The D.N.C. Is in Chaos and Desperate for Cash - Just months into the tenure of a new party leader, Ken Martin, the Democratic National Committee’s financial situation has grown so bleak that top officials have discussed whether they might need to borrow money this year to keep paying the bills.

Source:https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/18/us/politics/dnc-ken-martin.html
Archive:https://archive.is/wBrc6

Inside the Chaos Swirling Through a D.N.C. Desperate for Cash​

Under its new leader, Ken Martin, the Democratic National Committee has been plagued by infighting and a drop in big donations, raising alarms from Democrats as they try to win back power.

Just months into the tenure of a new party leader, Ken Martin, the Democratic National Committee’s financial situation has grown so bleak that top officials have discussed whether they might need to borrow money this year to keep paying the bills.

Fund-raising from major donors — some of whom Mr. Martin has still not spoken with — has slowed sharply. At the same time, he has expanded the party’s financial commitments to every state, and even to far-flung territories like Guam.

Fellow Democrats are grumbling that Mr. Martin, who quietly accepted a raise after taking the post, has been badly distracted by internal battles. So far, they say, he has been unable to help unite his party against Republicans, who control the federal government.

A protracted and public fight with David Hogg, the 25-year-old activist turned D.N.C. vice chair who blindsided party officials with a plan to challenge incumbent Democrats, made things worse. The clash included the leak of embarrassing audio of Mr. Martin questioning his own role and ended in Mr. Hogg’s unceremonious exit this month.

That was soon followed by the news that two of the country’s most influential labor leaders, who represent a combined 3.2 million workers, were also leaving the D.N.C. Both questioned the party’s direction under Mr. Martin.

Rufus Gifford, who served as the finance chairman of Kamala Harris’s 2024 campaign and maintains relationships with many top donors, suggested Democrats were being sent the wrong message at a time when they are desperately looking for “fight and leadership.”

“What they are seeing is headline after headline of incompetence and infighting, and I think that is a real problem not just for the D.N.C. but for the larger Democratic brand,” he said. “We need to come together and focus on the issues at hand. That’s got to happen now. And I mean today. And if that can’t happen, we need to shift course.”
This account of Mr. Martin’s tumultuous early tenure is based on interviews with more than two dozen Democratic lawmakers, donors, strategists, D.N.C. members and party officials.

‘Worse than some high school student council drama’​

Part of the bumpy beginning appears to be fallout from a bare-knuckled fight for the chairmanship. With the spoils going to the winner as usual, Mr. Martin has pushed to install allies in some key posts — and remove supporters of his vanquished rivals.

“Some of the changes will leave people feeling as if they don’t have a seat at the table,” said Donna Brazile, an influential former party chairwoman and a current D.N.C. member, who did not endorse a candidate or vote in the race for chair. “He has his own inner circle. I’m not in it, and I don’t want to be in it.”

It has not been lost on some Democrats that Mr. Martin arrived at the D.N.C. as the consummate insider, a man who had led both the state party in Minnesota and the association of state party chairs. Yet he has struggled to navigate some internal Democratic coalition politics.

Mr. Martin had offered to keep the two top union leaders — Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, and Lee Saunders, the president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees — as members of the D.N.C. But he would not renew their plum assignments on the powerful Rules and Bylaws Committee, which controls how the party nominates its presidential candidates.

The Hogg episode also consumed and exasperated party leaders for close to two months.
“This is worse than some high school student council drama,” said Representative Mark Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat.

Editors’ Picks
Chase Sapphire Leapfrogs Amex Platinum With a New $795 Annual Fee

‘Floating Ballerina Vibes’: The Hypnotic Allure of Indoor Skydiving
The Ever-Evolving Juneteenth Table

In an interview on Tuesday, Mr. Martin acknowledged that his early efforts to rebuild the party had been “overshadowed by some of this inside baseball stuff.” But he said he was bringing about meaningful change, pointing to increased investments in all 57 state parties, including the territories and Washington, D.C. He also noted that the D.N.C. was helping organize more than 100 town halls in Republican districts, carrying out an extensive 2024 postmortem and creating a war room to counter President Trump.

“I know there’s a lot of people that are carrying grudges, that are still litigating the campaign that their person didn’t win,” Mr. Martin said. “I am not one of those people. There’s no sense of living in the past. I have no enemies other than Donald Trump and the Republican Party.”

The biggest challenge facing Mr. Martin may now be financial.

