The Gun Control Debate Thread - Controlling autism since 2022

[updoot farmer]

Yes if you want to buy in bulk

Define "bulk". Cause you can buy that shit in gallon jugs at the home despot.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Define "bulk". Cause you can buy that shit in gallon jugs at the home despot.

It's impressive how he manages to be wrong about literally every single thing with no exception

 

[Justtocheck]

home despot.

lol. I don't think you'd want to unless you want a knock in the door. But hell, who knows. Still, back to the point of guns. Breivik killed only 8 people with a bomb and 69 with his mini-14 and Glock 34. So regardless of if bombs are easy or hard to make, if you want a high-score, guns are still top, and therefore should have more restriction.

 

[Particle Bored]

, guns are still top, and therefore should have more restriction.

They do.

As far as high score, youre wrong again. Murrah Federal Building bombing killed 168.

2nd and 3rd place are shootings. 4th place is a school bombing from 1927 (this incident also claims high score for "school" massacres).

 

[Justtocheck]

They do.

As far as high score, youre wrong again. Murrah Federal Building bombing killed 168.

2nd and 3rd place are shootings. 4th place is a school bombing from 1927.

McVeigh had to create a 5000 pound bomb in 1994 to get a high score that was matched by Tarrant, Bravik and Paddock with their tiny little "varmint" guns. You are not going to get those levels of ANFO that easily after that.

And you are wrong in your point as well. The highest of high scores was the 9/11 attacks. But this is not a debate about air control.

It's impressive how he manages to be wrong about literally every single thing with no exception

"A lefty that knows his stuff and has strong opinions has to be literally wrong about everything because I'm too dumb to face actual arguments."

 

[Useful_Mistake]

"A lefty that knows his stuff and has strong opinions has to be literally wrong about everything because I'm too dumb to face actual arguments."

Dude, you lost every single argument you had with me, and at one point you started crying and reeing angrily because I could link evidence to back my claims up, as where you couldn't, and still can't.

 

[Justtocheck]

Dude, you lost every single argument you had with me, and at one point you started crying and reeing angrily because I could link evidence to back my claims up, as where you couldn't, and still can't.

You've been avoiding my main argument all the time. It doesn't matter statistically how many americans may have rifles or % of violence from handguns. My argument is that war rifles should be regulated because they are incredible facilitators of spree killings.

 

[The Foxtrot]

Dude, you lost every single argument you had with me, and at one point you started crying and reeing angrily because I could link evidence to back my claims up, as where you couldn't, and still can't.

The only response I have to anything regarding "gun control" is this:
I refuse to disarm.

You've been avoiding my main argument all the time. It doesn't matter statistically how many americans may have rifles or % of violence from handguns. My argument is that war rifles should be regulated because they are incredible facilitators of spree killings.

Okay, what do you define as a "war rifle", and what kind of "regulations" are you talking about?

 

[Justtocheck]

Okay, what do you define as a "war rifle", and what kind of "regulations" are you talking about?

It's a term I've heard that avoids the issue of "technicalities" when dealing with gun fags. "Oh no it's not a rifle IT'S A PISTOL WITH A BRACE YA DUMMY"

A war rifle is a broad term that implies that if the rifle could be imagined as issued to a military for general usage by grunts in modern war. Implies ease of handling and capacity to deliver larger than pistol round in a large capacity. If you have trouble discerning what I mean then it's obvious you want to be using technicalities to derail on purpose.

Edit: Oh and about regulations; I want them out of cilvilian hands as much as possible. I think it's fair.

 

[The Foxtrot]

It's a term I've heard that avoids the issue of "technicalities" when dealing with gun fags. "Oh no it's not a rifle IT'S A PISTOL WITH A BRACE YA DUMMY"

It's a bullshit term. And we use "technicalities" because faggots like you keep demanding we disarm because "think of the children!", and we refuse to disarm, so we find ways to get around your bullshit laws too.

A war rifle is a broad term that implies that if the rifle could be imagined as issued to a military for general usage by grunts in modern war.

Okay, so by your metric something designed/manufactured from anytime after the year 1918.

Implies ease of handling and capacity to deliver larger than pistol round in a large capacity.

What's a "large capacity"? How do you define "ease of handling"?

If you have trouble discerning what I mean then it's obvious you want to be using technicalities to derail on purpose.

No, you just don't know jack shit about firearms, and you're trying to lecture to people who know a hell of a lot more than you.

Also, no, we're not going to disarm because you're a sad faggot.

 

[Particle Bored]

a high score that was matched by Tarrant, Bravik and Paddock with their tiny little "varmint" guns.

"Matched by." All three of those combined barely edge out the Murrah bombing.

And you are wrong in your point as well. The highest of high scores was the 9/11 attacks. But this is not a debate about air control.

How tf am I wrong if that wasnt the subject of the comparison? Jim Jones killed more than all spree shooters in the last 50 years! Ban Kool Aid!

