Opinion The Future of Classical Music Is Queer

Link (Archive)

The Future of Classical Music Is Queer​

There’s a new vitality in the classical music scene—and it would simply not exist without the creativity and support of queer people.

Picture this: The back room of Branded Saloon, a queer bar in Brooklyn, is filled to capacity. Beer sloshes as a server raises a tray high above the crowd. People in rainbow masks stand on Doc Marten–ed toes to catch a glimpse of the stage. But there isn’t a guitar or a drum set in sight.

Instead, violinist Rafa Prendergast and cellist Jules Biber play Arcangelo Corelli’s “La Folia” variations to hoots and hollers. A merch table sells T-shirts that say, “We’re here. We’re ChamberQUEER. Get Used to it.”

To some—especially queer classical music lovers—this may sound like a utopian dream. But the concert, titled “Baroqueer,” was very real—and took place on a Tuesday evening back in March, as part of ChamberQUEER, a year-round series championing queer classical performers and composers.

People are obsessed with the idea that “classical music is dying.” If you throw these terms into Google, you’ll get a whole host of results, including ones from Slate and the New York Times opinion section.

But what would it even mean for classical music to be “dying”? If anything, classical is merging with other genres. With pop, with rock, with cabaret, with drag, with jazz. And that renewed vitality would simply not exist without the creativity and support of queer people.

This is an opinion I’ve formed through writing Poison Put to Sound, a blog about classical music and queerness. Since starting Poison in September of 2022, I’ve attended roughly 50 queer classical concerts—mostly across New York’s “high” and “low” stages—and spoken with many musicians, 11 of whom appear here.

From those conversations, I’ve established this tenet: The cutting-edge of classical music is fluid. It is gender fluid. It is genre-fluid. And it’s unmistakably queer.

What does “queering” classical music look like? It looks like anachronism, hybridity, intersectionality, reclaiming the canon. That’s what ChamberQUEER embodies. Biber—who cofounded ChamberQUEER in 2018 with soprano Danielle Buonaiuto, baritone Brian Mummert, and cellist Andrew Yee—says they were “stunned” by Baroqueer’s turnout.

But maybe Biber shouldn’t have been so stunned. Because while people mistakenly think there’s a “stiffness or formalness” to Baroque, it’s actually “one of the freest eras of music making,” says Biber. And anyway, queerness is built into the very foundations of Baroque—and, for that matter, of classical music itself.

Baroque “can be so experimental, excessive, crazy, over the top, improvisatory, and it didn’t take itself too seriously.” Besides, “people wearing wigs and tights and high heels. It’s so gay.”

Though Yee is less involved with ChamberQUEER these days—especially after becoming a first-time mother—she maintains an active schedule as founding cellist of the Attacca Quartet.

She also has a solo show titled Halfie—consisting of original and commissioned pieces—that is “more of a band name than an actual program,” she says, while her son, Oatie, sleeps on her chest. “It’s something that has evolved. It started as a conversation between being biracial and nonbinary. Now, I’m trans. How does that change the tidiness of my original intent?”

Always questioning the status quo, Yee plays without an endpin— the metal rod that sticks out the bottom of the instrument—which has little to no effect on sound, but is considered standard among modern players.

“The endpin was a great invention, but I think it went unobserved,” says Yee. “It became the norm. It must be 11 inches, it must be at this angle, etc. It became as essential as the bow, and that’s just not true.”

When I saw Halfie more than a year ago, Yee wore a coral-colored dress with matching nails, grasping the cello between her legs, as she recited “The Sea As It Is,” her own composition about Jacob Riis Beach. During the pandemic, Yee was inspired to compose by Caroline Shaw, the youngest-ever winner of the Pulitzer Prize in music. “We’re in a bit of a boom for new classical music,” says Yee. “It’s bringing back the era of the composer-performer, which has been lost for so long.”

For her part, Shaw says queer “can mean a lot of things.”

“Both my sexuality, as well as embracing the idea that things can look different than the way I was taught,” she says. At the Attacca concerts, for example, “They don’t look like the usual classical music audience.” Shaw says that “classical” is “an imperfect term, useful as a quick gloss for something.” (In that way, she adds, it is kind of like the word “queer.”)

