The disturbing racial bias of The Greatest Dancer - members of the public vote for the whites rather than the superior minority races, this is shocking

trannyfucker

fucker of trannies
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-...disturbing-racial-bias-of-the-greatest-dancer

racist.jpg


Russian-trained ballet dancer Yassaui Mergaliyev steps up to perform. For two minutes, he does a staggering routine of superhuman spins and mid-air split jumps to try and wow the studio audience of BBC’s The Greatest Dancer. The presenters, Jordan Banjo and Alesha Dixon, have their jaws on the floor. The celebrity dance captains Cheryl, Oti Mabuse and Matthew Morrison are screaming themselves hoarse: “You have to vote for this guy!” But the Kazakh dancer does not get enough votes to go through to the next round. Someone in the crowd yawns. “It just wasn’t that exciting, was it?” another audience member whispers to her neighbour.

The BBC’s latest Saturday night competition has a unique twist: it hands the “power to the people” (and we all know how that goes). Members of the public have complete control over who progresses from the very start. Each dancer has to try and convince 75% of the audience to turn their lights on, which then opens up the studio mirror and lets them perform before the live crowd and the dance captains, as well as securing a place in the callbacks.

But this attempt at democracy has given us an insight into Britain’s dance tastes and, more uncomfortably, deep-rooted racial anxieties. This weekend, BBC One aired the last of the auditions, which resulted in only one of the nine finalists being an entirely BAME act.

Race-related issues have reared their head before on audience-controlled reality shows. Strictly Come Dancing, Big Brother and Love Island have all repeatedly pointed to the same result: that Britain has a clear preference, unconscious or otherwise, for caucasian contestants.

Some may claim that Mergaliyev failed because of ballet’s dwindling popularity in the mainstream or, as Cheryl claimed, the crowd’s lack of “technical-minded[ness]”, but his central Asian heritage seemingly deterred voters, too. In this climate of pre-Brexit limbo, the odds of minority dancers having what Simon Cowell dubs the “likability” factor appear especially slim.

The link between diversity and unpopularity was even more pronounced when Asian solo dancers Matthew Mindtrick Holt and 16-year-old Williamfailed to win over the crowd. Yet again, both presenters and all three captains were left aghast, shouting: “Come on, people. Vote! Vote! Vote! What is wrong with you?” But the audience refused to budge.

Perhaps the clearest case of prejudice, though, was the audition by Dans Chinese Dance, which received the lowest number of votes of all acts, including those who had slipped up. The traditional Chinese biàn liǎnperformers convinced just 34% of the crowd to switch on their lights. Although the group impressed dance captain Mabuse, the east Asian dresses and ancient opera masks proved a repellant. Receptionist Amelia Wilson was confused by the traditional dress, blurting “what is that!” as the troupe entered the room. A woman in the crowd noted “they’d frighten the life” out of her in their historical garments.

Elsewhere, technically flawed white contestants James Clifton and Dynamic Dads got 75% almost instantly, despite dance captain Morrison bluntly explaining that “the dance vocabulary wasn’t there”. In the audition stage, 83% of caucasian acts were successful, whereas only two Asian contestants managed to open the mirror.

The rejection of Yassaui, Matthew and William reflects the erasure of eastern and central Asian representation in modern British culture. According to recent statistics from the DWP, Asians are the least likely of any ethnic group in the UK to be in employment. If Asian faces are not entirely absent from British TV and film, they tend to adopt stereotypical secondary roles. Additionally, according to dating website OKCupid, Asian men are alongside black women as the demographics that receive the least matches.

Similarly, the treatment of black women in Britain appears to be paralleled in The Greatest Dancer audience votes. While Frobacks, a group of four black men, were in Cheryl’s top three, the only all-black and all-female group, Afro Queens, were unable to open the mirror. The group’s struggle to gain votes reflects the struggle that many black females face in reality television.

