The Final Transition / Trans Genocide / #StopTransGenocide - Trannies who have a severe victim's complex and their constant need to rewrite history's greatest tragedies.

This thread reminded me of an article series I found titled "The Génocidaires" by Giovanh, attempting to prove that a tranny genocide is happening with much verbal masturbation.
Sad part is this is the same Giovanh that wrote a great writeup on some Homestuck drama (as seen in the Homestuck thread).

- The Génocidaires: Intro (a)
- The Génocidaires: Laws (a)
- The Génocidaires: Exterminationism (a)
- The Génocidaires: People (a)

Highlights:
- The content warnings of each article always saying "Content warning for non-stop horribleness throughout. Like, no kidding, some of the worst humanity has to offer." Not kowtowing to trannies means you're "some of the worst humanity has to offer", apparently.
- In "Laws", this quote which is the literal definition of the "thing that never happens" argument:
Again, Gender-affirming genital surgery is not performed on minors. For it to be would be medical malpractice, as has already been clearly established by the mainstream medical community.
Gio's only missing the part where he goes "and if it was, that'd be a good thing!" Because we all know for a fact that kids' genitals are being chopped off and this quote is pure misinformation.
- Not to be outdone he spreads the same misinformation about puberty blockers.
Puberty blockers have been used safely to delay puberty since 1981, with 30 years of data showing them to be safe and effective. Cisgendered children with have been treated for puberty blockers for decades without any serious concerns about sterilization. (Who would toss around baseless claims about sterilization? Just you wait!)
- Unironically posts tweets from lolcows like Alex Caraballo. From "Exterminationism":
weirdal.png
- And Eevee, the same person from Floraverse who covered up his partners' child abuse and dogfucking.
eevee.png
- And Keffals, a child groomer, and Olly Thorn.
- In "Exterminationism" he also wrings his hands over the use of the word groomer to describe groomers.
- Pushes a conspiracy theory that Libs of TikTok "frequently highlights trans-positive pride events in order to make it easy for domestic terrorist groups like the Proud Boys or Patriot Front to directly attack the events". Just a baffling statement to me.
- Whines about Matt Walsh setting up a fake company to interview trannies for his What Is A Woman? documentary since no tranny would ever want their beliefs criticised, frames this as Matt Walsh being the "vicious hack" who is known for "generally acting in bad faith". Talk about projection!
- Gio's really lolcowish answer to what is a woman?:
As for the question, “What is a woman”? Well, that’s not too hard, actually. The actual ideas of “man” and “woman” that anti-trans activists are trying to conserve aren’t any kind of biological fact. They’re social ideas: how people dress, what kind of jobs they have, what their temperament is. There’s nothing about wearing a tie written as part of our DNA, or even mandated by God. The Two Genders, in all their holy wisdom, are inarguably social constructs themselves. It’s actually a disagreement over taxonomy, terminology, and methods of categorization. It’s a fight over conflicting definitions of categories, and ultimately it’s a conflict of the belief system of biological determinism against self determination.
- Hamming up the amount of transgender murders in the US... which are in the double digits... and almost none of them have to do with the victims being trannies. You can tell he's really disappointed that there aren't more because he makes all these hand wavey statements about how there's always "unreported incidents" and "many more deaths and murders that could be, but aren’t definitively, hate-motivated."
Since 2015, the Human Rights Campaign has published a report on violence and homicides of trans people in the united states. There’s a lack of accurate data collection, so it’s difficult to know how widespread the violence really is; the data gathered is always a minimum amount, due to unreported incidents. Worse, an analysis of the FBI’s hate crime statistics revealed trans-motivated murders that went unreported despite evidence. The HRC even suspects its own numbers to be low, due to many more deaths and murders that could be, but aren’t definitively, hate-motivated. All in all, violence against the trans community has steadily increased from 2015 to present.
I'm surprised he had enough good faith to actually post the infographics with the actual raw numbers. They're in the double digits, call me when more trannies die than people being struck by lightning.
- He doesn't like Kyle Rittenhouse. (This is in a section on the "Trans panic defense", which isn't a defense at all because guess what, murder is still illegal! Even against trannies.)
It’s the Rittenhouse problem: it’s not that people don’t really think this won’t harm trans people, it’s just that a lot of people think we should be doing that.
- He whines about Ovarit existing. How horrible that women are able to disagree with gender ideology on their own website! Seriously though this just shows that for all their handwringing about Kiwifarms, trannies and tranny simps like Giovan merely hate the thought that somebody, somewhere, doesn't like them, and once they take us down they'll go after Ovarit too.
ovarit.png
- In "People", he unironically invokes the intellectually hollow concept of """Stochastic terrorism""".

