The General Antisemitism Thread - OP uses a penis pump

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm sceptical of the stories, however, that "kings, princes and rulers" took their money and kicked them out of once they outlived their usefulness - rather, these cunts co-worked with Jews and once the heat of the populace and perhaps the infamy of Jews was known, it couldn't be hidden any longer and the rulers had to act.
Completely agree. In different occasions and places the rulers themselves might have decided to kick them out. In Spain they were kicked out after it was discovered that a child had been ritually sacrificed by them. The story we were told in history class was very different, though. It was because the king and queen, Isabel de Castilla and Fernando de Aragón were antisemitic fundamentalist catholics, and that their expulsion of the jews was the downfall of Spain. In reality, Spain flourished.

But yes, it has to be presented in a good manner - not in a spergy, Spicholas Fuentes (fed and or retarded manner).
I don't know what to think about Fuentes. He says some stuff that's completely retarded and doesn't help get any of this across to the public ("your body, my choice", for example). On the other hand, he just exposed Tucker Carlson as a CIA asset.
I truly don't know what to make of him.

Edit: Nevermind, fuck Fuentes, I just learned he does livestreams with the Tate cunts. What a pathetic little moron. I'm glad he exposed Carlson though.
"I'm a straight guy"
Your browser is not able to display this video.
He really is a groyper.
 
Last edited:
What helped me understand the jewish question was race realism. Some races really have behavior quirks which are overwhelmingly represented among their people. Niggers and violence being the obvious example. Jews have their own subset of quirks which which combined make them a parasitic force. For jews it's a bunch of more subtle behavior quirks which are easy to dismiss as flawed individuals. But these quirks continually emerge. They must be racial in origin.
I don't think you can consider modern jews a separate race. Their behaviour is acquired through their own culture and education, which is mostly malicious in nature, such as the talmud.
All of the Levantine and Semitic people act jewy to some degree. They're a merchant people by nature and tribal. Lebanese Christian and Iraqi Assyrians end up becoming business owners with a strong in-group when they emigrate, so it's not just Jews. The Talmud is part of it but it's as much a reflection of their innate nature as much as it is a cause. The Ashkenazim just ended up taking it up to 11.
Reminder that Max Blumenthal, the man who runs The Grayzone, is controlled opposition. He's jewish and so is his wife, as far as I'm aware. It's not that there aren't any good jews, but he has done some suspicious stuff in the past.
I'm quite familiar with Blumenthal's body of work as a former commie. He's a committed shitlib and his critique of Israel comes from that perspective. Besides being a shitlib though he's a dirty underhanded bastard. Here's him trying to do a hit job for the SPLC trying to shame David Irving using Holohoax bullshit. The same bullshit Israel uses to squash all criticisms over its actions in Gaza.
 
Last edited:
Steady+unadvised+false_214ae7_12657575.webp
 
Completely agree. In different occasions and places the rulers themselves might have decided to kick them out. In Spain they were kicked out after it was discovered that a child had been ritually sacrificed by them. The story we were told in history class was very different, though. It was because the king and queen, Isabel de Castilla and Fernando de Aragón were antisemitic fundamentalist catholics, and that their expulsion of the jews was the downfall of Spain. In reality, Spain flourished.
Indeed - Spain kicked them out for a good reason.
Edit: Nevermind, fuck Fuentes, I just learned he does livestreams with the Tate cunts. What a pathetic little moron. I'm glad he exposed Carlson though.
Interestingly, Devon Stack exposed Carlson before Faguentes did. Where the latter was "dumbfounded to learn his father was CIA". Incredible acting!
I can't seem to upload the video, however.
 
They know what they're doing. They want little girls raped. Jews don't care how many white children get raped and die. They actively talk all the time about how they want all Europeans dead.
Just think about this when Jews go O GAWAD when they talk about rampant antisemitism because people don’t worship Israel and Jews in the exact right way.
I'm sceptical of the stories, however, that "kings, princes and rulers" took their money and kicked them out of once they outlived their usefulness - rather, these cunts co-worked with Jews and once the heat of the populace and perhaps the infamy of Jews was known, it couldn't be hidden any longer and the rulers had to act.
It should be noted that in places like 15th century Spain, Jews controlled 90%+ of the trade and Spanish subjects were effectively locked out. For muh pogroms in the Pale of Settlement, Jews had a monopoly on moneylending, the liquor trade, and engaged in pimping out the local gentile girls.

