Opinion The Fall of Roe May Save Democrats in the Midterms, at Least in the Suburbs

Link (Archive)

The Fall of Roe May Save Democrats in the Midterms, at Least in the Suburbs​

For decades, while conservatives were patiently waiting for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, they were busy undermining it. In Congress and in statehouses, they pushed policies to make it harder to secure legal abortions, efforts that helped to widen the gap between the two major parties. And yet during the same time, most Americans settled into a complacent state in which they assumed Roewas settled law, even among those whomRepublican Presidents appointed to federal benches.

Well, on Friday, conservatives finally got their wish. The proverbial dog caught the car—and, at least politically, may come to regret it. Americans are still digesting the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling and its potential far-reaching consequences that could stretch from reproductive rights to personal relationships and marriage equality. But there will be no dodging this topic on the campaign trail.

It’s still early, and Election Day is a relatively distant 19 weeks away. But quick polling conducted in the days since the Supreme Court struck down the 1973 precedent shows political problems for Republicans, who otherwise seemed on a glide path toward November. Historically, the party that holds the White House has a dismal showing in its first test with voters; only the Sept. 11 attacks spared an incumbent President that insult back in 2002. President Joe Biden’s job approval numbers are among the worst since World War II, inflationis a persistent irritant to the electorate, and high gas prices are hitting everyone. Put another way, Republicans would have to really try to mess up their hand.

Yet on abortion rights, Democrats seemingly have an advantage on a topic dominating the news and likely to remain top of mind as almost every state will be forced to revisit its abortion policies. A record number of voters say abortion will be the issue that determines their vote this year, according to Gallup, and recent polls suggest a jump in interest in the midterms that seem to favor Democrats. Yet the threat of apathy and exhaustion is real, and sustaining outrage is hard work.

One group in particular may have outsized sway: college-educated women who determinethe outcomes in the swingy suburbs. Many came to regret their support for Trump in 2016, and went back to supporting Democrats in the following two elections. Now they are none-too-happy with the Dobbs ruling. A significant 71% of college-educated white women support abortion rights, a recent NPR poll found, and they are a must-win bloc for Democrats’ longterm prospects.

Even before the Supreme Court issued its ruling, the number of Americans who toldGallup pollsters that they identified as “pro-life” was at its lowest level since 1996. A near-record 55% of those surveyed said they identified as “pro-choice” and, in a first, a majority—52%—said abortion was morally acceptable. Over decades of polls, Gallup has found increasing support for abortion, and even in the last year, support for abortion rights has grown across every single demographic group.

Since Friday’s ruling, voters seem to have doubled down. An NPR-Marist poll over the weekend found 56% of all adults opposed the decision and 53% of independents said the same. And in a reason for Republican alarm, 66% of suburban women said they opposed it, alongside 70% of white women who graduated from college.

The same NPR-Marist survey found, among all registered voters, 48% of Americans said they would vote for the Democrat running for Congress, a slight edge over the 41% who said they’d vote for the Republican. Those numbers track with the same survey’s results a month before the 2018 elections that swept Democrats into power. (Keep in mind, when it comes to which party controls the House, gerrymandering has rendered many of these voters’ opinions unimportant as competitive districts are tough to find in many states.)

In short, if Democrats can sustain the intensity around this topic, they may defy history and a Biden drag and dodge an electoral disaster. They’ve been laying the groundwork for this moment for months, and further stepped up focus groups and polling after a draft of the ruling leaked in early May. EMILY’s List, Planned Parenthood, and NARAL—the big three abortion-rights groups—plan a $150 million blitz on the topic heading into the fall.

Republicans, however, are far from despondent. Their base loved the ruling: it carries 75% support among white Evangelicals, 84% of those who voted for Donald Trump in 2020, and 54% of white working-class men, according to NPR’s polling. GOP strategists have long argued that abortion fires up a small but dedicated part of the electorate, the volunteers who knock on doors and make phone calls. The emerging strategy appears to be to cast Democrats who support abortion rights as extremists; in New Mexico, where Democrats control the legislature, the GOP nominee for governor says he’s pro-life but is pledging only to ban “late-term and partial-birth abortion that the current governor supports.” (New Mexico stands to become a destination for abortion services as many other states in that region ban it altogether.)

