The General Antisemitism Thread - No excuses accepted here

Read my whole post. You can read tons of Talmud but can't read a short rebuttal?
It doesn't even address the passages I quoted.

I will be nice and make it easier for you, just give me your pedophile apologism for Ketubot 11b
An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done nothing, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't even address the passages I quoted.

I will be nice and make it easier for you, just give me your pedophile apologism for Ketubot 11b
If you bothered reading it you would have seen it

Yebhamoth 11b/Kethuboth 11b

Yebhamoth 11b says nothing about this so we'll go to the other source.

Rava said that this is what the mishna is saying: An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done nothing, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye.

The discussion here relates to the dowry for virgins and non-virgins. It has nothing to do with what acts are allowed, encouraged, forbidden, or discouraged. All it means is that if a three year old or younger girl is molested, she is still considered to be a virgin for the purposes of a dowry payment when she grows up. The Talmud doesn't allow sex before marriage.
 
If you bothered reading it you would have seen it
Nothing in your post read Ketubot, am I supposed to know the 500 subversions of your evil language?
An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done nothing, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored.
And your clarification.
The discussion here relates to the dowry for virgins and non-virgins. It has nothing to do with what acts are allowed, encouraged, forbidden, or discouraged. All it means is that if a three year old or younger girl is molested, she is still considered to be a virgin for the purposes of a dowry payment when she grows up. The Talmud doesn't allow sex before marriage.
So basically you think this is totally fine because it actually says:
"Hey, if you rape a baby girl younger than three, it's doesn't degrade her monetary worth. That baby vagina you tore open will heal up, and she will still be worth as many Scheckel as a virgin."

It doesn't really make it any better.

Was it or is it so common among Jews to rape a baby girl below 3 years of age that this case had to be discussed and put into the Talmud so all religious Jews learn about it?
Why do your top sages fantasize about raping a baby girl younger than 3?
 
20240803_192245.jpg
 
Nothing in your post read Ketubot, am I supposed to know the 500 subversions of your evil language?

And your clarification.

So basically you think this is totally fine because it actually says:
"Hey, if you rape a baby girl younger than three, it's doesn't degrade her monetary worth. That baby vagina you tore open will heal up, and she will still be worth as many Scheckel as a virgin."

It doesn't really make it any better.

Was it or is it so common among Jews to rape a baby girl below 3 years of age that this case had to be discussed and put into the Talmud so all religious Jews learn about it?
Why do your top sages fantasize about raping a baby girl younger than 3?
Read the rest of the post for those answers.
 
Read the rest of the post for those answers.
You bring up something good, the age of consent is lower that 3 years and two days.
A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal is betrothed with intercourse, as the legal status of intercourse with her is that of full-fledged intercourse.
It's a thought experiment as evidenced by the question of what if the 3 year old is menstruating which is an impossibility. Additionally there are 3 places that say that this is not allowed.
I like that you pretend your backwards pedophilic sages not knowing that it's impossible for a three year old to menstruate means it's actually not meant seriously.

Then you bring up a bunch of examples where the rabbis inform their fellow pedophiles that a large age gap comes with certain complications. Giving advice to the next generation of pedophiles how thoughtful of the rabbis.

You also say; 'but it's discouraged in another passage to rape women in public so that makes it okay.'

There is nothing that answered my previous questions.

Just stop defending pedophiles, it's not that hard.
You are allowed to condemn these pedophile priests.
 
Last edited:
You bring up something good, the age of consent is lower that 3 years and two days.


I like that you pretend your backwards pedophilic sages not knowing that it's impossible for a three year old to menstruate means it's actually not meant seriously.

Then you bring up a bunch of examples where the rabbis inform their fellow pedophiles that a large age gap comes with certain complications. Giving advice for the next generation of pedophiles how thoughtful of the rabbis.

You also say but it's discouraged in another passage to rape women in public so that makes it okay.

There is nothing that answered my previous questions.

Just stop defending pedophiles, it's not that hard.
You are allowed to condemn these pedophile priests.

Just a reminder the Rabbi tunnels under New York had stained mattresses and strollers found in them and it's all on video.

I wonder how these are connected 🤔
 
Nothing in your post read Ketubot, am I supposed to know the 500 subversions of your evil language?

And your clarification.

So basically you think this is totally fine because it actually says:
"Hey, if you rape a baby girl younger than three, it's doesn't degrade her monetary worth. That baby vagina you tore open will heal up, and she will still be worth as many Scheckel as a virgin."

It doesn't really make it any better.

Was it or is it so common among Jews to rape a baby girl below 3 years of age that this case had to be discussed and put into the Talmud so all religious Jews learn about it?
Why do your top sages fantasize about raping a baby girl younger than 3?
The talmud isn't for jews. Jews don't follow the talmud

Talmud is a religious document of satanism, not Judaism. Jewish law is contained in the Torah, given by God
 
Satanism was heavily at work in founding the 13 colonies

Source?

You don't have one. I know. But I still must ask for posterity sake. Even the most insane schizoposter has at least some weird string of pictures.
 
There is avoidance of the American slavery question still. If you wish to give an alternative reality you have to source it at least fucking tell it.

People who revise the Holocaust give a series of claims instead of just "no." I'm getting "no" from the people who are saying slavery never happened.

Please give me evidence or a theory or kill yourself.

ANYWAYS

View attachment 6265372

Hawk Tuwah girl DNA profile incase anyone was wondering why she was merchandising this.
Well, that explains a lot about the slut.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meiwaku
Big if True...

Tommy Robinson is Israeli Asset..... He's making you fight the browns they imported.....

20240804_015214.jpg
20240804_015201.jpg
20240804_015203.png
20240804_015206.jpg

This is from Xitter so take it with a grain of salt because I cannot confirm these 100%
 
Big if True...

Tommy Robinson is Israeli Asset..... He's making you fight the browns they imported.....

View attachment 6270192
View attachment 6270187
View attachment 6270188
View attachment 6270191

This is from Xitter so take it with a grain of salt because I cannot confirm these 100%
Yeah, this is known.
Robinson has been a pro Israel shill for a long time and he actively works to lead anyone away from noticing Jewish involvement in the mass immigration debacle.

He managed to be a big enough glow faggot to get on Metokurs radar.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Meiwaku
Back