Six people briefed on the party’s fund-raising, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss its finances frankly, said big donors — who are an essential part of the party’s funding — had been very slow to give to the party this year as Mr. Martin solicits contributions. His commitment to state parties, which amounts to $1 million in monthly spending, has further strained the finances.

Senior D.N.C. officials have discussed the possibility of borrowing money in the coming months to keep the operations fully funded, according to two people with direct knowledge of the private discussions who insisted on anonymity.

Mr. Martin acknowledged those talks.

“That’s certainly not our plan right now,” he said of tapping into a line of credit, adding, “I don’t know if we’ll have to at this point.” He noted that grass-roots fund-raising had remained strong, and the party said small donations in his first three months were the most under a new chairman.
Still, the party’s total cash reserves shrank by $4 million from January through April, according to the most recent federal records, while the Republican National Committee’s coffers swelled by roughly

$29 million. A new report is due this week.

The party out of power often falls behind the one holding the White House. Still, the current financial gap is large: $18 million on hand for the D.N.C. entering May, compared with $67.4 million for the R.N.C. Hefty chunks sit in special accounts that cannot be used for operational costs.

In the first four months of the year, only three people gave $100,000 or more to the D.N.C., according to Federal Election Commission reports. The party said it had received three more six-figure donations in May and June from individuals.

Almost no one questions Mr. Martin’s work ethic. He has traveled to two dozen states as chairman and has energetically sought out money from donors, including this week in New York just days after two friends were assassinated in Minnesota.

“Everything that Ken has done, regardless of the drama that it has caused, has been the right moves,” said Maria Cardona, a longtime D.N.C. member. “He does the work. He rolls up the sleeves.” She and other allies noted that Democrats had won recent down-ballot and special elections, with Mr. Martin campaigning in person in several.

Mr. Martin said he had found that major donors were unhappy across the Democratic ecosystem after last year’s defeats. He has commissioned a significant postmortem review of the 2024 race, which is being overseen by Paul Rivera, a longtime Democratic strategist, and is set to entail as many as 200 interviews. A final report is expected by the end of the summer.

“People invested more money than they ever had before, they dug deeper than they ever had, and they are quite frustrated by the result,” Mr. Martin said of big donors. “They want answers. I don’t take it personally. I wasn’t in charge.”

One recent New York event with Ms. Harris did not bring in as much money as some had hoped, raising roughly $300,000, according to people briefed on the matter who insisted on anonymity to protect relationships. The sum was a fraction of the $1 million price for a single top-end ticket to a New York fund-raiser headlined by Ms. Harris last fall, when she was the nominee.

Even as the party faces a financial crunch, the D.N.C. increased Mr. Martin’s salary this year, federal records show and the party confirmed. His annual salary is now $350,000, up from $300,000.
Mr. Martin said in the interview that his salary had been set by a compensation committee within the party.

Nothing fractured the party quite like Mr. Hogg’s surprise decision to wade into Democratic primaries to try to oust incumbents. He and Mr. Martin feuded privately and publicly until Mr. Hogg’s ultimate departure.

At one point, Mr. Martin directly called a lawyer, Graham Wilson, who works at the firm of the Democratic superlawyer Marc Elias, to express dismay that the firm was also working for Leaders We

Deserve, Mr. Hogg’s political action committee. The firm subsequently dropped Leaders We Deserve as a client, according to two people briefed on the matter who insisted on anonymity to discuss private conversations. A D.N.C. spokeswoman said Mr. Martin had never instructed the law firm to end its relationship with Mr. Hogg’s PAC.

“David Hogg came in and dropped a nuclear bomb on the place,” said James Skoufis, a Democratic state senator in New York and Martin ally who was recently installed on the party’s executive committee. “It’s everyone’s hope and expectation that the drama will be behind us.”

One challenge for Mr. Martin in wooing big contributors is that during the race for D.N.C. chair, his campaign criticized his chief rival, Ben Wikler, the chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party, for his ties to some of the party’s largest donors, such as the billionaires Reid Hoffman and Alex Soros. Shortly after Mr. Martin won, he told The New York Times that the onus would be on donors to mend any fences.

Mr. Soros has not heard from Mr. Martin since then, according to a spokesman for the billionaire. Mr. Martin said he had tried to connect with Mr. Hoffman but had “not had a chance to reach out to Alex yet.”

He added that new initiatives he had begun, including a “war room” to press the party’s message and the state investments, would pay long-term dividends. Another early Martin project is a new streaming show on YouTube, “The Daily Blueprint,” which is filmed in a studio with high-end production.