Shaw recently worked on a Concerto for Harpsichord and Strings with Byron Schenkman, the artistic director of Seattle-based Sound Salon. “It sounds like if Jane Austen took mushrooms and had a little tryst,” she jokes.

Shaw was the perfect match for Schenkman, who has called the harpsichord a “queer piano.” “There’s something mystical about being queer,” says Schenkman. “And there’s something mystical about being drawn to instruments and repertory from far away and long ago.”

Schenkman started studying early music when they were 17. “I was delighted by the idea of being a ‘happy homosexual harpsichordist,’” they say. “I had the idea that pianists were mostly Jewish and only harpsichordists could be gay. Now I’m glad to be a queer Jewish musician who performs on piano, harpsichord, and everything in between.”

An arguably even gayer instrument is the flute, which is “always given these flamboyant and lively and playful passages,” says Brandon Patrick George. “It’s written into the repertoire.”

In 2018, George replaced flutist Valerie Coleman of the groundbreaking Imani Winds. His new album, Twofold ,is about works in conversation, across time and identity. George says he first picked the flute because he identified with its sound.

“We are sometimes drawn to an instrument because we think, if there were music to the voice in our head, it would sound like that,” he says. “When I came out.… Music allowed me to time travel, in a sense. I left my current environment, with whatever turmoil there might have been, and was transported to a time which, at least from the paintings we see, had a lot of opulence and beauty. When I was a student learning about the Baroque era, I came across Frederick the Great, who was known for extravagance, and for composing for the flute, and was very, very queer.”

Things came full circle when George did a talk about the 18th-century Prussian king “in front of his gay and glamorous snuff box” at the Metropolitan Museum.

The Baroque era, with its “Queerococo” extravagance, was also an inspiration for Opera Lafayette’s production of Rameau’s Io, with fabulous costumes by drag queen Machine Dazzle.

Keats Dieffenbach—whose buzz cut signals more punk band than Baroque opera—was playing violin in the pit. “I’ve always been hybrid in a lot of ways,” they say.

There’s an aspect of “Queer Time”—a theory rejecting heteronormative temporality—to Dieffenbach’s trajectory. They came out as bisexual at 32, and—well after establishing themself as a modern violinist—applied to the Juilliard historical performance program at 34. “Early music, by definition, challenges established norms in mainstream classical music,” they say. It comes as no surprise that that world is so queer. It’s counterculture of a different kind.

Dieffenbach has also noticed parallels between their gender journey and the restoration of musical instruments: “I’ve found so much about transition is about a return to something that we’ve forgotten or neglected about ourselves,” they say.

It’s a concept familiar to Aiden Feltkamp, whose Instagram handle is “@transcherubino,” in reference to a famous pants role (the term for a female singer plays a male character in opera). “When I started testosterone, I knew I would be depressed about not being able to sing,” says Feltkamp, who has gone from mezzo to bass-baritone. “I thought: What are some other things that I can do to be involved in opera that I enjoy?”

The answer was libretto writing. They say their neurodivergence— in addition to queerness—contributes to the fantastical subjects of their operas: “It’s why I like sci-fi so much, these robots and aliens.”

Feeling “alien” is familiar to countertenor Anthony Roth Costanzo.

For the Metropolitan Opera’s production of Philip Glass’s Akhnaten ,Costanzo researched the opera’s titular, possibly intersex, character.

“I talked to Egyptologists, and Richard Parkinson put forth the idea that the Sun God was not a man or a woman, but the unification of man and woman,” he says. “As the pharaoh tried to come closer to God, he became more like both man and woman. I said OK, there is an entire queer narrative to Akhnaten, and I want to put that forward.”

In Akhnaten’s opening scene, Costanzo is naked and totally hairless. There’s a TikTok of him getting a full-body wax for the role—a kind of transformation.

Costanzo is currently working on a book, titled Countertenor, about this highest-of-male-voice-types. Often cast as “gods and monsters,” there’s this idea that “we are so other, we can only play the other.” This otherness, Costanzo says, stems from “sounding different than how I look. I built an entire career from not fitting into the mainstream.”

