Opinion The End of World Population Growth? Data Suggests a 2025 Peak

L | A
By Robert McAllister
The-End-of-World-Population-Growth-Data-Points-to-a-2025-Peak-Ahead.webp

Will the world’s population double by 2050, or could growth slow and halt far sooner than previously expected? A fresh analysis using advanced modeling and decades of United Nations data suggests that global population growth may peak as early as 2025, aligning with declining birth rates and the inevitability of a rising global death rate.

For years, demographers have projected future population growth using “principal components” methods, applying global fertility and mortality rates to the latest world population totals and projecting forward.

The United Nations offers three scenarios: a “high variant” projecting 28 billion people by 2150, a “medium variant” of 11.5 billion by 2075, and a “low variant” where growth peaks at 7 billion around 2050 before a gradual decline.

These scenarios have often felt like preparing for a blizzard, rain, and a heatwave simultaneously. The medium scenario is commonly treated as the “most likely” simply because it sits in the middle.

However, a least squares regression approach, which analyzes all past world population totals rather than relying on a single year’s data, offers a clearer and potentially more accurate forecast.

Using personal computing power to run these complex calculations, researchers compiled the most reliable UN Demographic Yearbook data from 1950 to 1990, dismissing outliers and averaging repeated estimates for accuracy.

For 1991–1996, they used the UN’s single published estimates and for 1994–1995, estimates from the Population Reference Bureau, ensuring continuity and precision.

This approach tested various growth models: straight-line, exponential, logistic, and convex (exponential growth at a decreasing rate). The convex growth model—producing a dome-shaped projection—showed the strongest correlation with actual historical data, achieving a near-perfect correlation coefficient of 0.99996 according to Research Gate.

On average, the difference between this model’s projections and actual population figures was just 7.9 million, a negligible margin at the global scale.

World-Population-Actual-Vs-Estimated-Chart-1536x916.webp
Chart comparing actual and estimated world population from 1950 to 1995

Based on this convex growth projection, global population growth is forecasted to peak at 7.07 billion around 2025, before entering a slow decline:
  • 2000: 6.09 billion
  • 2025: 7.07 billion
  • 2030: 7.01 billion
  • 2035: 6.86 billion
  • 2040: 6.64 billion
  • 2045: 6.34 billion
Such an unconventional forecast requires supporting evidence—and it finds it in the dynamics of birth and death rates. The world’s death rate currently stands at 9 deaths per 1,000 people per year, implying an unrealistic average life expectancy of 111 years if it continued.

Realistically, with life expectancy stabilizing around 75 years globally, the death rate would increase to approximately 13.3 deaths per 1,000, intersecting with declining birth rates around 2030.

This intersection suggests that the long-feared runaway population growth may never materialize. Instead, global birth rates are declining in many regions due to factors including urbanization, women’s education, and access to family planning, while the death rate is poised to rise simply due to biological limits on human lifespan.

The convergence of these trends aligns closely with the convex growth projection and the UN’s low variant, indicating that the global population could stabilize and begin to decline sooner than many governments and policy planners anticipate.

This shift carries profound implications for global economics, environmental planning, and social policy. Nations currently preparing for endless population increases may need to adjust strategies for infrastructure, food security, and aging populations in a world where the challenge may not be overpopulation, but rather a stabilizing or shrinking population.

As the world approaches what could be the end of its population boom, this new understanding urges policymakers, economists, and the public to rethink assumptions about the future—and prepare for a demographic transition that could reshape societies globally within the next generation.
 
We're already massively overpopulated. Like even now when I think of now compared to when I was a kid it's just striking how difficult it is to be alone in my city. Like take a random place in any city and see if you can stand there five minutes without encountering anyone. Used to just happen without being notable, now it's nigh impossible during daylight hours.


Too much traffic on the roads, too many people in the way when you're trying to get somewhere or do something. Housing is too expensive because of the ridiculous demand. Tbh I'd happily see the population cut in half, I imagine it'd alleviate a lot of the stress in modern life
 
You're behind the times. It's literally only Africans and Muslims now who are at replacement rate or above. All of non-Muslim Asia and nearly all of the Americas (South/North/Central) are also below replacement rate.

View attachment 7643992
Well if we can keep the USAID spigot shut off we won't have this issue. We are essentially paying for brain dead niggers and muslims to breed beyond their capacity.
 
There is no such thing as overpopulation, only undercapacity. If you and your ilk keep steady on your sentiment that most people around you ought to go away and refuse to accommodate them, you might just get what you want. Through the next generations disappearing.
But then I'd get to read all my books without interruptions or my bitch wife, I just hope I don't break my glasses!

I don't want to live in some niggerfaggot version of Blade Runner. The Georgia Guidstones had some sus shit on it but maintaining a eguenicized population of 500 million sounds like heaven. Too bad some spergs blew it up.
 
Humanity discovers we can have a self-regulating population growth. Don’t animals and bugs do this too?
The Mouse Utopia suggests that at certain densities, there seems to be a "kill switch" that activates (at least in mammals) and turns off the desire to reproduce and nothing turns it back on until the size of the population reduces.

