Dick, Bastard, or some other insulting term generally applied to males, instead of his preferred feminine title.

So this argument that calling a man a man instead of a woman is somehow being prejudiced is already based on a broken analogy. No insult can be inherent by simply stating a person's appearance.
I mean, you are super right, but for them not using his pronouns throws into question the entire foundation of their ideology: that self determination is enough to make something real. Not that I agree with that.
 
Yeah, but I never believed Chris was actually trans, considering his lesbian fetish, sooo...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterDisaster
Back