In 2017, Alexandra Burke was repeatedly placed in the Strictly bottom two,despite receiving the highest scores from the judges. Her inability to win over the British public magnified issues of intersecting prejudices against black women in the UK, who often experience dual discrimination based on both gender and race. But the rejection that women of colour and Asians encounter in talent shows such as Strictly and The Greatest Dancer is also a reflection of broader issues in the British workforce, healthcare, film and dating worlds.

The BBC was asked to comment on the issue of whitewashing in the show and responded: “The Greatest Dancer is one of the most inclusive talent competitions and includes a diverse range of dancing talent. Anyone can audition from the ages of seven to 70+ and all styles of dance are welcome. During auditions, the audience holds the power as to who goes through … The auditions were filmed in Birmingham, one of the UK’s most diverse and vibrant cities, and the studio reflected this.”

While there may be no evidence that the British public intentionally discriminates, reality TV continues to follow a formula of whitewashing, which extends into other areas of British society. Regardless of the audience’s multi-ethnicity, there is still a clear issue with the way the public votes, and the bias for white contestants must be called into question.

Additionally, according to dating website OKCupid, Asian men are alongside black women as the demographics that receive the least matches.

Not wanting to have sex with black women/Asian men is racist.

This weekend, BBC One aired the last of the auditions, which resulted in only one of the nine finalists being an entirely BAME act.

Entirely? So these don't count:

p06z3nlw.jpg


Too white!

Far too white:

49296044_1447340275400495_8223101357939228672_n.jpg


The sole all-BAME group:

p06z5slq.jpg


You can't expect the tranny group to contain any non-whites, all the black trannies were literally murdered:

p06z5v6f.jpg
 
Last edited:
I actually have a “theory” after autistically watching through all the examples of dancers they listed and I’d like to see what you guys think.
Dancing is a strange thing to watch as an observer with no knowledge because you can’t properly explain why you like someone’s dance and why you don’t; you just know that when it works, it works. You don’t really know or get the technical aspects behind dances, but you can tell when something is...”off.” What’s “off” isn’t the race of the dancer though (surprise, right?), it’s what the dancer is projecting to the audience. In shorter terms: charisma.

I’ll use two examples they listed in the article as side-by-side comparisons, William (Asian) and James (white dude). One of these guys is “technically impressive” and the other is “technically flawed.” However, one of these men won the audience over 8 seconds into his performance (he hadn’t even begun to dance yet)...can you guess why?


Do you remember the movie Black Swan when Nina (Natalie Portman) was having it explained to her why Lily (Mila Kunis) was a better dancer, despite Nina being “technically” better?
The same logic applies. While William can dance, he’s not nearly as engaging to watch. He never looks up, his expression is stern and focused, and there’s a certain something lacking...a “soul,” if you will. James is sassy, staring straight into the audience, and his movements aren’t nearly as precise as William, but he’s very engaged with the audience and looks like he’s having fun. And in a show dedicated to engagement with the audience, that’s way more important than giving a “technically impressive” performance.

The other big example they list is Alexandra Burke, who again is “technically impressive,” but merely on the basis that she was able to learn and replicate the specific dance style’s movement (in my opinion). The audience wasn’t fond of her though. There was speculation that she was “difficult to work with” and that she and her dance partner didn’t get along. If that is true, I’m almost positive her bad relationship with her partner was the reason audiences weren’t as impressed with their dances.

Going back to the charisma element, the chemistry between partners is important in things like waltzes and tangos. There’s a certain romance and flow to the dance that requires both individuals to work in tandem. The man may lead the dance, but if the woman doesn’t want to be lead by him, the dance loses all of the soul. If the waltz isn’t dreamy, elegant, and romantic then it’s just pretty steps. If a tango isn’t sensual, passionate, and intense then it’s just stepping and spinning. Burke doesn’t appear to have a lot of tandem or chemistry with her partner. Whether or not it’s directly her fault, I don’t know, but you be the judge.