Then there’s the economy. Everyone is feeling the pinch. Systematically, Democrats are simply hemorrhaging their voter rolls. An Associated Press analysis finds that more than 1 million voters across 43 states have switched to the Republican Party in the last year, a shift that is especially pronounced in the suburbs. If that trend holds, it could mean tens of thousands of suburban voters who were sour on Trump may have migrated back to the GOP, enough to potentially determine control of Congress.

What’s unknown is if the new abortion landscape might prompt those same voters to swing back into the Democratic fold. To that end, it’s worth listening to what suburban women are saying, especially the white ones with college degrees.

For Republican candidates, there will be little room to hide, especially if Democrats prove successful in painting the GOP as the party of extremism. Democrats will also have to address what comes next in a post-Roe world. Until recently, millions of swing voters had little expectation that Roe could really be struck down after so many years of hard-won durability. The surprise arrived and remade the political landscape. It’s now up to both parties to figure out how to read the new terrain.
 
enh maybe.
No, that's exactly it.

The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.[1] It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law.[2] However, federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution;[3] that is, they must be pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights—of particular interest is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution.

Abortion isn't in the Constitution. Congress can't make a law mandating all states allow abortion and not have said law vulnerable to valid constitutional challenge.
no state explicitly allowed it or forbade it afaik
From your link:

Prior to Roe v. Wade, 30 states prohibited abortion without exception, 16 states banned abortion except in certain special circumstances (e.g., rape, incest, health threat to mother), 3 states allowed residents to obtain abortions, and New York allowed abortions generally.

"early" is mushy and oldfashioned quickening is probably as good as it gets.
You mean the medieval theory made well before the invention of the ultrasound, or even the argument that the necessary vital continuity from zygote to the present day person obviates the debate on when the body is ensouled?
 
Last edited:
They needed this copium after the article came out yesterday showing over 1 million Democrat voters have switched to Republican in the last year, a big chunk of them coming from the suburbs.
Might add as well some Hispanic voters who saw there where the Dems goes with the grooming and all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
All the GOP would have to do is educate people about what Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health actually does--recognize that there is no Constitutional right to abortion and return the matter to the states. Emphasize the importance of democratic values and how everyone has a right to have a say on this matter.

They will not do that because they are the stupid wing of the Ubioarryz with the DNC being the evil wing that actually plays for keeps.
 
The only thing Democrats can ride on is abortion. Once the initial momentum from the ruling has subsided they'll have little to run on and news media will stop covering it as much as the economy. Bonus losses for Dems if a recession happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
I hope so. Things still need to get worse before the average lug starts looking for his pitchfork.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
The real reason the overturning hurts more than helps is that this wasn't a push by Republicans in congress, this wasn't unpopular legislation, there's no one Republican figurehead responsible, no Mitch McConnell or Ron DeSantis, and no "turncoat" Democrat like Mr. Manchin.

Yeah, they're so pissed at Clarence Thomas that they're openly calling him a House Nigger, but, he's not up for election, Democrats are.

The same Dems who failed to do anything about this very scenario for 40 years except milk it as a campaign promise. "Elect us, or those nasty Republicans will take away your abortions" , in an Administration that was already known for being unable to pass anything despite being in control, this just makes it all the more worse.

Trying to blame any Republican, be it incumbent or challenger for this just brings the heat equally back on them because they were just as much a bystander to this as the RNC was, might as well blame the Janitor for not turning in the $500 in cash you're CERTAIN you lost in the lobby the other day.... .even if he did pocket it, what's that say about you to be so dense as to lose it?
 
Prediction based on the rhetoric, actions, and occasional wink-nudge hints of the current junta:

"We" (Republicans) win 2022 in an unprecedented landslide.

Congress refuses to seat Republican winners because insurrection etc.

The GOP is outlawed.
Why not? They've been soaking this stack of jenga blocks we call a country in gasoline for the better of a decade, why not go ahead and toss a lighter on it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Abortion isn't in the Constitution. Congress can't make a law mandating all states allow abortion and not have said law vulnerable to valid constitutional challenge.
Along comes Wickard v. Filburn, "See not interstate commercing achually IS interstate commerce because reasons."
You mean the medieval theory made well before the invention of the ultrasound, or even the argument that the necessary vital continuity from zygote to the present day person obviates the debate on when the body is ensouled?
This is the best, people bitching about their theocracy fetish have no idea how Roe's standards are based on souls entering the body.

Before anyone sticks their necks out on this one, I recommend waiting for a few polls come out.
 
That's a nigh impossible task in the best case scenario.
I don't think so. I can explain it in about 120 seconds to anyone with half a brain. That qualifier excludes a lot of people but those bug eyed cretins would never vote anything but DNC of anything.