The show has drawn a minuscule audience so far, with some episodes scoring fewer than 1,000 views.
 
Remember when you guys took $1.5 billion from donors and used it to run Kamala Harris? And you spent it on things like having Beyonce appear at rallies or whatever? And then you lost in a brutal landslide? Maybe that has something to do with it.
And then they kept asking for money for her campaign after she lost the election, that's the step that drove a lot more people away, I know people who were still getting fundraising emails weeks after the election after everyone had found out about how much money was wasted on stupid shit. That was kicking those people when they were down and showed how the DNC saw them as nothing but credit card numbers.
 
All of that and the fact that their only True and Honest reformers want to go further left into outright communism, not back to the center to appeal to moderate Americans. They should be meeting the Republicans and arguing that they're not wrong with populism, just too business-friendly and we need more "local investment" - a caring more understanding populism!
But instead, they're trying to brand themselves as the truly populist party without changing anything about the party's behavior (for the better, at least). I'm sure you've noticed how they've silently accepted that populism is here and isn't going to be calmed down, so they're trying to co-opt it and turn it into leftoid populism... which is just socialism or worse. But at least they'll be driving the car!
 
I don't know if I believe they're broke, they complained all along the campaign trail in 24' about how much more money they needed and how far they were falling behind the fascists with donations... and yet Kamala still had a billion dollars to waste...... I'm sure they have internal problems as bad as they say... but I think the "we're broke, honest! Please be a donor!" is just a standard plea for money wrapped in a sympathetic (to them) message.
Oh, they're probably not broke, but they're definitely looking at some tough choices. Remember, it was thanks to Obama setting up his own parallel machine and excluding the DNC that allowed Hillary to force a devil's bargain on the DNC in the leadup to 2016: they'd put her loyalists in top spots, and in exchange she'd make sure her own friends kept them funded.

Of course, when the devil says you can have something he doesn't ever say you get to keep it, and so after her loss they bailed and took as much of that money with them as they could.
Six months ago they were crowing like banshees about having raised a billion dollars for Kamala.
Turns out when you write massive checks to celebrities all that money dries up fast. One billion is also known as a thousand million, so ten million here, five million there... before you know it its added up to real money.
 
Nah, even with all the gains Trump made compared to 2020 with black men, they still voted Kamala 70/30. That race remains pretty well captured by Democrats, to the point that a lot of black men who otherwise would vote Republican either don't vote or vote Democrat anyways due to the extreme cultural pressure on them to stay loyal.
Though Hispanic and Asian men are now in coin flip territory in terms of Democratic support, that's the real source of the party's current panic re: racial minorities.
 
You know that's a lie. As long as s0r0s and f1nk are around, they str8.
George Soros and Larry Fink. You don't have to censor their names here.
But instead, they're trying to brand themselves as the truly populist party without changing anything about the party's behavior (for the better, at least). I'm sure you've noticed how they've silently accepted that populism is here and isn't going to be calmed down, so they're trying to co-opt it and turn it into leftoid populism... which is just socialism or worse. But at least they'll be driving the car!
They might claim they've changed. But their messaging and actions will remain the same
 
Bet they wish they still had a slice of that $1.6 billion they pissed away trying to make Kamala an electable candidate.
Ding, ding, ding! WINNAH!

The Dems have utterly fucked themselves.

Remember a time when they were a reasonable alternative to the GOP. Those days are long gone. Now the Dems as a party are the party of leftists and hatred for America and American values. The three worst Presidents in my lifetime, and Ike was President when I was born, are Biden, Carter, and Obama.

The fuck bucket has been empty for the Dems for decades now.

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
 
Remember when you guys took $1.5 billion from donors and used it to run Kamala Harris? And you spent it on things like having Beyonce appear at rallies or whatever? And then you lost in a brutal landslide? Maybe that has something to do with it.
that was a different bucket of money.
 
Ding, ding, ding! WINNAH!

The Dems have utterly fucked themselves.

Remember a time when they were a reasonable alternative to the GOP. Those days are long gone. Now the Dems as a party are the party of leftists and hatred for America and American values. The three worst Presidents in my lifetime, and Ike was President when I was born, are Biden, Carter, and Obama.

The fuck bucket has been empty for the Dems for decades now.

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
Sorry, EISENHOWER?!?
 
they're trying to brand themselves as the truly populist party
They are a populist party, but their populatus is basically trigglypuffs, gendertrenders, middle-aged middle-class Chardonnay socialist white women, welfare dependent niggers, and illegals.