If you hear the tribe tell it, the locals just one day got a wild hair up their ass and decided to destroy the shtetls and just kicked out the Jews from their country out of jealousy oy vey! They’ll never explain why they get kicked out. Of course, modern Jews run the banks, the liquor trade, and are pornographers where Israel is still one of the world’s largest trafficking hubs except now its organs, not just prostitution. The more things change…
 
It's what makes me question if they genuinely are demonically possessed.
Jesus, talking to Jews:

John 8:44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
 
ABDL CEO Greenfag has announced that he's concerned about rising miscegenation in the ○ community


The hypocrisy of these fuckers is beyond what they call chutzpah.
 
Jesus, talking to Jews:

John 8:44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

This verse is questionably translated in the West. The more natural translation reads "You are from the father of the devil..for he is a liar, and so is his father." I can get into it more if you read Greek, but to try to explain it with English, imagine that punctuation isn't common in writing, and you come across the phrase "You are of the father of the devil" and decide it means "You are of the [your] father; [you are] of the devil." It'd technically be possible, but it wouldn't be good or clear grammar if that was what was meant, in English or Greek. Then the English translation suddenly invents an antecedent ("lies" or "lying") for the pronoun at the end of the sentence (the Greek is literally simply "his/its father"), and I'm not sure that reading even makes rhetorical sense: Jesus is making the points that A) the Jews are liars, and B) that this characteristic runs in the family, so to speak...but then the conclusion of his speech is that lying is the sibling of Jews?

Your way of translating it dates back to Origen. In his commentary on John he complained that a group of gnostic Christians really liked this verse; after all, who would the father of the devil be if not (the Jewish) God? So he wrote essentially that the gnostics were standing on firm grammatical ground, and it was unfortunate that John wrote in the way he did, but he knew that John "really" had the orthodox views of his own time, and so he explained the passage as having the meaning found in English bibles now as the only way of making sense of this passage.

There have been different ways of understanding the verse though. Cyril of Alexandria believed "the devil" (literally "the adversary") referred not to Satan, but to Cain, whom some early Christians referred to as "the devil," so the "father of the devil" was, actually, Satan. The scholar April D. Deconick takes it the opposite way, as identifying "the Jews" with a heretical Christian group called the "Cainites" who, according to Iranaeus, venerated Cain and believed that he fathered Satan. Either way it would explain the part about being "a murderer from the beginning," since, after all, whom did Satan murder?

I grew up religious and even though I'm not a believer, I sometimes half-against my will speculate about Biblical passages. Feel free to ignore the rest of what I'm saying if you don't want to entertain unorthodox ideas.

I've wondered if this passage really does refer to the Jewish God. In the exact same chapter of John, Jesus refuses to punish an adulterous woman, who according to the Jewish Bible should be executed. Is it a coincidence that Jesus immediately afterward accuses the Jews of having murderous tendencies? If Jesus' father were the Jewish God, why does Jesus refuse to carry out his Father's law? Additionally, the first character in the Bible to lie is God himself, who tells Adam that the "day you eat of it [the tree of knowledge of good and evil] you will surely die." Which does not happen. The snake in Genesis tells Eve this is a lie, and that God simply doesn't want humanity to become like the gods through their knowledge of good and evil. This is immediately confirmed by God as soon as he learns they've eaten from the tree: "The man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—” and then he expells them from the garden so that they can't become equal to "one of us."

It's well-known that the Torah uses variants of "El/Elyon/El Shaddai/Elohim" and "YHWH" somewhat interchangably. In Canaanite religion they were originally separate deities, YHWH being the son of El. This distinction is referred to in Deuteronomy 32, where the sons of El receive their inheritance:

When the Most High[Elyon] gave to the nations their inheritance,
when he divided mankind,
he fixed the borders of the peoples
according to the number of the sons of God.
But YHWH's portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted heritage.

Angels are sometimes referred to as "sons of God" in the Bible. If I were more of a believer, I'd wonder if the Jewish God, YHWH, is simply an evil angel, who claimed to be THE God and became conflated with him, which is responsible for the contradictory and seemingly schizophrenic depictions of God and God's will in the Bible. For instance, even though the Torah quite clearly claims Moses received the Law from God himself, Paul says (Galatians 3-4 : "The law was given through angels and entrusted to a mediator...we were held in custody under the law, locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed...we were in slavery under the elemental spiritual forces of the world...you were slaves to those who by nature are not gods. But now that you know God—or rather are known by God—how is it that you are turning back to those weak and miserable forces? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again? You are observing special days and months and seasons and years!" So observing the Law is "slavery" to "those who are not gods," and furthermore, he says the Law was only given that Jesus could set us free from it. "Scripture has locked up everything under the control of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe."