Here’s her Viennese waltz:
Here’s Kelly Osboune’s:
Here’s Burke’s tango:
Here’s my personal favorite tango:
(*fans self*)

I’ve heard people say that dances tell a story, so I assume that in a waltz or tango you’re unconsciously knowing that you’re watching the story of two people. But without that partner-chemistry, there’s no story to be told.

Kelly isn’t a dancer and made several mistakes during her dances, but the audience fell in love with her during her time on Dancing with the Stars. She and her dance partner, Louie, allegedly became very good friends during her time on the show, and I remember a lot of fans loving the chemistry between them so much that they were extremely disappointed when they realized Kelly was engaged to this guy (at the time). My point is: Chemistry is important and Alexandra Burke wasn’t the only person dancing and not wowing the audience, her partner wasn’t impressing them either. And in dances with partners, one person isn’t being judged, the pair is being judged.

Additionally: It’s also worth noting that in the dances with lower audience scores, the judges started barking at people to vote for who they, themselves, liked. Most people don’t like being told what to do, and even fewer people like being told how to vote on something subjective (like art or dance). Art will either appeal to you, or it won’t. And no matter how much you tell your friend a song, dance, or painting is “good,” your friend still isn’t going to like it just because you said so.

It’s easier and more click-baity to say the audience is racist or prejudiced then to accept the simple fact that just because something looks good, it doesn’t make it automatically “good.” The actual issue (if you can even call it that) the author fails to address is that people like to be entertained and to have fun. Personality gets you further in life than good looks do, and a charismatic performance will entertain more people than a “technically impressive” performance.

But I guess having a charismatic personality is racist (because personality is apparently =/= to identity).

[EDIT] oh fuck me I meant to embed the videos and I clicked hyperlink fuck my ass
-_-
 
I absolutely agree. Also, many times even in technical competitions, being technical isn't all. Look at how stiff Biles is compared to the champion despite her routine wasn't as impressive.



I wonder if it also has to do with how, recently, minorities are told how "fierce" and "strong" they have to be and they forget that many times there are other aspects to consider.
 
I absolutely agree. Also, many times even in technical competitions, being technical isn't all. Look at how stiff Biles is compared to the champion despite her routine wasn't as impressive.



I wonder if it also has to do with how, recently, minorities are told how "fierce" and "strong" they have to be and they forget that many times there are other aspects to consider.


Woof... she is stiff on that beam...

I agree with the fierce and strong point. And I would like to add that I think the meaning of these words has also been warped (“strong” especially, IMO). There seems to be a trend of conflating “fierce” with being a bitch, but iirc it used to be simply about having a having a confident and assertive demeanor. Same with being “strong” and having “inner strength.” People had to work at being “strong” before and it wasn’t just used to describe someone who just exists and/or has a vagina. Strength usually comes from trial, tribulation, resolution, and conviction, but I can go read Amberlynn’s comments and see people calling her “strong” because some meanies made her mad online and she’s fat as the moon. If that’s the standard for “strong,” then it’s no wonder people are so confused when they don’t get rewarded for mediocrity.
 
I actually have a “theory” after autistically watching through all the examples of dancers they listed and I’d like to see what you guys think.
Dancing is a strange thing to watch as an observer with no knowledge because you can’t properly explain why you like someone’s dance and why you don’t; you just know that when it works, it works. You don’t really know or get the technical aspects behind dances, but you can tell when something is...”off.” What’s “off” isn’t the race of the dancer though (surprise, right?), it’s what the dancer is projecting to the audience. In shorter terms: charisma.

I’ll use two examples they listed in the article as side-by-side comparisons, William (Asian) and James (white dude). One of these guys is “technically impressive” and the other is “technically flawed.” However, one of these men won the audience over 8 seconds into his performance (he hadn’t even begun to dance yet)...can you guess why?


