I used to disagree with the antisemites who were against Christianity, as I thought it wasn't helpful to be infighting with each other. But after seeing so many low IQ trad-Christian larpers, I am now convinced more than ever that Christianity really is just a way for Jews to control people. Maybe it didn't start that way originally, since I know Jews hate Christians. But it's currently being used that way. It's literally a way for Jews to have non-Jews avoid getting power and teaming up with each other, for non-Jews to accept being Jewish slaves. Christians have so many infighting denominations so they can't truly group up together against Jews. All the fed controlled opposition figureheads Jews push are also focused very heavily on Christianity. I can't think of any astroturfed antisemites that aren't Christians. The best way to get low IQ people to do what you want is religious fearmongering.
I especially believe Nick Fuentes is controlled opposition. He adamantly denies Israel having any involvement in Kirk's death but it's so obvious they did. Why else were so many search terms related to the shooting (shooter's full name including middle, etc.) being searched by locations where fed HQs are located, one day before the shooting? Google scrubbed this once people started pointing it out. They killed Kirk because he was a genuinely honest good guy that they didn't have any dirt or sexual blackmail on. But they probably have a lot of sexual blackmail on Nick since he's an obviously closeted gay man with a catboy fetish and that completely contradicts his Christian larp. Nick is being groomed to be the new Charlie Kirk that they can control. But low IQ retards won't be able to recognize that, since they're too retarded to even realize he's a flaming faggot.
Believe what you want but keep in mind that Jesus was not a Jew.
Judaism as we know it only began around 200 AD. Even the "old school" Jewish sects are only a few hundred years old (usually split off from the "main line" because of some radical Rabbi that practiced Jewish mysticism during the 1700-1800's.)
An important point to make is that the word "jew" gets misused when translating ancient documents. Judaean is the proper translation; literally meaning someone from Judea. Jesus was from Galilee. People in the northern area tended to also view Tyre as the "holy" city, not Jerusalem.
The Shandrahin was the "legislative" committee of Jerusalem, not really what we'd consider the religious one. Thats why there were different sects; Roman Judaeans, Greek Judaeans, Hebrew Judaeans, etc. The Greeks had conquered the area centuries before the Romans, each wave brought with them settlers.
The "religious" practices of the time were much different than what we think of as Jewish. It was far more like the other cults; sacrificing animals at a temple in a holy fire to appease a god. Not only is this not really part of main stream judaism anymore, it wasn't uncommon or unqiue to Jerusalem at the time. Literally everyone was doing that shit back then. Greeks, Romans, etc. It was all more performative than what we consider religious.
Jesus was actually arguing for a break from such nonsense. Even if you don't believe or aren't a Christian you can surely agree that sharing what little food you had among your neighbors was wiser than burning a portion of it at an annual festival. Forgiveness is usually healthier than holding a grudge, and this doesn't mean you allow your enemies to destroy you, it was meant as a way to heal close relationships--like when friends or family fight over stupid shit like we tend to do.
And when people claim Jesus was fulfilling the "old laws" (as is often used to defend that he was a jew) keep in mind most people back then would've only known about the 10 commandments when talking about Hebrew history. Books weren't common. You had to have a teacher recite that shit. Odds are 97% of folk had no idea about the details bullshit that made up the Hebrew scriptures back then. Jesus could've meant he was pro 10 commandments, which to be honest isn't the worst list of laws ever made.
Most damning is Jesus seems to have not been impressed by the priest's and holy men in charge of the temple of Jerusalem. This doesn't suggest he was super Jewish. Are people who charge into modern sacred spaces in protest ardent believers of said institutions? Not usually. They tend to be critics making a point.
Jesus may have been a monotheist who likes a few elements of the Hebrew scriptures that found the "organization" of the time totally corrupt. Ah, theres something "jewish" about the old temple thats still similar to modern judaism.