The argument would seem to be that good can't be demonstrated without evil, and the Jewish Law/Bible is evil, permitted to exist so that Jesus could free people from it. In other words, Jesus came to save us from Judaism.

Even more speculation:

A lot of people in esoteric circles have noticed that elites seem to venerate the planet Saturn, and its symbol of a black cube, and their agendas don't seem good for the common man. Saturn has been associated with the Jewish God and Jewish people since antiquity. It's not a coincidence that the holiest day of the week for Jews is Saturday (Saturn's day/dies Saturni). And I wonder if it's a coincidence that the Jewish Temple was built in the shape of a cube, or that the smiting and vengeful God of Revelation (a far cry from the God of love of John's Gospel) constructs a city "shaped like a cube" for the elect (Revelation 21). A common belief of early Christians, reflected in Jude, was that the stars were angels, and that planets (from a Greek word meaning "wanderering [stars]") and comets, because they didn't stay in place, were rebellious: "...the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, He has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day...wandering stars, for whom the gloom of utter darkness has been reserved forever."

(Incidentally, many early Christians believed astrology was real, but shouldn't be practiced because the planets were fallen angels. Converting to Christianity supposedly freed you from these planetary influences.)

The book of Amos condemns Jews for worshipping Saturn. It's a strange book. On the one hand it condemns Jews for not following "the Law." On the other hand, it condemns them for observing it, when "[you] afflict the righteous, who take a bribe, and turn aside the needy in the gate --" none of which are against the Law, except perhaps the commandment to "love your neighbor as yourself." It would seem to be the same kind of criticism Jesus had of the Jews of his own day: "You tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness." And, like Jesus says "These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others" but seems to indicate you shouldn't actually follow the Law through his own example (e.g. in matters of stoning women to death, working on the Sabbath, or washing hands), Amos' God says:

“I hate, I despise your feasts,

and I take no delight in your solemn assemblies.

Even though you offer me your burnt offerings and grain offerings,

I will not accept them;

and the peace offerings of your fattened animals,

I will not look upon them.

Take away from me the noise of your songs;

to the melody of your harps I will not listen.

But let justice roll down like waters,

and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.

“Did you bring to me sacrifices and offerings during the forty years in the wilderness, O house of Israel? You shall take up Sikkuth your king, and Kiyyun your star-god—your images that you made for yourselves, and I will send you into exile beyond Damascus,” says the LORD[YHWH] , whose name is the God of hosts.[El Shaddai]

Not even "These you ought to have done," but simply "don't do them."

Sikkuth and Kiyyun are Mesopotamian names for the planet/god Saturn. It should be noted that Amos never complains that the Israelites are worshipping other gods; his complaint throughout the entire book is that that they think they are worshipping the true God, but aren't. The god they actually worship is Saturn.

TL;DR even the Bible recognizes that something is deeply wrong with Judaism as a religion.
 
Last edited:
That's their way of life. That disgusting kike with dual citizenship (Chuck Schumer) is in favour of abortion in USA and in favour of more birth-rates in Israel.

Their mind games are old and overplayed, they never improve on their shtik.
They just start anew, in different places, the same old spiel ~until its too late for them.
This makes the globalisation, their unholy gift to this world into their most frightening weakness.
 
[A]sleesh.webm
Their mind games are old and overplayed, they never improve on their shtik.
They just start anew, in different places, the same old spiel ~until its too late for them.
This makes the globalisation, their unholy gift to this world into their most frightening weakness.
Which pretty much shows how they don't really have a long term plan - and their "genius" is overstated.
They would have something else to do, but all they have is contingency plans to "run away" and "subvert" the host country. Now one may say "NAJALT". And I say, and the "NAJALT"-Jews suffer equally, tough luck. One day, the Earth will become too small for these people to keep running to other countries.

Aso, one may say Israel is a country that works. Well, does it? How about cutting off the aid, and see if it truly does work on its own legs?
 
Which pretty much shows how they don't really have a long term plan - and their "genius" is overstated.
They would have something else to do, but all they have is contingency plans to "run away" and "subvert" the host country. Now one may say "NAJALT". And I say, and the "NAJALT"-Jews suffer equally, tough luck. One day, the Earth will become too small for these people to keep running to other countries.

Aso, one may say Israel is a country that works. Well, does it? How about cutting off the aid, and see if it truly does work on its own legs?
Jews are experiencing cognitive decline like the goyim are. You can see it in the quality of their scientists and even something more benign such as comedians. The high voibal IQ that they were known for in the 20th century is rapidly dissipating. A lot of this is due to that Orthodox Jews are inbred and secularized Jews are intermarrying with other groups.
 
Back
Top Bottom