But “in a way, voices aren’t gendered,” says Costanzo. “When I was younger, I called myself a male soprano. There’s also this term: sopranist. In theory, a man could be a mezzo. Anyone could be.”

“Opera is long the domain of queerness since its inception,” he continues.

Why opera? Composer Matthew Aucoin writes in The Impossible Art that opera is the combination of music, writing, theater, fashion, and dance—giving it, perhaps, even more potential for intersectionality, especially with regards to queerness.

“Inherent to opera has always been this notion of the mask, it is an art form of illusions,” says Aucoin. “Throwing your voice, disguising yourself, speaking in a way that goes beyond traditional notions of gender. Until recently, the mask or the illusion was integral—there was no way to express these things except for the mask.”

Aucoin’s first opera, The Crossing ,was about Walt Whitman. He also presented Eurydice at the Met, with a libretto by Sarah Ruhl. In it, he gave the leading man a queer-coded countertenor “double.” “It felt clear that the Orpheus of Sarah’s play was not the whole picture of who Orpheus is,” says Aucoin. “There had to be this overtone hanging in the air, this sense of mystery and otherness.”

A sense of otherness also resonates with tenor Russell Thomas, though he has had to approach the opera world from a different perspective than Aucoin. “Queer isn’t a word I use often,” he says. “The only sexuality-specific interview I had was with The Advocate. I often find myself answering questions solely about being Black.”

Regarding Fire Shut Up in My Bones and Champion—two operas by Terence Blanchard with Black, bisexual protagonists—“I like seeing these stories being told. But I wonder if there are other stories, or more potent stories. There was an opera about Stonewall, but it was mostly white people.”

Thomas collaborated with countertenor John Holiday—another queer, Black singer—on Vanished, an adaptation of a song cycle by Leoš Janáček for Dallas Opera. “I’ve always wanted to do [the love story] from a queer perspective,” says Thomas. “It’s one of the things I’m most proud of.”

Just as Thomas has a tenuous relationship with the word “queer,” so do some musicians with “classical.” Mantawoman is a London-based yangqin—or Chinese dulcimer—player who has performed with the Silk Road Project.

Soon after the pandemic, she says, “I posted my first drag video: a duet between my boyish self playing yangqin and Mantawoman lip-syncing Madison Beer’s ‘Boyshit’ as a takedown of toxic masculinity.” Since then, her drag “avatar” has taken over. “I like the term ‘genre-fluidity’ because it captures a sentiment that feels important to our generation,” she says.

Mantawoman says she sometimes feels it’s time to “break up” with classical music. Numerous experiences have contributed to this: Being disqualified from a concerto competition because the judges “didn’t know how to compare Rachmaninoff and yangqin.” Being told on tour to wear “boys’ clothes” so as “not to make conservative patrons uncomfortable.”

“Also, colonialism in classical music is not talked about nearly enough,” she says.

To Mantawoman, someone like Yo-Yo Ma, with such an intense fandom, could just as easily be considered a pop star as they could a classical performer. “I watched someone come up to him after a concert and cry her eyes out talking about how much his recordings changed her life.”

For someone like Shaw, the term “classical” is a useful approximation. For Mantawoman, the term no longer serves her—like a dead name.

But it is in this apparent paradox—contradiction being an integral part of the queer experience—that the future of classical music sits. That something can be both “dying” and thriving at the same time.
 
Music and theatre have always been the purview of degenerates.

We may value those things now, but remember, Nero fiddled while Rome burned.
Most of history has met musicians and actors with contempt.
I'm really not sure what the point of this article is.

What contributions are they making to the 2000+ year tradition of western music theory?
In my mind, two guys playing a gay bar, ain't a contribution.

This is a whole lot of talk about their sexuality, and very little on what actual contributions they are making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super Guido
>The Future of Classical Music Is Queer
>read "The Future of Classical Music Is Marxist"

If you see Queer, it usually means Queer Theory. aka not normal. Ugly and disgusting. Disturbing. Nothing to do with LGBT.

I thought it was movie and video game soundtracks?
Everything has to be queer. To be not normal. Once everything is queer, then nothing is queer. And all is right with the world.