Oh, and of course, nation-raping ultra-wealthy industrialists and media stars, but there’s not enough of them to swing a hammer let alone a county.

IMG_1571.webp
 
Some of the ones I used to know didn't always behave like this. I want to believe that something broke them rather than they were always like this.
Many people were drawn to the left from the 80s to 2000s by the Iraq war, the perfidy of the religious right, corporate greed, etc., believing that the left offered solutions to these things. After Obama was elected, the left saw a winnowing. As the ideology's demands became more strident and less rational, people started to peel away. Those who stayed ended up living in lawless cities, getting fired for being white and having their kids trooned out. It's sad but the ones who have hung on through it all seem to have become zombies with the vital spark completely drained out of them.

There are alot of people in the democratic party who believed that Hogg was really the answer. He has a million twitter followers so how can be wrong? Goes the logic.
The idea of primarying out deadweight politicians in safe seats would be a good way to revitalize the party, but the Dems are like a class of aristocrats, they'll never allow for such disruption of the hierarchy.
 
The idea of primarying out deadweight politicians in safe seats would be a good way to revitalize the party, but the Dems are like a class of aristocrats, they'll never allow for such disruption of the hierarchy.
Seriously, they just did all this soul-searching about how old their party is and how they need to revitalize it. They bring in Hogg (who I have absolutely no bias in favor of) and he actually came up with a reasonable idea. It caused a civil war, meltdown tapes leaked, and they forced him out. The party is genuinely captured by the stupid. I'm not saying Republicans are smart as a party, but Democrats are stupid in a very specific way where they just cannot listen to a young white man, they've hammered the very possibility out of themselves by embracing open bigotry against such people for decades.
 
But instead, they're trying to brand themselves as the truly populist party without changing anything about the party's behavior (for the better, at least). I'm sure you've noticed how they've silently accepted that populism is here and isn't going to be calmed down, so they're trying to co-opt it and turn it into leftoid populism... which is just socialism or worse. But at least they'll be driving the car!
They see populism as that cherished "messaging" that makes even bad ideas sell.... by their view? It made Hitler and fascism popular! So it'll obviously work for them if they can just unlock it's "secrets" or write a big enough check to buy the factory it came from, if only they could figure out where they're hiding it.


While still being pro-troon pro-illegal immigrant pro-censorship and every other 80 - 20 issue they occupy the 20 spot on.


Democrats are stupid in a very specific way where they just cannot listen to a young white man, they've hammered the very possibility out of themselves by embracing open bigotry against such people for decades.

This is the party who publicly acknowledges they don't have enough young men voting for them, but sent a lesbian dangerhair out into the world with a $20 million check to bring them back.

Their inflexible dogma that their activist class is an accurate representation of the "modern voter" is killing them, but they can't abandon it even when doing so pays immediate dividends (see Republicans) - who to be fair? Lucked into the solution. But were smart enough to run with it and did cut the neocons loose when it became apparent they don't / can't win elections with them anymore .
 
Last edited:
Seriously, they just did all this soul-searching about how old their party is and how they need to revitalize it. They bring in Hogg (who I have absolutely no bias in favor of) and he actually came up with a reasonable idea. It caused a civil war, meltdown tapes leaked, and they forced him out. The party is genuinely captured by the stupid. I'm not saying Republicans are smart as a party, but Democrats are stupid in a very specific way where they just cannot listen to a young white man, they've hammered the very possibility out of themselves by embracing open bigotry against such people for decades.
When Hogg is the side I’m rooting for on the matter of democrat infighting, I think it’s a good sign of how far gone they are.

In comparison, Trump comes off smelling like roses. Unfortunately the fact that he’s the best president of my lifetime (and it not even close) doesn’t bode well for the country.
 
In comparison, Trump comes off smelling like roses. Unfortunately the fact that he’s the best president of my lifetime (and it not even close) doesn’t bode well for the country.
Yeah it does, if I may be so bold.

You'd rather have had 4 more years of Biden? Or Kamala?

The fact he left the neocons adrift and they utterly failed to find land before they sunk has been one of the BEST things to ever happen to this country, politically, again if I may be so bold. It meant a PR-disaster Bible-thumper like Mike Pence or an opportunistic turncoat like John McCain looking to play the part of "The Democrats' favorite guy and one of the GOOD Republicans" is no longer viable on the right for anything but the memes.
 
Last edited:
Back