Oh and in case it wasn't clear, Gio hates us. He says we "pervert and weaponize archival", whatever that means, and says good riddance to """dirty info."""
dkf.png
source (a)
 
- He doesn't like Kyle Rittenhouse. (This is in a section on the "Trans panic defense", which isn't a defense at all because guess what, murder is still illegal! Even against trannies.)

Anyone who whines about a "gay panic defense" or "trans panic defense" simply want to be able to rape or sexually harass people without repercussion.

Same people who whine about people like Larry King being killed (this was months into the stupid kid sexually harassing his classmates, up until one of said classmates got fed up with him enough to bring a .22 revolver to school. It was not a homophobic hate crime as much as it was a case of a retarded sex pest fucking around with teenagers with violent tendencies and finding out)

Same people who whine about troons being killed in self-defense, because the troon in question tried to rape someone by pretending to be a woman.

Unless you're a rapist or a sex pest, you have nothing to fear, murder is illegal, self defense is not.
 
Last edited:
It took a while to dig up information on what that little piece of shit larry king did, but yeah. For sake of information for the next guy, Larry Lawrence Fobes King was born to a crack whore, cross-dressed in class, came out as "gay" at 10, disturbed students dressing with mascera, spike heel boots, ect, unwanted REPEATED sexual harassment of other students, which eventually lead to a kid being harassed so bad a kid brought a pistol to school and gave him the Hillary Clinton special. Of note, teachers knew it was going to get out of hand, but did nothing, infact, RIGHT before the shooting, the faggot was parading infront of his killer, making a scene, and the principal criticized the victim of the sexual harassment for getting upset, despite staff admitting that eventually a kid would deal with it themselves. But of course media treated it like Larry was the victim.

I really hate the habit of hysterically blaming everyone else while taking no accountability for ones own actions. Its not transphobic, or homophobic in the slightest, the kid who killed him was clearly bullied like hell, and teachers did fuck all about it.

What EXACTLY is someone supposed to do when repeated sexual harassment is ignored? If you were to be extremely charitable (Thats the polite way of saying retarded) , you could say shooting them wasn't the answer, but someone in that position feels pressured to EITHER do something drastic to stop it, or else just resign to helplessness at harassment.

On another note, trans fragility is something that ABSOLUTELY exists : They crack because you "misgender them", they commit suicide supposedly because people don't embrace them "being themselves" (which is actually a choice) Take any criticism or rejection as "violence" and reasoning to be ACTUALLY violent or at LEAST hostile and need countless hormone treatments, trainings, clothing accessories, packer, surgeries, ect, to not just collapse under the "dysphoria" of their own damn body, which is often 100% healthy til they fuck it up.

YOU CANNOT TELL ME THERE'S A MORE FRAGILE PERSON THAN THAT.
And I think this plays into the whole genocide BS more than anything, they are so fucking fragile that any slight, any damage to their self image, anything that shakes their illusion, or anything that makes them look like troon bafoons ends up making them too emotional to have accountability. They are broken, fucked up, deranged people, and so react to unpleasant feelings like broken, fucked up, deranged people.
 
They even continued to respect the transvestitenschein issued by the Institute (the article claiming that they didn't uses one case of a gay cross-dresser who ran a gay bar and vocally opposed the Nazis having his certificate revoked as proof that the Nazis didn't, dismissing the case where they renewed a certificate as "an outlier" without providing a single shred of evidence that one is more representative than the other).

The Nazis, like everyone else until very recently, seem to have distinguished between gay crossdressers and straight crossdressers most of the time. Gay crossdressers were just another type of homo, and thus were more likely to be viewed as degenerates who needed to be purged from society. Straight ones they seem to have viewed more of a curiosity than anything else, and they certainly were not targeted for any specific persecution at the state level.

TRAs are obliged to ignore this distinction, both because it ruins the historical "trans genocide" narrative and (perhaps more importantly) because even acknowledging that there are two different categories of "transwomen" risks someone accidentally validating or thinking about autogynephilia.

This is a very interesting recent article by a "queer historian" which I don't have time to read in depth right now, but overall the author seems to be trying to do a careful backtracking job in which she claims that okay, maybe the Nazis didn't genocide trans people or even kill many of them, but they sure were very very mean to some of them, and that's what counts, right?

And check out this paragraph:

It is the case that some transgender men and women were able to escape violence... In another case that Jane Caplan first brought to light, that of Gerd Kubbe of Berlin, police at first reacted harshly but later showed surprising leniency. Kubbe's transvestite permit was revoked in 1933. Accused of wearing men's clothing in public, he was sent to a concentration camp in 1938. Some months later, however, he was released and granted permission to wear men's clothing and to use the first name “Gerd.” I referred to this case previously as one that demonstrates both violence and state accommodation of transness. It is difficult to know what to make of it. I am not sure that I do yet. I can say, however, that it is unusual. It was, unfortunately, one of the first cases to be published and set a flawed paradigm.