These 'parasites' haven't stopped since Gamergate. As such its key to gatekeep and find ways to filter these retards.
See
 
Everything has to be queer. To be not normal. Once everything is queer, then nothing is queer. And all is right with the world.
Thing is, nothing is queer enough for these faggots. Even if they somehow mandate giving aids to strangers and fucking kids as well as animals as a normal, it will never be enough. There's no reasoning with locusts.
 
Thing is, nothing is queer enough for these faggots. Even if they somehow mandate giving aids to strangers and fucking kids as well as animals as a normal, it will never be enough. There's no reasoning with locusts.
That's the point. You keep pushing the envelope until it doesn't exist. then, utopia.
 
This happens when white people enjoy anything involving "problematic" white cultural activities that require skill and talent. A lot of white people feel guilty about this enjoyment and can only like very traditional things if they are "queering" them, which absolves the activity of its white guilt complex.
Slight disagree. While "white guilt" is a part of it from soyboys, handmaidens, and yasslighters who feel they must atone for their ancestors' "sins", real or imagined, I would argue that the majority is literally gayops from (((media))), and other propagandists that have already been infiltrated by faggotry. These people and their ideology are literally a metastatic cancer that invades and destroys everything they infect.

It's a cult in search if a purpos. In this case, degenerate faggots that know, on a certain base level instinct, that their inclinations are fundamentally wrong. So they search for others like-minded, and attempt to insert their faggotry into cultural institutions in order to assuage their own guilt, and reaffirm their degeneracy.
 
God, when will this whole "representation" bullshit meet the end of its faggotry?

Hey Queermos, not everything is about you. Maybe more is than we've acknowledged in the past, but the rest of us are becoming queerphobic because we're tired of your shit.
 
People are obsessed with the idea that “classical music is dying.” If you throw these terms into Google, you’ll get a whole host of results, including ones from Slate and the New York Times opinion section.

Classical music isn't "dying." It is dead already, killed, among other things, by new technologies that led people to interact with music differently. Recording technology for example made it so you no longer had to visit a performance by professional musicians or learn an instrument yourself and play it to hear music. You could just turn on your gramophone. Being able to listen to music in an increasingly wide range of situations thanks to gramophones, then walkman, then CD players, then MP3 players, now smartphones and other technologies meant you could listen to music while doing other things - meaning composers no longer had to compose 40 minute long, intricate pieces to hold your attention as you are glued to a chair in a concert hall for a performance you paid precious money for to attend, leading to changes in how people composed and structured music. Classical music died because it was unfortunately no longer needed and has since become a passion for those interested, but no longer the average person. (Not that it was ever the music of the average person, but it was certainly far more popular among the average person than it is today.) There is a reason for why the most financially successful aspect of the field is now endless repeat performances of past, great composers' works.

But what would it even mean for classical music to be “dying”? If anything, classical is merging with other genres. With pop, with rock, with cabaret, with drag, with jazz.

"Merging" referring to those novelty acts that put generic drum beats underneath famous pieces, famous pop stars suffering through a midlife crisis trying to convince themselves they are important artists by trying (and usually failing) to compose classical music, and metal bands simply using string sections for parts that otherwise would have simply gone to a synthesizer or guitar. Also, "drag" is not a music genre. Jazz has often been explicitly influenced by classical music. That doesn't mean classical music lives on, merely that there are still genres of music that go beyond the simplest of musical ideas, as jazz differs heavily from any classical type of music.

From those conversations, I’ve established this tenet: The cutting-edge of classical music is fluid. It is gender fluid. It is genre-fluid. And it’s unmistakably queer.

In so far that classical music is already dead and after it died, its strong reputation mixed with how easily up-for-grabs it was now had been very appealing to extremists and ideologists seeking to propagandize by appropriating it? Yes. But even that is old news at this point, not "the cutting edge," at least since Schönberg decided that the "next step" in classical music was going to be his self-conscious attempt to turn its future into an explicitly sociopolitical one, unable to see how for its entire history, music had developed according to tastes and the pursuit of beauty and instead trying to argue it was just about ideology all along. There is a good paper here for anyone interested in a deeper look into Schönberg's misguided and ideological approach. What this article describes is in no way different from what Schönberg attempted then, a hundred years ago, and is therefore anything but cutting edge. Classical music has been a corpse desecrated by a couple extremist weirdos ever since.