"A lefty that knows his stuff"

 

[Justtocheck]

Also, no, we're not going to disarm because you're a sad faggot.

They said the same about the Vax. Now there are also 1M deaths of mostly unvaxxed and we are coming for your wallet with the restrictions. You will give in your rifles eventually and you will like it. Mark my words.

 

[The Foxtrot]

They said the same about the Vax. Now there are also 1M death of mostly unvaxxed and coming for your wallet. You will give in your rifles eventually and you will like it. Mark my words.

Sorry, but no. I retain my purity of blood, and my rifles are non-negotiable. Quit fantasizing.

(also, most of those deaths are of Branch Covidians.)

 

[updoot farmer]

They said the same about the Vax. Now there are also 1M deaths of mostly unvaxxed and we are coming for your wallet with the restrictions. You will give in your rifles eventually and you will like it. Mark my words.

Remind me again, what was the percentage of weapon turn in in Australia? After the big government psyop, of course. wasn't it something abysmal like 10%

 

[The Foxtrot]

Remind me again, what was the percentage of weapon turn in in Australia?

Don't tell him about 80% Lowers and how STEN guns were literally made in backyard sheds...

 

[updoot farmer]

Don't tell him about 80% Lowers and how STEN guns were literally made in backyard sheds...

That's completely irrelevant to the point.

Hell, it's telling that most gun confiscation schemes suppose that if you willingly turn in a gun you are given amnesty. You ever wonder why? Because the amount of gun owners generally is higher than whatever police force there is. Shit, this was the case throughout the three "turn in all of your guns or go to the gulag" eras of the Soviet Union.

 

[Particle Bored]

They said the same about the Vax. Now there are also 1M deaths of mostly unvaxxed and we are coming for your wallet with the restrictions. You will give in your rifles eventually and you will like it. Mark my words.

If your side is as successful at getting my AR as you were getting me and my kids jabbed for covid, I guess I dont have much to worry about.

 

[The Foxtrot]

That's completely irrelevant to the point.

Hell, it's telling that most gun confiscation schemes suppose that if you willingly turn in a gun you are given amnesty. You ever wonder why? Because the amount of gun owners generally is higher than whatever police force there is. Shit, this was the case throughout the three "turn in all of your guns or go to the gulag" eras of the Soviet Union.

My point is, it's a fantasy these leftoids have. "YOU LOVE THE VAX AND YOU'LL LOVE DISARMING!", like, bitch please! Most people are skeptical of that "vaccine", and "getting WAR RIFLES out of civilian hands" in the USA is an impossibility. They don't even realize how fucking retarded their own rhetoric is, or just how many firearms are in circulation in the USA. Motherfucker thinks the term "war rifle" is somehow a "gotcha!" to own the Alt Right Chuds(TM) with FACTs AND LOGIC!, and not a blatant admission he's another clueless gun-grabber using whatever nonsense he thinks will work to forward his agenda.

FYI @Justtocheck, you do understand the AR-15 was purpose-built as a civilian sporting rifle, correct? It wasn't actually intended to be a military service weapon.

If your side is as successful at getting my AR as you were getting me and my kids jabbed for covid, I guess I dont have much to worry about.

Exactly my point as well.

 

[Justtocheck]

My point is, it's a fantasy these leftoids have. "YOU LOVE THE VAX AND YOU'LL LOVE DISARMING!", like, bitch please! Most people are skeptical of that "vaccine", and "getting WAR RIFLES out of civilian hands" in the USA is an impossibility.

By the way, out of topic, why are you here defending the rights of the US while displaying a Russian submarine. It's almost like you are a 5th column. It is weird that most pro gun nuts in the US were saying that zelensky giving rifles to Ukranians was a dumb volksstrum move. Almost like you would rather see an authoritarian foreign power win than supporting a presindent you don't agree with.

​

 

[The Foxtrot]

By the way, out of topic, why are you here defending the rights of the US while displaying a Russian submarine.

*Soviet submarine. And that's not relevant.

It's almost like you are a 5th column

What the fuck is that?

It is weird that most pro gun nuts in the US were saying that zelensky giving rifles to Ukranians was a dumb volksstrum move.

Because it was, and is.

Almost like you would rather see an authoritarian foreign power win than supporting a presindent you don't agree with.

Both sides are authoritarian shitholes. Zalinsky's government (which was installed by the West) is simply a useful tool for the assholes in my own government. If Russia wins (which it looks like they're going to), then so be it. If Zalinsky's government wins (which looks unlikely), then so be it.

I personally don't give a shit about that conflict, beyond wishing all the piglet supporters would remember that Ukraine's no better than Russia, and all the pro-Russians remembering that China's eyeing them up and to remember that the Chinese aren't your friends, and that every Russian killed in this conflict is a Russian that won't be there when China inevitably makes a move into Siberia.