"It is difficult to know what to make of it" = this case doesn't fit our narrative what do we do what do we do

"It was, unfortunately, one of the first cases to be published" = curse those nasty historians, publishing actual history about Nazis tolerating transvestites. They've fucked up our "trans genocide" push, and now the evil gender-critical feminists are able to access facts that we haven't approved of! Can we make this illegal somehow?

Like I was talking about above, the whole article is also crippled by the author's refusal to mentally distinguish between homosexual and heterosexual crossdressers. She's a pooner herself, so I suppose as a part of her gender religion she is simply not allowed to acknowledge the HSTS/AGP distinction. So she spends the whole article puzzling over why the Nazis seem to have been meaner to some crossdressers than others.
 
The Nazis, like everyone else until very recently, seem to have distinguished between gay crossdressers and straight crossdressers most of the time. Gay crossdressers were just another type of homo, and thus were more likely to be viewed as degenerates who needed to be purged from society. Straight ones they seem to have viewed more of a curiosity than anything else, and they certainly were not targeted for any specific persecution at the state level.

Very interesting that the Nazis were implicitly OK with autogynephilia.

Adolf Hitler was also rumored to have some rather questionable sexual proclivities himself more specifically coprophilia
 
I think a woman cross-dressing is nowhere near as bad as a man cross-dressing, mind you. Trans is entirely another subject, but a man cross dressing is a wolf in sheeps clothing, while a woman cross-dressing is sheep in wolfs clothing. Its weird sure, but its generally just a retarded sheep, not a wolf attempting to disguise.

Also I think its worth noting, Hitler was RIGHT after the Weimar republic, which was the most degenerate in a LONG time, child prostitution, rampant trannies, ect. This was arguably how he got in power, he fought the absolute SWAMP of degeneracy.
 
Very interesting that the Nazis were implicitly OK with autogynephilia.

I think the Nazis just didn't know what to make of it, and didn't see a reason to go after it. I don't even think that their attitudes were that unusual, to be honest. I even think we see the same thing even today. A lot of Western men have a visceral disgust for homosexuality, and see male homosexuals as an absolute "other." But a crossdressing AGP is seen by a lot of these same heterosexual men as being fundamentally in the same "hetero male" category as them, despite the weird clothes.

I think this is part of why so many AGPs are able to fit in so well in male power structures, even after they are "out." They just don't trigger the discomfort and negative responses in males that open homosexuals do.

I think a woman cross-dressing is nowhere near as bad as a man cross-dressing, mind you.

It's almost impossible for a woman to "crossdress" in modern western society unless she is actually wearing a fake beard and verbally claiming to be a man. There's no clothing that is generally "off-limits" for women socially. Even something like a shirt and tie is just seen as quirky and cute on a woman.

A lot of pooners seethe endlessly about this, because most people who see them have no idea they are even trying to crossdress.

Also I think its worth noting, Hitler was RIGHT

Oof, looks like the haters were right about this being a Nazi forum after all I'm just fucking with you
 
I will stop hoping for TTD and will quietly ignore weirdos in dresses in public when they stop trying to get me fired, rendered homeless and/or killed for laughing at freak shows on an Internet forum. I am not even kidding. As it stands right now someone could drag someone like Keffals out into the street and shoot his loved ones in front of him one by one before making him bite the curb and I would have only one word to say about it.

“Good.”
 
Also I think its worth noting, Hitler was RIGHT after the Weimar republic, which was the most degenerate in a LONG time, child prostitution, rampant trannies, ect. This was arguably how he got in power, he fought the absolute SWAMP of degeneracy.

It's like I keep saying: if liberals and leftists were truly terrified of nazis or fascists gaining power, they would crack down on degeneracy and go TTD. Save them the trouble.

Whether it's nazism or communism, people become political extremists because of desperation. You want to stop political extremism? Stop giving people a reason to be desperate and fix some shit already. Otherwise the people that get voted in will do far more than just chuck a bunch of crossdressers into the asylums to be forcibly cured. Far more.
 
Last edited:
nope no trans genocide.png
LINK / A

what am i seeing.png
LINK / A

IN RESPONSE TO UKRAINE WAR FOOTAGE OF CIVILIANS BEING KILLED LMFAO

There is NO trans genocide. A day of transgender rememberance is retarded and trivializes days of rememberance for tragedies. How have people allowed trannies to hijack this word? I don't get it. How are these trannies so unsympathetic to people being killed around the world when they claim to experience the same thing?

Questions that will never be answered. Happy New Years Kiwis!
 
i wonder if any of these people have actual proof of “genocide”

The genocide is not happening, and it's a damned good thing that it is.

Every time you push back against their grooming attempts, you're depriving them of their sole means of reproduction. Denying someone the ability to reproduce is genocide.
 
Back