And anyway, queerness is built into the very foundations of Baroque—and, for that matter, of classical music itself.

The most important baroque composer to ever have lived - Bach - was, like most major past composers, a christian family man, who worked for various churches. He would have considered these mentally ill weirdos beneath him.

Besides, “people wearing wigs and tights and high heels. It’s so gay.”

This is thinking so ahistorical that it become hilarious. It's like claiming all buddhists are nazis because one of the symbols used by them is the swastika.

Shaw says that “classical” is “an imperfect term, useful as a quick gloss for something.” (In that way, she adds, it is kind of like the word “queer.”)

This is true, but does nothing to prove a similarity or connection between the two otherwise. As used by laymen, the term "classical music" tends to refer to any european music made before roughly the beginning of the 20th century, which is pretty vague.

Schenkman started studying early music when they were 17. “I was delighted by the idea of being a ‘happy homosexual harpsichordist,’” they say. “I had the idea that pianists were mostly Jewish and only harpsichordists could be gay. Now I’m glad to be a queer Jewish musician who performs on piano, harpsichord, and everything in between.”

Again with that strange obsession among many jewish people with identity and social dynamics over what really matters - music in this case. Maybe if they were less focused on these issues and more on improving their craft, they would have an actual audience that cares about them, rather than this incestuous group of people telling each other how important they are and how much they supposedly matter.

An arguably even gayer instrument is the flute, which is “always given these flamboyant and lively and playful passages,” says Brandon Patrick George. “It’s written into the repertoire.”

Ignoring the part where an instrument whose timbre is well-suited to lyrical melodic parts is called gay for... being well-suited to lyrical melodic parts, this also strikes me as ironically very homophobic by arguing that homosexual people necessarily must be "flamboyant" and "lively" and "playful," as if those homosexual people who are neither are not as valid or gay as those who are.

The answer was libretto writing. They say their neurodivergence— in addition to queerness—contributes to the fantastical subjects of their operas: “It’s why I like sci-fi so much, these robots and aliens.”

Mentally ill people are largely behind this. What a surprise.

“Inherent to opera has always been this notion of the mask, it is an art form of illusions,” says Aucoin. “Throwing your voice, disguising yourself, speaking in a way that goes beyond traditional notions of gender. Until recently, the mask or the illusion was integral—there was no way to express these things except for the mask.”

Strange way to admit that your ideology is all about appearances rather than deeper truths, by implying for example that claiming to be a woman while being a man (or a man while being a woman) is just a mask you put on or, in other words, an act.

A sense of otherness also resonates with tenor Russell Thomas, though he has had to approach the opera world from a different perspective than Aucoin. “Queer isn’t a word I use often,” he says. “The only sexuality-specific interview I had was with The Advocate. I often find myself answering questions solely about being Black.”

Strange, that.

Just as Thomas has a tenuous relationship with the word “queer,” so do some musicians with “classical.” Mantawoman is a London-based yangqin—or Chinese dulcimer—player who has performed with the Silk Road Project. Soon after the pandemic, she says, “I posted my first drag video: a duet between my boyish self playing yangqin and Mantawoman lip-syncing Madison Beer’s ‘Boyshit’ as a takedown of toxic masculinity.” Since then, her drag “avatar” has taken over. “I like the term ‘genre-fluidity’ because it captures a sentiment that feels important to our generation,” she says. Mantawoman says she sometimes feels it’s time to “break up” with classical music. Numerous experiences have contributed to this: Being disqualified from a concerto competition because the judges “didn’t know how to compare Rachmaninoff and yangqin.” Being told on tour to wear “boys’ clothes” so as “not to make conservative patrons uncomfortable.” “Also, colonialism in classical music is not talked about nearly enough,” she says.

Once again proving that these ideologues can never pretend to be "the true members" of a community for too long before they get bored with the pretense and move on to the next step, which invariably is to destroy the thing itself.

But it is in this apparent paradox—contradiction being an integral part of the queer experience—that the future of classical music sits. That something can be both “dying” and thriving at the same time.

