EU The End of the West - Donald Trump's return to the White House shows that liberal democracy has failed. It proved unable to provide a coherent structure to the post postwar era.

A DER SPIEGEL Editorial by Dirk Kurbjuweit
10.11.2024, 11.41 Uhr

1731390753904.png
The return of Donald Trump to the White House marks the end of an era. Foto: Brian Snyder / REUTERS

One era is coming to an end and a new one is beginning. Nothing marks this shift as clearly as the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president of the United States. The West has lost its dominance and the shared foundation of values, which has been crumbling for some time, is now collapsing. There are tensions everywhere – between countries and within societies. The right wing is on the rise in Italy, France and Germany. The West as a block of liberal democracies no longer exists.

The Western world blossomed after 1945, a reaction to a pair of totalitarian systems: National Socialism and Stalinism. Hitler’s Reich served as a reminder that such a catastrophe must not be repeated. And the Soviet empire behind the Iron Curtain, while also seen as a threat, emboldened Western countries to invest in a shining counter-model: social and liberal democracy.

Prosperity for All​

The system’s strength was its concern for people, for the individual. Prosperity for all through social equality, more rights for women and homosexuals, the absence of authoritarian impositions by the state: All of this made the West attractive in the decades that followed World War II. Those who lived in the West enjoyed their freedoms and their high standard of living. A broad center developed, the pillar of liberal democracy.

The age of totalitarian ideologies, which were essentially political religions, was followed by a phase of rationality, of scientifically based reason. Politics was pursued with the utmost solemnity, because so much was at stake: preventing the return of fascism and standing up to the Soviet Union.

Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be.

Western countries joined forces in NATO. Individual countries were less important than the alliance as a whole. National borders became permeable, disappearing completely in some cases. Internationalization, the European Union, citizen of the world: It was, despite a few shortcomings, a good era. Unfortunately, it is now over.

How could that which began so promisingly now end with Donald Trump, a man who disrupts the system and whose policies are rooted in lunacy?

The initial steps forward in liberal democracies were social advances. But at some point, the social questions were considered to have been largely resolved and the era of social democracy came to an end. The majority of society, after all, was doing well. Progressive politics shifted to fresh challenges: doing away with patriarchy and establishing new freedoms for minorities – important projects to be sure.

But this shift was not managed well. Center-left politicians in particular – the Democrats in the U.S. and the Greens in Germany, for example – paid too little attention to the fact that the issue of equity, that concerns of social decline, don’t simply vanish when the general level of prosperity is high. The resulting impression was that center-left parties did too little for workers, for the center of society. The high cost of living is now seen as one of the most important reasons for Trump’s victory.

Beyond that, governments were unable to establish the fight against climate change early on as a sensible, self-evident project. Hesitation, equivocation and dawdling continued for so long that the challenge grew too large, to the point that many people began fearing for the lives they had grown used to. Trump was able to profit from that as well, by denying the facts.

Liberal democrats also underestimated just how important the concept of nation continues to be. When the Soviet Union disappeared, the West lost its most important source of cohesion. Without the pressure to stay together, many began focusing more intently on their own interests. No longer was the protection of the West in its entirety the focus, but one’s own country. Immigrants were increasingly seen as a threat. This shift, too, was given too little attention by liberal democracies. An advantage for Trump.

A Lack of Earnestness​

The fear of war and authoritarian rule initially made it easy for those in government to hold societies in Western countries together. When this bond dissolved, liberal democrats failed to provide a coherent structure to the post postwar era. Some simply lacked the requisite earnestness, as exemplified by the embarrassing disintegration of Germany’s governing coalition in these difficult times. They lost a large part of society, to the point that many voters feel better represented by authoritarian voices. What a tragedy.

The resuscitation of the West can only be successful if we finally understand that almost all issues are also social issues, whether it be economic policy, migration policy or climate policy. Rational politics remains the correct course of action. But it absolutely must have a heart.

Source (Archive)
 
This happens every 10 to 20 years. It happened in the 60, 70, 80s, 2005 and now 2024. It's nothing new.