But this idea that there IS such a thing as overpopulation despite technological induced cap removal is very disturbing to certain political and moral dogmas so it is very very aggressively opposed.
 
Last edited:
The Mouse Utopia suggests at certain densities, there seems to be a "kill switch" that activates (at least in mammals) and turns off the desire to reproduce
Here's a theory I just though of,
With the Internet and the population as high as it is, Humans see too many faces/people that our ""kill switch"" activates hence why countries that are being to come 'Online' are experiencing this decline in replacement rates.

Basically, Tik Tok brainrot is causing people to not reproduce.
 
But this idea that there IS such a thing as overpopulation despite technological induced cap removal is very disturbing to certain political and moral dogmas so it is very very aggressively opposed.
There's also a big difference between forcible population reduction and just allowing demographics to evolve naturally. A lot of systems just aren't capable of handling these populations, the US federal government especially.

Plus there's a difference between natural demographic decline and forcible population reduction. The former will end up stabilizing at a sustainable level ,while the latter gets you demographic collapse as will happen in China.
 
Was surprised about Indonesia being in the red tbh. Won't be surprised if we see the entire gulf states go into the red

Indonesia has had family planning policy since before you were born. China's policy gets all the attention but during the same time as China's one child policy almost all functional third world states imposed policies that were just as "successful," they just worked by persuasion and bribery instead of direct coercion. The only barrier to this was Catholics with political power but as the example of the Philippines clearly demonstrates that power is over.

What the countries with high TFR populations have in common is that they are either too unstable, too rural, or a combination of both for women to have consistent access to birth control. This is obscured on the map having only one category for TFR >2.5. It's dumb to mush together the birthrate of countries like Egypt and Kazakhstan, around 3 which is ideal and sustainable, with the top winners on the list which are double that.

It's also important to keep in mind that the most "successful" family planning programs were imposed on cultures with strong son preference (again, not just China, China's was just the ugliest). Like anybody talking about this issue who doesn't mention the fact that multiple human populations deliberately on purpose skewed their sex ratio into a unrecoverable doom spiral is either a retard or is deliberately obfuscating how bad the situation is.
 
Was surprised about Indonesia being in the red tbh. Won't be surprised if we see the entire gulf states go into the red
The whole Gulf State population pyramid is counting 'jeets from the subcontinent, you likely have an equal amount of males to females if you counted citizens and ethnic Arab expats. The birth rate on the other hands isn't too big of an issue since I assume it's within replacement level for citizens, but then again there's the cousin fucking to consider.
 
You're behind the times. It's literally only Africans and Muslims now who are at replacement rate or above. All of non-Muslim Asia and nearly all of the Americas (South/North/Central) are also below replacement rate.

View attachment 7643992
I still have no clue as to how war torn Africa can be popping out so many kids. Both north and south Sudan have been in endless civil wars after decolonization and yet some how people are stilling finding time to pop out kids. Its total population as of 2024 is 50 million and in the current civil war, the estimate number of people who have died is 672,000 with 522k of them being children. Meanwhile, the west has had a population decline despite not being in any big wars since the end of the Cold War and decolonial wars.
 
Probably wouldn't be any decline if bill gates wasn't injecting poison into infants, strangling agriculture, and encouraging self-steriliaztion and genocide
 
  • Informative
Reactions: frozen_runner
I still have no clue as to how war torn Africa can be popping out so many kids. Both north and south Sudan have been in endless civil wars after decolonization and yet some how people are stilling finding time to pop out kids. Its total population as of 2024 is 50 million and in the current civil war, the estimate number of people who have died is 672,000 with 522k of them being children. Meanwhile, the west has had a population decline despite not being in any big wars since the end of the Cold War and decolonial wars.
Liberalism is worse for population maintenance than war.
 
This is a disaster to economists because the entire world economy is currently a pyramid scheme of trying to get infinite growth. Gonna be insane in a decade or so when the lack of new people in the pyramid causes it to collapse.
During the metaverse fad (which might come back) the idea is that since we were running out of nearly everything so most physical goods would be unattainable for most the future of CONSOOM is virtual goods. Imagine the entire world economy running on horse armor market theories, that's the future zucc was thinking of.

Anyway, AI its about the delete the middle classes, and then cheapo mass produced robots will kill the lower classes. What the economy will run off when that happens I've no idea, maybe first world governments will tax the shit out off AI megacorps (big cope) and use it to keep almost everybody on UBI, but countries out of the G7 are fucked, some of the G20 might make it but not all, and those below that level are GONE.
It’s interesting that when those people invade first world western nations their birthdates fall as well. It’s only the people still living in the shitholes that keep popping out hollow eyed kids.
Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria are blue when those places are practically hell on earth, war-torn, running out of water, most infrastructure destroyed or collapsing, etc...

Hell even the birthplace of islam is in the red...
There's a different kind of plague that'll get the job done.
View attachment 7644230
A fate worse than slavery and colonialism combined.
 
Back