Straight from the horse's mouth once again: when the things they say don't make sense, it is not because they are irrational, anti-science cultists. It's because not making sense is "an integral part" of their ideology. That makes it alright then, I guess.
 
Modern classical music comes from video games.
And movies.
This is true. European composers just flat out refused to continue to compose classical music after WW2.
Instead they have been composing "modern music", also 100 years old btw, who nobody likes except boomer hipsters.
Modern music concerts have only a very small clique of those elitist white-hairs in attendence, rest is tumbleweeds.
Even in Vienna.
 
There is a good paper here for anyone interested in a deeper look into Schönberg's misguided and ideological approach. What this article describes is in no way different from what Schönberg attempted then, a hundred years ago, and is therefore anything but cutting edge. Classical music has been a corpse desecrated by a couple extremist weirdos ever since.
Thanks for the paper. Some parts I'd like to comment about:

"As far as Schoenberg is concerned, the twelve-tone technique was aimed at
solving a practical problem of composition: how to establish a new musical order in
response to the so-called "collapse of tonality."


Yeah, this "practical problem" that is totally self-inflicted. Nobody said that you have to stop using tonality. I hate this "progress at all costs" mindset in the arts because it's like they never stop to consider that there has to be a point where progress stops. There are physiological limits to how we perceive sound and people aren't just blank slates that can condition themselves to, at a whim, change the result of millions of years of evolution. (This kind of brings to mind how trannies keep telling people to condition themselves to accept the girldick)

"Adorno opposes the view that modern music
represents a rupture in music history and is incomprehensible the way, for instance,
Beethoven’s is; rather, he claims that the negative reaction of listeners to its harsh
qualities is, in fact, a reaction to the social truth communicated by it: "The dissonances
which horrify [the public] testify to their own condition and it is for this reason alone that
they are unbearable for them."


I hate that hack Adorno. "reaction to social truths" my ass. It's not that deep. People don't listen to music for enlightened social commentary.

Every time his name pops up it's always accompanied by the worst takes whether related to music or philosophy. I read his Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy page not too long ago and he struck me as the type of philosopher who makes a grand philosophical framework that relies on faulty assumptions and questionable definitions, and when this framework inevitably clashes with reality, they don't reconsider or adjust their premises and instead characterize it as some unsolvable problem in philosophy when if they had some common sense they'd realize the answer was under their noses all along. Like with Schoenberg, it's all just self-inflicted.
 
I can't believe I miss this thread, some thoughts:

1. If you foreground your sexuality, gay or straight, be prepared to be treated like a porn star or a prostitute.

2. Don't be deluded into thinking that you're "saving" classical music by appealing to sexuality, or by fraternizing with pop and other youth subculture. You are not the first people who do this and won't be the last. You may make the highfaluting claim that you're "queering" classical music, which means "anachronism, hybridity, intersectionality, reclaiming the canon", but in effect what you're saying is that you're doing crossover (Protip: next time add the term "creative misreading" to your list; this way New Musicology hacks will know you're in the know.) Flip side: I don't worry that these hipsters will "destroy" classical music: I've seen it all before.

3. I suspect the claim that "classical music is dying" is more a concern to art admins or the execs in Universal Classics or Sony Classical. For a humble listener like myself, classical music is prospering like never before. Obscure composers and works are being rediscovered; labels like Hyperion, Chandos, and BIS find something interesting to record -- and soloists and groups eager to record them -- every month. Young artists continue to emerge, and their standards were never higher. I understand many orchestras and opera companies are barely hanging on, but do we need an orchestra in every town? Smaller ensembles like piano duos, string quartets, and ad-hoc collectives are blooming.

4. The future of classical music is not queer; the future of anything is not queer -- for the simple reason that queer is an outsider status, and arouse interest precisely because of its outsider status. When queer becomes mainstream, it is no longer queer.

