Disaster The Democratic Party is bleeding millennial support. - Milliennials finally figure out "muh Nazis" won't get them jobs.

MANCHESTER, N.H. (Reuters) - Enthusiasm for the Democratic Party is waning among millennials as its candidates head into the crucial midterm congressional elections, according to the Reuters/Ipsos national opinion poll.

The online survey of more than 16,000 registered voters ages 18 to 34 shows their support for Democrats over Republicans for Congress slipped by about 9 percentage points over the past two years, to 46 percent overall. And they increasingly say the Republican Party is a better steward of the economy.

Although nearly two of three young voters polled said they do not like Republican President Donald Trump, their distaste for him does not necessarily extend to all Republicans or translate directly into votes for Democratic congressional candidates.

That presents a potential problem for Democrats who have come to count on millennials as a core constituency - and will need all the loyalty they can get to achieve a net gain of 23 seats to capture control of the U.S. House of Representatives in November.

Young voters represent an opportunity and a risk for both parties, said Donald Green, a political science professor at Columbia University in New York City.

“They’re not as wedded to one party,” Green said. “They’re easier to convince than, say, your 50- or 60-year-olds who don’t really change their minds very often.”

Terry Hood, 34, an African-American who works at a Dollar General store in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and took this year’s poll, said he voted for Democrat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

But he will consider a Republican for Congress because he believes the party is making it easier to find jobs and he applauds the recent Republican-led tax cut.

“It sounds strange to me to say this about the Republicans, but they’re helping with even the small things,” Hood said in a phone interview. “They’re taking less taxes out of my paycheck. I notice that.”

The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed young voters during the first three months of this year and the same period in 2016.

Only 28 percent of those polled expressed overt support for Republicans in the 2018 poll - about the same percentage as two years earlier.

But that does not mean the rest will turn out to back Democrats, the survey showed. A growing share of voters between ages 18 and 34 years old said they were undecided, would support a third-party candidate or not vote at all.

The shift away from Democrats was more pronounced among white millennials - who accounted for two-thirds of all votes cast in that age group in 2016.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-millennials-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN1I10YH
 
Yeah, I get the distinct impression the RNC and the establishment Republicans in general are along for the ride at this point, and the thing they are riding is a tiger. None of them are particularly happy with what is going on, but they can't get off now. Trump and his base were essentially a third party that coopted the existing institutions of the Republican Party. Where once there was a staid classically liberal political party interested in free trade, advancing business interests and a healthy dollop of christian social policy, now there is forming a reactionary traditionalist party interested in advancing nationalism and the working class.

Romney went on late night TV and asked people to not vote for Trump. The RNC didn't want him but what they wanted didn't matter.
 
Well, it doesn't help that their platform has turned into a logic pretzel within the past few years. I checked in with a person I knew a long time ago, someone who was very loyal to the DNC. Here is a condensed version of her belief system over the past 10 years.

"We should have government healthcare so that people can get the care they need."
"Wow, government healthcare is apparently really expensive."
"OMG, I'm pregnant, and a hospital birth costs the system $10,000."
"Women should give birth at home so that the system doesn't have to pay for them to give birth."

Yup... gotta have that ObamaCare, but can't let anyone use it if they need it because it's too expensive. Of course, she's also the type who says that the government should pay for all abortions too.
 
American media has gone insane.

Imagine if every instance of "white" in those headlines was replaced with "black."

The classic game of "Tumblr or Stormfront", but in the media. Someone should write an article about white people, submit it to one of those garbage websites, and then replace all uses of "white" with "black" or "Jew" and submit it to some white nationalist website.
 
Romney went on late night TV and asked people to not vote for Trump. The RNC didn't want him but what they wanted didn't matter.

The real scary thing was had Trump not gotten bored and decided "I think I'll run", we'd have President Hillary right now because the RNC would've run Cruz or Jeb, a pair of uninspiring cookie-cutter "Jesus says I can be President" Republicans. They talk about the DNC collapsing, and how bad it would be? Ha! The RNC collapsed first when it couldn't keep a third-party populist from hijacking it, and it practically birthed a new party overnight.... when shit gets that rotten, it deserves to collapse, something better or at least effective, will replace it.

As bad as the DNC is, the RNC was somehow even WORSE because it STILL thought the Newt Gingrich "moral majority" playbook could win..... it didn't even work for HIM back in 99'
 
Last edited:
The real scary thing was had Trump not gotten bored and decided "I think I'll run", we'd have President Hillary right now because the RNC would've run Cruz or Jeb, a pair of uninspiring cookie-cutter "Jesus says I can be President" Republicans. They talk about the DNC collapsing, and how bad it would be? Ha! The RNC collapsed first when it couldn't keep a third-party populist from hijacking it, and it practically birthed a new party overnight....

As bad as the DNC is, the RNC was somehow even WORSE because it STILL thought the Newt Gingrich playbook could win..... it didn't even work for HIM back in 99......
Years ago I heard a libertarian talk show host call the Republican party "The Party of Stupid," and that's never left my mind since. It's so accurate.
 
Both parties are stupid in their own special ways.

The Democrats are naive (there's no such thing as a bad minority! Trayvon only robbed that store because white supremacy left him no choice!) and the Republicans are stubborn, determined not to budge off their self-styled moral perch even if it kills them! (and it did).

The platform they almost ran on before the Donald annexed them was the exact... same... one.. .they've been trotting out there since 1980..... It's a wonder Cruz didn't miss a speech and blame it on coming down with a bad case of Pac-Man Fever.
 
That's a nice sacred band you have...would be a shame if someone...equipped the sarissa...
Philip fucking stole that idea from Thebes and didn't even credit them on his tumblr.