And? Russia needs to get bombed to the ground. It's only a matter of time until NATO slays these pests.
Great post but this thread is about why the majority of Germans voted to keep out of a conflict that has the potential to engulf Europe in a disastrous war for the third, and possibly, final time.

Feel free to stand behind your words. I respect someone who puts beliefs into action.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SIMIΔN
If the Gracchi brothers weren't murdered, civil society would have endured and Caesar wouldn't need to cross the Rubicon.

Trump isn't Caesar, he's perhaps the last remaining attempt to stop oligarchy from being so unassailablely entrenched, only a righteous military coup could possibly end it

This article is laughable coming from Germans, Scholtz weak but genuine attempts to prevent WW3 have been undermined by the coalition collapse. America just had a regular election.
 
America isn't a "liberal democracy". We are a Representative Republic. Article wastes no time failing in the very title.
Liberal democracy is a term of art in political science, and the United States is one. The article seems to conflate it with a number of ideas that are not integral to liberal democracy: homosexuality, cosmopolitanism, climate change, progressivism, etc.

And? Russia needs to get bombed to the ground. It's only a matter of time until NATO slays these pests.
Patton had their number. Churchill, too. We should have handled Russia before the Rosenbergs gave them the bomb.
 
If you peel away the caterwauling and garment rending, the article is not completely wrong if we substitute "the liberal international order" for "the West". It ruled the West from WW2 on, so it became synonymous with it. It's an easy mistake to think they are one and the same, and it is an easy manipulative tactic to appeal to this mistake. It deteriorated in the last decades, and is currently in the process of falling apart thanks to the incompetence of the people and institutions operating it. This weirdly named guy (Dirk Kurbjuweit, what the hell?!) gets that and puts a liberal spin on it, but the central point is fine. The liberal international order is going away, but the West will remain - and at this stage, it will get a chance to improve by moving away from a global system that is dragging it down into oblivion. The outcome will still be small l liberal, small d democratic, and small g global, because that is our nature as westerners. But we will hopefully be healed of the civilizational sickness consuming us, and dismantle the globalist dystopia our betters were building for us.
 
The end of west beginned much further back, some said with the creation of the Federal Reserve, LBJ's "Great society", FDR's "New Deal", Jimmy Carter. I think we could add Pierre Trudeau and his son, if he's really his son, Justin "Castro" Trudeau for causing the end of the west.
 
Trump isn't Caesar, he's perhaps the last remaining attempt to stop oligarchy from being so unassailablely entrenched, only a righteous military coup could possibly end it
Sulla did nothing wrong!
Remains to be seen if Trump is willing to let heads roll in order to save the republic.
 
Didn't the "end ofthe west" already happen and get kinda romanticized n that book where some kid and a bald guy fight to the death at the end as a last "dance" of the freedom of the er- Oh wait they don't mean THAT west they mean "The west has fallen" type west. Understandable. Now we can return to wicky wa wa.
 
I'm so fucking glad that the left's immediate reaction isn't to do what the right did, but to wither and die on the vine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TayTweets
The age of totalitarian ideologies, which were essentially political religions
Funny, I see a lot of blind faith disguised as "science!!!!1!" from the power structure Trump ran against...
 
Only if the west listened to girlboss Galadriel and didn't let yucky hueyte man have the rangz, I mean let them vote, Sauro... Trump wouldn't be partying in Mordor-alago!
 
The West is dead because your liberal world order fantasies of the End of History killed it. To see your fantasies die alongside it is a sweet pleasure, and my most sincere wish is that they lay buried in the same plot of history as Hitler's empire, global communism, and all the other dreams of yesterday.
You know I love Francis fukuyama because no one is actually ever read his books they just quote the end of history which is something he never argued for he argued whether or not liberal democracy would prevail and we would see the end of every other system of government you never said it was a certain thing to happen.
People should really read fukuyama he's generally actually an intelligent person same thing with Henry Kissinger
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SIMIΔN
Back