Baroque “can be so experimental, excessive, crazy, over the top, improvisatory, and it didn’t take itself too seriously.”
There is some truth in that claim. Baroque continuo is improvisatory, and music in that era does offer the performers freedom of interpretation in the way that latter music doesn't. The interpretation of a Baroque piece depends as much on the score, on the research into performance practice, as on the artistic judgement of the artists. Angela Hewitt, when playing Bach's keyboard concertos, plays the solo part on a modern concert (Fazioli) grand while stipulating that the continuo to be played on the harpsichord. She needs to justify her choice but no one claims she is "queering" Bach.

Besides, “people wearing wigs and tights and high heels. It’s so gay.”
There is nothing wrong with doing theatrics, with silly customs, when playing Baroque. The group Red Priest has been doing it for decades -- they can afford to because their musicianship is superb. But to equate exuberance with homosexuality is disgusting. It is symptomatic of the vulgar, hypersexualized time we are living in. I don't want to say anything about the assertion that the flute is a "gay" instrument.

Shaw was the perfect match for Schenkman, who has called the harpsichord a “queer piano.”
It is like saying your grandfather is a you, but gayer.

Schenkman started studying early music when they were 17. “I was delighted by the idea of being a ‘happy homosexual harpsichordist,’”
Oh you mean Scott Ross, the harpsichordist so happy that he died of AIDS?

“I had the idea that pianists were mostly Jewish.."
Update your stereotype. Nowadays pianists are mostly Chinese.

...the Metropolitan Opera’s production of Philip Glass’s Akhnaten ,Costanzo researched the opera’s titular, possibly intersex, character.

“I talked to Egyptologists, and Richard Parkinson put forth the idea that the Sun God was not a man or a woman, but the unification of man and woman,” he says. “As the pharaoh tried to come closer to God, he became more like both man and woman. I said OK, there is an entire queer narrative to Akhnaten, and I want to put that forward.”
Even early critics on Akhnaten have commented that Glass's music seems to make the point that both Akhnaten and his wife Nefertiti live an otherworldly, passion-less existence. But to equate otherworldliness with androgyny is a tired trope.

They say their neurodivergence— in addition to queerness—contributes to the fantastical subjects of their operas
What a coincidence -- Philip Glass's Einstein On The Beach uses large tracts of text written by autists, and in some performances you see downies on stage.
 
Last edited:
At long last, fags in the arts promoting faggotry, that's totally not something that has been around for thousands of years.
 
Faggotry has always been rife in the world of classical music. Not as much as in Broadway musicals, but still, very present.

I have no idea why articles like this exist. It's not like anyone straight who can't tolerate fags has existed in classical music since... Well... Ever.

I guess the just want to normalize butt-fucking in Swan Lake or some degenerate shit like that.
They want to consider 'queering' music to be fusing it with shittier 'diverse' genres, not getting more gay people involved.

Any of the old classical music-obsessed queens that I once knew would have started strangling this author two paragraphs into this article were they orating it. They are, ironically, usually huge sticklers for tradition and respect the music deeply. They'd scoff at changing a key or introducing an electric violin, the idea of fusing Allegri's Miserere with mumble rap would throw them into an apoplectic rage.
 
This is something that has bothered me since before I ever knew about all the woke shit. I used to go to the opera and to classical music performances, but grew increasingly frustrated. I am, for example, a huge Wagner fan, and I'm far from the only one - when ever they put on a Wagner performance it sold out pretty quickly. But they nearly never did, maybe once a year, twice if you were lucky. And this was, what, 15 years ago? And if they play something else I good and popular, they usually make you suffer through some modern or diverse shit they play first. Horrible. And of course these concerts with some modern shit mixed in don't sell out, at all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mukhrani
They want to consider 'queering' music to be fusing it with shittier 'diverse' genres, not getting more gay people involved.

Any of the old classical music-obsessed queens that I once knew would have started strangling this author two paragraphs into this article were they orating it. They are, ironically, usually huge sticklers for tradition and respect the music deeply. They'd scoff at changing a key or introducing an electric violin, the idea of fusing Allegri's Miserere with mumble rap would throw them into an apoplectic rage.
I've noticed that with older queens myself in various art forms. It's like they channeled their inability to reproduce children for the next generation into an impetus to preserve the arts for the next generation. I think it's a healthy reaction to sexual inversion so long as it's not hijacked by the desire to coom into the next generation of artists.
 
Back