Do you remember the movie Black Swan when Nina (Natalie Portman) was having it explained to her why Lily (Mila Kunis) was a better dancer, despite Nina being “technically” better?
The same logic applies. While William can dance, he’s not nearly as engaging to watch. He never looks up, his expression is stern and focused, and there’s a certain something lacking...a “soul,” if you will. James is sassy, staring straight into the audience, and his movements aren’t nearly as precise as William, but he’s very engaged with the audience and looks like he’s having fun. And in a show dedicated to engagement with the audience, that’s way more important than giving a “technically impressive” performance.

The other big example they list is Alexandra Burke, who again is “technically impressive,” but merely on the basis that she was able to learn and replicate the specific dance style’s movement (in my opinion). The audience wasn’t fond of her though. There was speculation that she was “difficult to work with” and that she and her dance partner didn’t get along. If that is true, I’m almost positive her bad relationship with her partner was the reason audiences weren’t as impressed with their dances.

Going back to the charisma element, the chemistry between partners is important in things like waltzes and tangos. There’s a certain romance and flow to the dance that requires both individuals to work in tandem. The man may lead the dance, but if the woman doesn’t want to be lead by him, the dance loses all of the soul. If the waltz isn’t dreamy, elegant, and romantic then it’s just pretty steps. If a tango isn’t sensual, passionate, and intense then it’s just stepping and spinning. Burke doesn’t appear to have a lot of tandem or chemistry with her partner. Whether or not it’s directly her fault, I don’t know, but you be the judge.

Here’s her Viennese waltz:
Here’s Kelly Osboune’s:
Here’s Burke’s tango:
Here’s my personal favorite tango:
(*fans self*)

I’ve heard people say that dances tell a story, so I assume that in a waltz or tango you’re unconsciously knowing that you’re watching the story of two people. But without that partner-chemistry, there’s no story to be told.

Kelly isn’t a dancer and made several mistakes during her dances, but the audience fell in love with her during her time on Dancing with the Stars. She and her dance partner, Louie, allegedly became very good friends during her time on the show, and I remember a lot of fans loving the chemistry between them so much that they were extremely disappointed when they realized Kelly was engaged to this guy (at the time). My point is: Chemistry is important and Alexandra Burke wasn’t the only person dancing and not wowing the audience, her partner wasn’t impressing them either. And in dances with partners, one person isn’t being judged, the pair is being judged.

Additionally: It’s also worth noting that in the dances with lower audience scores, the judges started barking at people to vote for who they, themselves, liked. Most people don’t like being told what to do, and even fewer people like being told how to vote on something subjective (like art or dance). Art will either appeal to you, or it won’t. And no matter how much you tell your friend a song, dance, or painting is “good,” your friend still isn’t going to like it just because you said so.

It’s easier and more click-baity to say the audience is racist or prejudiced then to accept the simple fact that just because something looks good, it doesn’t make it automatically “good.” The actual issue (if you can even call it that) the author fails to address is that people like to be entertained and to have fun. Personality gets you further in life than good looks do, and a charismatic performance will entertain more people than a “technically impressive” performance.

But I guess having a charismatic personality is racist (because personality is apparently =/= to identity).

[EDIT] oh fuck me I meant to embed the videos and I clicked hyperlink fuck my ass
-_-
Well today I learned a fucking lot about tango. I'll have to keep that in mind for when I try to court ladies.

You're absolutely right though in that Alexandra does a decent performance, it's too mechanical to make up for the lack of dripping sensuality that makes a good tango. On the other hand, that last tango you linked had two dance partners that feel like they're five seconds away from ripping off their clothes at any moment.
 
Another big problem with dance contests with public voting is that the judges are always highly into the whole dance scene (of course), and they are interested in the technical stuff, and for some reason it's all about ballet to them.

The public doesn't give a shit about ballet. They want to see cool moves, not moves that are the same as those shown in a french textbook about ballet from 1725.

So the judges usually narrow the field down to mostly ballet and a couple interesting acts, then the public "picks wrong" from the not so entertaining acts that remain. At least in the ones I watched.
 
I honestly thought the title was referring to the Super Sledge song at first, lol.
 
Back