In actuality, Dobbs is neutral about abortion and empowers the American citizenry to decide for themselves....
 
Last edited:
Yeah, no. Abortion ain't a main political point for most of the population. If given a choice, most people, even women, would vote for good economy instead of the chance of having abortions. With a good economy, you can access good medical care, get a good job, and properly raise a child. An abortion, otoh, won't necessarily give you a better job or a better life, no matter how much feminists insist it will.
 
"my libshit NPR poll says I'm right"
All these faggots do these days is cherry pick and cope. "Journalism" is just blogging while being as delusional and pretentious as possible. Can't wait for these shrieking vaginas to get absolutely assblasted in a few months. I don't even like republicans at all, but I still want them to dominate just to spite these elitist jackasses.
 
This is the best, people bitching about their theocracy fetish have no idea how Roe's standards are based on souls entering the body.
I'm sure they considered that, but the restrictions that the Roe verdict mandated are specifically structured around a fiction (that is, trimesters) that the justices made by themselves in that very verdict, all because they wanted to balance the government interest in preserving prenatal life and some bodily autonomy that only exists in the context of a woman killing her kid-- try using "muh bodily autonomy" to extort a codeine prescription out of your doctor.

"Quickening", as far as I've seen it, has only been brought up as part of a gotcha meant to insinuate that modern pro-life proponents are more extreme than their predecessors-- they'll never talk about how it wasn't dogma, it wasn't derived from dogma, it wasn't even enshrined doctrine, and it was proposed in a time when ultrasound and the current understanding of gestation didn't exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Another thing that everyone is missing is that people are frustrated with conservatives for being too squishy, for compromising too much. "Cuckservatives," if you will.

Growing a pair and taking a hard stance will actually win people over.

If anything, overturning Roe will actually help the republicans, not hurt them.
 
Last edited:
For anyone thinking this is going to move the needle for Democrats I point to the pro-abortion twenty something on MSNBC ranting at the reporter about how pissed she was at Democrats for sending out fundraising emails in response to the RvW overturn, pointing out that Democrats had fifty years to codify it.

Hell, Don’t Walk, Run on YouTube has a video about it with clips of Obama campaigning, saying he’ll codify RvW when he’s in office and cuts to a clip of him in office admitting that codifying RvW isn’t even on his radar.

It’s taking time but the normies and even the true believers are starting to see their favorite politicians for what they really are: Lying scum that will fuck your life, destroy your family and make you suffer so they can thrive.
 
Rate optimistic but I don't think Karen or Debra are going to care too much about their daughters' and nieces' "right" to kill their grandchildren when they're struggling to pay bills and can't afford for the kids to play little league soccer anymore.

Realistic, optimistic, why not both?
 
Yeah, no. Abortion ain't a main political point for most of the population. If given a choice, most people, even women, would vote for good economy instead of the chance of having abortions. With a good economy, you can access good medical care, get a good job, and properly raise a child. An abortion, otoh, won't necessarily give you a better job or a better life, no matter how much feminists insist it will.
middleaged Xers and old boomers don't get this, they really, really don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Yeah, no. Abortion ain't a main political point for most of the population. If given a choice, most people, even women, would vote for good economy instead of the chance of having abortions. With a good economy, you can access good medical care, get a good job, and properly raise a child. An abortion, otoh, won't necessarily give you a better job or a better life, no matter how much feminists insist it will.

So, in essence you believe that it's morally right to withold an essential right from people by extorting them with better economic opportunities? I believe that you should give them both, since these two in no way cancel each other out.

Rate optimistic but I don't think Karen or Debra are going to care too much about their daughters' and nieces' "right" to kill their grandchildren when they're struggling to pay bills and can't afford for the kids to play little league soccer anymore.

Oh, they will, once they have to start paying for their teenage girls trips to another state to get abortion. They will.

middleaged Xers and old boomers don't get this, they really, really don't.

Because these people still remember, especially the boomers, what it was to live in a world where abortion generally was illegal. They don't want that, and neither do younger people once they realize in what kind of Hell they are.

But all in all the cope seen in this thread is extremely amusing. You know, deep within, that this was a really fucking stupid move politics-wise, one that will inevitably come to bite back at your side of the issue come the elections, but you rather choose to engage in wishful thinking and elaborate fictions about how people will not vote against this at the ballot box, now that they have the chance.
 
Back