As bad as the DNC is, the RNC was somehow even WORSE because it STILL thought the Newt Gingrich "moral majority" playbook could win..... it didn't even work for HIM back in 99'
That's part of what makes it so sad/amusing. The religious right really didn't even matter. It was just a bunch of empty baggage. Hell, Gingrich can be pretty smart when he's not Christing it up, but the blindspot some of these guys have where it's concerned is just baffling to me.
 
Both parties are stupid in their own special ways.

The Democrats are naive (there's no such thing as a bad minority! Trayvon only robbed that store because white supremacy left him no choice!) and the Republicans are stubborn, determined not to budge off their self-styled moral perch even if it kills them! (and it did).

The platform they almost ran on before the Donald annexed them was the exact... same... one.. .they've been trotting out there since 1980..... It's a wonder Cruz didn't miss a speech and blame it on coming down with a bad case of Pac-Man Fever.

What this past couple of years ultimately signifies is the collapse of the neoliberal consensus which has dominated Washington (and really the entire Western world) for the better part of the last half-century. A fundamental shift has already occurred within the Republican party thanks to Trump, and it's only a matter of time before a similar development happens within the Democratic party as well.

The main thing the Democrats have to ensure going forward is that the screeching SJW types within the party are cordoned off and ignored, because if left unchecked, they will hijack any serious attempt to bring about positive reform within the party, and thus prevent such efforts from gaining popular support.
 
What is the actual definition of neoliberal? I only started seeing this used in the last six months or so.
 
What is the actual definition of neoliberal? I only started seeing this used in the last six months or so.
In the early 20th century it was the philosophy based on limiting government intervention in the free market. It was (and somewhat is still) the dominant ideology of the Republican Party post-WWI.

When the Democrat Party went more economically centrist in the wake of Reagan and the rise of the Clintons, far left critics of Democrats started using the term to call the centrist wing of the party Republicans in all but name. Continued misuse has morphed it into a general descriptor for the economically centrist, corporatist, global market-oriented philosophy found in spades among beltway insiders.
 
In the early 20th century it was the philosophy based on limiting government intervention in the free market. It was (and somewhat is still) the dominant ideology of the Republican Party post-WWI.
I've never heard that called that before. And I would not describe either the Republicans or the Democrats that way regardless of their rhetoric.

I really fucking hate American political terminology. It's such a mess.
 
The classic game of "Tumblr or Stormfront", but in the media. Someone should write an article about white people, submit it to one of those garbage websites, and then replace all uses of "white" with "black" or "Jew" and submit it to some white nationalist website.

There is already a very convincing set of Richard Spencer or Ta-Nehisi Coates screenshots out there.
 
What is the actual definition of neoliberal? I only started seeing this used in the last six months or so.

It's a term used to loosely describe the economic philosophy which began to take hold as western economies became increasingly financialized (that is, as banking and financial services comprised a larger and larger section of the economy, while manufacturing declined as a total share). It is most generally defined as a philosophy which promotes economic globalization and free trade, as well as perhaps expecting less accountability from financial institutions.

In recent years, the term has increasingly been employed as a pejorative to describe those who favor economic policies which are perceived to benefit multinational corporations and financial institutions at the expense of ordinary people, and there is some data to support this perception: manufacturing and the jobs associated with it are increasingly outsourced to other countries, real wages have declined in the last 30 years relative to living costs, wealth inequality has grown substantially, employment has become increasingly unstable, etc.
 
I really fucking hate American political terminology. It's such a mess.
Worse still, it's a mess by design. The tribal mentality in the country encourages people to adopt labels, but frequently change their beliefs (without acknowledging they've done so). The platforms change and the labels don't, until the labels themselves bear no resemblance to what they're supposed to mean.
 
The real scary thing was had Trump not gotten bored and decided "I think I'll run", we'd have President Hillary right now because the RNC would've run Cruz or Jeb, a pair of uninspiring cookie-cutter "Jesus says I can be President" Republicans. They talk about the DNC collapsing, and how bad it would be? Ha! The RNC collapsed first when it couldn't keep a third-party populist from hijacking it, and it practically birthed a new party overnight.... when shit gets that rotten, it deserves to collapse, something better or at least effective, will replace it.

As bad as the DNC is, the RNC was somehow even WORSE because it STILL thought the Newt Gingrich "moral majority" playbook could win..... it didn't even work for HIM back in 99'

Yeah, I think this is the takeaway from the 2016 election that much of the political intelligentsia in America missed. Both the major political parties experienced a revolt from within their own ranks against the core platforms of their institution. Trump leading what was essentially a rebirth of the Native American Party (The infamous "Know Nothing" party) from the 19th century, and Bernie Sanders a revolt by the Social Democrats from the early 20th century. Both of their ideologies are nothing new in American politics, but never had any of them risen to major prominence as the political structures that existed at the time cannibalized useful parts of their platforms and kicked the rest out.

The Democrats were strong enough institutionally to suppress the revolt within their ranks. Even to the point that they managed to kick the Sanders crowd a second time after they lost the national election by keeping his guys out of the senior party cadre when it came time to elect new members to the steering committee. The Republican Party by comparison failed to suppress the insurrection and was basically taken over in a coup de main. The idea of Trump winning seemed absurd to them as well, and they did not treat him with the same level of threat that the Democrats did with Sanders. After he clinched it there was an abortive effort to block Trump at the convention but it was far too late by then. At which point you had many establishment Republicans clearly hoping Clinton would emerge the victor. But Trump didn't lose. And that was basically the death of the Republican Party as we knew it.
 
Back