- Joined
- Apr 16, 2017
Replies ain't working for your post @Dom Cruise
Making the Ghostbusters defunct and having Egon leave his partners and take all the equipment for no reason while allowing no room for ghost occurrences in the last 30 years feels like the movie's biggest flaw imo. Anyway I could be wrong but it looks like they were at least still in contact with each other regardless of the lack of ghost activity until a decade ago before the movie it seems.when are the Ghostbusters supposed to have gone defunct? Ray's conversation on the phone was pretty dense and I feel like I might have missed a few details, Egon is supposed to have died only a week prior to the events of the movie, right?
I think it did a great job of following the movies until Q5 happened and turned the show into a slimey disaster. Ghostbusters II sort of throws a wrench into things but unlike Q5, bridging the pre-Q5 seasons of the cartoon with the sequel is nothing a few small retcons can't fix.That's the only thing that really bugs me about Ghostbusters II.
I never really thought of the cartoon as being the same continuity as the movies, but I guess you can kind of consider it a version of events that did happen to them.
In the game it mentions that the babylonian cult of Tiamat and the sumerian cult of Gozer clashed with each other since both Tiamat and Gozer were rival chaos gods and that it was through Tiamat that the ancient people were able to banish Gozer from our dimension. There's also some kind of item in the game's haunted island level that implies that the island was once called Tiamat island or that Ivo Shandor once went to an island named after Tiamat. I think they even expanded on this in Tobin's Spirit Guide (which is a great read). So maybe Shandor wanted to use Tiamat to destroy the world at some point before settling on Gozer?How does the 2009 game reference Tiamat?